commissioners corey teague. again, just to verify. yes, the assessor and tax still listed as 12 units, not as 11, just to confirm that. yeah. i mean, i feel like the issues are still are still the same, the kind of nature of the unit and what the potential would be by splitting the unit is not really the issue. this isn't a policy. this is it like a conditional use authorization requesting for the better of the city to split the unit. this is a technical question as to whether or not there's legally 12 or legally 11 units. i mean, i think even in part by the request to the czar to make that determination, there's an understanding of jurisdiction under the planning code to make that call to determine how many legal dwelling units there are under the planning code. i would note and mr. green can speak to this next, if you'd like, the there is also a unit verification process through dbi as well to go through. you can work with dbi. they go through all the paperwork, all the inspections, everything to try to determine from therein what t

sure uh, corey teague, zoning administrator. um, i think as was mentioned, our properties in the city are really divided into two camps. we have what most people think of the properties that are actually required and have been since the downtown plan was adopted. and so that's an actual code requirement since roughly 85 and has very specific controls. but what was happening prior to that is that the planning commission was just ad hoc, requiring these open spaces without any code structure around it. right. and that's where this falls into. and all of these do have this route, right? they can come back to the planning commission and request to have those conditions modified. so this is i mean, i'm not off the top of my head. i'm not familiar with any other propose, at least in recent history that's come through this process and ask the planning commission to convert or remove in some way, you know, a portion of a required downtown propose. so this you know, this is an example of that. and whether or not that's going to lead to m