corey lewandowski, a private citizen at that point, sat him down in the oval office and told him to take dictation. corey, write this down. told him to write down a message that was essentially a draft statement that he wanted attorney general jeff sessions to deliver. that draft statement he wanted jeff sessions to deliver would have jeff sessions announcing that he was unrecusing himself from the russia investigation, he was taking over control of the special counsel's investigation, and he was directing mueller that he could no longer look at anything that happened in the 2016 election. instead, mueller henceforth must only look at future crimes. he must only look at crimes that russia might commit against future american elections that hadn't happened yet. but all of 2016, that's no longer what mueller is looking at. now, as the mueller report describes, lewandowski got this direction from the president. wrote it all down and then actually did take action to try to reach jeff sessions to deliver that message. they ultimately never got together and corey lewandowski never delivered hi

corey lewandowski told the president, he understood what the president wanted sessions to do. write this down, corey. i've got a great idea! the redacted report goes to to explain that he doesn't deliver this message to jeff sessions. he tries. he makes an appointment with jeff sessions. jeff sessions cancels and lewandowski doesn't know what to do. he puts the thing that he dictated from trump in a safe. one thing we know in this report is that lots of people around president trump not only have safes at home. they use them whenever the president asks them to do manage that seems lowell. he gives the message to a locked safe. the president calls him back in for a one-on-one meeting. did you tell sessions? they have another meeting where the president asks corey lewandowski to deliver it again or else. and the or else is genius. back to the report. in the follow-up meeting, in the july 19 meeting with lewandowski, the president raised his previous qu and asked if lewandowski had talked on sessions. he told the president the message would be dhifrd soon, the president then told

corey lewandowski agreed to do it. a meeting for the following night, the report says lewandowski wanted to pass the message to sessions in person rather than over the phone for didn't want to meet at the department of justice because he did not want a public log of his visit and did not want sessions to have an advantage over him by meeting on what lewandowski described as sessions upon serious turf. that meeting never happen because sessions canceled at the last moment. again, president trump asked lewandowski, what happened. lewandowski told him his message to sessions would be delivered soon. lewandowski even try to pass it off to then deputy white house chief of staff rick dearborn, according to reports the message raised an eyebrow and he recalled not asking where it came from oregon think about doing anything with it. he recalled earlier telling lewandowski that he handled the situation, but he did not actually follow through. how did the special counsel interpret those actions? the report said the president's e

well, joining us now, corey lewandowski and david bossie gentlemen great to have you here >> thank you. lou: let me start, corey your reaction today as we heard the attorney general of the united states say there was spying. >> look i'm relieved that someone has acknowledged this now. i'm pleased that he's going to launch the investigation to find out what happened but i'm also frightened about what they did to members of our team, the government, spied on us, on domestic spoil, because they didn't like our politics, it's not some nebulous group this is corey lewandowski and david bossie our friends, our families , the trumps, their families and friends, all because -- lou: and god knows how many others. >> and how many others and they did it because they didn't like our politics and lou we asked the president about this some time ago and he said very clearly, he believes this went all the way to the top of the previous administration, this didn't stop at ben roads or some other low level underling. barack obama knew about this and he authorized about it and was complicit or implicit a

more next and the man who help john to get to the white house corey lewandowski and the corey lewandowski and the president's response in a ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ jeanine . >> attorney general did a great disservice to the country to misrepresent significant parts of the mueller report. attempting to put a positive spin toward the president on the special counsel's findings. with the attorney general gives the perception they fully cooperated when he didn't provided all the information and materials when they didn't and the president deprived the special counsel of his own verbal testimony that misleads the american people. jeanine: that is adam schiff attacking attorney general bar's character. now we go to the campaign manager corey lewandowski. hears what bothers me. the attorney general has a disservice to misrepresent significant parts of the mueller report. first, it is for the attorney general he did not even have to release it. number two the attorney general makes the decision ultimately asked to obstruction because mueller could not do that himself so it is amazing he has been jumping

jeanine: thank you for being with us tonight corey lewandowski.adio show host from judicial watch standing by next. one report and two very different takes. and then our political panel ready to debate the mueller report and what happens next on capitol h to reach a firm conclusion. now back to "justice with judge jeanine". jeanine. >> with considerable evidence of obstruction of justice is what mueller is saying laying that out to congress to pursue that. but attorney general bar took it upon himself to clear the president. it is not up to him we need the whole report including the underlying documents unredacted. jeanine: no collusion or obstruction but the mueller report thinks that congress wants to pick up obstruction of justice on its own democrats are laser focus to find wrongdoing by the president but should congress allow endless investigations? former aide to chuck schumer. this is interesting to listen to jerry nadler say there is considerable evidence but if there was considerable evidence why don't you tell me why robert mueller indic

jeanine: thank you for being with us tonight corey lewandowski.io show host from judicial watch standing by next. one report and two very different takes. and then our political panel ready to debate the mueller report and what happens next on capitol hill. don't go away. t so much in retu. join our family of home instead caregivers and help make a world of difference. home instead senior care. apply today. home instead senior care. when it comes to the quality of our cars: the highest. it's why only 1 in 10 cars we look at qualify to sell on our site. if it's been in a reported accident, we won't sell it. and at our state-of-the-art facilities our ase certified mechanics roll up their sleeves and get to it. inspecting, dialing-in, and fine tuning every single car inside and out, bringing all of it up to our high standards. by the time we're done, our cars are beyond "certified." they're carvana certified. so whether you have it delivered or pick it up, we do it all so you can rest easy. live from america's news headquarters a florida man is under

corey lewandowski is very uncomfortable with following the president's order on that, and ultimatelychief of staff, rick dearborn. somebody was very involved with the campaign. and he says, "you tell sessions. i don't want to tell sessions." according to the report by mueller, white house official rick dearborn was directed to deliver it. dearborn was uncomfortable with the task did not follow through. there are repeated times here when mcgann, corey lewandowski, they are directed by the president to do something that would have interfered. >> bill: what you describe as you can have a buffet at anyone in the room. but if you don't act and they don't ask, where's the crime? >> chris: executive. that's the point. had they then gone ahead and done some of these things, we might be in a different place. but perhaps they saved the president from themselves but moments when he was blowing hot. you can argue in his defense, when these things didn't happen he didn't pursue them. so it's an interesting kind of dynamic inside the white house. but there seems to be a lot of times when the presi

now if you remember, corey lewandowski has never worked in the trump administration. so the president was turning to someone outside of the government who he thought may be loyal to him and could help continue to pressure sessions, who the president was going after publicly, who he was asking privately to get him to unrecuse, the president was holding over him a resignation letter that sessions had given him. and here's corey lewandowski who has gone in and met with mueller and given up these details and is being used by mueller to tell the story of obstruction. and if you're the president and you look at that and think, man i thought a guy like corey was loyal to me but obviously there he gave up a lot to the investigators. >> someone else the president may or may not have found loyal is don mcghan, his former white house counsel who has an instantly famous quote we've been talking about all day. mcgahn was asked to do crazy bleep, referenced saturday night massacre. mcgahn's clear recollection was the president directed him to tell rod rosenstein that conflicts exis

at the time, corey lewandowski did not work for the president.ver been part of the conversation. >> right. >> so technically, the president of the united states called up a private citizen. >> right. >> and said, can you call the attorney general of the united states of america and influence him. that's like me calling you and saying, you got jeff sessions on tv later tonight, can you hit him up with "x." that's crazy. think about that in terms of national security. >> and he's not the only one. corey lewandowski is thought of someone who often thought of doing the president's bidding. don mcgahn threatened to resign after the president asked him to do crazy -- using a word i can't use on tv. and then jeff sessions recused himself from the investigation and deputy attorney general rod rosenstein, he refused to hold a press conference at trump's direction to take responsibility himself for the firing of james comey. so interesting that in all of these -- the report is very, very clear about this. donald trump asked a lot of people to do things tha

including corey lewandowski.eport said he was asked to recap the probe and he knew it wasn't a good idea. author of team of vipers. 500 days in the trump white house. this reporting about people not following the president's orders is actually sworn system given to robert mueller. is it consistent with what you saw or heard in your time in the white house? >> i write a little bit about this in team of vipers. there's two types of presidential orders. one is the type that you follow immediately. the second is the type that you kind of see if he brings it back up again later on and most of the times these things were like not the more serious directives. there's a keen in the book where the president says he wants to do the fake news awards. it's the first time he brought that up as a concept. to laughed about it and didn't hear anything about it and brought it back up again and he was more serious about it. we did kind of have it at one point. and i think it's more often what happens is not that someone disobeys a

corey lewandowski wants no part of this. he hands it off to rick dearborn, another person in the white house who had worked in the campaign. he doesn't want any part of it. the special counsel argues one of the reasons there may not have been obstruction of just thinks is because some of the people around the president refused to do what he ordered them to do, so mueller wasn't removed, the investigation wasn't stopped and the attorney general didn't take back control of the situation. it wasn't because the president didn't ask it. it's because a number of the top people refused to do what the president was asking them to do. >> shepard: but that doesn't absolve the president. it's the asking that is the wrong thing to do. >> well, i don't know. >> shepard: i didn't say if it's criminal. it's not what you're supposed to do. >> shepard: certainly not what you're supposed to do. whether or not that's a basis for a criminal prosecution, evidently the attorney general says no. whether it's the basis for impeachment, that's a pol

relates to corey lewandowski, june 19th, 2017. where the president called him into the office, dictated a message to lewandowski, and told him to tell sessions that he should publicly announce the investigation was, quote, very unfair, and let him move forward with the investigation, the investigation election meddling for future elections. in other words, get off 2016 and look to the future. that's an instance of a president trying to get an aide to instruct his sitting attorney general to stop investigating this, interestingly, corey lewandowski handed that off to rick dearborn, and he refused to do it. like the mcgahn example, the president instructed, they refused to follow through, which should be confidence indicing, but it's another incident we know about of an attempt to allegedly obstruct. >> let's go back to the moment in which robert mueller states it is a fact that president trump called don mcgahn, then the white house counsel, and says fire robert mueller. fire the special counsel. now, mcgahn ultimately does not fir

lou: two we'll wh people who wee at the time, corey lewandowski and david bossie, their remarks. >> he president about this some time ago he said clearly, he believes this went all the way to the top of previous administration, it did not stop at ben rhodes, barack obama knew about it, he authorized it, he was either complicit, i am happy attorney general barr is seeking into this. >> corey lewandowski is happy, tens of millions of american are happy could your thoughts about attorney general's announcement that we'll now have an investigation? >> i think most of us have a look on our face when senator shaheen had on her face, you don't think he was spied othat is what attorney general said, yes, i do, a look on her face as if she was frozen in amber for last two years, yes, we -- now it said but the timing is important. after everything we have experienced, attorney general saying that bluntly, we know that it was a hoax. we know that it -- >> special counsel investigation. >>ious dossie yes, dossier and l that, i don't like what happened over last two year, attorney general barr i th

where he basically said you know a lot of trump's mandates to his staff rob porter apparently corey lewandowsky and others were just not acted upon because the staff knew that this would get the administration an extremely hot water so the irony here is that he actually has a staff that's really looking out for his best interest the question is a question of intent as as i think you have been in and others you know would end with. does it become a prosecutable offense and i think that what we're looking at here and this has been indicated in some of the footnotes in the report is that this is something that basically muller said this is something for congress to look at well is that what we're going to see now i mean mulder is going to testify today we heard the attorney general say he can do that right i'm not against that let's say he goes to congress and testifies and then it's up to congress to decide what to do i mean the document the report is no longer just a legal document it's now a political document right impeachment itself is political not legal right so there are two avenues that t

joining me right now, former trump 2016 campaign manager corey lewandowski. elcome back to the show. >> thank you for having me back. trish: i know that you, you deserve -- i think you deserve -- to know whether or not the obama administration wanted you spied on when you were running the trump campaign. what do you think? >> you know, trish, they didn't just spy on in the nebulous group of people who were running a campaign, they spied on me and my friends, the trumps, their family, their friends. anybody associated with the presidential campaign, because they didn't like the politics of us, they didn't like the way that donald trump delivered a message. they were so afraid that donald trump was going to win the presidency that they started to spy on americans on domestic soil and get applications and warrants against us because they wanted to make sure donald trump never won. and after he won, they continued spying because we know the final fisa application was signed after donald trump was sworn in as the president of the united states. so that spying conti

give us a sense of how the president was operating. >> the president wanted corey lewandowski to deliver this message to jeff sessions to unrecuse and try to limit the scope of the operation, and lewandowski, an outside adviser to the president didn't feel he was comfortable and didn't feel it was his place and didn't have an official job in the white house and didn't follow through and took it over to rick dearborn who was working in the white house and tried to get him to deliver the session to jeff sessions and rick dearborn didn't feel comfortable and tnts understand what was going on and decided not to deliver the message and you see the theme over and over again in the report, and the president dig stating what stating, dictating what he wants done to advisers inside the white house and outside the white house and they don't follow through on it. >> and asking deputy attorney general rod rosenstein to fire james comey was rosenstein's idea and the report says that night, the white house press conference called the department of justice and said the white house wanted to put out a s

at this moment, the former 2016 campaign manager corey lewandowski is going to be here and he says it's time for the country to start taking accountability. that needs to happen now. and attorney general barr will testify in front of the house judiciary committee this after jerry nadler says he want staff attorneys to be part of the questioning. one member on that committee, andy biggs, is here and he's going to weigh in. a and he will tell is what rod rosenstein's resignation means for the justice department. >>.>>> what he's actually asking for from you, from me and everyone else in america. "trustrish regan primetime" begs now. >>> tonight, porous borders are big business with major growth trajectories. this is what you call like a growth stock, right? and it's growing for the criminal cartels that are choosing to exploit our border. the going rate for one single migrant is 7,000 dollars. they can get anywhere up to 10, 10 grand is what some coyotes are charging the migrants for an armed escort across the texas or arizona border. you know, it's such a big business that the coyotes ar

some of their motivation from don mcgahn, casey mcfarland, corey lewandowski. i don't know if altruism and their own moral compass or self-preservation that they knew what the president was asking them to do in terms of getting rid of robert mueller, if they just knew that it would get them into trouble, but you just hear it time and again p don -- reince priebus testified, the first chief of staff testifies that don mcgahn told him the president is trying to get me to do crazy stuff. i mean, priebus said that president asked him to do crazy blank but mcgahn did not tell him the specifics because mcgahn was trying to protect priebus from what he did not need to know. that is a theme time and again. could this have gone very differently had they not been those guardrails? >> absolutely, alison. one of the silver linings of this story is that our institutions held. a lot of the people around the president were able to see themselves in a larger context than just serving the president minute by minute whims. they were able to see the bigger picture. our systems of

that's the case, and mueller goes into great detail, tell that don began, tell this one come corey lewandowski, then explain to our viewers why there is no, in your mind, obstruction here? >> the key part of obstruction, which mueller could not nail down, did the president, when he executed his congressional prerogatives which on their face are in the president's power, did he have some kind of corrupt motive? is not just department policy that you can indict a sitting president so this is where i think he went too far. if you read to the end of the report, he has a lengthy section that seizes power from the attorney general and tries to say, i'm going to interpret the president's constitutional powers the a way the justice department has never before and i'm going to be able to show that even the president is using his constitutional authority to remove law informing officers, which no one disputes, i can still make crime out of it if he has the wrong state of mind. i have a great deal of respect for him, but his team went too far and actually took away part of attorney general barr's preroga

was wrong because he tried to get people who had no business firing his attorney general like corey lewandowski on the message to him, lou lewandowski passed it to an aide who had no business of firing the attorney general, and this is a pattern of the president trying to outsource things that he doesn't want his finger prints on, and this is in the report, where mueller thought that maybe the president thought that he was breaking the law in some cases and was trying to hide that, and maybe he wasn't actually breaking the law but the president might have thought he was. i thought that was extraordinary that he knew that this was not right, and was trying to hide it. i think it does speak in some ways to his mindset and his motivation for doing it, and i think that probably speaks to the people who think he should have been charged. if you don't think you're obstructing justice, you're not going to try to hide the activities that you're doing that seem like obstruction of justice. >> that was very interesting to see the various people who for whatever reason, maybe they have a moral compass, ma

attorney general jeff sessions refused to unreduce himself and corey lewandowski, the former campaignto tell sessions to tell mueller to limit the scope of his inquiry when trump told him to, just to name a few of trump's orders that aides disobeyed. if they had been carried out perhaps mueller would have made the call on whether the president obstructed justice instead of punting that decision to attorney general bill barr and then we might be talking about a very different forecast for the president's future right now. >>> to impeach or not to impeach. this is the dilemma that's facing divide democrats. in a letter to her connection house speaker nancy pelosi tried to tamp down the impeachment talk but some 2020 candidates say the house should go ahead. >> i believe congress should take the steps towards impeachment. >> there is no political inconvenience exception to the united states constitution. if any other human being in this country had done what is documented in the mueller report, they would be arrested and put in jail. >> the impeachment proceedings are up to the house. th

trump's efforts to enlist corey lewandowski provides a new window into how far the president went in trying to hold back the special counsel. the episode which discomfited some of trump's most loyal advisors was read by some legal observers as one of the clearest cases laid out of mueller's report of potential obstruction of justice by the president, but chuck, i'm not being snide, what do we do with information like this? it's been the question really for the past seven days after all of that was served up to us by the special counsel. >> right. we're still digesting it and it's not clear what we do. i mean, as voters, we'll have an opportunity to do something with it in 2020. the congress has the constitutional authority to do something with it right now and quite frankly, every sitting president becomes a former president and so conceivably, former president can be charged while a sitting president cannot, brian. i think there is a useful exercise here. if you were to read volume 2 of the report, the part that's about obstruction and take out the name trump and take out the title

book last year where he said that a lot of trump scuba mandates to his staff to rob porter and corey lewandowski and others were not acted on because the staff knew that this would get the administration in hot water. the irony here is that he has a staff of is looking out for his interests. the question is a question of intent. when does it become a cross -- prosecutable offense question mark but we are looking at here and has been indicated in some of the footnotes is that this is something that mueller said this is something for congress to look into. >> let's say that mueller goes to congress and testifies and then it is up to congress to decide what to do. it's now a political document. impeachment itself is political and not legal. >> there are two avenues this will take. one is the political avenue to do with congress and the other is the prosecutions that could occur by the new york state attorney general, or in the southern district of new york. one of the glaring omissions from the report has been trump's finances and the state of his finances. there is some speculation that a lot of t

these people incredibly close to the president and corey lewandowski, says they were told to meddle in the investigation, do things to stop the investigation, and they refused to do so. >> right. but you see this time and time again with president trump. you're close to him until you say something that he finds unflattering about him and/or rerealizes he can't control you or what you say, and in the case of don mcgahn and a lot of other people who spoke to the special counsel. they told the truth and told the narrative the way they saw it so now they are no longer close. >> think about the people that are out there that might turn to their neighbor and say did you know that the special counsel didn't interview anybody who was close to the president's campaign? >> that's why it's our job to call out the facts, number one and i would urge anybody out there, fine, it read it yourself. don't believe anybody else. the words quoted by the people who were pretty close to the president. what part -- you made the point, the president's political argumenting is to try to convince everybody there

corey lewandowski because called by the president and said take down this message. aid don, i want you to fire robert mueller is he conflicted. mcgahn didn't do it. he was to the point he was going to quit if he was forced. to say did those two people save the president. >> look, these are the room nations of a president frustrated. he is being investigated for a crime he didn't do. and didn't even exist. and so the fact that he said fire sessions, resign. and it wasn't done, he knew it wasn't being done. and it wasn't done. and he could have done it anyway. brian: there is a lot of questions out there. democrats might say this is an opportunity to start bringing don mcgahn back and robert mueller. see if there is enough to hurt the president or impeach the president. what do you recommend. >> my experience in '98 is when it's over it's over. we spent two years on this. of the tolerance of the public to go forward is limited. maybe this is going to be a structural problem that you've got two people who head committees who are nobodies unless they go out every day and

tomorrow night on show, texas republican congressman michael burgess and corey lewandowski. and you. >> good evening everybody. i'm david asman if for lou dobbs. the national security crisis at our southern border worsening by the day. top officials confirming that smugglers and the cartels know that u.s. immigration laws are weak, so they exploit them. the mexican side of the border is controlled by these dangerous thugs, yet the radical dems ignoring the crisis calling for open borders. president trump's say the left immigration agenda endangers our nation. >> nothing is more dangerous than the democrats crazy immigration agenda. their entire party has been taken over by far left radicals who want to nullify and erase american borders. they want open borders. david: tonight we take a look at the crisis at the border with a man who has spent his career on the front lines. national border patrol council president brandon judd joining us tonight. president trump's fight for border security coming as he dodges the endless attempts to undermine his presidency. deep staters jame

corey lewandowski, don mcgahn, or who were making a principled stance.ike don mcgahn had that to actually resign. but, those people are -- i mean, corey lewandowski is probably still involved, but don mcgahn is gone. >> well, not just those two. also gone are general kelly, general mattis. >> mcmaster. >> mcmaster, cohn, all of these people left concluding that the president of the united states is incapable of being entrusted with the centuries of the united states. and it goes back to these questions of lying, contempt for law, and actual ignorance of policy where the united states has played a role in the world and what the role of the united states has been in the world during the service of colonel peters and others. they concluded that the president of the united states was somehow incapable of acting in a national interest. and so you saw the same thing with mattis, with tillerson, et cetera, et cetera, that you see happening with the counsel to the president of the united states. they do not trust the president of the united states, even though t

the first campaign manager, corey lewandowski, another campaign manager, paul manafort, the deputy campaign manager, rick gates, steve bannon, and even the president's son-in-law and now senior adviser jared kushner, twice. so the idea that they didn't speak to anyone who was high ranking on the campaign or very familiar with the campaign is just simply not true. because they actually had extensive interviews with a lot of these people that worked on the campaign. >> so who's he talking about? kellyanne conway? >> there were a few people who weren't interview, but there were an extensive amount of interviews this is based off of. so if the president is trying to frame it that the people who were interviewed are simply people who don't like him, like don mcgahn, it's just simply not the case. >> jen psaki, let me ask you about rudy giuliani latest thing where he told me yesterday that, you know, it's not wrong to accept information from the russians. you know, depending on what it is. that strikes me as a jarring comment. what was your reaction? >> incredibly jarring. i mean, if you read the

what about corey lewandowski, former campaign manager? he's mentioned in the mueller report for trying to urge the president have attorney general sessions limit the probe.at the house judiciary outlook? karoun: you saw them prepare five subpoenas for mcgahn, for hope hicks. this was the opening salvo we t were goio see and he's issued one of those which is for gahn so he's charted the macro plan for what the full map might be but he said he could go beyond that, but what the ening targets are. if he's going to grow that number of people thate will h to go through subpoena processes, potential court battles, he'll have to move quickly to move throughnough people to get to the stage of the court battles in order to make a decision down the line if this is going to lead to inything that looks like impeachment proce because there's pressure on jerry nadler to do that from the progressive left side of the democratic party. of course leaders don't want to go there unless ty have evidence but they have to replicate much of's muell investigation

he then went to corey lewandowski, who didn't even work in the white house, but had been part of his campaign, and asked him and had him dictate a message that he wanted jeff sessions to read to un-recuse himself. so why do you have these big discrepancies? we've been inside the justice department, talking to officials after some of this fire has died down, to say, so, what gives? why did the attorney general say that obstruction was just something that robert mueller couldn't prove? and they say that one thing that's key here is that they say that the office of legal counsel opinion, which sounds wonky, but really does matter here, that opinion that says that you can't indict a sitting president was one factor, but not the only factor that robert mueller included in his consideration not to charge the president with obstruction. and so today we heard very careful wording from the attorney general in that unprecedented press conference, when he said he would not -- he asked robert mueller if he would charge with obstruction if not more that loc opinion and he would "no." but there we

and running the trump campaign, it was pretty much trump, corey lewandowski, and hope hicks. >> right >> jared kushner was back new york pretending not to be related to trump until he's about to lock up the nomination, and suddly, ivanka and jared move in and say, "okay. --'s corey or us." >> so, fast-forwar >> so, presidency is not what he campaigned on. >> rht. so that gets us to t point of, "how do you feel he's doing now?" because you've said the president is an idiot. you've called him the biggest wimp. >> yes. >> you don't think it's going so well. >> no. i mean, i wish he'd readi "iadios, a!" again. i mean, look, we did trust him. i trusted him. the angel moms trusted him.ou >>aid you'd give a two-time divorcée a one-time pass. >> that's right. don't expect i it was the basket of issues. if either -- i loved when the republican party -- the official republican party came out against trump -- i mean, all of them did over a over and over again, it really -- for the first time, it crystallized for m and, you know, maybe i'm an idiot. other people have said this. i always thought t

house attorney donegan who refused to make steps to file by or rather the special prosecutor and corey lewandowsky his former campaign manager who wouldn't go to jeff sessions and do what the president wanted so the president benefited from the fact that staff would not follow through in terms of what he was asking them to do. that in your resell thank you so much christensen is in new york taking a closer look now at some of the fallout from the moller investigation has sparked a range of separate worries for the u.s. president. robert muller did not charge president trump with the crime his inquiry did help trigger however several new and wide ranging investigations related to the president's business practices as well as his presidency including some right here at federal court in new york new york is just one of a half dozen federal state and city jurisdictions conducting their own often overlapping investigations one centers on alleged hush money payments to two women including stormy daniels by the president's former personal attorney in the final weeks of his campaign another looks at how h

and did not fire bob mueller as he asked corey lewandowski according to mueller's report and don mcgahn to do. >> you can make that argument. however if that were only reason that he was saved, then there would have been a different conclusion reached by and in the report. in circumstance of totality. >> is there enough leverage for democrat, as a band i were discussing, live cliff to parade wenwitness after witness. taylor testimony. that donald trump has to go, we within wait until election of 2020. >> i would say no, that is what this respect was about, trying to -- report was about, digging in and finding the facts in case, is it not time for democrats to move on, there are so many other things to focus on, endless debt and war. >> they love that. very few people defend civil liberties this day. do you think matt that democrats will try to develop this national consensus by the sam ervin model of went after witness. -- witness after witness. >> we don't live in that world. i don't think in our partisan -- we have right now we have that. i think we'll see a lot of witness after witne

but trump's meeting with corey lewandowski. [cheering and applause] mueller really understands great tv. frustration turns to oppression and they will go through this report and try to look for a daily position to hang the trump the trying to prove the earth is flat or the moon landing was fake. what would be a good prank? announced another less redacted report in three weeks just to watch them fall for this a third time. you keep doing this for years. bottom line, press wanted americans president to be arrested dude even if that destroy the country. don't expect them to stop they will push the mueller hysteria because what else do they have? it up prosperous peaceful era with low implement, economical, strong military and the media can't do a thing with that so everyday on cnn or emissivity is a therapy session, collusion anonymous. they have to talk about it every day because if they don't they might do something horrible like wake up one day in 2020 and god for bid, vote for trump. [cheering and applause] greg: let's welcome