corsi, we're not interested in your theories. we know russia did it. well, maybe you guys ought to be interested in my theories, because i can prove that julian assange is right, and the russians had nothing to do with stealing these e-mails. trish: okay. so let me play devil's advocate, maybe it's good to have him in custody. maybe now there can be some negotiation where we say, hey, julian, we need to know this, that and the other -- >> well, if he would do what i did and say i would not, before god and before a judge, plead to a crime i didn't commit, i said put me in prison. julian assange can say put me in prison, but i'm writing a book and telling the world my story, and you guys are lying, mueller's lying, d. of justice is lying. i was only doing journalism. and he should say i can prove russia didn't steal -- trish: he's kind of been classified as a computer hacker. >> he is not a computer hacker. he publishes what other people hack, and the deep state hates him because he exposes government secrets. governments want to fight illegal wars, they

and ted corsi had multiple facetime discussions about wikileaks. unnamed person had, quote, made a suggestion about assange. that person whose name was redacted will be released prior to election day and would be helpful to the trump campaign. >> whether these contacts were sufficiently elicit to rise to the level of conspiracy. they're unquestionably dishonest, immoral, unethical and unpatriotic. >> reporter: while the report says it could not prove a crime related to the contact it reveals mueller's report may have been different with access to different information. the information was accessed by witness who lied. writing in the report, the office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light or cast in a new light events described in the report. a portion of the report was redacted. and attorneys of attorney general barr followed through on his transparency extending an opportunity to view a less redacted view of the mueller reportt invitation. pamela brown, cnn, washington. >> let's talk now abou

you've had jerome corsi on your show, having your? jerome corsi actually sent us, i think, the documents that demonstrate they were trying to get him to live. >> laura: what incenses you the most about this report? >> speak with complete deceptiof trying to present the facts from cohen as if they are true. >> laura: michael cohen. >> i can tell you any of the things i have personal knowledge about on the report from cohen our lives. to take him and put them there as if we are going to take his credibility over the president of united states is totally warped. at least you've got to put out in that report the issues of his credibility, some people are warned that he lied, what, three years ago months ago in front of cummings that he didn't seek a job. he saw a pardon with me. i will testify against him and his perjury trial and i'll call cuomo the justified because cuomo knows he was seeking. >> laura: why was mcgahn threatened to quit? >> actually at one point he said he told the president he was going to quit. actually had to amend t

but jerome corsi fit within the four corners of the jurisdiction of the special counsel so that's whyto predict or speculate about it. it wouldn't be anything you would think would be russia related and it might be things like michael cohen with hush money payments. that's one of them that's not redacted. >> phil, you have a much better eye for this than i ever will. i was trying to figure out what the redactions may be about. there was a significant amount of russia talk going on in there obviously, how they're the main ma malefactor in all of this. in terms of what has redacted, what do you want to settle as the level of expectation if we finding out what it is? >> i don't think it will change judgments. a lot of redactions relate to the fact that the president talks about and his team talks about this is obama's fault. we heard in last midterms that the russians are still meddling. there's a counterintelligence investigation. that's redacted in the report. there's private information about u.s. citizens who should not be public in the report. that's redacted. there's ongoing invest

jerome corsi who was given a draft indictment by mueller's team that he might be charged. we now it ended with him being declined to be charged. under the rules that needs to be explained somewhere to congress. >> i think it does need to be explained. i think he could do it when he submits the mueller report in full. so far all he has done is kind of a trickle down. he has let us know a couple of things and then cleared the president of obstruction, which is not the way the rules are supposed to work. and that's one of the many reasons i think congress is absolutely right to say by april 2, that's tomorrow, turn over the full report. you can't be playing ducks and drakes and releasing selectively some quotes here and some quote there's. >> the other big question i have for you someone i admit may be hard to answer, but i'm curious, neal, do you think that that discussion of who mueller chose not to charge, is that an itemized list that barr currently has, whether it's people we would expect to be on it like mr. corsi, because there was literally a draft indictment, or peop

how corsi can says coach pleasure of the fist after a game his team should have one. of these a performance we put in here today again well the chance to get points on the board in every game beats a point. in knowing that the hope of a turnaround lives on. as they still have a few games to go. let's look at the results now. ok there might not exactly have been one hundred eighty degree turn this weekend by an endorsement of one and like to continue to look dominant bernard barely missed out on three points against shaka but there are more important things in life like friendship for instance. that's right friendship things might change quickly in football but not everything is so malleable and fan friendships between german clubs are a big deal especially knowing that and shall come. despite being locked in a duel for survival fans from both clubs celebrated each other before their match another unique aspect of german fan culture and further proof that some things are more important than results. the top five spots whereas on moving as the bond between shall can ear

indicated that the special counsel was using exceedingly unethical tactics in trying to get jerome corsi to testify. now i don't know where they came from. i went to the fbi. i gave them to the fbi, and then we used those documents. i didn't steal them, didn't take them. they came from a legitimate source. the reality is when you get information about your oppond t 's true -- >> even if it comes from a foreign entity? even if it comes from a foreign entity? whyidn't donald trump jr. called the fbi when the russians offered dirt on hillary clinton? >> i wonder if there isn't an argument that the people h k the right tow that about hillary clinton. people had a right to know that hillary clinton and the people around her were as dishonest, deceptive as they are? >> why not run an honest campaign -- don't use a foreign campaign, don't use a foreign adversary -- >> but why -- you're not changing -- >> donald trump jr. accepted the wikileaks -- >> i let you read all that, but didn't read that there was no evidence of collusion by trump or anyone on the trump campaign. there was no involvement

jerome corsi is here on the news that the wikileaks founder, jewell assange -- julian assange, has beenhe highest taxes in the country is using taxpayer money to foot the bill so illegals can go to college. i mean, hey, what about the american kids whose familie

any contact that assange had with the president, anyone on the president's team, roger stone, jerome corsiorbit, any americans altogether frankly. >> reporter: before finishing the report the special counsel appeared interest in assange. in the indictment of roger stone, mueller's prosecutor said stone was asked by a top trump campaign official to find out from wikileaks what dirt about clinton would be released and when. at the time, stone was claiming to be in touch with assange. stone later said he was never in direct touch, and assange has denied that he got the hacked information from the kremlin. >> it is not a safe party. so the answer for our interactions is no. >> reporter: but u.s. intelligence says the hackers were agents of russian intelligence, and according to one of mueller's indictments, wikileaks begged the hackers in the summer of 2016, quote, if you have anything hillary related, we want it in the next two days. >> his interests align with the russian government's in 2016. again, it's no secret that assange has a stated motivation of destabilizing the u.s. interests and

why wasn't jerome corsi charged? mueller sent a draft indictment to him and then elected not to charge him. finally, there was that bizarre meeting in the cigar bar between the ukrainian russian operative and paul manafort at the heat of the campaign and manafort gives private polling data. at one court proceeding mueller said that goes to the heart of the investigation. what's up with no evidence of collusion according to the attorney general? that seemed pretty incriminating to me. >> you asked only good questions for which there are no answers yet. shannon, we note that the president is not in mar-a-lago this weekend. he'll be bouncing around the white house all weekend. is there a stated plan for white house rebuttal other than rudy's constant mentions that they have house rebuttal other than rudy's constant mentions that they have a counter report ready and on the skids? >> right. well, they do have a counter report and that's something they've been working on for months. actually, since the summer. jane raskin,

that indicated that special counsel was using kpedingly unethical tactics in trying to get jerome corsi to testify. i don't know where they came from. i went okay the fbi, gave them to the fbi, and we used those documents. they came from a legitimate source. the reality is when you get information about your opponent and it's true -- >> even if it comes from a foreign entity. >> i wonder if there is a -- >> why didn't donald trump jr. call the fbi when the russians offered dirt on hillary clinton? >> i wonder if there isn't an argument that the people had a right to know that information about hillary clinton? people had a right to know that hillary clinton and the people around her were as dishonest as they are. >> why not run an honest political campaign depicting that? why youz a foreign adversary? >> nobody used them. >> donald trump jr. accepted the wikileaks -- >> i let you read all that, but i notice you didn't read there was no evidence of collusion with the russians by trump or anyone in the trump campaign. there was no involvement. >> but they wanted to. should that bother ame

to the bitter end of this long investigation with people running them down rabbit holes like jerome corsi and they are really obviously running a fact-based investigation, they weren't going to take the word of an eccentric old man. if you look at it that way, they look at his mandate as very, very narrow and robert mueller as someone, as a prosecutor who takes their own mandate very seriously and though he was allowed to pursue things, he came across along the way, if he did, he sent them to the southern district. david: they are giving me a wrap but i have to ask, are democrats at all concerned they may be overplaying their hand, that americans as we found out with the fox poll are far more interested in immigration and the economy than they are in any of this investigation stuff? >> they are absolutely concerned with the potential for a backlash and this is why you see them in a big sort of tense standoff with each other between sections of the party over whether or not to impeach, so it's a very tough corner they find themselves in because there are those in the party who say we shoul

the report also details conversations between jerome corsi, an acquaintance of roger stone and former adviser to trump, and ted mallick. he told investigators he and corsi had multiple facetime discussions about wikileaks and said an unnamed person had, quote, made a connection to assange about john podesta's males. that person, whose name is redacted, said males will be released prior to election day and would be helpful to the trump campaign. >> whether the contacts were illicit or rise to a level of criminal conspiracy, they are unquestionably dishonest, unethical, immoral, and unpatriotic. >> while the report says investigators could not prove a federal crime related to the contact, it reveals that mueller's conclusion may have been different with access to more evidence. the investigation, mueller says, was impacted by witnesses who lied or even deleted information, writing in the report, the office cannot rule out the possibility that the unavailable information would shed additional light on or cast in a new light the events described in the report. so in the end, by our accoun

jer mjeromejerome corsi. >> i think the democrat democrat the report to prove collusion.general barr's summary is going to be representative of what the report says. i take attorney general barr as really a consummate professional. i think he's going to play by the book. and i don't think he would give a summary that was inaccurate when we see the full report. >> he's trying to say that he made this judgment a couple of weeks ago on his own and he couldn't have known what was in the entire mueller report. when in fact we've done the reporting, mueller had tipped him off weeks before the letter to congress and said mr. attorney general, let me brief you. and there's no collusion. >> well i'm sure attorney general barr was fully briefed before the summly wa summary wa. it's important that deputy attorney general rosenstein stayed on and signed. >> not always a trump fan. >> in fact he had appointed mueller. if rosenstein signed the summary, that's a good indication that the summary is accurate. >> originally the democrats wanted collusion. couldn't get that. then it became