echoing the same sentiments we've heard it time and again address to the security council, address at the general assembly, there are still over 11 thousand children that have been killed over 100 days now of israeli bombardment of gaza, nearly 26,ousand palestinians dead and no answers at the security council or the general assembly, we're live there in new york, we get back to your regular program in progress. hello everyone and welcome to our new edition of face to face on press tv. today our guest is the yemeny prime minister dr. abdul aziz bin saleh, welcome doctor and thank you for your time. your decision of... preventing the ships or vessels heading to the occupied ports in palestine is very bold decision. how did you make this decision? especially that you know that the trade is very vital for the international trade. bismillah, of course, what is happening in the world in general and what is happening in palestine in particular, pushes any person who has a little dignity and human. "this decision was based on humanitarian, religious and moral aspects to support our people in palestine. it is no

know that they haven't respected any divisions by the unit and machinations to get to the council general assembly, the advisor to open the end of this very course. and they even dismissed the i c. c . previously, i guess some of the investigation, we know that is what you would not expect. however, many of its allies were provided coverage provided cover. the military, the financial media cover, the more on a couple of some how far is we have to continue with the consent about being involved in such a case that has been decided upon by across the board, canada, it might be like we see the kind of get canadian statement while rejecting the south african cleans who could not make any and then you get this going to come into the court. the same applies for the companies that opinion and the same applies for the u. k. a who do i against to do against which the court judge wants to. this might not be the case for a, for israel and some of its allies, but for the majority it would decrease and in fact, i know what to do, the pressure them to act in a 2nd. okay, michael, your thoughts? what do you think

know that they haven't respected any divisions by the unit and that condition to get at the council general assembly. the advice that opens up is very cold and the even dismiss the icy see previously, i guess some of the investigation. we know that there's a will not respect. however, many of its allies were provided coverage provided cover. the military, the financial media cover, the more on a couple of some how far is we have to continue with the consent about being involved in such a case that has been decided upon by the for canada. it might be like we see the kind of get canadian statement while rejecting dissolved academically and to begin, let's make a mean and then you get this going to come into the court. the same applies for the companies with the same applies for the u. k. a who do i against to the against which the court judge that one's a this might not be the case for a, for israel and some of its allies. but for the majority, it was the case. and in fact, i know with the depression i've been to active. okay, michael, your thoughts? what do you think is likely to be the outcome of th

at this time south africa had already accused israel in the security council, the general assembly. and in genocidal acts, it had conducted a diplomatic daymarch on israel, warning it that it viewed its conduct as genocidal. it had requested the international criminal court to vigorously investigate crimes under the genocide convention committed by israel in the guisa strip and it accused israel into alien. the deliberate targeting of civilians intentionally causing starvation and impeeding relief supplies. it had accused israel leaders of expressing, quote, the intent of committing genocide. israel had flatly denied south africa's accusations. despite these harsh accusations is has persisted in his genecidal act against the population of gaza, what more evidence could be required to establish a dispute? it is precisely because of a situation of this kind, effecting the international community as a whole, that article 9 of the genocide convention does not require negotiations as a precondition to seasing the jurisdiction of the court. certainly a respondent state cannot prevent a referr

at this time, south africa had already a twos use the in the security council, the general assembly. and as a big florida of engaging agend decides of act. he's had conducted a different magic day most or is the warning it that it viewed its conduct as genocide is route accused of south africa, also acting not on behalf of the students, but that's what it's called the legal of the have must. there was organization, south africa, i denied that charge and insist is doing everything it can to stop more hom being done to the palestinians. alas, my case here at the international court of justice with south africa. i'm making a compelling argument via the lease, as well as permitting genocide and gaza. and israel saying is absent and self defense and refusing how much on the internal side of whatever the outcome. c, s, around for the 1st time in the dog is considered a win for international justice and it shows that she a gravity of the situation in gaza. a decision by the court on an urgent injunction is expected in a few weeks. step 5 from l just sierra in the hey girlfriend, and this is

in particular, reservations have been adopted by the general assembly must pretty councit— the general assembly must pretty councilf the conflict — referring to many aspects of the conflict. the scope of the present case _ conflict. the scope of the present case submitted to the court is limited — case submitted to the court is limited. south africa has instituted these _ limited. south africa has instituted these proceedings under the genocide convention. the court then turns to the conditions needed to be fulfilled in order for it to indicate provisional measures for supper— indicate provisional measures for supper with respect to the question of, supper with respect to the question of. the _ supper with respect to the question of, the court observes that it may indicate _ of, the court observes that it may indicate provisional measures, only if the _ indicate provisional measures, only if the measures rely on the applicant in relation, but it need not satisfy— applicant in relation, but it need not satisfy itself in a definitive matter— not satisfy itself in a definitive matter that hasjurisdiction not satisfy

the in the security council, the general assembly. and as a big florida of engaging in gen, decides that act, it had conducted a different magic day most. or is that a warning? it that you viewed its conduct as genocide is rel, accuse of south africa, of acting not on behalf of the students, but that's what it's called, the legal of the how much there was organization. south africa denied that charge and insist it's doing everything it can to stop more hom being done to the palestinians. alas, my case here at the international court of justice with south africa, i'm making a compelling argument. why and the lease as well as for missing genocide and gaza, and israel saying is absent and self defense. and it's using how much of the internal side of whatever the outcome c s around for the 1st time. and the dog is considered a win for international justice and it shows that she a gravity of the situation in gaza. a decision by the court on an urgent injunction is expected in a few weeks step fast and l just sierra in the hey. but who in r

article 39 of the violation that is taking place and it should be put on the agenda of the general assembly and the council should be approved , military attacks should be carried out against israel and the zionist regime. in fact, it should intervene , but experience has proven that the security council, because of its structure, takes action every time it is asked against the crime of sah. yes, it has faced the veto of the united states. in fact, there is no hope for this case . now, if you say yes, let me tell you that it has been removed from the council's agenda. 41 and 422 right now, can the general assembly take any action or not? they came to the conclusion that if any action by a government causes a breach of peace, all governments should cooperate in it, and in general, we are in the organization's procedure. nations also have the fact that in 1951 , the ajsen resolution was about these repeated vetoes . our discussion is as far as the repeated veto debate and the un cannot make a decision. it was already approved, and the security council has come to a conclusion and approved this resolution. it

the main body's of that you, when the security council, the general assembly daniel motorized council echo suck and the i c, j. it's for the model minister for the minutes that it has incited against the secret that he did on it. and it's cut on foreign minister has accused the commission, not a gun at all. i'm unable of being a supporter of that is in and out today. just and despicable claim. is it a, a has long gone pains against you. uh, no officials including live in hastings, the s t and the fuse the grand visas, 30 percent that they have of you and bodies as punishment for upholding data mandates. it has in this assault kid more than 150 u. n stuff. the highest number of losses by you and stuff since world war 2 in any conflict, is it a is trying to dismantle any ops that can do? it's planned to destroy the palestine and the palestinian people to forcibly displace them and replace them to seize phone control from that ever to the sea and to implement its premises and colonial events. in dealing with the is there any allegations, again, some on or was stuff one should never lose

there was no other way then to deliver it on the decision of the security council and general assembly on the question of how students stages as well as the principles of ed, we're endorsed by every one of the back. in the days i'm in the borders of 1967 with a capital in east jerusalem. a distribution is as well as ensuring the viability to palestine estate does a person instead good, safely and securely because of coexist peacefully with israel and the rest of the, the you and other regional nations, which you didn't really of us. if you get again a little bit because of that you believe after such a task was us the 1st formulated sort of go back in the, at the end of the 19 forces forties ends of this for many decades, this task. so this is obligation to create a palestinian state has been dragged out here with words and was trying to reach the could. so it's buried in use this issue has so it is hard to school to initiatives if that's the situation repeats again, actually had new conflicts that will read the food of yet another conflict. get another explosion of violence, which is

push forces, why they are killing across the sides and the united nations security council, united nations general assembly and all other international agencies are keeping silence, why? "this is, this is not acceptable, any until if we will not take action against these veto powers, i think the united nations" the consult will not be successful, will not be fruitful. mr. abu mariam, an interesting point that was brought up by the iranian foreign minister at the united nations, was that the us, he had it basically the survival of the israeli regime only relies on regional crisis and the spillover of this conflict into other countries, and that the united states must pull itself out of that trap that the israeli regime has set to drag washington into a direct conflict. do you think... that is one of the objectives of the israelis to get the united states directly involved in in this conflict. yes, mr. hussein amir abdullahyan has raised valid and very strong point because the history is saying the same from since 1948, 1954, 1967, 73, 78, all the times, we are witnessed that the zinust regime creat. the war

says it keeps vetoing the cease-fire resolutions that the general assembly -- of the security counciling against them at the general assembly. steven, how long could this take in terms of the judicial functions? >> well, the icj works very, very slowly. it gives states a lot of time to final different documents, and there's many states to litigation. the case brought by bosnia against serbia for genocide in the early 1990s was not decided by the court until 2007. and so, we have a long wait for any kind of a judgment about this allegation. it will always be in the background. however, israel will continue to file briefs and send people to the hague to make arguments, as will south africa, and it will be one of many things going on in the background. and i think the fact that the court is not a political body, that its members are independent for the most part, and that this order was so overwhelming, it was a 15-2 vote, does suggest that israel is going to engage with this process seriously. and it is not dismissing it as it does many other u.n. actors who are hostile to israel. >> so

n and engage the security council and the general assembly and the secretary general. we are engaging them was part of this, a group of countries in which you, man, i mostly the united, around these things that i mentioned. you add to it that a member of our route south africa is dealt with the issue of asking the i cda to take from we do not imagine to stop the killing of our people to stop the genocide . which means that it is increasing the pressure and that is that i usually side and those who are shielding is that i and that they cannot continue to run away from stopping it. or they have to stop the war, sees why it has to be put in place and hopefully very soon. and now for some sports news, the 1st round of the matches of the 2024 african cope of nations has wrapped up in the ivory coast. is local, gentlest society, my body with more on how the events being going so far. i just forget to get permission for me and 2 days after being matched the hospital beginning the 3 points to get me be so much the provides been upset as one of his properties where has drove by

council. a general assembly meeting has to take place to explain why that veto was used. so we've had right now these riley, i'm box it up with a file re speech. i'm talking about how mouse and the crime is of home us as you'd expect. that's what he's been focusing on. his speech, the product, sitting in that box that it was speaking before him. he said that of the death toll in gauze that one percent of the population. if that was the us, it would be $3000000.00 people. if you projected on the size of the us population 3 percent of the population of goes up seriously injured. he said that would be 10000000 people in the united states and he made it clear to everyone he believes now should be holding a c spa. now post and he held one up in the general assembly before him. we had the us and the deputy about the robot woods and he was explaining why on the 22nd of december, the us we'll do that. it's vito against that amendment. it is also striking that even as we hear many countries urging the end to this conflict, which we would all like to see, we hear very few demands o

at this time, south africa had a video to use the in the security council, the general assembly. and as a big florida of engaging in gen decides that act, it had conducted a different magic day most or is i don't warning it that it viewed its conduct as genocide. he said, requested the international criminal court to vigorously investigate crimes. and to the genocide convention committed by is valid and because the script and just accused israel into idea of the deliberate targeting of civilians to change and the causing starvation and impeding relief and surprise it attitude is the leaders of expressing, quote, the intent of committing genocide is had flat be denied, sought that because accusations despite these harsh accusations, isabel has persisted the industry and the size of act, guys, the population of draws what evidence could be required to establish a dispute. it is precisely because of the situation of this kind affecting the international community as a whole. article 9 of the genocide convention does not require negotiations as a precondition to seizing jurisdiction

things that the president president, in his speech, only this tuesday , that is, the council of the fourth general assembly of the deputies of the finance department all over the country, which was held, my president. he gave a speech there. again, for the transparency of the financial system of organizations and institutions, yes, there are several things that are actually desired, one of them is. and the most important thing is that a fair payment system in the administrative structure of the country should actually be revived and designed. well, the president in the first year even emphasized that in the budget bill of 1401, which was actually the new government, he would introduce it , but to that bill did not arrive, then it was supposed to be followed up in 1402. in fact , there are still some plans on the table, but they have not been completed . it is that we have different payments in the government system for people with conditions they are the same. yes, and the president says that this must be reformed. well, it is necessary to reform it . in fact, it is necessary to harmonize the method of rec

at this time, south africa had a video to use the in the security council, the general assembly. and as a big florida of engaging in gen, decides and act, it had conducted a different magic day most or it is a warning. it that it viewed its conduct as genocide is rel, accuse of south africa, of acting not on behalf of the students, but that's what it's called the legal of the have must, there was organization, south africa denied that charge and insist it's doing everything it can to stop more hom being done to the palestinians. alas, my case here at the international court of justice with south africa, i'm making a compelling argument. why of the lease as well is committed to genocide and gaza. and israel saying is absent in self defense and refusing how much on the internal side of whatever the outcome c is around for the 1st time. and the dog is considered a win for international justice. and it shows that she a gravity of the situation in gaza. a decision by the court on an urgent injunction is expected in a few weeks step fast and l just sierra in the he is ready for his cla

the court has 15 judges elected by the un general assembly and the security council. it's laid by us judge join don't i. q a former state department official, entered the peachy is russian judge could either give odeon former ambassadors of an invalid. they all represent the different regions and legal systems, and it looks like this. 3 seats occupied by african judges. judges from messing america and the caribbean holds another 23 occupied by asian judges, 5 held by judges from western europe and other western countries into by judges from eastern europe. if a country involved in a case doesn't have a judge from its region on the beach, it can appoint a temporary one to that case. according to the union shots that the judges performed made use these individually knots as representatives of the home countries. in his history, the court has seen $193.00 cases, including disputes, or the land and maritime borders and genocide. one significant case was between nicaragua and the united states in 1986 when the i c j rule that the us had violated international by supporting

the court has 15 judges elected by the un general assembly and the security council. it's laid by us judge john donahue, a former state department official, entered the pc is russian judge could either give all the informer invested as of the naval lens. they all represent the different regions and legal systems, and it looks like this. 3 seats occupied by african judges. judges from messing america and the caribbean holds another to 3 occupied by asian judges, 5 held by judges from western europe and other western countries. and to buy judges from eastern europe. if a country involved in a case doesn't have a judge from its region on the beach, it can appoint a temporary one to that case. according to the union shots that the judges perform the duties individually nots as representatives of the home country. in its history, the court has seen $193.00 cases, including disputes or the land and maritime borders and genocide. one significant case was between the cut aguayo and the united states in 1986 when the icy j roll that the us had violated international by supposi

mohseni ajrei sat for two hours following the words of the members of the council for the session of the general assembly of new york. dear mr. mohseni, you deliberately called me on my cell phone and said that i wanted to emphasize that if you had a meeting with the iranians, tell them that we strongly support whatever problems they have in the judicial branch. let them count on us to solve their problems and facilitate their affairs. first of all, there is a report on the legal facilities of iranians abroad, the sana system , which had some problems, the most important of which was actually the issue of iranian mobile phones, because if it is not there , there is no way to register until later. we have solved this problem from the various investigations we had with the statistics and information technology center of the food ministry and the ministry of communications, and in fact two of them have been replaced by social messengers . . then the last details of the support bill follow-up iranians have been presented, we are currently in the commission's courtroom, three meetings have been held so far, y

today, the un general assembly was supposed to hold a meeting. tomorrow , the security council will hold a meeting . we will get more information from ali b. well, as you said, today the united nations general assembly held a meeting on the subject of reviewing the us veto in the first meeting of the security council, which was held on the subject of gaza. if you remember, in that meeting of arab and islamic countries through the united arab emirates, which he is a non-permanent member of the security council he proposed a resolution. to the security council in the initial text of the agreement, in fact, the resolution emphasized the cessation of attacks by the zionist regime and a complete ceasefire in gaza, so that it would be possible to provide assistance to the people of gaza . the cease-fire was removed from this resolution. america had emphasized that if the clause related to the cease-fire is not removed. the men who are being dragged in the streets of gaza by the zionist soldiers, the countless children who are being massacred every day, and a large part of the palesti

the use being expressed very strongly in the general assembly that don't match in many ways what's happening in terms of the decisions of the un security council. so this committee of general assembly meeting now and in 45 minutes time the un security council will be meeting. and of course that's where the deadlock is. and that's where the power in the you and the system is. that's the decisions by the security council of binding international law. and of course, we've had attempts to try and get a see saw an agency start off with un security council and they've been repeatedly locked. now we've just been hearing on that matter actually from the un sector general and 10, you can tell us who's been addressing the committee in the last few minutes. he's made it clear, no policy to an own conflict is above international law. he said international humanitarian know, including the principles of distinction, proportionality and precautions and tech must be upheld at all times. and i think this is important because we have that ruling that the entry and ruling from the international court of justice that came through on friday. he says, the bindings,

in particular, reservations have been adopted by the general assembly and the security council of the united nations referring to many aspects of the conflict. the scope of the present case submitted to the course however, is limited. as south africa has instituted these proceedings under the genocide convention. so, the court then turns to the conditions needed to be fulfilled in order for it to indicate provisional measures. with respect to the question of premeditation jurisdiction, the court observes that it may indicate provisional measures only if the provisions relied on by the applicant appear. cream efficient to afford a basis on which its jurisdiction could be founded, but it need not satisfy itself in the definitive matter that it has jurisdiction. as regards the merits of the case. in the present case, south africa seeks to found the jurisdiction of the court on article $36.00 paragraph one of the statute of the court. and on article 9 of the genocide convention. the court must therefore, 1st determine whether those provisions presentations, confer upon it jurisdiction to

many world leaders, rights organizations, international bodies including the un, general assembly, the security council, how many sessions scott, how much documented? proof, do you have to show the world that every single war crime and rule of engagement has been violated here before israel's backers stop giving arms to the regime in tel aviv? that's that's the other question that now is being answered by the witness of what the united nations is and what the united nations security council is, it is nothing but puppet of the west, puppet of the united states, of britain, of france, of germany, they have all conspired to work against russia, for example, uh denying a united nations security council emergency meeting over the ukrainians murdering prisoners of war by blowing the plane out of the sky because they didn't want their stories to be told, no doubt. this shows us what the united nations is all about, and we don't have any faith in this institution, essentially as it is. there need to be new institutions and new movements autonomously designed and implemented. so it, if you keep knocking on the

today , the un general assembly was supposed to hold a meeting . tomorrow, the security council will hold a meeting regarding the situation in gaza. we get more information from ali rajabi. in the name of god. hello , have a good time. well, as you said, today the united nations general assembly held a meeting on the subject of reviewing the us veto in the security council's first meeting on the issue of gaza. well, if you remember, in that meeting of arab and islamic countries. through the united arab emirates, which is a non-permanent member of the security council proposing to the security council in the initial text of the contract, in fact the resolution, what was being discussed was the cessation of attacks by the zionist regime and a complete ceasefire in gaza in order to provide aid to the people of gaza . the paragraph related to the ceasefire of this resolution, in this meeting of the security council, the representative of the palestinian authority in the united nations announced that i am on behalf of the large number of people who are being slaughtered, the men and

mohseni ajei sat for two hours listening to the words of the members of the council for the meeting of the general assembly. i was in new york, mr. mohsen ijeh you deliberately called me on my cell phone and said that i wanted to emphasize that if you meet with iranians , tell them that we strongly support them, whatever problems they have in the judiciary , they should count on our actions to solve their class and facilitate their affairs. first, the report on legal facilities for iranians abroad, the system. there were some problems, the most important of which was actually the issue of iranian mobile phones, because if it is not there, it is not possible to register until after various checks that we had with the statistics and information technology center of the ministry of food and communications. we solved and actually the message two of them have been replaced by social media . the discussion of electronic proceedings within the framework of regulations and laws is on the agenda . then, the last details of the follow-up of the iranian protection bill were presented. it was the third, and we discuss

the council must also charge this specific way forward and it's the timeframe for its implementation. so this is not just a political, judy spinning from general assembly resolution security council resolutions, metric principles and other room you decisions. this is merle james and company on the internet for community recall and security council to implemented was president . today, some delegation was deemed it acceptable to rachel off at 2 nations that's leveled at to the russian federation because we are conducting a special note, your operation to combat not to them in kids, from a movie still to colleagues which you noticed. but incidentally menu, we knew your conscience is very heavy way down by the statements. but that's your problem. however, that really would let us just go that we cannot very, the idea of posting and he was statehood. and just like we buried the mist agreement was dated 2015, the guarantors of those agreements with friends and germany. subsequently friends in germany, admitted that they didn't even really think that they would implement them. we cannot, as such ships do illegal actions to be taken visiting the palestinian p

council member use is vito. it triggers a meeting of the general assembly for an explanation of why they use a veto, a some of the describe this as a sort of name and shame measure of focusing on that security council member and getting them to explain why they've taken this step of using that every time in this case, the us blocking a metro that would have meant to see saw in cause a we heard of the wrong from the deputy, us and best robot would. this was his explanation. it is also striking that even as we hear many countries urging the end to this conflict, which we would all like to see, we hear very few demands of the initiator of this conflict. hum us to stop hiding behind civilians laid down its arms and surrender. this would have been over it from us as leaders had done that of the only big beating of the un today, taking place in the un general assembly. the un security council, of course, is the subject of the meeting and most it did at the end of last year, i thought there was things going on in the security council even though it wasn't meeting today. and that's because a group called a rabbis for pea

council. we've seen the secretary general. we've seen the general assembly, we've yet to hear from the human rights council before we turn to the you and i think people on the streets have the answer. millions of people are marching in the streets, demanding the enter, the war and immediate humanitarian relief. it's now time for the government to work together through the u. n. and to put real pressure on israel, it's allies have done nothing to prevent this, this risk of famine and this risk of genocide. so now it's time for people to continue pressuring their governments and for governments to economically pressure israel to diplomatically pressure israel and politically, pressure israel to stop um, desponding. we've spoken a lot here, michael. about intent, as many agencies have pointed out, the use of starvation as a weapon of what is a will crime. so what sort of accountability cannot be, will there be i to call it a war crime in legal terms. what that means is to we can try and hold individuals accountable through international criminal courts through

everything... comes back to the un security council and the un security council will not take action, for some reason the general assembly is not willing to invoke its powers under section 377 to seiz itself of the matter to the exclusion of the security council and take action, so it's hard to see any kind of accountability being imposed when they just continue to do what they're doing. without the slightest concern for being prosecuted or or or held accountable, the only way to hold them accountable is is through some form of warfare, but sadly in terms of the the weapons game is such, not that it's ever desirable, the atlantic world supporting the occupation winds hands down in comparison to obviously. palestinians who are who are more or less defending themselves with homemade weapons and some rockets and other things that very often don't even have a payload, so there's really no grounds for comparison and it's hard to imagine that palestinians alone um can hold the occupation responsible militarily even though, i think there's a growing consensus that israel has already lost this this outrageous war, if we can even

gaza. hilda sits in the un security council chain, the hot diplomatic as james base, as that to the only big beating of the un today, taking place in the un general assembly. the un security council, of course, is the subject of the meeting and most it did at the end of last year. but there was things going on in the security council even though it wasn't meeting today. and that's because a group called a rabbis for peace, decided to occupy for a brief time until they were removed by un security, the security council chamber. what happened is that they've gone on an official un tool that takes people around the buildings even into the security council when it's empty. and when they got to the security council, they set that for a time they, which on thing they was seeing, this is a group of rabbis called rabbis, full piece, a group of rabbi's us realize represents 200 us rabbis who urgently demanding us the spot in casa, the colorado skin look at some of the world news. now former us president donald trump has spent the day in court trying to convince a panel of judges that he should be immune from federal charges, trying to overturn the 2020 election. th

more moreover, we already see this now, judging by the voting not in the security council, but in the general assembly nuances, maybe perhaps not even conspicuous in some way, and perhaps , as they say, from the realm of, as they say, not exactly fantasies, but some kind of assumptions, look, after all, this does not happen so often in the security council, so that the minister comes to the meeting, and the minister comes, the minister of foreign affairs, state, member of the permanent five, members of the security council. i came specifically for this meeting on palestine; it just so happened that before this there was a meeting of the security council on ukraine, where the minister also made an extensive speech, but here that was the goal. arrival, and you look , in such cases, well , somehow it was customary, after all, for the top officials of other delegations, ambassadors to come, but we see now uh, and uh , behind the sign united states, the united states, someone is sitting... then from the deputies, and united i haven’t seen kingdom, but in my opinion, too, and these are some, you know, secon

trust in the international institutions which we rely on like the un security council like the courts, like the general assembly that we rely on to deliver human rights and ensure accountability. so the into double standards and for the states to stop being able to cherry pick um and being selective about where they ensure that international humanitarian, more and international, more implemented. because you have to remember human rights, another nice to have these rights much down to the doctor's times and humanities that were agreed upon by countries all over the world. and they all know that. and when countries step outside of those laws or they violate those rules, they need to be held accountable. it doesn't matter who they are, what region they're in, or who they will lead is or who they will need is a friends with accountabilities for everyone. and the 2nd practice that we need to see is that we have seen an alarming rise in states beginning to, to engage in what we call transactional diplomacy, where they turn a blind eye to human rights abuses. in exchange for meeting some sort of short term domestic n

i, c, j is me, is there, what does it say if, when it comes to the young security council, or indeed the general assembly, if you know the us don't at least upstate, this is the thing right that we've noticed over the past 4 months. in fact, over the past 3 years since ukraine came to the scene, russia invasion, and then as, as genocide in gaza that your peers have been following and america's footsteps. in fact, they've been kind of thing, america position. unfortunately, america has also been putting nothing you know is position, but that's another good software. that's how big it does lie with the buy. they're in misplaced it. in fact it lies with president by the himself. he's been that the side or if you were in his administration about such issues and he needs to decide how he's going to go down in history as genocide, joe, or as genuine jo genocide. joe was there at his back on the world court and wants to continue with business as usual. genuine joe would say, look, we've supported you and as much as we can, we've already committed to putting the human rights at the center of our foreign policy.

it's imbedded in un general assembly resolutions and a new and security council resolutions. the problem is, i'm afraid to say, is the united states. united states is publicly committed to is due to state solution, but didn't ensures that there is no price on israel for its actions, which makes it $2.00 state solution highly improbable, particularly with respect to the spread of the of the illegal is really settlements . we now have over 500000 as rarely settlers in the west bank, another 240000 in jerusalem. it's a, it's very hard to imagine how it to state solution based on the 1967 borders is going to occur with uh, with so many settlers with that would have to be removed or agreed to live under ballast ending self injury touches parliament has approved sweden's application to join nato clearing a longstanding hurdle to its accession. lawmakers voted overwhelmingly in favor of sweden's bid to become this with the 32nd member of the alliance after it won the public backend of talk. he's president of time or the one had acute sweden not being too lenient toward the psychiatr