ta being in the best position to provide the technical support for the technical feasibility and costubg, -- costing. i want to make sure that all the different alignments and options that are being suggested are studied and that we have the facts. and hopefully the answer will then become clear. but at least we will have the full information. i think that the hsr working group is the best vehicle to lead that, and the ta is in a unique position to provide the technical report to make sure we're judging the feasibility and the costs. does that make sense? >> perfect sense, and we're committed to doing that work and doing it as quickly as we can. you will be the body looking at the results, so we can have a proper public debate about what that might entail. i do want to caution that part of the attractiveness of a fast start project is the possibility to look at the environmental studies that have already been done and completed. we have made and will continue to make the case to the authority that those projects are able to absorbable money right now, move forward, and of course, anythin