hello um, corey teague, zoning administrator for planning department. i just thought it'd be interesting to know. i mean, on this issue, the planning commission has stopped taking remote comment. except when there are accommodations requested. and, um, but just for your information, zoning administrator hearings for variances and enforcement hearings, we have continued to have remote hearing, uh, remote access and public comment, um, and plan to do those through at least the spring, um, and then kind of reevaluate there. so just wanted to give you that information. um, so that you're aware of it. thank you. thank you. is there anyone else in the room who would like to provide public comment? okay. i see a caller, um, on zoom, please go ahead. you need to dial star six to unmute yourself. okay go ahead. uh, this is sue hester. uh, we deserve a remote call in on this item. i encourage the commission to hold fast with your position. it's reasonable for people to have disabilities. and a lot of people can't take the time. a lot to come to city hall. so maxi

corey teague, the zoning administrator representing the planning department, matthew green, deputy director of

corey teague, the zoning administrator representing the planning department, matthew green, deputy director of inspection services for the department of building inspection and james zon, housing

corey teague, the zoning administrator representing the planning department, matthew

uh, corey teague, zoning administrator. um the only thing i can really state at this point is to confirm what staff had mentioned, which is the nature of the unit now and what's proposed is, is a relocation of a unit in a way that it was a unit that met required exposure to a unit that does not meet required exposure, and that would trigger the requirement for a variance. and so the only way that would be able to move forward is if a variance was granted. and then beyond that, even if the variance was granted, if it happened to be appealed, then that would go to the board of appeals for their consideration. i wonder if the project sponsor or their attorney want to comment on, uh, sort of your thoughts in light of the comments you've heard. thank you. um, you know, we're we're working very hard to try to grow this unit to get it into greater parity. i appreciate the comments. with respect to the ci broke my glasses just before i came in. perfect timing. um, thankfully i know this for the back of my heart, back of my hand. um

president diamond commissioners corey teague, zoning administrator. welcome, commissioner williams. the board of appeals did meet last night, and they took action on one item of interest to the planning commission, again, this is the golden gate highway. excuse me. great highway pilot program. the closure on fridays and weekends, planning commission approved the coastal permit for that pilot project back in november. that was appealed. three separate appellants to the board of appeals. and that was heard in february, ultimately, the board voted to deny those appeals of that coastal permit. however the same three appellants also filed rehearing requests to the board of appeals, which is, a process through the board where if, kind of new information that could have changed the outcome is presented, or if there's the possibility of kind of manifest injustice, the board can choose to hold a new hearing on the appeal. so, all of the arguments from the appellants, for the rehearing, save for one, were dismissed. the one issue that was, kind of considered by many of the commissioners was i