thank you. >> corey smith, san francisco housing coalition. generally supportive, but a few amendments we would like to see. eliminate all conditional use requirements altogether. san francisco all housing is necessary and desirable, especially housing that is dense along transportation corridors. we want to support commercial corridors need more sensity and requesting that we get rid of demolition controls. there is ground floor retail with residential above and we would be able to open up a lot more housing if we were able to capitalize. there are plenty of strong rates of return and moving fees to make sure that no one is getting evicted or displaced. [please stand by]

. >> corey smith, san francisco housing coalition. generally supportive, but a few amendments we would like to see. eliminate all conditional use requirements altogether. san francisco all housing is necessary and desirable, especially housing that is dense along transportation corridors. we want to support commercial corridors need more sensity and requesting that we get rid of demolition controls. there is ground floor retail with residential above and we would be able to open up a lot more housing if we were able to capitalize. there are plenty of strong rates of return and moving fees to make sure that no one is getting evicted or displaced. [please stand by] [bell ringing] >> hi, supervisors, christie wong. thanks for the opportunity to weigh in on this proposal. we've strongly supported this program since supervisor tang first introduced it in 2015. and we think we believe the intention has been for home sf to be a local attraction. unfortunately, there has been a lack of demand for the program, perhaps due to the affordability

. >> good afternoon, supervisors, corey smith, on bee hall of the san francisco coalition action. in the sake of brevity, we share a lot of the same concerns with state law. as somebody who has not an attorney, a plain reading of it, we're potentially going to be outside of compliance for a long time. the city of san francisco has operated and operated like they didn't care can with what the state of california said that they were supposed to do. we saw another state density project headed to soma. we will not get the opportunity to use a local program with more inclusionary housing. more housing is good, but we can get affordable by design, lowercase a, affordable housing. we want to be sure we're good to go in regards to the state of california. thank you. >> afternoon. jennifer fever, san francisco tenants universiounion. i'm changing my testimony, took the wind out of my sails. we had seen a lot of a.d.u. permits violating the rights of existing tenants. they're using seismic work to force tenants out for a long period of time and not compensating them and taking away services

. >> corey smith, san francisco housing action commission. i want to show this today, if i can get the overhead. as you can see, this is carbon footprint for bay area households on a number of factors, transportation, housing, food, goods and services. vehicle fuel outweighs all the rest. we're at the point where 41% of the co2 emissions come from vehicle use. that's what's killing our planet. thank you. >> president hillis: thank you. next speaker, please, ms. clarke. >> reporter: hi. i'm laura clarke. i want to reiterate some of my favorite parts of yesterday's inauguration speech. "we have people who come from all over the world that come to create, who are innovative, who look at san francisco and say, that's the place where i want to be. and we have failed. we have failed to build more housing to accommodate the increase in the number of job opportunities that have poured into san francisco, pushing residents who have been here all their lives out of the city they call home." and my favorite part, "the politics of no has plagued our city

smith. >> good afternoon, corey myth on san francisco housing coalition. i want to add recommendations. we are advocating eliminating the condition use requirement on home-sf requirements. when we get extra density we get affordable housing. what is that not necessary and desirable? homebuilders are taking risks. there needs to be a level of certainty. if there was no cu requirement maybe that went through with the remember. additional 30 something included in that. for home assessed projects both mixed income and 100% condition no requirements. there is a lot of conversation about how to get more people walking around in neighborhoods. we believe extra density is a tool the get us there. we are advocating for elimination of demolition controls. there are grounds for property with old units above. if we can unlock 60, 70 home was additional below market housing we should explore it. we understand there are risks and consequences. the state of california has best practices regarding moving fees and other things to make sure people are proprotected that is a priority. if there is old buil