the rights of minorities, which is allowed, then this can be done with the help of the council of europe convention of the rights of national minorities, not with the help of tanks and rockets. and here europe is interested in ukraine. lost, we are economically 20 times more powerful than russia. poland currently spends more than 4% of gdp on defense, by the way, we recently signed a large arms contract for 96 combat helicopters of the apach. most nato countries are also already spending 2% of their gdp on defense, and this will continue, because putin has ended the poster child for the cold war, during which it seemed that we should last. of the soviet union was that brezhnev was giving too much gdp to armaments, and that he cannot allow this to happen, but is doing that alone russia spends 30% of the budget on armaments, this is unacceptable. one german military commander said that his internal clock told him that germany should be ready for war in about 5 years. he knows something that we don't. in poland, time limits are being considered when this war can spread to other european countries. as

fight for rights of minorities, which is allowed, it can be done with the help of the council of europe conventiontection of the rights of national minorities, and not with the help of tanks and missiles. council of europe to business. and here europe is interested in ukraine regaining its control over internationally recognized borders. this will continue, because putin ended the poster child of the cold war, during which it seemed that we had a lasting peace in europe. we now turn to the logic of deterrence. a year or two ago, putin said that the source of the decline of the soviet union was that that brezhnev was spending too much gdp on armaments. and that he cannot allow such a thing to happen, but does it on his own. russia spends 30% of its budget on armaments, this is unacceptable. one german military commander said that his internal clock told him that germany should be ready for war in about five years. he knows something that we don't. in poland, time limits are considered when... georgia attacked georgia, threatened ukraine and attacked ukraine, threatens latvia and poland, and when ru

for the rights of minorities, which is allowed, then it can be done with the help of the council of europe conventionrotection of the rights of national minorities, not with the help of tanks and rockets. council of europe to business and here europe is interested in ukraine. we talk about it all the time. putin, of course, would be crazy, he cannot defeat ukraine. someone lost the entire nato, of course. we are economically 20 times more powerful than russia. poland currently spends more than 4% of gdp on defense. by the way, we recently signed a major arms contract for 96 apache attack helicopters. pcb for selection. most nato countries are also already spending 2% of their gdp on defense, and this will continue, because putin ended the poster child of the cold war, during which it seemed that we had a lasting peace in europe. we now turn to the logic of deterrence. a year or two ago, putin said that the source of the collapse of the soviet union was the fact that brezhnem spent a lot of gdp on armaments, and that he cannot allow this to happen, but is doing it himself. russia spends 30% of its bud

the rights of minorities, which is allowed, then this can be done with the help of the council of europe conventionon the protection of cases national minorities, and not with the help of tanks and rockets. and here europe is interested in ukraine regaining its control over internationally recognized borders. ma interes w tym, aby ukraina odzyskała kontrolka nad international. is europe europe preparing for the fact that the war may go beyond the borders of ukraine and spread further. are european politicians talking about it, taking any steps? we talk about it all the time. of course, putin would be crazy, he cannot defeat ukraine. who is with the whole of nato, of course lost. we economically twenty times more powerful than russia. poland currently spends more than 4% of gdp on defense. by the way, we recently signed a large arms contract for 96 combat helicopters of the apach. most of the nato countries also already spend 2% of gdp on defense and this will continue, because putin ended the cold war poster during. which seemed like we had long-term peace in europe, now we have moved to the logic

between people, which, from my point of view, is a gross violation of all existing conventions within the osce, the council of europe union. we, however, on the contrary, show our openness, the desire to show our country to the international community, come, see, work with our people. will come more than once, and having seen the first time, will want to come a second, third and fourth, taking into account that it will be a visa-free regime, i am sure that he will bring more of his friends who are easy-going, so we agreed, let's go to belarus tomorrow , let's go, well, as they say in midi, welcome, poland, for me personally... the possibility of closing borders for cargo is nothing more than a pr decision that will obviously hit the poles themselves, no matter how they put a good face on a bad game, won't poland turn into the polish silk road dead end? you know, a very interesting question, i think i know and understand poland a little bit. i'll reveal another secret, but it may not be a secret for... for the poles it's definitely not a secret, so for you and for the viewers of the program too, my grandmother was ma