have, and about the expansion of the security council, and because the security council and nization of the united nations arose after of the second world war and, accordingly, reflected the growth of international forces in the immediate post-war period, and it is certainly the case that today the question arises about the need for the entire structure to participate in other important participants in international relations until recently about the reality of the reform of the security council did not have time to speak, but what do i hope for, the defeat of russia, the defeat of the aggressor, the defeat of the aggressor, who is a permanent member of the un security council and has nuclear weapons , unjust and bloody wars against ukraine, against ukraine and the world system, will lead to a weakening of the international role of russia and will open a historic, in my opinion, historical window of opportunity to take a number of steps to reform the security council, mr. danylo, that is, as of today, legal steps actually do not exist, they cannot gather even if all the membe

thus , in fact, speaking of legality the presence of russia in the security council, we are talking aboutmplementation of the security council statute. and it is not observed in this part because the security council did not make any decision. what is even more even more rude is that the general assembly did not make any decision at all , and in the list of issues that are accepted by default this problem does not exist because the membership of the un, and even more so in the security council, and the acquisition is very clearly spelled out from such organizations of the manufacturer, this is the first and second strengthening of this position, strengthening of this position and such a path to it the second issue is the recognition of russia as a country that finances terrorism or a country or state of tourists , because it is related to the possibility of a court making decisions on the legality of these or other behaviors of the authorities of the russian delegation to the un security council, which can be interpreted as responsibility for what i i say as non-fulfillment of the charter

so what is the purpose of this vote in the security council today? in the what is to show the security council's position and make each of the 15 members of the security council declared that position the resolution has been drawn up by albania. and by the us and the u. s. representative of the security council, the us ambassador than to thomas greenfield is addressing the council right now. she's just actually read some quotes from the secretary general of the united nations. antonia terrace, who in the last 24 hours, said that the referenda, which he called not, not legitimate referenda deserve to be condemned. she also went on to say that this organization is referring to the un was built on an idea that never again would one country be able to take territory from another. and she said, that's exactly what's happening here. so the us ambassador, trying to rally support this last moment before the vote of all the 15 security council members. we know, i think pretty certainly how russia is going to vote. russia has been condemned here. russia is a pe

, called on the initiative of ukraine, the answer to the 1038th meeting of the security council begins. temporary agenda for this meeting: support for peace and security of ukraine, and now i would like to give the floor to his excellency mr. volodymyr zelenskyi , the president of ukraine. members of the un security council who respect and fulfill the un charter, dear representatives of the states and leaders who are listening to me now , the un security council is an institution that works for well-known and defined rules according to the regulations of which even the representatives of russia are still following, they have not yet used weapons instead of words in this hall and have not yet knocked out chairs from their neighbors for security advice, but probably no one will be surprised if this zaora without the oun will be transformed by representatives russia in the zone of violence of the un charter russia in life considers any rules of this world russia is already breaking, so it is only a matter of time when it will destroy this last international institution that can sti

do you know this reform of the security council, they are talking about it it's been years since the nity of the organization of the united nations and nothing special has happened yet, there were some cosmetic procedures there, no, but they didn't change much, but one way or another, well, even this war, in principle, you know, it makes more and more bystanders that something must be done, otherwise ion will eventually turn into a type of league of nations, and we all know the fate of the league of nations. it simply died or was dispersed, and due to its complete inability to solve any political problems, i wanted to remember the year 46 when it stopped activities of the league of nations and in the 45th year, the un emerged as an organization when the united states of america did not join the league of nations in principle. this organization existed there for 26 years, if i am not mistaken, and this is how the un actually arose so after uh this great russian-ukrainian war, because it is the biggest continental war since the second world war with the biggest victims and the most braz

national security today a big conversation was dedicated to alexander lukashenko in the palace of independence, he met with the secretary of state of the security council alexander volfovich. firstly, the concept of national security will be updated in the country, which is required by the difficult geopolitical situation at the same time. this is a systematic work in the wake of the referendum and the new constitution, the document will be open. the main requirement of the president is not to hide anything - the full openness of the text. it will be possible to discuss in their teams and organizations on dialogue platforms in the same way as this it was when we were working on a new constitution, today we touched on the situation on the southern border, including taking into account the experience and the special operation in ukraine, on behalf of the president, the security council also monitors the situation in law enforcement agencies, but the head of state. we need an assessment not through the prism of exclusively positive results. in particular, from the point of view of what else needs to be worked on, the secretaries of state will not get invo

this is an attempt to expand the security council with the help of their military allies. that's what it is. i can even say who they want to push into the united nations security council. these are washington's allies, germany and japan. the states that were initially recognized in the un charter as enemy states, but today the united states of america is abandoning its former intentions. this comes as a u. s. ambassador to the united nations linda thomas greenfield. recently question the current world order. she opposed preserving the status quo at the un security council, which grants the 5 nations that comprise the permanent security council of the un veto power. we should not to found a non sustainable and outdated state disquiet. instead, we must demonstrate flexibility and willingness to compromise in the name of great to credibility and legitimacy, which it forge can sounds says there are some sibling credible proposals to expand the security council membership. our guest again says in the case of reforming the un security council, it should be expanded with states th

to speak to the security council and your representative of the state that's being discussed by the security council, then this meeting is all about ukraine. then you have to come here in person, he says that's been the roof over 70 years and he says it's this sort of show that the ukrainians have been putting on in recent weeks. and the security council is not the place for shows. interestingly, i did speak to best in the benz here on the way and, and said, well, he get a forced this to a vote because they can have a procedural vote. if the russians want to call for one to decide whether president zalinski is addressed by video is allowed or not, he said there wouldn't be a procedural vote suggesting to me the russians know already that round the security council table, 50 members of the security council. there is no, the town procedural matters. they would lose that procedural vote. so i think the meeting now with the french president, boston declared that the review is going to get under way and we're going to hear the 50 members of the security council. we're also going to hear f

of global peace and security. to put an end to the high handedness of these countries, including the united states, at the risk of the international security council community, with the sampling of these developing countries for the majority of the u.n. membership, as issued in the impartiality of the activities it should stick to the cognizant principles to serve the determinations of the peoples. the united states and other member states are trying to enforce on sovereign states international orders under the signposts of safeguarding democracy and protecting human rights. these interventionist attempts are a blanket breach of the u.n. charter, a procedure to the softening of a quality with partial attacks and double standards favoring the unfair positions of individual countries and specific versus should be thoroughly eliminated with the core principles of the charter being equal rights and the domination of the people as strictly observed. texting that opportunity for the people of cuba in their struggle to safeguard their sovereignty and the development of the country in the face of the high handedness of the united states in their internal

the resolution of the general assembly, which was adopted by china, but as for the members of the security councilthere remains the soviet union and the republic of china . implementation of the security council statute and it is not observed in this part because the security council did not make any decision nor even more, even more rudely, also that the general assembly did not make any decision at all and in the list of issues that are accepted by default this problem does not exist because the membership of the un and even more so in the security council, and the acquisition is very clearly spelled out from such organizations of joint operations, this is the first and second strengthening of this position, the strengthening of a-a of this position and also the way, there is also a second issue, this is the recognition of russia as a country that finances terrorism or a country or a tourist state, because it is related to the possibility of a court decision on the legality of these or other behaviors of the powers of the russian delegation to the un security council, which can be interpreted as

of extra reservists. well, this is the seen inside the security council at the moment. washington will make the case for tougher condemnation of russia and delegates will also address allegations of war crimes. russia holds a permit seat on the security council and can veto any sanctions, including those against itself. so we'll hear shortly from the un secretary general until you are good to, to, to speak in the few hours ahead of that. we'll speak with d, w as a chief international editor. richard, welcome, richard. what can we expect to hear from? i'm trying to get her where she will be speaking at any minute. now, phil, and i mean, i think we heard from him, of course, in his speech opening the un general assembly. but if anything, he spent rather little time talking about the war in ukraine and also tries to talk about the many other crises facing the world. but i think what we're going to hear from him is a pretty clear position on the, the increasing concerns that have come during the course of this very week emerging from vladimir putin announcements of general m

most of the security council of armenia has officially appealed to russia. the c s t o, which is the moscow lead defense block. and the un security council, in connection with the hostilities on the border on the contrary, the other by johnny defense minister claims the initial attack was a response to a growing armenian military presence on the border. our local journalist from back, who has more as within other positions of us within our vs, were under intensive and systematic foyer, armenia. i have be concentrating, offensive weapons, heavy artillery and mum, polar. along the border was as it was awful, less mas, such actions taken by armenia aims, aim to us, old on the implementation of large scale infrastructure projects in boarder regence luncheon. i tell roger as well as to maintain the tension, the accuracy of tension, of the borderline as ukraine expects to receive another installment of financial aid from the european union in the amount of 5000000000 euros locals in gaza are suffering from a lagging reconstruction process. as many fear they will be

we will continue to consistently support, within the framework of the un security council, international efforts for a post-conflict settlement in colombia in the interests of maintaining peace and national harmony in this country, ensuring regional security and stability. we intend to further strengthen traditional friendly relations with united republic of tanzania, including in such promising areas as peaceful atom, transport, energy, tourism. we welcome the role of the active role. the etenzoanist side in solving the problems of the african continent will interact on a wide range of topical issues of the regional and international agenda. the assets of russian philippine relations include successfully implemented projects in various fields, there are all prerequisites for expanding such a relationship , cooperation in the energy sector, space exploration, sphere, information technology, agro-industry and tourism. we are ready for partner-to-partner interaction and hope that the same approach will be shared by the new leadership of the philippines. we are convinced that the developmen

security council. they should perhaps be more members of the security council and more permanent members as well. because remember, this security council was established in the aftermath of the 2nd world war and was built built to deal with the realities of a post war world. and the world has changed dramatically since then, and many countries think it's no time for the u. n. to change as well. and unfair south, thanks very much for joining us there. i will come back to you later once we hear the ukrainian foreign minister speaking and within the next half hour, we imagine well as you just heard, russia's foreign minister sag oliver of left the meeting as his country faced more and more criticism, he attempted to defend the invasion minutes earlier, it wasn't the one that was to the you room. today's meeting was motivated by the intention of several delegations to discuss the topic of impunity in ukraine. i think this very timely because this is precisely this term. impunity reflects what has been going on in that country. since 2014, the national radical forces opened, russo folks and neo nazis,

of the security council decoys so easily do not drag green. i had to try myself. he again raises the stakes, however, replays such improvisations, the authors of this script. even can greet you need to globally isolate russia, this country, can no longer be a permanent member of the security council, he and the rightist wetta should exclude russia from all international organizations, if this is difficult to do in terms of procedures, then its participation should be suspended. second. it is necessary to introduce even tougher sanctions against moscow if russia recognizes. tatarreferendums , there’s nothing more to talk about with putin, but why didn’t kiev want to talk before? why did he leave the negotiations after the command from washington, as sergey lavrov said in the same hall for another week no explanations back, but now the united states is threatening to adopt an anti-russian resolution. if not in the security council, then in the general assembly, well, with new sanctions, of course, the ukrainian people have already shown that they

if we talk about the un, let's start with the un security council, we see that the work of the un security council is practically blocked due to russia's veto herbest ca n't do anything to stop putin in the general assembly , is there any possibility to do it, well, look at the un today with its inability , especially the issue of war, especially the issue of aggression against ukraine on the part of the russian federation and it depends on the fact that in the un charter there is such a norm as legal and which are used by the permanent members of the russian federation, in particular, whether we like it or not . to allow the security council to play its statutory role, it is necessary to change the statute, it is not necessary to introduce those high-quality cases. today, it is only of an advisory nature. although i believe that the potential of the security council is not fully used it is necessary to show simply creative approaches, now there is no time to thoroughly discuss these specific proposals, but among them there are provisions that are not fully implemented, in particular, ther

national interests and fighting double standards, which were recalled at the last meeting of the security councilf the world organization by the permanent representative vasily nebenzya from new york, our own correspondent valentin bogdanov tom and therefore the meeting of the un security council on ukraine was requested in advance for the day when their results were summed up by zelinsky via video link. it's already a must programs by a member of the security council offer to feel as if in the auditorium of a cinema of a repeated film. are you not against the very participation of the president of ukraine or his representative? well, this participation should be very advice should not be turned into a platform for political shows or a cinema. leniency in these matters causes the most serious damage to the authority of the council extras were catching up to applaud a pre- recorded video of the speech of the ukrainian president, and then it was filmed on phones and then given out on social networks as his supposedly wide support among a member of the general assembly. so just don’t drag zelensky t

well, vasyl nebenze, the representative of russia at the un, is at the same meeting of the un security councilin repeated the thesis of russian propaganda that the so- called vote had been expected for a long time in those regions that apparently had not seen the peace for 8 years. the introduction of all electoral cities is not an applied fact, how many of you, the kyiv regime and its rulers, did not ask back, observed the outcome and will be able to for 8 international observers of 40 countries. this was the position of the russian side, but instead i will add that most of the countries participating in the un security council strongly condemned the so-called referendums , china and india spoke relatively neutrally, they did not condemn the pseudo-referendums, but simply called for peace and dialogue, well, the question arises as to how the world will react to the actions of russia and what other sanctions can be applied to the kremlin in response to the so-called referendums, we will talk about this later kostyantyn eliseyev joins the broadcast as deputy minister of foreign affairs of ukrai

well , the un charter begins with the fact that the security council must solve the problems of peacecurity in the world. today, these security issues cannot be solved with all due respect to such problems as global warming, climate change, terrorism, economic decline, and many, many other things, but he cannot deal only with these problems , after all, there are still many specialized institutions that deal with with this, how can you, with nuclear energy, with unesco, with issues of culture and education, and so on, and so on, and yet the un is the core of the un, it is the un security council, if it is unable to work effectively, then something is wrong in our house. we need to change something, let's see, by the way, uh, today just starts another session of the assembly data, it opens uh, and the session will start already, well, high- level discussions will begin in a week, and surely all these questions will be heard there. i think that the ukrainian delegation will too, whoever leads it she will also express her vision, including the issues that you are raising right now. it wi

five states, one of which was the soviet union, russia, its legal successor and the security council e of that system of international relations, in which today almost 200 states participate, but the ukrainian president, apparently, imagined that he was able to create a new security system, who even came up with the name the peace formula, the formula must be said to be very complicated, but the president of serbia speaks separately about the territorial integrity of ukraine in response to this asked your question. what is the difference between the sovereignty of the territorial integrity of ukraine and the sovereignty of the territorial integrity of serbia, most of those who are in the current general assembly advocate for changes in the un charter, they themselves do not comply with this charter, the president of serbia added that same evening, western politicians demonstrated that the prime minister did not comply with the charter of the united nations, the head of european diplomacy , josé borel, gathered eu foreign ministers to discuss new sanctions with them. against russia, of

it was a re-broadcast of the council. the un securityouncil in a dozen cities in russia held concerts and rallies under the slogan we are together in support of the republics of donbass of the kherson and zaporozhye regions that joined russia, as anastasia ivanova told the voices of the inhabitants of the new ones, but russia heard such native republics. now, all over the country, the voices of the holiday of patrism are merging in the crimea, as nowhere else did the reunification of donbass zaporozhye kherson with its people one people one side feel he is very happy that they are coming home. really looking forward to reunification with russia. hooray. russia is with us. victory will be ours, songs are winding and words of support are heard without exaggeration in all corners of russia at a rally in tver, participants congratulated each other on a significant day veterans ivan petrovich afanasiev liberated gorlovka donetsk from the nazis in 1943. he is sure new russian territories will soon be liberated from nazism again today is the da

states there are three states of the un and ukraine, as we all know, as a permanent member of the security councilated the need to reform the deformation of the security council, which is the most important thing for the possibility of modifying the right of veto - this is a key position - this is a key lever, so to speak or a tool that is both in the arsenal of permanent members and with the use of which they can block any decision of this organization, therefore, as they say, it was the first swallow , the proposal that came from the united states gives us, so to speak, the grounds and to talk about the possibility of further progress in the plan of the reform, she proposed such a very modest step. but nevertheless, this will be the first step in terms of modification, so to speak, of the legal one, which was considered a cash cow and inviolability. she proposed that the permanent members of the security council, when the vote is held, and one of them applies the right of veto, they gave an explanation at the un general assembly, that is, they must motivate and explain to the world community why

is the rhetoric present and the western leader they they are talking about the expansion of the security councilnd the reformatting of the un security council, and here i was interested in the minister's opinion. does he already see such a window of opportunity today and under what circumstances would such a window of opportunity exist to exclude russia from the elite club of the un security council? but i think that mr. minister will this answer be given by some of your other programs » er, there were certain hints that such a country that aggresses, that tries to seize other territories by force, attack smaller states, which has not been missed in the modern world may be present at the un but maybe this requires a restart of this organization of the united nations e let's listen to biden then i understand there are quotes phrases e replicas of the opinion of the company sinyutka biden drozdov yes i'm not against it at all let's listen to joe biden with the permission of ostap drozdov be please president putin has made open nuclear threats against europe with reckless disregard for non-prolifer

, or russia is a member of the security council and has right of veto, so he will block any initiative to collect funds from it on the air told the only news to the telephonist minister of justice denys malovska we want the general assembly to consecrate and agree and say that it is ok to actually create such a mechanism at the expense of the russian federation, why is it important the fact is that certainly similar decisions that radically change the status quo in the world should be accepted by the un security council but we all understand that russia, as a radio member, has the right of veto , so it will block it. another option is practically the only one we have now, which is to use the decision of the general assembly. it is specific. that the general assembly does not have the right to make binding decisions, they are decisions of a recommendatory nature, but there is a nuance here, the more votes cast for a certain resolution of the general assembly, the more authoritative it is and the better we will be able to use it in the future

, but russia is a permanent member of the un security council . he said that if a country that is a permanent member of the un security council allows itself to annex foreign territories of an independent country, a sovereign country recognized by the world, the country of ukraine, then this is the collapse of the world order and it is true, this is the collapse of the world order in which everyone bordered, then it tries destroy the civilized world don't let them do that volodymyr grave head of the central district administration in the mariupol city council p volodymyr greetings good afternoon, i will start immediately with this event that happened today in moscow unanimously there it means that the territory of the donetsk luhansk region was recognized as a part of the russian federation that in your opinion, this changes exactly how the occupiers will behave now, let's say, in occupied mariupol, because again, for the armed forces of ukraine, for the ukrainian leadership it doesn't change anything for the normal world community, but how do you

strengthening strategic partnership and strengthening security and the union state in moscow a meeting of the heads of the security council of the two countries took place in new york the un general assembly opens the delegation of belarus is already in place, as well as the accents this time in the letter of appeal to the participants were placed by the head of our foreign ministry, the amazonian twitch does not have time to ban users in place of the banned streamer of household gas on watch took over. the streamer of hot water from the bathroom of the tent is rudely demolished, but this makes them even bigger for the fourth day under pressure and threats, the protesters in moldova do not retreat demanding an adequate politician, and not sandu, the beauty of the soul will preserve peace and tranquility. the trilogy of books was presented by the belarusian peace foundation. a belarusian delegation headed by the minister of foreign affairs arrived in new york. the un general assembly opens there vladimir makeev also sent a message to all members of the international organization. letter of appeal, belarus is forced to stat

and the expansion of security council. w and order the russian ministry of justice is celebrating its 220th anniversary. today, the ministry of justice is actively introducing digital technologies, several online platforms have been launched. there you can get legal services. the main tasks of the department are the protection of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of citizens, reporting. maria valieva wedding palace. one bride is more beautiful than the other in the hall rattles. march mendelssohn newlyweds here. they come only for marriage registration. applications are submitted online quickly convenient no queues the bureaucratic procedures of the celebration do not overshadow the smartphone entered through the phone, it registered through the computer and that's it. i expect in due time anastasia pavel yursky the application was submitted through public services. and now the signatures have been put on, the rings are put on, it's time to think about the children they plan to have three. and how to register to

and then when members of the security council spoke, it was very clear that there were differences among the major countries. now we heard from both russia and the united states, both permanent members of the security council here is the clear differences between the 2. if we know the outcomes of the sham referenda were pre determined in moscow, they in no way represent a legitimate expression of the will of the ukrainian people. some a groom, if you could, you could, if any of the loudest critics of reference in the danverse, the foreclosure on coastal regions were at one time at the forefront of support for cosello's independence. no referendums were held in kosovo tow. only a declaration of independence adopted by the provisional self governing body in excess of its powers. but back then it was enough for the west to recognise costello's independence, clear differences between major countries expressed at the security council meeting . now it's important to note that just prior to the un security council meeting, the u. s. secretary of state anthony blanket made clear that the united

and then when members of the security council spoke, it was very clear that there were differences among the major countries. now we heard from both russia and the united states, both permanent members of the security council here is the clear differences between the 2. we know the outcomes of these sham referenda were predetermine in moscow. they in no way represent a legitimate expression of the will of the ukrainian people. i'd like to say that the referendums were conducted transparently upholding old electro norms. more than 100 independent international observers from 40 countries observed the referendum. they gave their opinions to the media, but unfortunately, you won't have this in western media story that might be carried out with weapons provided to kia by the united states. this is what anthony blanket said shortly before the un security council meeting. will the us still allow ukrainian troops to use us weaponry to defend against russians in those territories, no matter what the outcome of these referendums and this, these possible annexations ukraine has the absolute right

in accordance with rule 39 of the council's provisional rules, i invite the representative of the european union for foreign affairs and security policy to participate in this meeting. in accordance with rule 37 of the council's rules of procedure, i would invite the representative's of belarus, poland, turkey and ukraine to participate in this meeting. the security council will now begin consideration of item two of the agenda. i would like to warmly welcome the secretary general, the prime minister and other high-level representatives. your presence underscores the importance of the subject matter under discussion. now, the secretary-general mr. gutierrez. >> russia's war on ukraine shows no signs of letting up. the past seven months have seen unspeakable suffering and devastation. the latest developments are dangerous and disturbing. we are further steps away from any prospect of peace, and towards an endless cycle of horror and bloodshed. as i have said from the start, this senseless war has unlimited potential to reach a terrible harm in ukraine and around the world. the idea of nuclear conflict, once on thinkable, has bec

and the expansion of the security council. of the main russian social networks vk strives to become also the exclusive supplier of games, and such prospects we will ask about philip trofimov, the host of the program vesti.net philip i welcome how big this market is. what is the fight for? good afternoon. well, if in money, then the russian video game market is under 200 billion rubles. and more than 60% of russians play games in one way or another, which is something to fight for, but a little later we will start with their competitor about vk initiatives. alice is now in the shops and cafes of a voice assistant from yandex and yandex.stations speakers will provide musical accompaniment for all kinds of public spaces. first of all, of course commercial because the thing is not free. however, we are not that very expensive. but the design is guaranteed to consist of licensed music. this is a joint project between yandex and qbik mus.

the west had no doubts about novorossia, and therefore the meeting of the un security council on ukraineance on the day when zelensky summed up their results via video link. here, already as an obligatory point of the program, a member of the security council is offered to feel as if in the auditorium of a cinema of a repeated film, the council should not turn into a platform for political shows or into a cinema, just such a show of the ukrainian delegation was staged by the genus legion for a high-level week, when in the hall with a directed the extras were chasing after a pre-recorded video of the speech of the ukrainian president in the security council of decoys just don’t drag it through, zelensky. i had to try myself. he again raises the stakes , however, replays such improvisations, the authors of this script. they can even welcome the need to globally isolate russia, this country can no longer be a permanent member of the security council, he and the right-wing wetta need to introduce even tougher sanctions against moscow if russia recognizes the results of the referendums, then

exclusion of the russian federation from the un to play a security game in particular well, for example, with the first one, the president of the united states said about the reform of the security council, before that, the american delegation, let's say, took such a silent position when it came to the reform, negotiations were underway processes and the working group of negotiating groups on this issue, but the americans never processed the activities there and it was clear to everyone that as well as the country that has the right to veto what other four of the whole five i am among them countries and it always belongs to security, they did not activate this position was expected while you were talking about the issue of leisure now at the level of the president of the united states - this is the highest level, it will be a general onion, it is said about the need for reform of the un. i think that the next step - this will already talk about the place occupied by the russian federation illegally, this is the seat of the soviet union, which she actually took over in december 1991. well, for example, such a person is far from the last in the world . it is the chairman of the european c

. >> what does it mean, that russia, a permanent member of the un security council, is supposed to ensurelective peace and security? not just an invasion of another member, but now the annexing of territories. >> we have been clear, the russian invasion of ukraine has been a clear violation of the u.n. charter and international law. the sectary-general's efforts have been one on helping the people of ukraine on the humanitarian side, and where he could be useful and practical in bringing both sides together to limit the global impact of the war. >> president erdogan was talking about a successful effort by turkey and the u.n. to get out of those blockaded ukrainian port could the u.n. secretary general play a role in trying to mediate and ending to this crisis and negotiate a settlement? >> we have to take things one step at a time. our reading is at this point we don't see an immediate possibility for the two sides t speak togetheto settle this conflict. we would like to see it, but we don't see it happening soon. the availability of grain to not be exported from the black sea is a great

forbidden words, what he said about what he kept silent, the head of the magaten at the meeting of the un security council zaporozhye npp kiev puts europe on the brink of a man-made disaster, but the west again claims against russia in history the first soviet nuclear submarine leninsky komsomol in kronstadt unique football players become a museum exhibit. here are the ports to force it to carry out an engineering operation of fantastic complexity. so today is the main day of the eastern economic forum. everybody in anticipation of vladimir putin's speech at the plenary session. it will begin in the near future . traditionally, the president will pay attention to the most sensitive topics, as his spokesman said earlier. dmitry peskov, the head of state, will assess the economic situation with an emphasis on the dynamically developing far east region. the most important thing for our country, well, of course, not only this is the domestic and foreign policy restructuring the economy in the face of aggressive actions. west shift of business activity to the east. global transformation and a chance to build a

now, the un security council of task with making sure world peace continue and deescalate and conflicts. but it seems like, as russia pointed out, the un security council will just use the platform for grand standing, just as a place to put on political shows to demonize russia when real danger to world peace and the possibility of this conflict escalating too much greater heights. are hanging over our heads as a result of the response of the united states and its allies to the referendum. i just got the latest last cross live now to kennestone of the hamilton coalition to stop the war. ken, it's great to have you on the program today. now, western media headlines have claimed that people in the don bass and the to break away ukrainian regions were forced to vote at gunpoint. international observers told a very different story. so who are people expected to believe here? here western reports are mere propaganda. i your news clip and the reports of the observers who are actually on the grant and show that the people that there was an enthusiastic response on the part of the people of the

the world, do i believe in your ability to act, do you, alexander, believe in the ability of the un security council to put putin in his place in the matter of the possible annexation of the occupied regions of donetsk and luhansk, kherson and zaporizhzhia regions, the security council of course no , as long as russia is there and as long as it has a legal right, then of course they cannot make any decisions , moreover, you know, i will tell you that even the council of ministers itself consulted with russia, even when they made some decisions, for example, regarding sanctions against iran i didn't guarantee that russia would comply with them, because it's an interesting thing, i'll just make a digression so that it's clear what's up with the security council. and i want to remind you that since the mid-2000s, sanctions have been introduced against iran by a un security council resolution, which russia also voted for then but in principle , this did not interfere with anything, as later it turned out that russia was sending arms to iran in order to circumvent the same sanctions that she herself vote

[indiscernible] >> madam president and distinguished members of the security council, secretary general, prosecutor, i thank the french presidency to keep the focus of the security council on the threat. russia's war of aggression against ukraine. bodies of innocent victims are being exhumed at least 445 graves in the recently liberated city izium. the grief of those who are close is yet another drop in the ocean of suffering that russia has inflicted upon the people of ukraine since seven months and eight years of his barbaric aggression. you have seen the image of a dead hand of a ukranian soldier with a yellow and blue bracelet still on it. i do wear one, too. many of us do. and russia should know one thing, it will never be able to kill all of us. and here is why. because on february 24 when russia attacked ukraine from all directions, within first 24 hours, tens of thousands of ukranians returned from abroad to defend their country and what happened within the first 24 hours after president putin announced mobilization, the opposite, thousands of russians booked international fligh

west what the results of the referendum in novorossia would be, and therefore the meeting of the un security council on ukraine was requested in advance for the day when zelensky summed up their results via video link. here , already as an obligatory point of the program, a member of the security council is offered to feel as if in the auditorium of a cinema of a repeated film ; extras were staged catching up to applaud in advance, the recorded video of the speech of the ukrainian president in the security council of decoys so just don’t drag zelensky through. i had to try myself. he again raises the stakes , however, replays such improvisations, the authors of this script. even can welcome the need to globally isolate russia, this country can no longer be permanent. the un security council with the right of wett second need to introduce even tougher sanctions against moscow if russia recognizes the results of the referendums, then there is nothing more to talk about with putin, but why did kiev not want to talk for a long time? why did he leave the negotiations after the team from washington, as se

now, the un security council of task with making sure world peace continue and deescalate and conflicts. but it seems like, as russia pointed out, the un security council was just using the platform for grand standing, just as a place to put on political shows to demonize russia when real danger to world peace and the possibility of this conflict escalating too much greater heights. are hanging over our heads as a result of the response of the united states and its allies to the referendum jo ultimate host or the conservative daily podcast. say the referendums gave local a chance to restore stability in the region. people are having a resounding this is a resounding vote. the basically says we want to step away from what's happening happening in ukraine. we wanna step away from the neo nazis that have taken over and have have a pervasive authority in or power inside of ukraine. so i think that this gives them the opportunity in those regions that they can have more stability and, and be able to be protected. and you're talking about western influences and western media. they haven't tol

australia penny board regarding ukraine china is a great power china is a permanent member of the un security councild the un charter we believe like every country except russia that russia violates the un charter with its invasion of ukraine we encourage china as a permanent member of the un security council with a special responsibility to support the un charter and use its influence to stop the war, said wonk at a briefing on the sidelines of the un general assembly in new york, and we understand what happened both at the century-long meeting of the un general assembly and before that there was a meeting of the shanghai cooperation organization, where there were all the calls, and there was also an extremely strange statement by the minister of foreign affairs of china, who stated that, so to speak, without any additional conditions, ukraine and russia should enter into negotiations, that is, the impression is that china supports the creeping occupation temporarily, of course, of our territories, mr. ambassadors, glory to the heroes, i think that, well, first of all, this is an important statement

richard, it's the never ending story of russia in the security council. isn't it? can you actually do anything, i mean, meaningful to respond? yeah, i mean, of course, having a permanent seats in the un security council means that russia has a veto in that body, that the vote body is the ultimate arbiter of security and world affairs within the united nation system. so that means that russia can block any kind of action on the un security council level, but there will be a meeting of the un security council tomorrow to discuss this, a lot of focus on that. some speculation about whether the russians are going to take part in that white might want to see that how the ukranian ambassadors, the u. n. is going to be there certainly will have the united states, another country supporting a ukraine using that as a kind of podium to try and get their message across even further. but i think it's also quite interesting to see what's happening now feeding into the discussions about the need to reform the un security council, which many countries have been going on about for

and at the very fact that rasa could veto this at any time, is preventing the un security council from acting on top of that, there is a responsibility to protect. that is something that voted me lensky, actually called on at leaders to actually take more seriously. also in the un security council not been used many times in syria, in molly, in countries that don't have the kind of political clout that rossa pass. so patience is wearing thin in the knowledge that the un is unable to really act against this rule in ukraine and against russia's actions that on, on that point they were. because if you say, as you say, russia has a veto. so what is the point of today's security council meeting? well, at the very least, m a, russia had to sit there and take what everybody else was saying in the un security council. and that did include some criticism from china. your china doesn't actively criticize, but when you have tie needs a foreign minister sitting there and calling on all states to respect international borders. but also calling for threats to be heard. that is china really navigate in a delicate bal

directly get used to the exclusion of the russian federation from the un to play security in particular well, for example, with the first one about the reform of the security council said the president of the usa before that, the american delegation, let's say so, took such a silent position when it came to the reform, negotiation processes were underway, there is a working group, negotiation groups on this issue, but the americans never processed the activities there and it was clear to everyone that as well as the country that has the right to veto, what are the other four of all the five countries, i always provide something for security, they, uh, did not activate this position, they waited while you said the question of leisure. now at the level of the president of the united states - this is the highest level, it will be it was said about the need to reform the un. i think that the next step is to talk about the place that the russian federation occupies illegally, this is the place of the soviet union, which it actually took over in december 1991. well, for example, such a person is far from the last in the world. the chairman of the european council or the