or is copperheads of reform definitely next term?edy: i don't think you will see copperheads of reform. i think you guys got very close. here you have such division from both sides. not necessarily both parties because they're of some people need to go different ways on this. there are chasms in both partie parties. i do agree that a 2200-mile wall doesn't make sense. he will run into a lot of eminent domain issues, and that will get tied up in the courts. i think the world is not a safe now as it wasn't too thousand six when democrats voted for border funding and protection. ask them in 2006, because many of them are still in congress. ask dianne feinstein, what would she agree to? what would she agree to then, that she wouldn't agree to now? some of the legislators and governors in border states, i think, should have more of a say. >> marie: harris? >> harris: we've got some breaking news. the houses expected to approve the stopgap we were talking about, it's happening on the hill now. it will be a two-week spending spending bill t

copperheads of reform must come through congress and focus on finishing the structural flaws that still persist after the great recession. comprehensive legislation is the only way to ensure a stable housing finance system. not guaranteed the taxpayers right now are at a risk of loss due to the failure of underlying mortgage loans. has taken steps to reduce taxpayer risk on such loans. by shifting a substantial amount of the credit risk to financial investors. we joined other organizations in urging policymakers to lock-in reforms and complete additional reforms through legislation. legislation that must be retained and stakeholders must continue to press for permanent reform that fixes the structural flaws. the administration has signaled to make additional reforms to legislation in the absence of congressional action. we look forward to the opportunity to work with the new director and other administration officials to offer thoughts on reform efforts. we believe that any administrative reforms should be carefully thought through and implemented in a way that will not adversely impact

sense, but ite would recognize there is something going on that maybe we don't copper meant -- copperheadt this point. joe: when people were trying to figure out what the definition of a dovish hike was, i didn't see anyone forecast that there would be some message about the change to the balance sheet runoff, yet, if you look at the market reaction yesterday and the lots of the commentary today, you see disappointment that chairman powell was not more flexible with the run-up. could you explain what it was about the message that seemed to unnerve people because it done -- did not seem like this would ever be in play? i think there was a hope that if the fed kept a hawkish interest rate path, they could compensate for that with changing the pace of the balance sheet. obviously, there is concern about how the balance sheet runoff and liquidity on wall street -- there is an underlying sense that maybe this was a way out for the fed, and the fed did not choose to take it. romaine: when we look at some of the market signals we are getting, it seems the market seems to be suggesting maybe the

which a lot of state copperheads and schools don't get. need to apply and how much of a chance did you think you had?” did not. i had a negative perception of oxford before i applied. i thought it was a place of social elitism. it completely changed for me. i used a summer school programme at oxford university runs. i spent a week living in oxford free living in college. i met lots of current students and that change my mind. evie how much difference does that make depending on which college you applied to? are some more welcoming of not independent school pupils? different colleges have different access levels. in general, the idea is what college you apply to does not matter. joe, it seems that there are 3000 state schools who are historically the one to put in the least applications. what needs to be donein least applications. what needs to be done in your view to encourage those schools to get more involved and to consider 0xbridge for their pupils? first of all you've got to acknowledge that oxford and capers spent a huge amount of ti

when the country started crying for his head, and the copperhead movement was calling for peace and in 1860 for and general macleod, the foreigner general ran against him on a piece plank. when all of this was happening and that somebody said you have to get rid of grant, he is a butcher. and lincoln said i can't spare that man, he bites. and what we have seen about these leaders is they can peer over the horizon and they can see things that we don't see. >> that's something we were talking about before. are these leaders, and doors you are writing about lincoln and roosevelt and fdr and teddy roosevelt and lbj. are they visionary leaders? i use the example of steve jobs in the area of business. he was able to see that we wanted and needed that we couldn't see. do you think these are men that have that? >> lincoln was asked at one point did you think that we might lose the war? and he said i didn't think that. he envisioned somehow, i don't think he knew how it was going to happen but i think about lbj. the first night he comes in the presidency, his line on this big bed of his in the

bush, and he said that when he left the white house in january of 1993, we really had however, copperheads we really had our heads hung low because no one knew how great a man he is. now he is one of the most revered people in modern history, for sure. there is a special relationship in history, john adams and john quincy adams were the first father and son to serve as president, and when 43 was asked to write a book about 41, one of the things he asked his dad was, how did you find the strength to conduct yourself with such grace and dignity and 41 said, i had no choice. that is because he chose to live, not readily, which is again, why i think you see this tremendous outpouring, and a very sad day, you are showing the pictures of him on his parachute jump. he just loved life and wanted to experience all of it. >> shannon: he absolutely did. bret, we are looking back at some of his quotes over the years. he was pithy at time and pointed, not afraid to make fun, but something very pointed he said, speaking to a joint section of congress in 1991, he said, "if anyone tells you that america's

announced by the united states and mexico in december 2018, both countries are committed to work on a copperheads plan to reduce migration across the region -- comprehensive plan to reduce migration across the region. i have had meetings with leaders from the northern triangle, private sector executives, and put forth proposals to address the root causes of illegal migration. we look forward to working with our we look forward to working with our mexican partners. i cannot overstate the significance of these developments. we are taking lawful unilateral action to stop illegal entry now. mexico is taking its own appropriate actions in response, and our two countries have committed to a major original plan to solve this crisis. host: that policy announcement by the secretary of homeland security. there has been speculation whether she will stay in the job based on some this agreements she's had with the president, although publicly she has said she will remain in the job. that hearing yesterday before the house judiciary committee. robert is joining us from missouri. reuters saying the president is

and the cno's copperheads of review. in the after math of the uss fitzgerald and uss john mccain collisions. 17 sailors lost their lives, the commanders and sailors called for full navy reform, accountability, office reviews cited overextended and undermanned ship, overwork cruise, a decline in naval mastering and confusing chains of command. as contributing factors to the navy's readiness problems. our legislation, based on the navy's own recommendations were specifically designed to address these challenges. although i'm can't the neighbors leadership i believe that congress must play an active role in ensuring the right long-term corrective actions are successfully implemented. the john s. mccain national defense authorization act for fy2019 , which president trump signed into law in august includes 11 provisions derived from our original legislation. these reforms require the navy to review its chained of command, ensure the ship's home ported overseas rotate back home and keep formal what standing records, among sev

>> i want to shift to that for just a minute because as jack mentioned, we have been exploring copperheads of consumer privacy legislation and we availed two hearings this fall to discuss the issue of consumer privacy. this would be for any of you to respond to, but do you support efforts by congress to develop comprehensive privacy legislation? >> absolutely. >> yes. >> yes i support this effort. >> good answer. now for the harder question. in your view, is there key features that should be included in any privacy legislation? >> one of the things that we have asked for on the data security cited civil the authority in order to create effective deterrence. the same dynamic will apply on the privacy side as well and i think that will be very important. >> is that a view shared by members of the commission? >> i have a slightly different view on that. it is not a toady settled one. as i said in my opening remark, one of the things about privacy is that it is a concept, and different people see a different risk as greater and that is a very reasonable debate and a lot of people have a strong