crucially these reforms are supported by air traffic controllers themselves. they are the ones that know the systems that they want. they know it better than anybody. we have people that don't even call them. in the past, but now we call them. i'm also proud to be joined today by passenger advocates pilot unions and leaders of airlines and cargo companies who strongly support our new frame work and our bidding process. we're bidding to one great company. that will be many bids. one great company that can piece it all together. not million companies all over the united states like in the past when they came time to piece it together. it didn't work. there were different systems. we threw away billions and billions of dollars. i am very grateful that every former f.a.a. chief and chief operating officer and three former transportation secretaries, jim burnley elizabeth and mary peters stand with us today. thank you. this is an incredible coalition for change. all over the room. coalition for change. the leaders of the industry. our new plan will dramatically imp

it goes from one control tore the other control tore another controller until the plane comes in on the ground and up. this is a technology we use. if you go to these other countr ies, to the tower in toronto or the tower in heathrow or the tower in hong kong, it's electronically. they have modern systems. trafficow that our controllers, the union that represents them, knows that they are far behind these other countries with these systems. so it is about time. that our aviation system moves century.21st it was in the fall of 2014, to trump when i went tower to talk to donald trump about my idea about my plan for aviation. his response was clear. that was back in the fall of candidatere he was trump. and he said something to the effect that it doesn't need to government, it shouldn't be in government. and so that's the spirit we have here today. reforms separates the regulator from the operator, which was mentioned over 60 countries in the world have done it. government. as secretary chao mentioned profits a not for organization, independent of the government, operated, controlled of th

number two, this new air traffic control system will not be controlled by airplanes but they said number one there will be a new government structure and a new financing structure. the structure will comprise of 13 members and only to see are available by airlines of the rest will be by airports, labor groups, the labor representatives. it will be the whole stakeholder group but that responsibility isn't to look after their parochial interests but the interest of the whole air traffic control system. we are very much aware of and as we go forward we've released thiwe believe thisproposal and o working with the members of the committee and senate of the congress on this issue. >> it will be very helpful if we can include mayors and governors. >> we are meeting with them this friday. >> mr. chairman, thank you for being here to take time from your schedule to answer some questions. can i change directions for just a minute. it's important to the state of nevada because it is one of the recognized unmanned aircraft systems test sites you are probably familiar with. i think our state i has a

air traffic control is a perfecm example. despite billions of dollars of taxpayer investment over severai decades, the implementation of state-of-the-art air traffic control technology is not where it needs to be. so, this administration has j taken a bold step and joined many of our counterparts worldwide by separating air traffic control operations from the safety oversight function os the faa. this administration's proposal will create a separate,count nongovernmental, nonprofit cooperative to operate thehe country's air traffic control system. the new entity will be a fully capitalized financially self-sustaining entity funded by users of its services, all reve surplus revenues would be reinvested back into the system. .. t accumulate surpluses. mindful that the key to any organization's success is the employees, the administration's proposal poses that the new in ty honor existing labor agreements and that employeesrance fer from the faa to be kept whole in terms of pay and benefits, although, they would no longer be fed

let's turn to conventional arms-control in europe. kind of like a side scheme in washington, you barely hear it mentioned these days. conventional arms-control in europe is that locks at least since 2002. efforts by the obama administration i have failed, largely because at that time the russians completely lost interest in it. >> if we go down one level, we come to the regional balance. there, in the baltic region is a very strong concern for nato and the country's concern. if we go even one level below that, to the sub regional level, here russia is concerned about the security of the leningrad. as much as we talk every day about leningrad, the russian military is concerned about their ability to hold the leningrad and in open conflict with nato. so, think of this whole approach over this whole situation as a russian. [inaudible] you have the strategic level and regional and subregional. at least, theoretical, it should be possible to arrive at some kind of quid pro quo low arrangement for the region because everyone could gain some

a lot of that has to go back to the air traffic control system. so they are in favor of this. where you might see some resistance is from general aviation who says look we don't have many of our owners of private aircraft may not have the updated equipment. it's going a cost to them. the administration in a briefing that we were on twin last hour said look we're going to be working with general aviation to make sure that they can upgrade their equipment as well and not just flipping a switch. it will take several years for this implementation of privatizing or making a nonprofit entity in charge of air traffic control. it will take at least three years for this to happen. >> you see jared kushner on the left-hand side of your screen as people filter in. >>> improving on time performance. has work been done on percentage improvement of on time arrivals or departures or what it would do to a slot at an airport. how many more planes you could squeeze into a landing strip over a certain amount of time? >> there has been some work done. the foundation

has obviously long history in disarmament and arms control and nonproliferation. it is one of the pillars upon which the organization rests. from the first general assembly resolution that called for the elimination of nuclear weapons, and all other weapons of mass distraction, to the biological and chemical weapons conventions, the nuclear nonproliferation treaty, the u.n. has been a venue for dialogue, a source of technical knowledge, and if you will, and honest broker. multinational disarmament and nonproliferation is a web of interlocking agreements and instruments. the well functioning of each matters greatly to the maintenance of the overall credibility of the international disarmament and nonproliferation regime. each of these instruments is a brick in the wall of our collective security. allow one to crumble, and it will damage the entire edifice. in this relation we are witnessing some warring trends. take for example, the organization for the fact-finding mission in the republic and the joint investigative mechanism. both have been a pity me of objective

air traffic control. as i'm not sure that, those reservations are enough to slow down this transition. you have so many airlines that are in favor of this, the opposition going to come from your general aviation both operator swelz manufacturers, who fear that if you have this entity that the airlines have a large influence on, that they basically will box out general aviation from a number of airports, but my sense is that that resistance is something that can be overcome. >> phil lebeau, appreciate it as we watch the president begin his push for the privatization he hopes of air traffic control. want to welcome you back. when our top trade is all about apple. the call that is sending those shares lower today. real question is should you take profits in what is the dow's best perform year to date. with us today, joe, josh, jim, steve, we want to begin with apple. josh, i'm wondering what you make of this call today from pacific crest, which says the upside from the iphone 8 is priced in. the risks are no

host: dfa -- the faa says the traffic controllers and control centers, do the numbers go down with the work force behind those who watch it day in and day out? guest: i don't know about the number of towers. that has been a point of debate. airports would get the attention from air traffic control that they need. been reticentve to go along with this plan because they are afraid they will be left behind. there is a little -- a amount oft participation. host: they are ensuring the same numbers will take place. why the large amount of numbers? because of the work requirement or shift requirement? why do we see so many onboard? guest: i am not sure i can answer that. i don't know if that is something people -- i have not heard lawmakers take aim specifically at the size of the workforce. perhaps because they are trying to get nafta on board. i have not heard that being discussed. what people are talking about when they say there needs to be a change, it is about the implementation of the gen. host: frequent flyers, (202) 748-8000. air traffic controllers, (202) 748-8001. all others, (202)

number two, this new air traffic control system is not going to be controlled by airlines. what the president's proposal says is that there's going to be a new governing structure and a new financing structure. the governing structure will comprise of 13 members and only two seats are available by airlines. the rest are going to be filled by airports, labor groups, labor representatives, general aviation. we'll have at least two. it will be the whole stake holder group. their responsibility is not to look after their parochial interests but to look after the interests of the whole air traffic control system. so rural america is very much a part of that. we're very much aware that the members of the committee come primarily from rural states. it is an issue that we are aware of, and as we go forward, we've now released this proposal. we look forward to working with the members of this committee and the senate and the congress on this issue. >> thank you. and i think it would be very helpful if we could include mayors and governors in that discussion as well. >> we're meeting

this is supported by air traffic controllers themselves. they know it better than anybody, and we know people do not even call them in the past, but now we call them. i'm also pleased to be joined today by passenger advocates, unions, and leaders of airlines and cargo companies who strongly support our new framework and our bidding process. ideally, fordding, one great company. there will be many bits, but one great company that can piece it all together. not many companies all over the whend, like in the past, it came time to piece it together, it did not work. they were all different systems. we threw away billions and billions of dollars. i'm very grateful that every former faa chief and chief operating officers and three former transportation secretary, jim brenly, elizabeth dole, and mary peters, stand with us today. thank you. [applause] pres. trump: this is an incredible coalition for change all over the room, all over the room, a coalition for change, leaders of the industry. at its core, our plan was radically improves america's ai

russian arms control, what speaks for further control, what speaks against the, what could be done, and what has the trump administration done so far. as you will see, quite a lot speaks for mobile arms control in these difficult times, however without anticipating my own conclusions and remarks, unfortunately i'm very skeptical with regard to further u.s. russia arms control, at least in the short to midterm. this is due to reasons that have not so much to do with arms control but more with the general bilateral u.s. russian relationship and the return of geopolitical competition and maybe we can talk about that later because i think we need to frame arms control and a larger political environment. let me start with the first are area. why do we need it the risk of military explanation is high. one can find more reasons but i'm concentrating on two. russia continues. [inaudible] the regional military balance creates insecurity in the baltic states. i just came back from a recent research trip and i can tell you these guys are really afraid of what russia is doing with their borders. at

and that leads me to my last punt, nuclear arms control. as we all have learned earlier this year from media reports, russia has not only produced more inf missiles than are need today sustain a flight program but to deploy some of the weapons. that's at least what we hear from assessments and leak that is come to the press. so the missiles are known as so-called ssc8. well, that fact alone speaks quite strongly against nuclear arms control and grimmer scenario sees both sides and latest effort at the hill seem to point in that direction and the consequence for europe could be tremendously negative. let me make this point as clear as possible. if not carefully handled the inf crisis has the potential of reinvigorating with all the turmoil encountered at the time and also with all of the potential to further undermine and split the alliance. in times of a politically weakened nato, in times of a almost no leadership from the united states, we should make sure that that is not happening. we should not make -- we should not allow to split the

number two, this new air traffic control system is not going to be controlled by airlines. what the presidents proposal merely says is that there willt be a new governance and financing structure. that will comprise of 13 members and only two seats are available i airlines. the restlessly filled by airports, labor groups, labor representatives, general aviation will have at least two so it'll be a whole state code group. there responsibility is not to look after their parochial interest, but to look after the interest of the whole air traffic control system. rural america is very much a part of that. we're very much aware that the members of this committee come primarily from rural states. it is an issue we are very cognizant of. as we go forward, we've now released this proposal.we we look forward to working with members of this committee and the senate and thef congress on this issue. >> thank you. i think it will be veryf helpful if we can include mayors and governors as well. >> we are meeting with them this friday. >> thank you. tha >> thank you for being here and taki

can check out resources on our arms control app which is simply arms control on all of the app stores. we are very pleased to see so many of you here today, members, friends, colleagues from the diplomatic community and we welcome you those who are with us watching in on c-span and for those of you following on social media, the twitter handle for today's event to be part of the conversation is armscontrol17. so the theme of this year's arms control association annual meeting is arms control and nonproliferation restraint at risk and they are, we are facing serious and unprecedented challenges this year in ongoing cast to reduce the nuclear danger. the bedrock of all nonproliferation efforts, the nuclear nonproliferation treaty faces implementation challenges. we have key commitments and nonproliferation obligations that are unfulfilled and that's led many of the world nonnuclear states to begin negotiations on a treaty to prohibit nuclear weapons and we'll talk about that later today. with the deterioration with the u.s.-russia relations, key arms control treaties including the new s

air traffic controllers... could raise prices for >>> well, senator chuck schumer says that the president's plan to privatize air traffic controllers could raise air prices. >> but is that true? we look at the president's plan. >> this idea is not a new one, and controllers themselves have long complained that the current system is antiquated. insiders tell me that if privization is not handled properly however, it could cripple the nation's air waves, because thousands of air traffic controllers are eligible to retire right now, and they might just do it all at once if they see that privatization is going to be a threatt to the future. >> reporter: the u.s. has the most complex and busiest air system in the world. right now, about 10,500 air traffic controllers are on the job in 367 control towers a around the country. according to the national air traffic controllers association, that is the fewest on the job in 28 years. >> today, we are proposing to take american air travel into the future finally. finally.

had control of that whole area.t they have had control of that whole arealj their perimeter, but they have had control of that whole area. i have seen tweets and references a suicide belt or an explosives belt. can we confirm that detail? that i can't confirm, no. what we have heard from the crisis centre was this statement, that one person, the implication was this was somebody believed to be connected with the ignition or the flames that erupted. that that security force had neutralised a person, thought to be connected with this incident. so thatis connected with this incident. so that is what we know officially at this stage. so i couldn't confirm more than that. thank you very much. you know where we are if you find out any more. of course i'm live with you with the bbc‘s news room in london. as and when we get more information on this, we will bring it to you. to reiterate, i will keep an eye on the news wires and the latest social media. next we can speak to david coburn, a ukip mep, live us with on the phone

caller: i am a retired air traffic controllers my comments on your previous guest. the problem is the system is already privatized. because of happen the contacts were certain things, the only way that the companies can do that is do that in make money is by reducing staffing. i worked in a number of facilities where they worked alone, by themselves, eight hours extended for days on the end, really. shiftks the entire themselves. that is how the government made money -- by reducing the staffing. the second factor is when you make something not a government agent the, it is not concerned safety.bout as federal controllers, we were only concerned with what worked and what was safe. there were mistakes come as your previous caller said, and they were addressed and should be continue to be addressed, but when you talk about airlines on the board of directors, you introduce other factors other than safety, so how it impacts the bottom line, what can be done to make the system work better for the users commit all of those things from an air traffic control stamp are kind

the arms-control persons of the year award of course was about arms control. we were of course very disappointed that last fall by the narrow margins the international court of justice decided not to adjudicate the nuclear disarmament cases on the merits. however, simply bringing the cases raised the worlds attention that failure of the powers to fill the obligation to negotiate and reach the global elimination of nuclear weapons, that is what the court said in its 1996 advisory opinion. for those of you who like to dig into things, they are also a rich resource for the development of the political and legal arguments for disarmament. in the memorial in the uk case, the team argued the merits and that is how the case unfolded. so as mentioned from 1946 and 1958 the u.s. conducted 67 tests in the marshall islands and included the first hydrogen bomb test and infamous test of 195415 megatons, 1,000 times the size of the nagasaki bombs. tony was a 9-year-old boy fishing in the canoe with his grandfather when he witnessed the test 200 miles away. the sky turned bl

control ago parts of the brain. that's a great story. a story that is very popular. it's popular in industry in the media. everybody loves that story. the problem with the story is that your brain didn't evolve -- no brain evolved with sedimentary layers. the core test didn't evolve like frosting 0 on a cake. it's been known that brains did no evolve at that time way. not organized that way, as bray done brains are like companies to use a phrase from the neurobiologist george streeter. as they grow they re-organize to become efficient. there's actually -- it's highly debated still whether -- for the most part most of the core text of -- cortex of your brain can be found in every mammal. one or two parts where people debate whether it's new to primates, let's say, but even in those cases it's pretty clear to a lot of us that there is no neocortex. it's actually just certain parts of to brain have grown bigger because they developed for longer in development. so, i guess my -- so, just to say that one of the most deep

crucially these reforms are supported by air traffic controllers themselves. they're the ones that know the systems that they want. they know it better than anybody. and we have people that don't even call them in the past. but now we call them. i'm also proud to be joined today by passenger advocates, pilot unions, and leaders of airlines and cargo companies who strongly support our new framework and our bidding process and we're bidding ideally to one great company. there'll be many bids. but one great company that can piece it all together. not many companies all over the united states like in the past. when they came time to piece it together, it didn't work. there were all different systems. we threw away billions and billions of dollars. i am very grateful that every former faa chief and chief operating officers and three former transportation secretaries, jim burnley, elizabeth dole and mary peters, stand with us today. thank you. [ applause ] >> this is an incredible coalition for change all over the room. it's a coalition for change. the leaders of th

now, theminutes from president will announce a proposal to hand over control of the air traffic controlystem to a nonprofit corporation. later in the week when the president will go to ohio in support for a plan to put $1 trillion into roads, bridges, and other public facilities. is downplaying reports from russian interference in u.s. politics. he tells nbc news he is unaware of a proposal from president trump's son-in-law jared kushner to set up a back channel between the incoming administration and the kremlin. is nonsense to say russia has collected compromising material about mr. trump. saudi arabia is leading a push to isolate qatar over his relationship with iran and the support for the islamic state movement. other nations have cut the dramatic ties with the nation and are suspending air and sea travel. saudi arabia has accused qaqtr underminera of trying to efforts to -- iran. global news 24 hours a day powered by more than 2600 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries. this is bloomberg. vonnie: thank you. coming up, more insight on the geopolitical facing markets.

yes, jeff. >> i'm also at the arms control. i was going to ask a question that jonathan is very trained well. your experience and background in other areas with great benefit and i wanted to ask the question of how you thank you might bring the working to push the army agenda. having worked at the un, the un has seen as a very. [inaudible] i would say you started reminding us that some people take a break from disarmament and i would say can we think of it the other way around can we use the other issues to make progress on disarmament and i would say that the humanitarian consequences is what drove the nuclear ban treaty with a very different, out-of-the-box, human side and so, if you have experience in you can bring to that and i want to ask more specifically when you talked about chemical weapons, i see that country as the sticking point for people who criticize security councils for not be able to do anything and critic eyes and making it impossible and for russia to operate. if you have some thinking on that, again, the id

in the late 90s it controlled kabul and imposed a ha rdline late 90s it controlled kabul and imposedd other targets. the islamist terror group al-qaeda will swiftly identified as the main suspect. its leader, osama bin laden, was closely linked to this taliban who publicly condemned the attacks. they refused to release him to international justice. the us invaded afghanistan and pushed the taliban out of kabul. international forces took responsibility for security across the country. a new regime was set up and after it had been in place a decade outside military withdrew. in 201a, control was handed back to afg ha n forces. 201a, control was handed back to afghan forces. since then, in surge has been rising in afghanistan, there has been a surge in taliban activity, along with the number of attacks by so—called islamic state. there have been several attacks in kabul itself. there are some suggestions that... let‘s talk to afghanistan‘s are it in the uk. also a british afghan charity workers. and also, someone who lost their colleague in yesterday‘s attack. view our director of afgha

a time for your traffic control system about 30 minutes from now. something that kellyanne conway says is just the beginning of big changes ahead on infrastructure. >> when the president was running and he was president-elect, now is president, has made clear his -- infrastructure. and his secretary has talking about the byzantine labyrinth permeating process that we have in this country, the fact that we do not build anything anymore as a country. that our roads and our bridges are in disrepair. it is a very exciting thing that people will literally see the fruits of those promises beginning today. >> jon: and the president is speaking out about his travel ban, urging the courts to quit playing politics with national security. this is a mid breaking in londo london. more raids and more arrests in britain's capital city after the deadly terror attack there over the weekend. we have fox news live coverage. david lee miller and london with the investigation. we begin with john roberts live at the white house. >> good morning to pray to the president o

crucially, these reforms are supported by air traffic controllers themselves. they are the ones that know the systems that they want. they know it better than anybody. and we have people that do not even call them in the past. but now we call them. i'm also proud to be joined by passenger advocates, pilot unions, and leaders of airlines. and cargo companies who strongly support our new framework. and our bidding process, and we are bidding ideally to one great company. they will be many bids, but one great company that can piece it all together. not too many companies over the united states, like in the past when it came time to piece it together, it did not work. they were all different systems. we threw away billions and billions of dollars. i am very grateful that every former faa chief and chief operating officer's into the former transportation secretaries, jim burnley, elizabeth doyle, mary pierce stand with us today. thank you. [applause] this is an incredible coalition for change all over the room. it is a coalition for change. the leaders of the indust

can check out resources on our arms control app which is simply arms control on all of the app stores. we are very pleased to see so many of you here today, members, friends, colleagues from the dip -- diplomatic community and we welcome you those who are watching in on c-span and for those of you following on social media, the twitter handle of today's event is arms control 17. so the theme of this year's arms control association annual meeting is arms control and nonproliferation restraint at risk and they are, we are facing serious and unprecedented challenge this is year in the ongoing cast to reduce the nuclear danger. the bedrock of all nonproliferation efforts, the nuclear nonproliferation treaty faces implementation challenges. we have key key commitments and nonproliferation obligations that are unfulfilled and that's led many of the world nonnuclear states to begin negotiations on a treaty to prevent nuclear weapons. we will talk about that later today. with the deterioration with the u.s.-russia relations, key arms control treaty is including the new strategic arms treaty a

right now, about 10,500 air traffic controllers are on the job in 367 control towers around the country the national air traffic controllers association, that's the fewest controllers on the job in 28 years. >> today we're proposing to take american air travel into the future, finally. finally. >> reporter: the president's proposal to privatize the air traffic controller system could streamline, centralize and modernize a system that critics say relies on decades' old technology, such as tracking airplanes by paper strips rather than by computer. >> but after billions and billions of tax dollars spent, and the many years of delays, we're still stuck with an ancient, broken, antiquated, horrible system that doesn't work. >> reporter: aviation sources say the idea has been kicked around in the halls of washington for decades. as a way of taking air traffic control out of the political hands of congress, which currently funds the system every year. in a statement, natca said it has been working with congressional leaders to come up with, quote, a stable, predictable funding stream which wo

yet, our air traffic control system is stuck painfully in the past. the faa has been trying to upgrade our nation's air traffic control system for a long period of years. but after billions and billions of tax dollars spent and the many years of delays, we're still stuck with an ancient, broken, antiquated, horrible system that doesn't work. other than that, it's quite good. the previous administration spent over $7 billion trying to upgrade the system and totally failed. honestly, they didn't know what the hell they were doing. a total waste of money, $7 biion plus plus. it's time to join the future. that is why i'm proposing new principles to congress for air traffic control reform making flights quicker, safer and more reliable. crucially, these reforms are supported by air traffic controllers themselves. they're the ones that know the systems that they want. they know it better than anybody. and we have people that don't even call them. in the past. but now we call them. i'm also proud to be joined today by passenger advocates, pilot unions, and l

that outside arms-control disarmament. so other outside the box. >> let me start with the syria, that is clearly one of the if you will, more immediate acute priority agenda my office has at the moment. aunt in here what i have been emphasizing already is that this is actually, of course it's about syria, but it's not just about syria. if this continues be politicized and seen from different positions that different groups of the city council have on syrian conflict, and we might in fact, start to lose part of the very important disarmament regime. there is a reason why the international community created a technical agency such as, and if those entities are, in fact, politicized, then we were really start to lose the capacities that the nonproliferation regime that has worked so well over the years, will start to crumble. we want to prevent that. so i have been already messaging this with all the relevant parties, and i won't share the details in a public session, but i think this is a line that we must really continue to

so self-control was the chief victorian virtue. i want to show you an example of this from major league baseball, 1947. this is joe dimaggio as an example of this victorian type. joe dimaggio was famous for not being very expressive. for being, kind of controlling his emotions on the field. there is one moment in the 1947 world series with the yankees against the dodgers. the dodgers were up by three runs. joe dimaggio was at bat and there were two men on base. he has a long fly ball that almost certainly would have been a home run but was caught by the dodgers outfielder. look at this clip. it is very quick. not too much is going on. but look at joe dimaggio's reaction. >> it's a long one. back, back, back. he makes a one-handed catch against the bullpen. prof. moreno: when dimaggio kicked the dirt like that, that was as emotive as he ever got. he was such a model of self-control, that was the remarkable thing about that play. the famously stoic joe dimaggio lost his temper. if you compare this with a way that athletes today expre

we are dealing with a monopoly, whether it is a monopoly controlled by the government or a monopoly controlled by somebody else, it will still be a monopoly. i have not been shy of saying that i believe we should maintain air traffic control system. that is accountable to the public, it is on by the public and it should be accountable by the public. eye don't see any other way to achieve this then to maintain our role. i've -- i believe preserving the public's voice, frankly, is the only way to maintain the airspace as a national asset. and to protect access to all users. this is key. drones and space operators, in many cases we don't know what they are, but we know it is happening now. maximum extent possible protect the right of the traveling public. aerospace isecret, the most, located in the world with a unmatched safety record. we can work together to build on that safety record and i look forward to. open the airspace to more users. let's make sure we are not limiting it but opening it to more users. some are beyond our imagination that are starting to happen. madam secretary, know that

we're dealing with a monopoly, whether it's the monopoly controlled by the government or monopoly controlled by somebody else, it will still be a monopoly. i've not been shy of saying i believe we should maintain air traffic control system that is accountable to the public. it's owned by the and can should be accountable to the public, and i don't see any other way to achieve this than to continue our ongoing cal overright rowell and preserving the public's voice is the an way to keep our national asset and protect all uses, commercial aviation, and general aviation, and drones and commercial space operators, we don't know that they are but know it's starting to happen now. so we must to the maximum extent possible protect the rights of the traveling public as well. it's not a secret, our air sprays has an up matched safety record. we can watch together to build on the safety record, and i look forward to it, and open the air sprays to more -- air space to more and mow users as technology changes. some of which are beyond our current imagination but are starting to happen right now. so, mada

arms-control is a means to which we remain committed and then we are attracted to good arms-control. we don't like arms-control it doesn't make sense, doesn't provide stability and can't violate its terms. our efforts to ensure that it meets the criteria that we set forth publicly in the private example on the compliance report. we're officially behind in the report on inherence and compliance witharms-control nonverbal proliferation , did i get right? so we're trying to articulate alittle bit more about , i said if you are worried about these things there's the association a couple days ago. but it's precisely because we like the idea of good arms-control that we think it necessary to point these things out. in the context we have a problem with what to do about the inf. this was as you all know a pivotal control agreement, the first agreement of any sort to eliminate an entire class of delivery systems, it's important under the reagan administration and the implementation went very well. there's a problem with that now as you have been tracking the last few years. the russians are

.>> it's limited to the realm of arms control. >> taken as you will. cause broader arms control may not be a concern of the europeans at this point especially given their reaffirmation of article 5. what three things with a light to the. >> to answer my question she ran overtime. >> how do these questions. and that anything including comments you might make as well. you want to start in response to rachel's question? >> rachel, inf basically what could happen are two domino effects. the one would very much pertain to the european theater. the other one would pertain to the bilateral us russian strategic stability so the first we know the facts, let's start with a worst-case scenario. >> the russians, they just continue to entrench them and they all, we're not doing anything wrong here, i was fine whatever and the us asserts that it decides that they look and say we've got to get out of inf and we have to counter that. [bleep] for tat. we also need at least you'll capable inf missiles in europe. or maybe just go full in and say nuclear tipped inf missil

with privatizing air traffic control.f air traffic control end up paying more and taxpayers in general don't. let's say you never take a flight. but air traffic control user fees increase. that's one way of thinking about this, right? they made this argument in health care. why should people who don't use it pay for it. we don't agree with that when it comes to health care. you will die if you don't get health care into my children feel that way if they don't go to disney. >> that's where the rubber might hit the road. it might become more expensive if you are a flyer, if you are a cargo company. your fedex shipments or u.p.s. shipments may be more but you don't see tax increases and it's not subject totach cuts. that's an interesting thing. >> this is a far less radical agenda item than we've seen from the president. this white house needs a win right now. ing infrastructure if the president stays on message, if he presents something that is pat latable, you weren't going to get nancy pelosi to say i'm on board. >> ted c

controlled corporate monopoly. we should note the air traffic control union mostly support privatizing atc. elaine chao will begin selling the plan to congress. >> we saw her to his left shoulder the whole time he was speaking today. great to see you. we're coming right back. it's the phillips' lady! anyone ever have occasional constipation,diarrhea, gas or bloating? she does. she does. help defend against those digestive issues. take phillips' colon health probiotic caps daily with three types of good bacteria. 400 likes? wow! try phillips' colon health. ykeep you sidelined.ng that's why you drink ensure. with 9 grams of protein and 26 vitamins and minerals. for the strength and energy to get back to doing... ...what you love. ensure. always be you. >> i don't know if you new this, but as the london terror attacks were unfolding, there was a bomb scare in italy triggering a stampede that left 1,500 people hurt. it happened in turin, italy during the soccer championships. most of the victims have been treated for m

britain would regain control. control of its borders and immigration.le from the eu. control of employment rights and trade — a british rule book, not a eu one. control of its own trade deals with countries outside of the eu, like america, china, and india. many say hard brexit could cause economic damage, notjust to the uk, but also to the eu. we are the second largest economy in the eu. since the election, things have certainly become less clear. some people believe we should now be pushing for what is being described as a softer brexit. many argue this makes jobs and the economy the priority, more important than controlling immigration or regaining sovereignty. with a softer brexit, britain could gain special access to this in the market, but we might have to make it easier for eu immigrants to work here. we could just try to stay in that customs union, which would allow the free movement of goods, but not free movement of people. eu trade laws would apply, so the uk would have to sign its own trade deals with other countries. brexit is up there as o

i think the gun control issue is mislabeled. it should be people controlled with guns. i think a lot of people have made good points about assault rifles. this has got to stop. my other concern is a gated community and all the special privilege. it is not a big deal and is a regular person off the street. everybody is sorry about it, and i wish steve and his family the best. i don't think anybody deserves this, but this gentleman who shot at them, apparently did -- ining right because the long run, everybody is coming together. why can't we do that when it really matters when it is us public people suffocated committee and the elite few? we need police, too. it is not just what you guys need, but it is but we all need for protection, and there is a not enough people in the world to protect us because everyone has their opinions running wild . guest: good morning, and i do not disagree with what you said. i have been one of the fighters for gun violence prevention and working with mental health issues, or if it is not that, making sure -- there are so many things, not ju

today we are in malaysia, which took a massive gamble and brought in capital controls, effectively controllingney went in and out of the country, rejecting help from the imf, and alienating the international financial community. in the short term, this helped lessen the economic damage, but what about the long—term? christine hah reports. a constant buzz of activity. this company makes cranes and lifting equipment for industrial sites across asia. last year they opened the largest manufacturing facility in southeast asia. asign of a sign of confidence in future growth. 20 years ago its business ranked almost 70% in a matter of months. this man was starting out in the family business in malaysia which included the company. we were seeing first customers come back and saying we probably can't take delivery, or we will take delivery but we cannot pay the final bill. in that year, ‘97, the damage when we looked at our books, will always be in our memories as the worst ever. but things looked very different at street level. this man has run the store for 46 years and says he did not feel the effect