cotter?> i site support in the brief. >> do you believe it's limited to at most an lpr type status under today's law? >> wong by its fact and limited to children born of parents at the time of birth were in the united states lawfully or indeed permanent residents from a professor at nyu. >> mr. cooper, do you share that view? >> i do share that view and i would point out again, wong itself conditioned irretistable conclusion from the 14th amendment, citizenship by birth within the territory in the allegiance and under the protection of the country which was premised in that case on the parents of wong being lawful permanent residents, allegiant to this country. >> so to be clear, mr. cooper, you do not believe that -- that wong's opinion extends certainly at a minimum beyond again what we would characterize under today's law as lpr status individual? >> no, it clearly just didn't have anything to do as mr. o'brian has said with illegal aliens or aliens here who may be here lawfully but only t