verkhovna rada of ukraine and the congress of judges, that is, we will still see new faces in the constitutional courtly quite a good update, because according to the constitution there are only 18 of them, that is, you can go for such a good third. to say, the renewal will take place, there are already many requirements, of course, first of all, to meet high moral qualities, it is the fact that competence is checked in interviews, well , they are quite formal, it is age, having a higher legal education, sufficient work experience and so on, what is checked at the level of the competition is first these formal ones, we see if there is enough age, if they have worked enough, and then interviews at... well, that's what we call at integrity and appropriate testing for competence, so we will see quite a bit, we hope soon, given the way... the competition for the verkhovna rada of ukraine for new judges of the constitutional court, as i said, will be a good update, now it will be for sure a big challenge is the candidates, because we saw that after the first attempt, a lot of those who clearly did not meet

, mocked the constitutional court, ignored him, so the constitutional court practically existsally, but it would nevertheless and most likely would have issued a negative conclusion for zelensky, which is why zelensky did not contact him. now, as for the chairman of the verkhovna rada, you know, in the constitution in general it does not say who will serve as president if his powers are extended. the constitution only talks about the early termination of the powers of the president, for example, in the event of death, illness, resignation or the president commits a criminal... crime, that is, four positions, yes, when the powers of the president can be terminated early, but even then a complex procedure, it requires the conclusion of the constitutional court that for 90 days the duties of the president can be fulfilled, with the exception of a number of powers of the president, the chairman may have a direct instruction from the constitution on the supreme council. the most important thing is that the chairman of the supreme council is left for these 90 days. these are only the

in our country, the constitutional court of the criminal constitution provides an explanation of thetion in terms of extending the powers of the president, in particular. and this would be the instance, it would be the last instance, the position of which is actually. would be the norm of the law, what is happening in our country is that they do not appeal to the constitutional court, they appeal to the cec, to the central election commission, which does not have the competence to make statements regarding the possibility of holding presidential elections or impossibility, this is a question for the constitutional court, which would remove these questions, okay, you suspended the constitutional court, you made it ineffective, you have a conflict. with the leadership of the constitutional court, okay, then hold a discussion, sit lawyers, a round table, a public round table, with a public manifestation of the position of all lawyers and not only defenders of the office of the president, by post, who are now commenting on this situation, all jurists who would have a consolidated positio

although, although, if we recall the same leonid kuchma, there was also a decision of the constitutional court second term of kochma in the early 2000s. because according to the 1996 constitution, the president did not have the right to serve twice to hold the presidency, and this norm is in force now, but kuchma was elected in 1994. year before the adoption of the first time, before the adoption of the constitution of 1996, well, in the early 2000s, they decided to count how many presidential terms leonid danylovych served, and it turned out that if before the adoption of the constitution it was one term, after its adoption it was also the first , and then the second one is possible, but the political situation there developed in such a way that kuchma had to agree to the fact that in 2004 ... he should resign, because the cassette scandal, and the murder of heorhiy gangadz, there were many things that simply did not allow him to take advantage of this decision of the constitutional court, but andriy, in this story, of course, when the russians are spinning this story with the legitimacy or i

there is a constitutional court that interprets the constitution, moreover, the question of legitimacye further legitimacy of zelenskyi could simply be fixed by a decision of the constitutional court and shown to everyone, including not only ukrainians, but also leaders of western countries, because russia, in principle, uses this and is trying to torpedo our western... partners and say: listen, well you will give weapons there, and there the president has already reached the end of his powers, and in general, as levrov says, we, we will not sit down at the negotiating table with zelensky after may 21, 2024, because, as the kremlin says, he nobody for us. well, in principle, we understand that for russia the arguments there are unimportant, how they are in fact is also unimportant, so any situation from a propaganda point of view is possible. twist, here you can mention that in gur, for example, it has been reported for a long time that there is a special operation, maidan 3, and so on are called, i.e., that there is a certain information wave, a threat, we now see in principle how it

igor, that the constitutional court is just that the constitutional court of ukraine, and it should proceedm the interests of the state interests of the ukrainian state, and from the point of view of national security and defense, that is , during a war, imagine that the constitutional court will make an illegal decision that will contradict the concept of national security and defense, or well let's say so, then it will contradict. because of what we are doing, defending ourselves from russia, it would be very strange, but in this situation, in your opinion, who are they for, whose political responsibility is it that the moscow church is still working in ukraine? i think so formally, of course, it is primarily a monomajority, because they have the necessary number of votes to vote for it, i think that to a certain extent political responsibility, well, let's be honest, it is possible somewhere under the president of ukraine, in which sensei? i understand very well that... he has more important tasks, he deals with these issues, defense, diplomacy, aid and so on, but, you know, if he would

opinion, why the presidential team did not go, well, in such a traditional way, there is a constitutional court that interprets. the constitution, and even more so, the question of legitimacy and further legitimacy of zelenskyi could simply be fixed by a decision of the constitutional court and shown to everyone, including not only to ukrainians, but also to the leaders of western countries, because russia in principle uses this and tries to torpedo our western partners and say: listen, you will give weapons there, and there the president has already reached the end of his powers and in general, as lavrov says , we, we will not be at the negotiating table with zelensky at all. these dates are after may 21 , 2024, because, as the kremlin says, he is nobody to us. well, in principle, we understand that for russia the arguments there are unimportant, how they are in fact is also unimportant, therefore any the situation from a propaganda point of view can be twisted, here it can be mentioned that in gur, for example, he has been informed for a long time about what is there, the maidan 3 special ope

in the near future we will meet with all members of the constitutional court and talk. the future, howncluding under the new constitution, because as you know, there are responsibilities and rights and powers of the expanded constitutional court, well, what the constitutional court was striving for, on thursday we will decide on a work plan and begin to really work, so i wish you success in this work, and so that you don’t stay in one place for a long time, success, thank you. thank you. according to svetlana lyubetskaya, as a judge of the constitutional court she will have to, among other things , direct her efforts to implement the provisions of the updated fundamental law of the country. the document, the lawyer is convinced, has opened up a broad perspective for the development of belarus as a legal and social state. this is quite a lot of work that needs to be done to continue, now for me within the framework of the activities of the constitutional court, since it, as the custodian of the constitution, must accumulate. sphere, this is very important, this is very interesting work

a petition demanding the constitutional court to cancel the law. kolisnychenko and i canceled this law, i will use exactly this pronoun, if i had not been in the parliament at that time, no one would have initiated this, because the then acting president and chairman of the verkhovna rada, turchynov, did not sign the resolution on the cancellation of kyvalov kolisnychenko's language law, that is, the language problem, dear society, has been going on since of that time, and we still have people who find excuses in the public space for the language of the enemy, it is on the verge of foul, it cannot be imagined by any nation in the world, that is why it is so difficult for us today to end this war with our victory, and there is one key to solving this problem, and i remember how we discussed this key to solving this problem with serhii golovaty, by the way, he recently had an anniversary, now he belongs to constitutional court, so the most important thing was to explain to this extremely distant society of ours. to free thinking, what is the russian-

and did not place full stop, because in ukraine only the constitutional court can interpret they would have this verdict constitutional, they would say... and to the europeans, we have a higher legislative body that interprets, a legislative, the only body that can interpret the constitution and the constitution, and the conformity of laws to the constitution, and they said, listen, well, this moscow is doing something of its own propaganda, but we have such a conclusion, all the answers, all the answer options that i will name now, you will not like , the first, they don't have it had enough sense, secondly, the answer that the constitutional court would give is not suitable for them, well , there are various conversations, experts talk about the fact that they went to talk to the constitutional court, we received such an answer that neither zelenskyi nor his office was satisfied, i don't know how true this is, it's hard for me to talk about it, well, what powers, for example , would have to emerge and it is necessary to transfer the powers to stefanchuk voluntarily, that is, t

court, mocked the constitutional court, ignored it, so the constitutional court practically exists therelensky will continue to be president. this decision is due, as the bankai states, to the fact that the country is under martial law and elections are not being held during this period. according to this law, if the term of office of the president of ukraine expires during martial law, his powers continue until the newly elected president takes office, favorites after. lifting martial law, but that’s not the goal, this law directly contrasts itself with the main law of ukraine, the constitution, which clearly states that the presidential term is 5 years, that’s all, without any additions. the only body that has the right to interpret the provisions of the constitution, in my opinion, in any country, this also applies to ukraine, is the constitutional court; elections, for example, are appointed by the parliament, not the president, therefore. issuing his decree on the cancellation of elections and, so to speak, the unauthorized extension of powers, committed a clear crime and against th

to the constitutional court in time, i think that the clarification of the constitutional court would be additional proof that the president is legitimate, because the constitution contains all the articles that can be interpreted by the constitutional court, but there are certain things that russia and its followers can use as contradictions, and that is in order to to clarify these contradictions, the constitutional court exists, it is for clarifying the contradictions of the constitution. that this is the position of the minister of justice, it is political, it is not legal, but i think that there could have been a legal position, because the minister of justice is a politician, not a lawyer, and lawyers are judges of the constitutional court of ukraine, and why they don't do it, i don't know, but you know this, this is another story, this is the story with which we started our dialogue, this is a story about the effectiveness of state supervision, when you form an apparatus in which no one is against which does not correspond, and all are dependent on one person. surname, which ev

the chairmen of both houses of parliament, as well as the supreme and constitutional courts were invited to the ceremony. in a solemn atmosphere, the judge committed herself to honestly, conscientiously and impartially defending the constitutional order and the supremacy of the fundamental. the belarusian trading house is planning to open in omsk; the parties discussed the future business model at the opening of the days of the minsk region in moscow. traditionally, they take place in the belarusian pavilion at vdnkh. the central region of belarus closely cooperates with 37 russian regions. last year , mutual trade turnover increased by almost 10% and amounted to about $9 billion. regions. known for its industrial potential , famous belazs are created here, coli salt is mined, and belarusian-chinese bilg cars are jointly made here. mishchina works closely with the umsk region of russia, with plans to create a joint chemical cluster where they will produce import-substituting products. the parties have already agreed to involve scientists in resolving issues of deepening the processing of

, because only the constitutional court in ukraine can interpret and draw conclusions regarding norms of the basic law, and these norms must be confirmed in the constitutional court, i.e. if the constitutional court writes in its decision that until the election of a new president, zelenskyi performs or is the president of ukraine legitimately, then no one will have any questions at all and no one will ever question it. or use it in information-psychological special operations, by the way, about these information-special psychological special operations conducted by russia, as the representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense andriy yusav says, these ipso are intended to lead to the discovery internal front in ukraine, let's listen to what mr. yusav said. all these ipso, fakes, lies and propaganda of the racists, which are poured out on ukrainians, have the ultimate goal, the breakthrough and collapse of the ukrainian front and the opening of the internal front, therefore countering such hybrid informational aggression is extremely important. the

chairman of the constitutional court of the russian federation valery dmitrievich zurkin. the heads of both houses of parliament and the head of the constitutional court appear on the podium. ladies and gentlemen, attention to the screens. so, only a few minutes remain before the ceremony of inauguration of the president of russia begins on your screens right now. we know putin well from official footage, we regularly see them in the news, the president has literally a few minutes before he ends up in the state rooms of the large kremlin palace, we see the head of state, he has a document in his hands. which he carefully studies, in the same office there is a table at which the head of state regularly holds meetings with governors and ministers, you can see him on the right in the frame, well, now the footage is truly rare; the reception of the head of state, he is greeted by his assistant, well then the corridors of the highest russian authorities, this is the first building of the kremlin, the security council, the presidential library, the situation center. on the secon

, because only the constitutional court in ukraine can interpret and draw conclusions regarding of the basic law , and these norms must be confirmed in the constitutional court, i.e. that the constitutional court will write in its decision that until the election of a new president, zelenskyy fulfills or is the legitimate president of ukraine, then no one will have any questions at all and no one will never put and sum up or use it in informational and psychological special operations. by the way, about these information and psychological special operations conducted by russia, according to the representative of the main intelligence department of the ministry of defense andriy yusav, it is these ipso that aim to lead to the opening of the internal front in ukraine, let's hear what mr. yusel said. all these ipso, fakes, lies and propaganda of the racists, which are poured out on ukrainians, have the ultimate goal, the breakthrough and collapse of the ukrainian front and the opening.

, they suddenly talk about some kind of illegitimacy of zelenskyi, is this decision of the constitutional courtat no one there tries to accuse him of illegitimacy? i have only one explanation, a logical one, why the president's office did not turn to the constitutional court for a corresponding decision, because there was, i am i understand, danger. that there will not be a quorum in the constitutional court, and a situation will arise when the request will already be there, and accordingly it will be known, well, you know, as a classic scheme, that the press service of the constitutional court reports that this or that request has arrived, and there is no solution, and accordingly, russian propaganda would also start to make noise about it wherever it is... maybe i can say that zelensky is legitimate, and in my opinion, although i cannot, i think, be called a supporter of zelensky, but in any case his authority end with the acquisition of the powers of the next president, and you, as a specialist in the modern history of ukraine, will also know this. because i will remind you of a fact that se

put all the dots of hope, because the constitution can be interpreted in ukraine only has a constitutional courtd they would have this verdict constitutional, they say. laws to the constitution and said, listen, this moscow is doing something of its own propaganda over there, but we have such a conclusion, all the answers, all the answer options that i will name now, you will not like, first, they did not have enough sense for this , secondly, the answer that the constitutional court would give does not suit them, well , there are different conversations, experts talk about the fact that they went to talk to the constitutional court, we received such an answer that... neither zelenskyi nor his office was satisfied, i don’t know how true it is, it’s hard for me to say about it, well, what powers, for example, should, yes, emerge and it is necessary to hand over the powers to stefanchuk on a voluntary basis, that is, there, there really is no clearly written norm in the constitution, how the president should act, it is a unique situation, but there is no continuation of powers, what the circles sa

for a relevant decision, because there was, as i understand it, the danger that the constitutional courte a quorum and a situation would arise, when the request will already be there, and accordingly. it will be known, well, you know, as a classic scheme, that the press service of the constitutional court reports that this or that request has been received, but there is no decision, and accordingly russian propaganda would also start to trumpet about it wherever it can, i i will say that zelenskyi is legitimate and... in my understanding, although i cannot, i think, be called a supporter of zelenskyi, but in any case, his powers end with the acquisition of the powers of the next president, and it is up to you, as a specialist in the modern history of ukraine will also know, because i will remind you of a fact that, it seems, almost everyone has forgotten, after the orange revolution, when there was the third round of presidential... elections, remember, at that time kuchma was also several he overstayed his powers for months, until february, until february 2005, the inauguration, and at

don’t yet know completely whether we are doing the right thing, i will wait for the verdict constitutional court to confiscate their legal property or not, which was previously accepted, worked for the estonian economy and so on, this is the whole essence of the baltic regimes, estonian, latvian, steal, here one can recall the historically latvian red riflemen, who not only protected lenin, but also staged the most terrible terror in the middle palace of russia, there in the saratov region, at one time he studied... european affairs, that ukraine would be ready for membership in the european union, we will accept, yes, that is, they are no longer luring nato into joining, there will always be no ukraine at the washington summit, this is normal, to europe, yes, that is, lgbt propaganda, destruction of churches, humanism, i would rather . to enjoy, when the border between ukraine and the european union falls, they will get joy, those men with guns will go to explain to the europeans, who are you, this will all work, the store, yours, mine, the squeeze will work, everything is fine, tomorrow we won

is legitimate, because the constitution has all the articles that can be interpreted by the constitutional courtcertain things that russia... and its followers can use as contradictions, and in order to clarify these contradictions, the constitutional the court exists, it is to clarify the contradiction of the constitution, so this is the position of the minister of justice, it is political, it is not legal, but i think that there could have been a legal position, because the minister of justice is a politician, not a lawyer, and lawyers are judges of the constitutional court of ukraine, and why they don't do it, i don't know, but you know that, that's another story, that's the story we started with. our dialogue is a story about the effectiveness of state supervision, when you form an apparatus in which no one is responsible for anything and everyone depends on one person, whose last name everyone knows, then it is not effective, it cannot be effective, well, it's simple by definition, yes, this is how power is organized in general, in a country where people depend on their political forces, on

dots in two, because the constitution can be interpreted maybe in ukraine there is only a constitutional court, and they would have this verdict constitutional, they would also say to the europeans, we have a higher the legislative body that treats. laws to the constitution and said, listen, this moscow is doing something of its own propaganda there, but we have such a conclusion, all the answers, all the answer options that i will name now you will not like, the first one, they did not have enough sense for this , secondly, the answer that the constitutional court would give does not suit them, well... there are various conversations, experts talk about the fact that they went to talk to the constitutional court, we received such an answer that did not suit either zelenskyi or him office i don't know to what extent it is true, it is difficult for me to say about it, well, what powers, for example, should, yes, emerge and it is necessary to transfer the powers to stefanchuk on a voluntary basis, that is, there really is no clearly written norm in the constitution, how the president should act,

, and why did your team refuse the verdict of the constitutional court. regarding zelensky's powerse turning to the constitutional court is definitely playing into putin's hands, because we have elected legal bodies government, we have a war, we have martial law, you can't hold elections during martial law, you can't hold elections during martial law, the vast majority of citizens say that elections during martial... during full-scale war, it's stupid, and to turn somewhere - this is exactly behaving like cowardly leaders in the west, who, returning to the first question, constantly, when putin starts saying: i have nuclear weapons, and they are all oh, we are so scared, we are afraid, we are afraid, there is no , unfortunately, no, new, i’m already silent about chershel, there is no eisenhower, who in ... for the first berlin crisis simply brought out tanks and there is no world war ii hero kennedy, the commander of a torpedo boat, a hero, let me remind you, who knew exactly what war is, who simply in response to the cuban crisis led to the full combat readiness of the nuclear forc

and in general, in razumkov's opinion , the constitutional court should put an end to the debate about the presidential term. in addition to razumkov, there were other opponents of zelensky who voiced similar theses. my colleague svyatoslav khomenko explained in detail where they appear from. contradictions regarding the duration of the president's mandate. the essence of the problem lies in the conflict between several articles of the constitution. on the one hand , the constitution states that the presidential term is five years. that is, if the inauguration of volodymyr zelenskyi took place on may 20, 2019, so his term should have ended on may 20, 2024. on the other hand, the same constitution states that the president is in office until the next head of state is elected and takes office. but as we know, there were no elections in ukraine, so no next head of state was elected, and therefore zelenskyi simply has no one to transfer powers to, and then supporters of the theory of zelenskyi’s illegitimacy turn to the question, how does the constitution deal with so that the state does n

. and why did your team refuse the verdict of the constitutional court regarding zelenskyi's powerse turning to the constitutional court is definitely playing on putin's hand, because we have elected legitimate authorities, we have a war, we have martial law, during elections you can't hold, during martial law you can't hold... elections, the vast majority of citizens say that elections during martial law, during a full-scale war, it's stupid, and to turn somewhere is exactly behaving like cowardly leaders certain in the west, who , returning to the first question, constantly, when putin starts saying: i have nuclear weapons, and they all oh we're so scared we are afraid, we are afraid, there is, unfortunately, no... new, i am already silent about cherschel, there is no eisenhower, who in response to the first berlin crisis simply brought out the tanks, and there is no hero of the second world war, kennedy, the commander of the torpedo boat, the hero, let me remind you, who knew exactly what war was, who, simply in response to the cuban crisis, put the nuclear forces of the united s

would clearly interpret this issue not in favor of the law that would be adopted. or maybe the constitutional courty, on the contrary, that there are no questions, and it corresponds to the constitution and should actually to be implemented in practice, but in the whole statement we saw how mr. stefanchuk, you know, is fighting two, well, two of his dishes, on the one hand, purely as a speaker, as a person who is the chairman of the verkhovna rada, a certain caution on his part, she understood, he wants there to be a guarantee that this law will be voted on, that all deputies... will be present in the session hall, that there will not be any, well, there will not be any violations, procedural possible appeals and so on, you can understand it here , since the law is really important enough and so on, but you understand, this legal opinion of his is completely covered by the political one, he stated with this statement that we have just listened to, that the monomajority of the de facto restoration refuses to support this law, that is, there is not the necessary number. votes due to the position of t

the verkhovna rada appointed a new member of the constitutional court of ukraine, he became a professor of the department of constitutional law trorek serhiy riznyk of the ivan franko university of lviv, this is the first judge elected under the new procedure with the participation of an advisory group of experts, the relevant appointment was supported by 276 parliamentarians, you know, he is trying to correct them, it depends on us, our security, this was the first time that the election of a judge of the constitutional court was held under the new procedure , with the participation of the appropriate council, which through the sieve passed 28 candidates, three today, who scored the highest number of points. as the candidates were presented in the session hall, i want to say that it is very important, that's what this one is contest, he crosses out all the horror stories about the fact that there can be external control in the selection of judges of the constitutional court, the hall united around the candidacy of serhiy riznyk, we know serhiy riznyk as a professor-constitutionalist fr

i was a consultant to the constitutional court, and we really want mr. serhiy to feel all the responsibility that ukrainian society has placed on him, well, we wish him success, today i also read the opinion of experts, people who work in the field of law, and they had a very positive attitude specifically to such a choice and precisely to such a decision, because i will only remind you that when this selection for the constitutional court began, there was one of the candidates who, by the way, was a judge, a judge, he was a judge, he was a judge, he did not know what day and what year was adopted by the constitution of ukraine, well, the person simply did not know, but he wanted to be a judge, so the fact that we have such a classy judge, well , we hope that everything will be fine, but a professional one, at least so precisely, is a great success. the ministry of defense held a meeting on adaptive clothing for the wounded, it's actually very important, it included medics who work directly with the victims took part, volunteer iryna said. among the inno

so, vladimir putin rises to the podium, greets the chairman of the constitutional court, valentina matvienkoaccordance with part two article 82 of the constitution of the russian federation, crime in office. protect the rights and freedoms of man and citizen, comply with, protect the constitution of the russian federation, protect sovereignty and independence, security and integrity of the state, faithfully serve the people. vladimir vladimirovich putin took office as president of russia. our russian power, russia, our loving one, was on the right, to our will, great glory is your insistence, for our land, saving. heading home, the seas swelled to the polar edge, ours spread out. as strength is given by our loyalty to life, as it was, so it is, we will always be so, our free, pro-russian people, are allied. lands that defended the right to be together with their homeland, i want to bow to our heroes, participants in a special military operation, everyone who fights for the fatherland. once again thank you for your trust and support. and now i am addressing every citizen of russia, i have jus

friends, here it is public ceremony, in the near future we will meet with all members of the constitutional courtjudge of the constitutional court, she will also have to direct her efforts to implement the provisions of the updated basic law of the country. the document, the lawyer is convinced, has opened up broad prospects for the development of belarus as a legal and social state. and this is quite a capacious work that needs to be continued, now i’m already within the limits activities of the constitutional court, since it, as the custodian of the constitution, must accumulate. ideas of the law, what the legislator must do today is to develop these norms, and the constitutional court, of course, within the framework of constitutional control, must give direction in this area. this is very important, this is very interesting work for the future, because i repeat, only a strong rule of law state can cope with the challenges that our country faces today. honored lawyer of belarus svetlana lyubetskaya has been in the judicial system for more than 20 years. she was awarded the highest qualificatio

see valeriyevich, in front of me is chukovsky, a cartoon, i need to change clothes for the constitutional courtituyevich, well, are you serious, yes, i’m completely serious, here i am watching a television picture, i’m in i have been to these halls many times, i would like to remind you that quite recently they took place presidential elections, i have already carried out these... figures, they are widely known, but it seems to me that it would not be a sin to repeat them. 76 million voters voted for vladimir putin, this is an absolute majority, and this is an absolute number. it seems to me that it will go down in history; it is unlikely that we will ever see anything else. the second point is that, well, we can say that 87% of voters voted for putin, that 77% turnout, this is also important, by the way, because turnout is also the highest, and this indicates consolidation. of course, we have internal enemies, the main thing is now still, don’t focus your energy on finding these enemies, on creative things, because when we talk about what macron thinks. what some ursula thinks, sometimes we, s

the verkhovna rada of ukraine appointed the first judge of the constitutional court, who was elected according to the new competition procedure. this is serhii riznyk, professor of the department of constitutional law and vice-rector of the ivan franko university of lviv. 276 parliamentarians voted for it. the candidate passed the interview advisory group of experts. for the first time , this election of a judge of the constitutional court was held under a new procedure, with the participation of the council of judges, which passed through a sieve 28 candidates, three today, who scored the highest number of points, as the candidates were presented in the session hall. i want to say that it is very important, that's what this competition is... it erases all the horror stories about the fact that there can be external control in the selection of judges of the constitutional court. the hall united around the candidacy of serhiy riznyk. we know serhiy riznyk as a constitutionalist professor from lviv university. he was responsible for scientific work, developed international relations of

he was a consultant to the constitutional court. and we really want mr. serhiy to feel all the responsibility that ukrainian society has placed on him. in lviv, the ukrainian catory university opened its first medical institution to treat psychological and physical injuries. in this you can make an appointment with a family doctor, psychotherapist, therapist, ent and audiologist. also, specialists in physical and occupational therapy will help veterans and civilians adapt to life after severe injuries and illnesses. ukrainian and foreign donors helped financially to implement the project. the clinic says that the medical center will become a base for training narrow specialists, both in ukraine and abroad. the first patients will be admitted on june 3. in order to transfer experience, to teach our specialists high-quality physical therapy and occupational therapy, and already in the process of creating a medical clinic, we have grown additional departments, departments and directions, such as primary medicine plus and mental health, department of mental h

in the large kremlin palace, 2,500 guests were present: senators, deputies, a judge of the constitutional court, heads of regions, heroes of russia, representatives of the clergy and public organizations. vladimir putin took the oath of office, placing his hand on a special copy of the constitution. the procedure, it lasted just under an hour, was strictly regulated and scheduled literally minute by minute, starting with the introduction of the flag and standard of the head of state into st. andrew's hall. and... how it all happened in the report by yuri lepatov. from his office, vladimir putin walked through the kremlin corridors, so that he could then already in the presidential car aurus, accompanied by a motorcade of motorcyclists, go to the large kremlin palace. he accepted the report of the kremlin commandant. comrade president of the russian federation, commandant of the moscow kremlin, i wish the general. he walked up the main staircase to the sounds of the orchestra. past a suite of halls in which the invited guests line up the guardsmen of the presidential regiment, then there are mem

is insignificant, well, that is , the decision of the constitutional court is recognized as insignificantthe understanding of zelensky with a diploma, he needs to catch it while there is still an opportunity, there is a table, while there is a chair, ink , to write, i consider the decision of the last court to be insignificant, yes, to appear at the horror with it, to say, i have everything written down, that is, in principle, everything is logical, and indeed, putin has laid it out neatly. it's easy to get caught up in the facts when you only see part of the big picture. changing entire locations in pursuit of views is easy to do. we have an understanding of who should now represent the legitimate government in ukraine, if if they are for it, well, again, they can change it there, but then change it, but for now it’s a boar, and in place of the boar poroshenko negotiations, we noticed how yulia vladimirovna again look good, well, yulia vladimirovna always feeds on blood.

on the other hand, there is the decision of the constitutional court dated may 15, 2014, which, in response to the submission of the 104th people's deputies of ukraine, clearly defined, unequivocally and absolutely, that the president of ukraine is elected for a term of 5 years, and such a moment also creates in ukraine the opportunity is the ground for these discussions, which are spreading and which are actively fueled today, for this it was necessary, of course think. in advance and the president's office actually submitted a submission to the constitutional court regarding the interpretation during the martial law, but they did not do this, as far as i know, they even said that they were afraid of a negative conclusion, but this is a kind of legal so small... carry out the powers of the president of ukraine what creates all these conversations, but according to the constitution, zelensky will be the newly elected president of ukraine before taking office. then there will be only, i think, discussions about the legitimacy of accepting those or other solutions, here i see the greatest dan

and on the other hand, there is a solution of the constitutional court of may 15, 2014, and... which,n response to the submission of 104 people's deputies of ukraine, clearly defined, unequivocally and absolutely, that the president of ukraine is elected for a term of 5 years, and such a moment also creates in ukraine, that is what gives the opportunity for these discussions, which are spreading and which are actively fueled today. for this, of course, it was necessary to think in advance, and the office of the president itself should make a submission to the constitutional court regarding the interpretation during the martial law, but they did not do this, as far as i know, they even talked about the fact that they were afraid of a negative conclusion, but that's just the way it is. such a small legal failure, which creates all these conversations, however, zelensky will fulfill the powers of the president of ukraine according to the constitution before taking office as the newly elected president of ukraine. then there will be only, i think, discussions about the legitimacy of makin

he can be president for two terms, well two in a row terms, and they were then given by the constitutional court the conclusion is that kuchma started one term before the adoption of the constitution, and that is , even then he can be like, yes, that is, for the third term, only the situation that was quite difficult in ukraine after the gongadz case and the tape scandal, in principle, probably ... kuchma was removed from the third presidential term, here, really, there was no one to say, or is it just a combination, according to which her presidential team , well, is considering the possibility that these elections can be held even during the war, but for example the next year, er, no, this the combination, uh, they very clearly control what, what, what... you can't cancel, you can't take away from the green government, it's that they conduct polls there every two weeks, well , there are focus groups once a month , they are very clearly monitoring the situation, and what is going on with the electorate, and for now they would not mind holding elections, why, because for now zelenskyi has, if no

case, but let's return to the constitution itself, well, we do not have a decision of the constitutional courtbut we are forced to leave that matter. which is you cited article 83, why, for example, this record is relative to the parliament, but relative there is no president. in my opinion, there can be two reasons. the first reason is that in 1996, when the constitution was adopted, uh, the constitution makers, in this particular case the people's deputies who voted for the constitution, tried to pay special attention to the parliament, that is, as the main pillar of democracy in the country. the second, the second reason is that the fourth chapter in sequence, precedes the fifth chapter, the fourth chapter about the verkhovna rada, precedes the fifth chapter, which deals with the president, and even more so, precedes the chapter chapter 10 of the autonomous republic of crimea, which deals with the verkhovna rada of the arc, and chapter 11, which deals with local councils and village mayors, it is not by chance that i mention all these institutions, because they are all elected, they also el

alexander lukashenko swore in the judge of the constitutional court of belarus svetlana lyubetskaya.ent to this position was signed in april, but she did not exercise her powers. a judge can do this in full only after taking the oath. the chairmen of both houses of parliament, as well as the supreme and constitutional courts were invited to the ceremony. in in a solemn atmosphere, the judge assigned herself.