corey teague reporting planning. kevin birmingham building inspector with dbi.in engineer with public works.

corey teague reporting planning. kevin birmingham building inspector with dbi. public

corey taik teague representing planning and kevin acting chief building inspector. guidelines the board request you silence sdpoens electronics so they don't disturb. no eating or drinking the rules of presentation are follows appellates, permit holders and respondedants 7 minutes to present the case and 3 for rebuttal. people afilliated with the parties include comment in thes periods. members of public not affiliated have 3 minutes no rebutel. you will get a 30 second warning. 4 votes are required for an appeal or permit. at this time vote of an absent commissioner would make a difference the matter will be continued. if you have questions e mail board of appeals sfgov.org. access and participation are of importance to the board. we are broadcasting and streaming live and will have the ability to receive comment for each item on the agenda. >> sfgov.org providing closed captioning for the meeting to watch it go to sfgov.org channel 78. it will be rebroadcast on friday's at 4 p.m. a link is found on the home page of the website. public comment can be provide in per

corey teague za for planning. provide background information. so as mentioned a prior variance was granted. specific low for the perimeter felonies. which is 4 feet along the property line and the interior side line it is 4 feet for several feet in the property and dump bumped up to 6 feet high. area along the perimeter that the height of that is 4 feet. that variance was granted in 2019. and another variance application was submitted 2 years ago for the were fire pit that is in the required front setback and large are than permitted under the code to be in a front setback. we had the variance hearing for that -- proposal in january of last year. a year and a half will ago. we heard terror and had public comment of the i expressed new concerns about challenges for the project to meet the findings for a variance. but held off in make decisions there was outstanding property line dispute that is hard to make the decision about the variance if the location of the property line had not been solidified that decision has not been issued. it has been p

corey taik teague representing planning and kevin acting chief building inspector. guidelines the board request you silence sdpoens

corey taik teague representing planning and kevin acting chief building inspector.t you silence sdpoens electronics so they don't disturb. no eating or drinking the rules of presentation are follows appellates, permit holders and respondedants 7 minutes to present the case and 3 for rebuttal. people afilliated with the parties include comment in thes periods. members of public not affiliated have 3 minutes no rebutel. you will get a 30 second warning. 4 votes are required for an appeal or permit. at this time vote of an absent commissioner would make a difference the matter will be continued. if you have questions e mail board of appeals sfgov.org. access and participation are of importance to the board. we are broadcasting and streaming live and will have the ability to receive comment for each item on the agenda. >> sfgov.org providing closed captioning for the meeting to watch it go to sfgov.org channel 78. it will be rebroadcast on friday's at 4 p.m. a link is found on the home page of the website. public comment can be provide in person, zoom. go to the website

corey teague. here to talk about the office development annual limit program and more specifically impacts of proposition c, which passed earlier this year. just outline of what we'll talk about today. give backgrond on the program itself. we have newer commissioners that had a lot of presentations about the actual program and history and mechanics so provide a little background and go if to the specifics of the amendments to the program under prop c and how we plan to implement those provisions. so, what is the office development annual limit program? it is essentially a regulation to limit major office development each year. it is a city wide program, not specific to any particular zoning districts or parts of the city. it applies to any office development of 25 thousand square feet or more in the city, and it essentially every year gives the city 950 thousand square feet of office space to allocate to projects and two different buckets. what we call the small cap and large cap. we get 75 thousan