mr cooney all it's a joke if using the mr rudd of steamed inside. like many done to make a new bike was still within seconds of this content editor of say juice and that's when doing business in the city. this may seem tempting just testing the dvd set of sheets maybe so maybe the type of activity out there. you are weak and unable to double its annual give it a feeling that i found out that the family saturday started out about his youth. the random thoughts and solutions and claimed that only seventy twenty miles from the venture capital to back. since seed of a man not only suffers from out of the existence of this mostly deaf and he couldn't stand the tank to store food brought to the groom. at that. i said the end of them. the band in the end of the event. yet the apples tonight yes that's in this fight of the seventies that he missed on the goddamned the test if any could be the fifth sixth i might be too many draws the day with hindsight out to trick the contract to command a fee despite rising temperatures. the six fl to spend to lose its va

cooney? >> he is involved of the investigation is you the lead agent? familiar with the name. >> who is leading the investigation? who is the point person of targeting of conservative groups through the iris merrick this is far afield of the subject. >> but you oversee the public integrity section for are just want to know this is one of the biggest cases you have got and you don't know who is leading the investigation? garett there are career prosecutors. >> how many? >> in total? i cannot tell you that. >> is this an important case for the justice department of first amendment rights were violated how they were targeted? >> i characterize that situation differently. >> you don't even know how many agents are involved with your division? >> they are involved from the fbi. >>, the attorneys from your division? >> i cannot give you a precise number of. >> earlier this week with a bipartisan majority 26 democrats joined every single republican to say we should have a special counsel take over this investigation. , like the states and actions of the irs an

cooney. >> i am not familiar with that name. >> he is in the public integrity section. we understand he is involved. do you know if he is the lead agent? >> i am not familiar with the name. >> can you tell me who is leading the investigation? there has to be someone in charge. who is the point person? >> congressman, obviously this is far afield of the subject of the hearing that we are -- >> what you oversee the public integrity section and other criminal division that is involved you don't know -- this is one of the biggest cases you have. >> there are numerous career federal prosecutors on the investigation. >> can you tell me how many? >> how many prosecutors in total, i can't tell you. >> is this an important case? >> again, i would disagree with the characterization of the investigation but, yes, this is an important case. >> you don't know how many agents are involved? >> the agents would be involved from the federal bureau. >> how many attorneys from your division. >> i can't give you a precise number. >> let me ask you -- this week, earlier this week in a bipar

. >> do you know jp cooney? do you know if he is the lead agent? >> i am not familiar. >> who is in charge? >> congressman, this is far afield of the subject of the hearing. oversee the public integrity section. this is one of the biggest cases you've got. >> there are numerous federal prosecutors. >> i have been trying to get this answer for 11 months. >> is this abusiness an importat case -- is this an important case? >> i disagree with the characterization but it is an important case. the agents would be involved from the federal bureau of investigation. i can't give you a precise number. week, 26r this democrats joined republicans and said we should have a special counsel take over this investigation. statements and actions in connection with the matter have served to undermine the department of justice investigation. it was part of the resolution. do you think that we need a special counsel to take over do you agreeation? with a 26 democrats that agree >> i thinksolution? the attorney general and others answered that question. >> it's not the