david contreras a real estate consultant specializing in high-rise living and says the 360 wasn't up front about demand. >> i think that they didn't get as many offers as they might have had they just been honest with people and let them know that they are not half sold out. they were looking for people to make offers on the unit. >>reporter: interplan b. kennedy wilson bought the property at foreclosure sale last month and asked city leaders to allow the 360 to convert to rental. >> it's good to get the building activate sod really good step that they are going to convert to it rental. it will fill quickly. >>reporter: redevelopment agency sold the site to the developer for 10 million dollars. 8 million was paid up front with rest of the bilodeaux when the condo sold. the agreement calls for the remaining money to be paid off like this. 250,000 now and the rest when market conditions change and the for sale sign come out again. perhaps in 5 years. the idea is whether they are owners or renter. people living in the 360 will support downtown businesses. >> so there will be no loss to

. >> over the year, -- over the years, you all have heard numerous high-profile and somewhat contreras suitcases, and it is possible that next year you'll be hearing another one -- a somewhat controversial cases. in situations like that, how do highly publicized and controversy will oral arguments affect the court's operations? especially if it pertains to reporters and interested citizens. does other core business get put on hold for the day? i am more interested in the process and not the subject, if you know what i mean. >> we have a system that has formal, traditional constraints and a ticket. we follow that -- constrains an adequate budget constraints and ettiquite. our workload is such that we really don't address problems until we have to. as you know, we get all of our work done every year by june 30, thank you very much. it is always 100% finished on our argued cases. i go home and tell my wife, we have solved every problem in the world. there is nothing left. and then we find all these new problems. but that is the dynamic of the law. we wait until a dispute comes before us,