president cooliage's authenticity so much that the one that we proposed today to keep cool with cooliage. the president's ability to earn with a high level of people is particularly powerful given the context in which he took office. he did so by demonstrating a trustworthiness and delivering on the few promises that he carefully made. to put this in a present context, it would be particularly refreshing to have a candidate as genuine as cooliage is at a historical low. we may be compromised on the debt ceiling which continue to stagnate american policy-making and the economy today. we must move forward, but we have to move forward as a unified country. it is time to restore america's faith in the federal government, something that can only be done by a candidate who is willing to honestly underpromise and over-deliver. on the other hand, as beloved as he is, president reagan was larger than life. an actor who plays a hero in every role. we also recognize that this is a rare that can often not be replicated. does nothing to improve people's optimism about the american government. instead

i wonder how you reconcile that calvin cooliage, 1924, the northwest european stock. the mule mantarian character of -- he was also, i believe, said to have embraced eugenics, i guess teddy roosevelt was also thought along those same lines. do you judge this as being a creature of the times? >> they needed -- they saw babies die all of the time and they couldn't save them. on the issue of immigration, a man named john blafr wrote a dissertation in getting the immigrant vote in massachusetts. we all know he had a long career. he was good with the irish people, good with the german people, good with the southern europeans who would lose out with the johnson act. because he cared about them. he feared, as would any politician, the rise of political blocks. his path is let us consider everyone a citizen or a near citizen or a future citizen. let us not change too fast. it's not evil. >> will're done with him. we don't like to say, i'm done because the piece of legislation is shallow. >> i signed something i didn't really like. and this would have passed over his veto if h