identity and for most good younger fi has always been trans indian secondary but not so much for constantin opal and key of for consumption opal for example its whole supremacy claim is based on the fact that the orthodox christianity was born in geographic locale and i think the ukrainians advancing a similar argument that. christians christians were there before moscow was even found it and why should it has it have any demeaning and over us what's your response to that. i should underline that there is ness in the bed in the fully itself the russian orthodox church at some point was a part of the gate of constantinople then. it became an outer surface church and they didn't ask for their consent and opal permission i didn't ask for the permission of constantinople because at that time the preacher called constance you know paul was in the union was wrong which according to the russian church was a here is it so the preacher core of constance in op was a heretic there was no one to ask listen from. the cephalic by itself there is nothing bad in the it but the problem for the ukraine currently