we have corey teague, the zoning administrator representing the planning department and joseph ospital senior building inspector with the department of building inspection. the board meeting guidelines are as follows the board requests that you turn off or silence all phones and other electronic devices so they will not disturb the proceedings. no eating or drinking in the hearing room. appellant's permit holders and department respondents each were given seven minutes to present their case and three minutes for rebuttal. people affiliated with these parties must include their comments within the 7 or 3 minute periods. members of the public who are not affiliated with the parties have up to three minutes each to address the board and no rebuttal. mr. long way our legal system will give you a verbal warning 30s before your time is up. since the board has a vacancy only three votes are required to grant an appeal or to modify a permit or determination. if you have questions about requesting a rehearing the board rules are hearing schedules. >> please email board staff at board of appeals

thank you again corey teague for the ping department.st a cple quick points just tolarify again the planning commissionoes not have a adopted pol on tse types ofcenarios and what setbacks these kinds of decks should or should not have. they have approved projects in the past that are basically these types of scenarios with landings and stairs on the side property line. again we look at a lot of different factors that we're trying to balance related to privacy, light etc. also the the deck information handout the three foot setback that is more for was basically telling people what it says is that typically if you have a low deck like this and you provide a three foot setback the deck can be approved over the counter is about a convenience thing if you want the easiest approval path this is what it is. that doesn't mean there's one factor in other scenarios there's not a case that we might not require a bigger setback or allow less of a setback. it's just if you want it approved over the counter quickly generally in that scenario providin

good afternoon president so commissioners corey teague zoning administrator if i can get the overheadhe presentation. thank you. so the purpose of the presentation today the real impetus is proposition c that was passed last year but is also creates a good opportunity just to give an a more general overview of the office development annual limit program in general for some of the commissioner commissioners who've been here for a little while this would be a little bit of a rehash but for some of the newer commissioners they may not have had an opportunity to have an overview of the program. >> i am going to try to keep the time limited though but of course any questions you might have willing to answer those at the end? >> so again the presentation here is just going to go over a little bit the program overall some of the history and the rationale behind it and some of the kind of historical trends we've seen and then specifically move into our prop c and then to the program. so the overall program as you may know is just a regulation that limits the kind of the amount and kind of spe