and, you know, corley is with me in africa. he's with us for the invasion of sicily. him a lot, but i sure do admire him. >> host: tom e-mails in: at the beginning of world war ii, mark clark was looked upon as sort of a golden boy. was he as bad a general as he is portrayed now? >> guest: i don't think he is, and i don't portray him as a bad general. he's the dominant figure in volume two of this trilogy, particularly the second half of it. .. >> he's a bit self-absorbedded, extruer nard ambitious, and he has a thirst for publicity that is beyond belief. what you find when you get to italy where clark is the commander of the fifth army is a man who cares about the soldiers, who is attentive to the welfare, who is personally brave, unlike some of the stories that have been told about him, and yet is inso board inapt in dealing with the prettyish, and makes decisions indefensible about pressing on to rome, and so i find, personally, that he's a mixed bag. you can see mark clark as somebody who is able to handle 23,000 american battle deaths in italy, not everyone is pu