but if it were to happen after the development were finished, the costa mesa case stands for the proposition that anyone could bring a challenge within 180 days to have facts of the project not being as they were originally adgesed by the city. as you've heard here today there are many interested people who will be following this project very closely. i might also add, that as mr. sullivan mentioned earlier, the development agreement arequires that are there be recontribute -- restrictive covenant. even after the replacement units are built and after the development is completely built out, those obligations will be recorded against the title and the city will be afforded the opportunity to enforce those as a third-party peffry. -- beneficiary. again, i'm previewing things they hope we will have an opportunity to discuss in length but be -- because i understand how sincere the concerns are of this board. we think these are the proper topic for discussion at the substantive hearing on the merits about the project approval itself and the development agreement itself. i do want to go to one oth