but will corbyn do it ? corbyn do it? imagine so. >> why not? well, he's not ruling it out. he's gone on the airwaves and people keep asking him and he's not ruling it out. well, he's not ruling out. >> he's not ruling out anything, but he doesn't need to be bounced into making a decision by or whoever is by robert peston or whoever is interviewing by robert peston or whoever is intewell,ing by robert peston or whoever is intewell,in mean, by robert peston or whoever is intewell,inmean, he can just say >> well, i mean, he can just say yes whether he's doing it yes or no whether he's doing it or whether he isn't. i mean, that would provide some clarity, right? >> yes. but i mean, it doesn't really it doesn't really matter. he's his own he's allowed to make his own choices his own time. think. >> should he have the labour whip restored, do you think? >> i think it's very unlikely, given happened. given what's happened. but i mean, yes, absolutely. i mean, he have had removed he shouldn't have had it removed in the first pla

a key figure from the jeremy corbyn era has written to i jeremy corbyn era has written to keir starmerr starmer to complain about the treatment of the left.— treatment of the left. what i'm sa in: is treatment of the left. what i'm saying is what _ treatment of the left. what i'm saying is what he _ treatment of the left. what i'm saying is what he has _ treatment of the left. what i'm saying is what he has allowed l treatment of the left. what i'm l saying is what he has allowed to happen i think is a right—wing faction becoming drunk with power and using devices within the party almost on a search and destroy of the left. they seem more interested in destroying the presence of the left in the party than getting a labour government. we all want a broad church party and we want to build enthusiasm before the election but we need commitment when times get rough in government. that is when you draw upon all elements of the party, you cannot let one element dominate.— the party, you cannot let one element dominate. you talk about bein: in element dominate. you talk about being in governme

i continue to say that jeremy corbyn was anti-somatic?at. i said the was anti-somatic? i didn't say that. i said the party _ was anti-somatic? i didn't say that. i said the party under— was anti-somatic? i didn't say that. i said the party under him _ was anti-somatic? i didn't say that. i said the party under him enabled l i said the party under him enabled anti—semitism. the i said the party under him enabled anti-semitism._ anti-semitism. the results of the research into _ anti-semitism. the results of the research into that _ anti-semitism. the results of the research into that by _ anti-semitism. the results of the research into that by various - research into that by various parties said it wasn't for that why are you saying it was?— parties said it wasn't for that why are you saying it was? david, thank ou ve are you saying it was? david, thank you very much _ are you saying it was? david, thank you very much for _ are you saying it was? david, thank you very much for being _ are you saying it was? david, thank you very much for be

. advisor to jeremy corbyn, james schneider.lture wars. might we go transit? she's got some great emails to read a couple out. judnh emails to read a couple out. judhhi emails to read a couple out. judith i would never ever vote labour whilst they spout this trans rubbish. i am not a cis woman . i'm trans rubbish. i am not a cis woman. i'm just just a woman . woman. i'm just just a woman. and then phil starmer is hanging on to the trans gender hangers on to the trans gender hangers on and they make him unelectable , certainly by women . gordon has , certainly by women. gordon has a bit of fun with his final comment. i can self id as a giraffe, but it still doesn't mean i can eat the leaves from a tall tree without the aid of a cherry picker. yeah. gordon. i can see what you did there. let's move on to our final debate of the evening so orkney could be leaving the uk to become a self—governing territory of norway . orkney territory of norway. orkney council passed the motion allowing the island a future outside of scotland and th

any kind of in corbyn.party, if an mp was about deselected, they'd about to be deselected, they'd call now mps are call it stalinism. now mps are getting deselected right call it stalinism. now mps are gett centre ;elected right call it stalinism. now mps are gett centre and ted right call it stalinism. now mps are gett centre and there right call it stalinism. now mps are gett centre and there isn'tjht and centre and there isn't a peep when it comes to the obr. lots of were against lots of wonks were against brexit. know this person was brexit. i know this person was against but that's against brexit, but that's because tended to because technocrats tended to agree that it wouldn't make britain richer. agree that it wouldn't make britain richer . the obe, agree that it wouldn't make britain richer. the obe, though i think we might have an agreement because i would get rid it. i think it was rid of it. i think it was introduced george osborne, introduced by george osborne, the whole point the is to the whol

. you than with corbyn.ed in a free country. >> but that's where this interesting question is about reputational risk and which people we can block out. you know, why should we? well, we do.the know, why should we? well, we do. the russian oligarchs. well, a classic case that's different criminals against the rule of law, for example. but it's quite new. it's quite new. london was making a lot of money, london, russian money. and it's all really quite recently under under really the. yes. the auspices of likes of jacob rhiannon. >> dare i say, you've got to go back to blair and brown. and i love go back to jacob who goes back to because they had the state putin. so you state visit of putin. so you can't start everything at can't just start everything at year zero being 2010. anyway, thank you to my panel for that. coming up, should people still be prosecuted covid be prosecuted for covid restrictions , breaches and plus, restrictions, breaches and plus, oh, should we criminalise skateboarding ? the temperatu

this is corbyn well see i don't corbyn omics well see i don't really believe that they don't know whereant >> i think they just don't want to tell us. okay, so, where to tell us. okay, so, so where do think? do you think? >> way of doing >> look, the only way of doing this more money, >> look, the only way of doing this more, more money, >> look, the only way of doing this more, imakingyney, >> look, the only way of doing this more, imaking cuts ? taxing more, or making cuts? >> well, there's part of me >> well, there's a part of me that feels that there's a lot more money lurking around than we because when they need we think because when they need when they put it this way, when they want money for something, they want money for something, the money appears. ukraine, you know so well. but think think about it. think about covid aukus all the money that was wasted on ppe that didn't fit, ppe, that wasn't really ppe . you ppe, that wasn't really ppe. you know, all of that billions were spent. where did that money come from? so i think that they actually do have money. and i think also,

this is corbyn well see i don't corbyn omics well see i don't really believe that they don't know whereing from. >> just don't want >> i think they just don't want to tell us. okay, so, so where do think? do you think? >> way of doing >> look, the only way of doing this more money, >> look, the only way of doing this more, more money, >> look, the only way of doing this more, imakingyney, >> look, the only way of doing this more, imaking cuts ? taxing more, or making cuts? >> well, there's part of me >> well, there's a part of me that feels that there's a lot more money lurking around than we because when they need we think because when they need when they put it this way, when they want money for something, they want money for something, the money appears. ukraine, you know so well. but think think about it. think about covid aukus all the money that was wasted on ppe that didn't fit, ppe, that wasn't really ppe . you ppe, that wasn't really ppe. you know, all of that billions were spent. where did that money come from? so i think that they actually do have money. and i think also, too

you are deputy to jeremy corbyn, who is on the left of the labour party. the two traditions of the labour party, they, they clashed . the party, they, they clashed. the labour party is in civil war. how does that personally affect someone who is in that position? >> well, you kind of you're in these jobs temporarily and i felt very responsible that i was temporarily in control of 100 year old institution in a really important, powerful vehicle for changing lives and dramatically changed the lives of many millions of working people over that time . so i felt worried for that time. so i felt worried for the institution then. i obviously felt worried for the country . me and at first tried country. me and at first tried to use the usual means. country. me and at first tried to use the usual means . you have to use the usual means. you have to, you know, try and influence change through the committees and the shadow cabinet, but then realised there was a little bit more going on and it became very difficult in the latter years. what was the toughest moment for

, bofis theresa may, jeremy corbyn, boris johnson, jeremy corbyn, massive differences and the media wasstablishment was so because electorate so upset because the electorate had i think we've had a choice and i think we've now gone back to something which they wanted all along, which is basically a conservative party which doesn't conserve liberal which doesn't conserve a liberal democratic which is democratic party, which is neither democratic, neither liberal nor democratic, and which and a labour party, which is certainly social democratic and a labour party, which is ce socialist social democratic and a labour party, which is ce socialist . social democratic or socialist. >> and they're all green. yeah, well extent. well, to an extent. >> i mean, all have the >> i mean, they all have the same, i believe in having to address change and i'm address climate change and i'm sure watching this sure some people watching this would but think you would disagree. but i think you have to accept have you have to accept a disagreement on how to get there. it's very like so there. it's very usefu

you are deputy to jeremy corbyn, who is on the left of the labour party. the two traditions of the labour party, they, they clashed . the party, they, they clashed. the labour party is in civil war. how does that personally affect someone who is in that position? >> well, you kind of you're in these jobs temporarily and i felt very responsible that i was temporarily in control of 100 year old institution in a really important, powerful vehicle for changing lives and dramatically changed the lives of many millions of working people over that time . so i felt worried for that time. so i felt worried for the institution then. i obviously felt worried for the country . me and at first tried country. me and at first tried to use the usual means. country. me and at first tried to use the usual means . you have to use the usual means. you have to, you know, try and influence change through the committees and the shadow cabinet, but then realised there was a little bit more going on and it became very difficult in the latter years. what was the toughest moment for

in the studio is labour councillor frankie leach, who was an advisor to former party leaderjeremy corbyneir starmer should be setting out a more radical agenda? he absolutely should be. it was interesting to see my former colleague andrew fisher earlier talking about essentially how the labour party has reneged on what we consider its more radical commitments, whether renationalising energy, trying to end the hostile environment we have seen for immigrants and migrants and asylum—seekers and i think the labour party is right when it analyses the fact we are in a fiscal emergency but what i am concerned about is if we take away the investment from things like public sector and we take away the investment for people who are on the breadline already suffering without offering radical policies like rent control or giving people who is well needed public sector pay rises, what the labour party is doing is not putting much clear water between them and the conservatives. what putting much clear water between them and the conservatives. what are them and the conservatives. what are the for? them

>> jeremy corbyn i have spoken to about jeremy corbyn's anti—semitism . anti—semitism. >> you a bad,u had a bad, i believe jeremy a right jeremy corbyn deserves a right for account. unless the for a bank account. unless the police that jeremy corbyn police say that jeremy corbyn has broken law. has has broken the law. he has a right for a bank account. just like i believe the media had a right to have a youtube account. >> did lend? jeremy? this >> did you lend? jeremy? this is the difference between the left and the right. >> would lend him money? >> would you lend him money? this fundamental this is the fundamental difference between the left and the the right stand up the right. the right stand up for speech. stand for for free speech. we stand up for free speech. matter free speech. it doesn't matter whether left having said whether on the left having said he was anti cancel culture, he is a hypocrite. >> can i just come in? >> yes. final word. >> yes. final word. >> you talked about people being cancelled. i mean, you have people as jk people as well known as jk rowling and othe

>> jeremy corbyn i have spoken to about jeremy corbyn's anti—semitism . anti—semitism. >> you a bad,u had a bad, i believe jeremy right jeremy corbyn deserves a right for bank account. unless the for a bank account. unless the police that jeremy corbyn police say that jeremy corbyn has broken he has has broken the law. he has a right for a bank account. just like i believe the media had a right to have a youtube account. >> you lend? jeremy? is >> did you lend? jeremy? this is the difference between the left and the right. >> would him money? >> would you lend him money? this the fundamental this is the fundamental difference between the left and the the right stand up the right. the right stand up for speech. stand for for free speech. we stand up for free speech. matter free speech. it doesn't matter whether left having said whether on the left having said he was anti cancel culture, he is a hypocrite. >> can i just come in? >> yes. final word. >> yes. final word. >> you talked about people being cancelled. i mean, you have people as jk people as well known as jk rowling and other

james schneider, former adviser to jeremy corbyn. neil hamilton , jeremy corbyn. broadcaster. fox, legendary dj and broadcaster . all fox, legendary dj and broadcaster. all right. i'm going to start actually with you actually, neil. neil, do the culture wars matter ? culture wars matter? >> well, they do, but it's not a zero sum game here. >> i don't think that the tories will win an election just by concentrating on culture wars. then they're not going to win the election anyway because the problem it's far problem with them is it's far too late for words . too late for words. >> the actions that they'll be judged by those that they've judged by are those that they've taken already , which have taken already, which have wrecked economy, wrecked the economy, for example, because of the covid lockdowns or things that lockdowns or or things that they've not done like exerting any kind of control over migration and loads of things they could have done to defend they could have done to defend the interests of free speech, for example. >> or let's just take the nigel f

>> well, the point >> well, this is the point because corbyn you had because under corbyn you had a loadow many would you say? >> 20, 30, 2030? >> i would have thought absolutely. who would have put the headbangers? >> absolutely. >> absolutely. >> he's going to to >> and he's going to have to deal those they could deal with those and they could hold the balance of power in a hung parliament. exactly or if it's small majority hung parliament. exactly or if it's they small majority hung parliament. exactly or if it's they smallthejority hung parliament. exactly or if it's they smallthe labour party, they will be the labour mps holding starmer. party, they will be the labour mps holding starmer . you mps who are holding starmer. you know , and they'll they'll push know, and they'll they'll push his agenda to the left won't they. >> yeah, they'll make challenges. isn't that a concern for you, sean. well you take nothing granted until nothing for granted until polling day comes and you know, until all those votes are counted. >> you do not know the you fancy a big majority, don't you? >> i t

vote labour under the corbyn leadership either in 2017 or 2019.goal and go back to the football analogy . i back to the football analogy. i think it is reasonable though not particularly inspiring , that not particularly inspiring, that keir starmer is steadying the ship . if he's allowing the ship. if he's allowing the conservatives to do his work for them, they're blowing themselves up. yes, i would like to see more policy, but for me a massive priority on this is that i want to see far less of the toxicity that has been encouraged by rishi sunak in the form of suella braverman, who he gets to his dirty work gets to do his dirty work talking invasion zones, talking about invasion zones, this obsession culture wars this obsession with culture wars . people vote generally on financial grounds , on on the financial grounds, on on the economics. people want to have poundsin economics. people want to have pounds in their pounds in their in their pockets. and just very quickly, if you read the times today, their main story was rishi sunak. he seems de

vote labour under the corbyn leadership either in 2017 or 2019.goal and go back to the football analogy . i back to the football analogy. i think it is reasonable though not particularly inspiring , that not particularly inspiring, that keir starmer is steadying the ship . if he's allowing the ship. if he's allowing the conservatives to do his work for them, they're blowing themselves up. yes, i would like to see more policy, but for me a massive priority on this is that i want to see far less of the toxicity that has been encouraged by rishi sunak in the form of suella braverman, who he gets to his dirty work gets to do his dirty work talking invasion zones, talking about invasion zones, this obsession culture wars this obsession with culture wars . people vote generally on financial grounds , on on the financial grounds, on on the economics. people want to have poundsin economics. people want to have pounds in their pounds in their in their pockets. and just very quickly, if you read the times today, their main story was rishi sunak. he seems de

corbyn stands know policy because it's killing us in lon corbyn stands kit.n where corbyn stands ona degree of infighting still carrying on in the labour party . a lot of disaffection party. a lot of disaffection from the left in the party, thinking that basically starmer is too right wing. he's almost too right wing for the left and too right wing for the left and too left wing for the right, and therefore doesn't seem to be therefore he doesn't seem to be really appealing. but then is sunak to wait sunak either. we'll have to wait and he performs and see how he performs this summer . summer. >> summer. >> thrown one thing up >> you've thrown one thing up for though, before let you for me though, before i let you 90, for me though, before i let you go, i noticed yesterday go, because i noticed yesterday we a of guests going we had a couple of guests going ulez, you said ulez. we ulez, and you just said ulez. we we've ulez is what we've been saying ulez is what is it? >> probably call it ulez. i don't know why i'm calling it ulez woman in the know. ulez you're a woman in the know. i

corbyn did it . for our voters. corbyn did it. clegg did it with tuition fees.heritance tax. this will play out, though, won't it? very well. in those blue wall areas, perhaps where tory voters, heartland voters, think about switching to the liberal democrats , the nimbys, liberal democrats, the nimbys, the greens, they can't compete on that. but is very on that. but this is very tempting to property owners. >> well, absolutely. it's a really interesting policy proposal. and let's just say at the it is that it the beginning it is only that it is proposal . all those is only a proposal. all those who are advocating it say that it could only happen when inflation comes down. and the prime himself prime minister himself is distancing so distancing himself from it. so we are at the very early stages of this conversation. but what's really it is really interesting about it is that that the that it shows that the government now trying government is now trying desperately to reach out to its core voters. these are people in the south of england whose properties are wor

there may be some people like jeremy corbyn who don't much like it, but in fact the heartland of thewith a good majority , which is what i think majority, which is what i think he will get , are people who he will get, are people who actually think he's talking sense. >> but the, the seats that were won by boris in 2019, in many of the northern seats and i'm the president of high peak conservative association so we are a key marginal seat in the north of england . they're north of england. they're actually more likely , according actually more likely, according to all the polls, to stay with the tories. and actually, one of the tories. and actually, one of the reasons is exactly what has just been said, what sean's been putting his fingers on, that they understand that if the economy badly run, if there's economy is badly run, if there's a spending goes completely haywire and suddenly there's a crackdown and taxes start to have to go up and so on, it's actually some of the poorest in society then have to pay. >> and but let me and they're worried about that. >> much prefer to >> they

corbyn.johnson himself, i mean, we looked at during his time, premiership, we time, during his premiership, we had tax burden since had the highest tax burden since the second world war. we had increasing amounts of immigration the immigration. we had the lockdowns, which effectively were in effective and we saw sort of a 3.2% reduction in mortality rates . and yet we saw mortality rates. and yet we saw all of the social costs. we saw children that weren't able to go to school. we saw people being mandated to have the vaccine . so mandated to have the vaccine. so actually, i think that when we're looking at the broader picture here, boris johnson was one of the worst prime ministers that we've had in country. that we've had in this country. he to he is he when it came to 2019, he is a fantastic election winner. he's incredibly charismatic. people love . even the few times love him. even the few times that our faces lit up. look, i mean, the few times i have met him, i've sort of told myself m

we can see this from when he supported corbyn. then he's completely anti corbyn.which must make his life very hard . his life very hard. >> we'll return to this at 1030, but up, what does ann but next up, what does ann widdecombe if she widdecombe think? if only she ruled the world. she's next papers at 1030. but right now , papers at 1030. but right now, let's talk about rishi sunak, who has promised drivers that he's on their side as he ordered a review of controversial anti car schemes being rolled out across britain. in an interview with the telegraph this weekend, the prime minister said the vast majority people are dependent majority of people are dependent on cars and that anti on their cars and that anti motorist policies fail to take account of how families live their lives. mr sunak has ordered the department for transport to carry out a review of so—called low traffic neighbourhoods , which often use neighbourhoods, which often use cameras. giant planters and bollards to turn away cars . so bollards to turn away cars. so could backing drivers and reject

it's jeremy corbyn. starmer. corbyn. good old starmer.nfair on on ago. so unfair on on on those and miss out on and they're going to miss out on opportunities country opportunities this country will miss don't think if you >> i don't think that if you improve system, you don't >> i don't think that if you improve the system, you don't >> i don't think that if you improve the system you don't >> i don't think that if you improve the system by u don't >> i don't think that if you improve the system by making the system that's well, taking improve the system by making the system from s well, taking improve the system by making the system from that well, taking improve the system by making the system from that because taking improve the system by making the system from that because theng improve the system by making the system from that because then in money from that because then in the what will happen is the end, what will happen is that down. so that system will go down. so instead it down, instead of taking it down, improving you're impr

of the corbyn era . the corbyn era. i mean. simon danczuk ex—labour mp , told me on this programme that there 20 to 30 hard left there are 20 to 30 hard left members of parliament on those back benches now if starmer gets a 100 seat majority, no problem . but if he's got a majority of five or 10 or 15, they will re—emerge and they will be quite influential . influential. >> yes, i mean, if you're looking at a small majority, any party in government that's got thatis party in government that's got that is going to have problems , that is going to have problems, i don't think that's the situation we're facing at the moment. i mean, what the by—election showed is that roughly the swing was about the same, same as the polls have been. so it's over 20. now, this would give keir starmer a huge majority , 80 so rishi sunak only majority, 80 so rishi sunak only hope really a reducing that is to go sooner rather than later. but of course he's not going to do that. he wants to remain prime minister as long as he c

of the corbyn era . the corbyn era. i mean. simon danczuk ex—labour mp , told me on this programme that there 20 to 30 hard left there are 20 to 30 hard left members of parliament on those back benches now if starmer gets a 100 seat majority, no problem . but if he's got a majority of five or 10 or 15, they will re—emerge and they will be quite influential . influential. >> yes, i mean, if you're looking at a small majority, any party in government that's got thatis party in government that's got that is going to have problems , that is going to have problems, i don't think that's the situation we're facing at the moment. i mean, what the by—election showed is that roughly the swing was about the same, same as the polls have been. so it's over 20. now, this would give keir starmer a huge majority , 80 so rishi sunak only majority, 80 so rishi sunak only hope really a reducing that is to go sooner rather than later. but of course he's not going to do that. he wants to remain prime minister as long as he c

we can see this from when he supported corbyn. then he's completely anti corbyn.which must make his life very hard . his life very hard. >> we'll return to this at 1030, but up, what does ann but next up, what does ann widdecombe if she widdecombe think? if only she ruled the world. she's next papers at 1030. but right now , papers at 1030. but right now, let's talk about rishi sunak, who has promised drivers that he's on their side as he ordered a review of controversial anti car schemes being rolled out across britain. in an interview with the telegraph this weekend, the prime minister said the vast majority people are dependent majority of people are dependent on cars and that anti on their cars and that anti motorist policies fail to take account of how families live their lives. mr sunak has ordered the department for transport to carry out a review of so—called low traffic neighbourhoods , which often use neighbourhoods, which often use cameras. giant planters and bollards to turn away cars . so bollards to turn away cars. so could backing drivers and reject

pierce corbyn let london live . steve corbyn let london live.chard hewison rejoin eu howling hope official monster raving loony party 77. joseph independent rebecca jane ukip enem nent christian alliance's people party and leo farage and independent ont okay gb views and listeners have probably already heard that of the farage banking fiasco. my gb news colleague nigel farage says he's now been denied accounts by nine separate banks . but now laws separate banks. but now laws which allow banks to close customers accounts over their political views are expected to be ditched by the government . be ditched by the government. it's been reported that the likes of jeremy hunt and kemi badenoch are looking into changing the law, which we only adopted as an eu regulation from when we were a member of the union . but joining me now is union. but joining me now is former adviser to the bank of england, roger gill, with the chief economic adviser to the centre for economic and business research , vicky pryce, and research, vicky pryce, and the director fo

certainly look at corbyn era.k at rachel and economist as rachel reeves and economist as shadow chancellor better. to go back your point. back to your point. >> my question back to >> my question to come back to my question who you put my question though, who you put in the party, if in there in the labour party, if you presumably you were because presumably everyone going everyone thinks labour are going to if we go with to win. okay. so if we go with that, who put in then that, who would you put in then for labour party? who for the labour party? who would be to his shoes? be able to fill his shoes? >> even answer the >> you can't even answer the question are question because there are because anyone. because there isn't anyone. there a paucity of there is such a paucity of talent on the front of the talent on the front bench of the labour party and if emily thornberry thornberry, labour party and if emily thoranho's thornberry, labour party and if emily thoranho's total|ornberry, labour party and if emily thora

there you go. >> day the third corbyn >> one day the third corbyn brother will emerge. will all really kick off anyway. we have apparently anyway. josh we have apparently bnbes anyway. josh we have apparently bribes hospital bribes to clear hospital queues by not by any means possible. not necessarily go, necessarily the way to go, according telegraph. according to the telegraph. >> no, i don't think paying >> no, i don't think so. paying hostels clear an x risk hostels to clear an x risk patient medical patient safety says medical chief. the whole point is chief. really the whole point is they clear the queues or they should clear the queues or keep allocated times and keep to the allocated times and whatnot because their whatnot because that's their job. the that they get this job. the idea that they get this bonus there's this pot of bonus and there's this pot of like 150 million that they can access they doing access because they are doing their seems somewhat their job seems somewhat ridiculous . their job seems somewhat ridiculous. but more than that, it's been po

no, corbyn is that, well, yeah. no, he does. he does.alise it yet, but you will in a minute. jacob and that is that you think the bbc is biased. you think they're the british bolshevik corporation, whereas he thinks it's full of wicked tories , so they must be doing tories, so they must be doing something right. but the real question is tell me which of their presenters has gone off to do a right wing podcast. it doesn't really matter. >> it's quite important because that's the reality of the bbc. all ones gone off, all the ones who've gone off, gone off. left wing. all the ones who've gone off, gori off. left wing. all the ones who've gone off, gori mean, left wing. all the ones who've gone off, gori mean, yes, wing. all the ones who've gone off, gori mean, yes, but|g. all the ones who've gone off, gori mean, yes, but i. all the ones who've gone off, gori mean, yes, but i mean, hang >> i mean, yes, but i mean, hang on. channel is not exactly on. this channel is not exactly a left wing, but we have a huge number of people. >> we've got t

this year. >> so in the wake of the last leadership in that period under the leadership of jeremy corbyneks and months that followed, the equalities and human rights commission announced that they were investigating the labour party . investigating the labour party. and there's a pretty damaging findings. it was a labour party under that leadership was found to have intimidated and harassed its jewish members . there was its jewish members. there was political interference that had come from the top and the labour party was put into special measures . party was put into special measures. this is normally a mechanism reserved for organisations that do really bad things. so it was , you know, things. so it was, you know, pretty, pretty traumatic i think, to the party to have been put in that place . people said, put in that place. people said, you know, that i must have had some sort of satisfaction that those findings were brought forward. but no , not at all. forward. but no, not at all. earlier this year, after a number of special measures and requirements that the labour party had to c

that if you'd been jeremy corbyn and whatever reason, and for whatever reason, he'd been , moved beenved, moved for political of a bank political grounds of a bank account from his bank. this would have been an absolute outcry and rightly, people would have furious that this have been furious that this could happen in britain and actually, when people i talk to people about this, they say, well, think that this well, we didn't think that this could happen in britain. this is the sort of thing you about the sort of thing you read about in times china or all in soviet times or china or all of this . and i think it really of this. and i think it really stirs people's indignation. >> one final thought on this, if i may. globally, through the european union laws coming into our laws and through our own compliance with fca and elsewhere, we all know there's a massive problem with the international drugs, trade laundering money. we know that's a huge problem and we want to take steps to prevent it. i think the anti—money laundering legislation that has been put in place in this country has b

been bigger the row would have been if he backed had been if the person he backed had been jeremy corbynowned by a tory government or we'd had a labour government or we'd had a labour government that banked nigel government that had banked nigel farage owning 38% that everyone would then have thought the politicisation of banking and perhaps this argument to end on an optimist note, means that we won't politicise banking and that banking will go back , back that banking will go back, back to being about actually making money. particularly important for back some of for natwest to pay back some of the it had from the taxpayer. >> absolutely. let's continue to his point. and francis coppola on newsnight was saying on on newsnight was saying natwest is a commercial organisation and it's a commercial decision. and that was the defence a lot of these people were using. it's all the commerciality. and was like, commerciality. and i was like, well, two here. well, there's two points here. first the first of all, natwest, the entire system hardly entire banking system is hardly truly commercial

the difference between me and jeremy corbyn is i've said sorry and i mean it.nd his comments about the politicisation and weaponisation of anti—semitism is still up. so, you know, he cannot make any serious or genuine claim that he's been apology poetic. it's just garbage and yes, momentum will, of course. and those on the hard left will of course attack me with this. they attack me for swearing when they tried to deselect me last time. i don't doubt they'll use it again. to members here again. and i go to members here and i just look at my track and i just say, look at my track record . look what you know from record. look what you know from day as mp this day one. as mp for this constituency. see my outreach surgeries in the mosques, my work on the most difficult estates . that's where i go. estates. that's where i go. that's where i place my effort in this constituency . and look in this constituency. and look at the people i've brought forward in the local party, including the only muslim hijab wearing councillor in southwark, is someone i got to join the l

that if you'd been jeremy corbyn and whatever reason, and for whatever reason, he'd been , moved beenved, moved for political of a bank political grounds of a bank account from his bank. this would have been an absolute outcry and rightly, people would have furious that this have been furious that this could happen in britain and actually, when people i talk to people about this, they say, well, think that this well, we didn't think that this could happen in britain. this is the sort of thing you about the sort of thing you read about in times china or all in soviet times or china or all of this . and i think it really of this. and i think it really stirs people's indignation. >> one final thought on this, if i may. globally, through the european union laws coming into our laws and through our own compliance with fca and elsewhere, we all know there's a massive problem with the international drugs, trade laundering money. we know that's a huge problem and we want to take steps to prevent it. i think the anti—money laundering legislation that has been put in place in this country has b

euros jeremy corbyn's three, _ to the questions.ght. it is not doablej right person fight. it is not doable unless you _ right person fight. it is not doable unless you have _ right person fight. it is not doable unless you have a _ right person fight. it is not doable unless you have a labour- right person fight. it is not doable - unless you have a labour government with its sleeves rolled up that is absolutely treating this as mission—critical. because otherwise, we will end up, at the moment we are subsidising energy bills, we can go on like that forever, we've got to have a longer term solution and that is clean power by 2030. cheaper bills, next generation ofjobs and energy independence are worth fighting for. energy independence are worth fighting for-— energy independence are worth fiaahtin for. . ~ , . fighting for. thank you very much, indeed. fighting for. thank you very much, indeed- you _ fighting for. thank you very much, indeed. you did _ fighting for. thank you very much, indeed. you did use _ fighting for. thank you

the same way keir starmer was criticised for trying to present himself as somebody who is notjeremy corbyn on his five pledges. it looks from the conversations we have had with serve mps, they're turning more to other issues that they think they can own, the wedge issues, where they can try and show more of a divide with labour. the problem they will face of course is whether or not those are really the issues that voters think are important. that is where i think are important. that is where i think as we get closer to conservative party conference we will hear more from rishi sunak about the things he wants to push. do they cut through as were, are they important? salma, we can look at the front—pages broadly here. the times has rishi sunak aims to divide and rule after poll set back and cites migrant boats and transrights being the issues. tories to rein in green pledges after by—election carnage. we have had lord frost and jacob rees mogg on that theme. do aco ees 0 on a eme. 0 b r m gg th tth d you jacob rees mogg on that theme. do you think that will be enough? there is a dancer you

it was a lot to do with corbyn was and with how toxic corbyn was and also about being also just worriedarty gone. >> well, this this also >> well, this this policy also seems communism. seems it seems like communism. >> china had the >> you know, china had the one child feels very similar. >> the two child policy is very similar. better similar. we're going one better than them. >> you f.- f..- >> but you know, you don't get don't get the benefit discouraged. >> all right. let's have a quick look this important look at this very important story look at this very important st0|yeah, nerds versus aliens. so >> yeah, nerds versus aliens. so this is anonymous. know if you remember they sort remember them. yeah, they sort of hack of they've managed to hack church and church of scientology and various corporations and whatnot. they're saying they're going this all this going after all this all this stuff about aliens now and i don't know if you've noticed, but there's definitely been more has recent . and has been coming out recent. and i've got friend of mine who's i've got a friend of mine

piers corbyn candidates _ you. that's interesting. piers corbyn candidates over- you. much. good evenina. likely won't change much. good evening- can — likely won't change much. good evening- can i— likely won't change much. good evening. can i have _ likely won't change much. good evening. can i have all- likely won't change much. good evening. can i have all the - evening. can i have all the candidates please in the room onto the stage _ candidates please in the room onto the stage here, if you'd like to come — the stage here, if you'd like to come down this and onto the stage. a bucket or burn i think it is, isn't it? ——or bin. all the candidates gathering there. it is going to take a while to herd 17 candidates onto the stage to give the results because there will be read out in a political order, but here we go. read out in a political order, but here we 90-— read out in a political order, but here we no. . . . here we go. ladies and gentlemen, i, llo d here we go. ladies and gentlemen, i, lloyd white. — here we go. ladies and gentlemen, i, lloyd white, acting _ h

there is england's representation on the barbados side with the corbyn sisters representing them in thisnd will want a winning start here tonight-— scotland will want a winning start here tonirht. ., . , . here tonight. catherine, many thanks indeed in cape _ here tonight. catherine, many thanks indeed in cape town _ here tonight. catherine, many thanks indeed in cape town for— here tonight. catherine, many thanks indeed in cape town for us. - here tonight. catherine, many thanks indeed in cape town for us. britain i indeed in cape town for us. britain had won their second gold at the world aquatics championship. with the men's 4 by 200 metres team adding a world title to their olympic gold. that was in tokyo. today was in fukuoka. after strong opening legs from duncan scott, the 200m individual medley silver medallist, and 200m freestyle champion matt richards, veteranjames guy edged in front to give tom dean the responsibility of bringing the british quartet home. dean — who finished second to richards in the individual event — did exactly that. pulling away from american kieran smith

but i stand jeremy corbyn today. but i stand by srsrytotot— jeremy corbyn today. youtube. we supported down by youtube. we supported you tstuss— down by youtube. we supported you because we— down by youtube. we supported you because we know that's troporttot— you because we know that's troporttot .— you because we know that's important. but— you because we know that's important. but it's not about pottttstt— important. but it's not about our political-it's- important. but it's not about our political it's about our political views. it's about trsstoro— our political views. it's about trsstoro ot— our political views. it's about freedom of speech. but that tosso-t—tt- freedom of speech. but that. doesn't—it comes freedom of speech. but that- doesn't_it comes to doesn't happen when it comes to the doesn't happen when it comes to tos—sstottts- doesn't happen when it comes to the—scandals thati the left and these scandals that are the left and these scandals that otppsotot— the left and these scandals that are happening-the— are happening in the conservative are happe

, jeremy corbyn is gone. saying, look, jeremy corbyn is gone .te, sensible labour party. tony blair won three elections. lest we forget . so maybe we can lest we forget. so maybe we can learn a few things from this guy and to be seen sharing a platform with him, he thinks. >> i think he's wrong. mrs. those are gone. those days are gone. >> elections the tories >> elections and the tories eventually sharing eventually stopped sharing a platform it because it platform with it because it wasn't me good or it's wasn't doing me any good or it's going bad. >> that's almost >> well, that's almost as if labour couldn't forgive tony blair all the blair for making all the compromises and the concessions that to win that he needed to do to win three but now that's three elections. but now that's changing. they've had their time three elections. but now that's ch oppositioney've had their time three elections. but now that's ch opposition and had their time three elections. but now that's ch opposition and they their time three elections. but now that's ch o

but i stand jeremy corbyn today. but i stand by eweryrhhhg— jeremy corbyn today.ou because we know that's hrheerrahr .— you because we know that's important. but— you because we know that's important. but it's not about eehhrheah— important. but it's not about our political views. it's about rreeaerh— our political views. it's about rreeaerh er— our political views. it's about freedom of speech. but that aeeeh-r— freedom of speech. but that. doesn't—comes freedom of speech. but that- doesn't_comes to doesn't happen when it comes to the doesn't happen when it comes to rhe—eeaheahe- doesn't happen when it comes to the—scandals thati the left and these scandals that are—h— the left and these scandals that are—h rhe— are happening in the conservative are happening in the- conservative - now. are happening in the conservative-now. mean, conservative party now. i mean, in conservative party now. i mean, he herme— conservative party now. i mean, in terms nigel farage, in terms of nigel farage, i think if his bank account has been shut for his political been shut down for