happen russia, eh, valeriu , can this vote be a prologue to the reform of the united nations, in particular, regarding the un security council, where russia has the right of veto well, we have repeatedly talked with you on the air about how russia got into the un security council and in general into the un since 1991, when they declared themselves the legal successors of the soviet union, at a time when belarus and ukraine were the founders the united nations organizations actually extended their membership after the collapse of the soviet union because ukraine was already represented there during the soviet union, and can this unity encourage the united nations organization, as at one time a league of nations, to reformat or make some new object? unity, if only to limit the right of russian terrorists, a country of terror, to influence world politics by using the right of veto in the council of security, well, let me briefly say, yes, i do not count on the fact that russia will be thrown out of the un, so even if she will lose absolutely on legal grounds she will lose now this place she will submit in a new way, as china di

did a g eval mister president distinguished members of the security council. we are aware that the russian federation has filed an official complaint in line with the provisions of optical 6 regarding allegations of biological weapon programs in ukraine. as high representative when i commit to inform the council in march and may of this year, united nations is not aware of any such biological weapons programs. this remains the case today. i would also like to note that united nations currently have my either the mandate nor the technical operational capacity to investigate this information as high representative like a mitchell previously stated in the council. the relevant instrument of international law is the 1972 biological weapons convention b, w. c. which effectively prohibits the development products from acquisition transfer, stockpiling and use of biological and talks in weapons. the lesson fredrickson and ukraine are both state parties to the biological weapons convention. mister president, on the 29th of june, 2022, the russian federation submitted a

repeating that allowing russia to use the right of the soviet union to veto the decisions of the security counciloes not really give this body the opportunity to fulfill its main mission in accordance with by the un charter, namely the maintenance of international peace and security. at this moment, millions of people in this world see on their screens the devastating consequences of russia's presence in the security council and the fact that the council of security cannot effectively respond to security threats of a global nature, and of course all this undermines the image of the united nations organization, e-e summarizes the ambassador of ukraine to the united nations also demands reform and e-e, the us ambassador to the organization e-e linda thomas greenpaw for her in the words of america, you are never with her russian claims on ukrainian lands . i think that in principle here, tatyana, it is still worth reminding that back in april, ukraine, members of the united nations, submitted such a proposal to reform the organization under the terms which, in principle, legally, the general assembl

the new territories of the country strengthening security measures in other regions and the creation of territorial defense the president held a meeting of the russian security council and gave a number of important instructions. so, the most important thing on the territory of the donetsk and luhansk people's republics, as well as the kherson and zaporozhye regions, martial law. the decree goes into effect tomorrow, according to federal law. this means, among other things, the strengthening of the protection of all strategic state facilities, we will especially decide the entry for the movement of citizens, if necessary, the resettlement of residents to safer areas, a curfew. everything, this is primarily for the safety of citizens, in addition, during the operation of the martial law regime. it is possible to seize the property of citizens for the needs of the army with subsequent compensation for the involvement of citizens for public works and for the needs of defense also according to the decree of the president in the dnr lc. headquarters of territorial defense are being created in the kherson zaporizhia regions. and in the regions bordering with ukraine, crim

base provocation, trying to push through a document with a direct condemnation of one member of the security council from these un security council , vasily nebenzin, our country's permanent representative to the un, said this. russia vetoed a resolution that condemned the holding of a referendum in novorossia . united states valentin bogdanov sponsored a resolution condemning the referendum in the donbass, zaporozhye, kherson regions. from the very beginning, they understood that she had no chance, but the permanent representatives of the united states and albania for in addition, they brought it to the security council in order to stumble upon russia's protest and inflate the scandal even more. some of our advise colleagues have reached their bottom. violated even those few decency, which as it seemed to us still remained in this hall. we do not know, for example, that the security council has ever adopted a resolution directly condemning one of the members of the council. tell me, do you seriously expect that russia can consider and support such a project. and? if not, then it turns out that you

of global peace and security. to put an end to the high handedness of these countries, including the united states, at the risk of the international security council community, with the sampling of these developing countries for the majority of the u.n. membership, as issued in the impartiality of the activities it should stick to the cognizant principles to serve the determinations of the peoples. the united states and other member states are trying to enforce on sovereign states international orders under the signposts of safeguarding democracy and protecting human rights. these interventionist attempts are a blanket breach of the u.n. charter, a procedure to the softening of a quality with partial attacks and double standards favoring the unfair positions of individual countries and specific versus should be thoroughly eliminated with the core principles of the charter being equal rights and the domination of the people as strictly observed. texting that opportunity for the people of cuba in their struggle to safeguard their sovereignty and the development of the country in the face of the high handedness of the united states in their internal

it is also connected with the activity of the councils of the national councils security of the un anday recognized russia as a terrorist regime, a european sadist - this is a parliamentary assembly eh and a very important osce and there was such a point in the resolution that russia does not have the right to be among the permanent academics of the security council. security, where is russia with the right of veto to allow peacekeeping forces to enter, and i think that the meeting with kuleb is logical, mrs. olya. thank you. olga kosharna, an expert on nuclear energy , was with us. ukraine decided to introduce personal sanctions against russians and ukrainians on the blacklist of more than 3,600 people and companies . artists on september 30, the national security and defense council of ukraine finally decided to introduce personal sanctions against russians and ukrainians who encroached on the sovereignty and territorial integrity of ukraine. we focus not on apprenticeship, but on the fact that we can really dismantle the russian influence and at the same time influence the state of

a language that is not liked by other permanent members, who are really permanent members of the security council, because i said that i hear a request not to focus on this, so until the political position of the permanent members of the security council, in particular, the legal blue, from their point of view, changes prospects for solving the issue of removing russia from the security council. i do not see that this can be a political decision, because it would then involve, among other things, the recognition of the fallacy of what they decided behind closed doors the decision in december 1991, when without holding any consultations of public meetings of the formal security council meetings of the general assembly without voting in the security council, which in the general assemblies of the beans of the soviet union closed the meeting of the villages of the soviet union and opened the next meeting of the cursor of russia no more systemic changes in security architectures 4 regional or global took place after regional or world wars, so i think that given the extraordinary nature of the war of

council, it is the security council responsible for maintaining international peace and security and russia's attack on ukraine raised the question of whether the council is capable of preventing wars in the world . it is more than once after a full-scale invasion that president zelenskyi has declared, and in this he is supported by some western partners of ukraine, in particular the usa and the eu, when the permanent position of the supreme un security council begins to an unjust war has been provoked, a war condemned by the un general assembly, and the exclusion of security treason should be automatic. consists of five permanent members, including russia. they have the right to veto any initiative . of ukraine at the un volodymyr yelchenko russia one of the first vetoes of all time more times than all the other permanent members put together, the root of this problem is that uh, in our situation, it russia's veto power well, in general, the veto right as a tool that was more or less effectively abolished in the 50s and 60s, when the world was clearly divided into spheres of influence, and let's say that western countries did not a

now let's move on to the agenda of the meeting of the security council and discuss some issues of migration policy. this area is extremely sensitive for national security for the stable development of russia and our society , the situation in the world. dynamically changing, new global and regional factors are emerging that affect to the migration area. and we need to promptly and effectively respond to these changes and improve our work based on a thorough analysis of the new realities, as it is obvious that it is necessary to correct the current concept of state migration policy. it must take full account of all existing and potential challenges. by the way, i gave the basic instructions for further improvement of legislation in march 2020. and today i am waiting for detailed reports on what has already been done such priorities to be focused. in the near future. let's move on to the discussion, the floor to the deputy chairman of the security council, dmitry anatolyevich medvedev, please, this was footage of a meeting of the russian security council via videoconference, the president ann

was initiated and started by an organization, or rather a country, a state that is a member of the security councila member of the security council that was one of the founders of the united nations, but today it even became the question of whether this particular state created and was one of the founders of the united nations organization and whether this particular state can be a permanent member of the un security council, that is, it arises even legally because of what you said, raises two logical questions at once. first, let's talk about how did russia get there? do you know? i think that today this is a huge issue not only for russia, but it is a huge challenge for all countries that are permanent members of the un security council. this is a huge issue for the organization's leadership. of the united nations because in 1991, when russia replaced the soviet union, it actually took the place of the soviet union of this organization a and europeans e all types closed their eyes well, okay, but for 30 years no one talked about an organization without legal ones, or rather a country without lega

then why do we need the collective bodies of the security council or the general assembly, the same membersthe security councils, which literally 2 weeks ago. in this hall, foaming at the mouth , they argued the need for protection, today they themselves openly violate the un charter and push it to the same secretariat. and for the united states, which is already 4 years old, as they themselves violate the resolution 22-31 will be released in 2018 unilaterally from svd, this is just some new unseen early level of bush neglect. by the decision of the security council, iran was also mentioned today in the white house. there, president biden received an israeli colleague. isaac duke, the details of the negotiations are unknown, but after herzek said that they talked about the islamic republic most of all. basically. we discussed the topic of iran, its desire to obtain nuclear weapons, the suppression of its own citizens by violent violent methods and activity early on the supply of weapons, which kills innocent civilians. ukrainian hearts, for sure, had in mind drones on the eve it was reporte

are members of the security council of the united nations, the state that attacked the neighboring statey, which condemned and obliged russia to stop aggression, said nothing about that that they should be deprived of the right to vote in the security council. at least for the time when aggressive actions are taking place, and the international court of human rights of the united nations did not do the same, and if mr. mykola - this is an extremely important point, i agree with you, let's hope that appropriate procedures will be applied to putin, i have a more down-to-earth question, which refers to the active little putin who came from the russian federation, put on the criminal uniform of the russian federation army and began to kill our civilians, in particular, starting to bombard our cities with aviation, machines with artillery, and so on, and these little tiny birds were captured, and according to how the situation looks with them now, because we regularly hear information about the exchange of a possible exchange of all for all, but on the other hand, there are military criminals

then why do we need the collective bodies of the security council or the general assembly, the same memberse security councils, which literally 2 weeks ago. in this room with foam mouth, argued the need to protect the un charter, today they themselves openly violate it and push it to the same secretariat. and for the united states, which for 4 years already, as they themselves have been violating the resolution at 22-31, will be released unilaterally from the svd in 2018, this is just some kind of new unprecedented early level of neglect of the bush. by the decision of the security council, iran was also mentioned today in the white house. there, president biden received an israeli colleague. isaac duke details of the negotiations are unknown, but after hercek said, that the islamic republic was talked about most of all. basically. we discussed the topic of iran, its quest to obtain nuclear weapons, the suppression of its own citizens by brutal violent methods, and early arms transfer activity that kills innocent civilians. ukrainian hearts, for sure, had in mind the drones on the eve it wa

bodies of the council of ministers of foreign affairs of the council of ministers of defense of the committee of secretaries of securitypresentatives of all member states of the utcb work in the secretariat, they are appointed according to a quota on the principles of rotation, every 3 years the secretary general of the csb leads the secretariat. our team is quite professional and trained, in which representatives of all our states are present, and people with serious experience always just don’t get into it man from the street. uh, only really professional which, well, that's very little uh, and everyone is worth it. for example, the activity of vector beyagov, his colleague from kyrgyzstan mirlan turgunbekov gave almost 30 years to diplomacy just 2 years ago, did not even think about such work, he came to his position in 2020 from the anti-terrorist special unit. i, like every growing boy , have always dreamed of landing. for me, this proposal was unexpected. as they say, being a military man accepted for execution high trust leadership and arrived at the duty station. quiet diplomatic work is very different from the

of course, the council of europe as another international organization cannot exclude russia from the un security. but again, we started as a couple the preparation of another resolution that actually explains that russia is not should be a member of the un at all, why? because it is legal, when the soviet union collapsed, russia as a country did not apply for membership and these documents, if you look for them, there are no such documents in gena's un headquarters in the flat there, because there was a tacit agreement that russia is becoming, as they say, the legal successor of the soviet union, and by the way, it is interesting that ukraine and belarus were still republics of the union at the time. they immediately had a separate membership , and this is just normal, so they became the legal successors of their own countries when they became independent countries, but from russia such there are no documents because well, we will, well, at least use the couple's resolution as another legal uh, well, such a tool so that our lawyers in new york, uh, could also uh, uh, ask this uh, question at the

of article 6 in this manner. is a forger attempt by russia to misuse to be w. c. on the security council, as a platform for this information in an attempt to justify it's unjustifiable on unlawful invasion of ukraine. such deeply cynical and harmful actions demeaned a council on its role in maintaining international peace on security. president, russia's actions risk undermining, essential disarmament, a nonproliferation instruments upon which all our security depends equally there and talk on the gym cooperation and research, supporting public health in ukraine and congress around the world. we must do all that we count as global partners to ensure effective disease monitoring detection control and prevention efforts to misrepresent or undermine such work in ukraine and elsewhere will only weaken efforts to prevent and control future outbreaks. this is worked at russia. it says engages in and benefits from the present. russia would be better served by immediately and unconditionally ending and hostile. it is withdrawn from the entire territory of ukraine and refraining for, for the thre

important to say, well, the secretary advises us on security and defense oleksiy danilov of ukraine reacted and commented on the statements of the security councile russian federation, which stated the need to desatonize ukraine. putin's council of security consists of 13 members and the same damn dozen and who needs desatonization. messages, meanwhile, the command of the air force of ukraine urges not to show the combat work of airist and nasams, this also applies to the coverage of work against air defense. so, literally from the press service of the command's public relations, dear representatives of the ukrainian and foreign mass media, coverage of the combat work of the air defense of the air forces of the armed forces of ukraine is not expected, this applies to the process of the arrival of anti-aircraft missile systems in ukraine and on the male of their ugu robot and this means so that anti -aircraft - missile complexes are received, they apply not only to aster ayla on males. journalists because well, our prime minister recently spoke about the efficiency and cutting edge, in particular , of the only installation we have so far, accordi

benefits from sabotage on the nord stream gas pipelines the question put on the agenda of the un security council the reaction of the american representative and the right of veto that russia used in relation to the us resolution of those who joined the ranks armed forces in the framework of partial mobilization. the conditions under which they live were checked today by defense minister sergei shoigu, he arrived in kubinka near moscow, where places for recruits are deployed, the minister made a number of important statements. let me remind you about who concerns partial mobilization. it began on the order of the supreme commander-in-chief to protect the donetsk and luhansk people's republics of kherson and zaporizhzhya regions, which had been admitted to russia the day before . konstantin panyushkin. the morning after during the solemn ceremony in the kremlin, the minister of defense, the mayor of moscow and the governor of the moscow region in patriot park, generators of dust kitchens are noisy everywhere, where until recently a review of the main novelties of military equipment was held, now b

of iranian-made drones found in order to facilitate the implementation of the resolution of the security councilthe international ski federation continued the suspension of russian and belarusian athletes from competitions, a member of the board of directors of phys mat'orges stated this, according to him , there was no discussion because everything was so obvious and the decision to stop activities national federations of belarus and russia passed a decision in march in the summer continued 45 echelons with civilians 445 towns and villages 1944 wagons with inhumane under the conditions of one night, the soviet authorities expelled almost 78 thousand ukrainians from their homes. on october 21, 1947 , operation west began, the most massive deportation of ukrainians to siberia and kazakhstan. the crimes of the kremlin. we will live with you, because there will still be a lot of work day after day, they will burn with the fire of the sunflowers that will sprout from the enemy's pockets, we have many plans for after the war, we will live for them, we will live remembering everyone what to do if the

the limitation of russia's rights in the organization of the united nations, including in the council of securityt you and i talked several times on our broadcasts about the status of the russian federation, how it gained authority in the organization of the united nations in 1991, and you talked about the fact that there are legal points regarding the legal succession of the russian federation, the fact that it declared itself, or let's say , the cis countries agreed to the fact that russia was the legal successor of the ussr in the un, and according to the un charter, russia still had to go through the entire procedure from joining the un to its acceptance into the un security council, taking into account the fact that literally 10 days ago, the un general assembly voted on a resolution condemning the accession of the occupied territories by russia territories of ukraine and we received the result of 143 votes and there were only a few against er is there a chance to throw russia out of the un security council, so that they do not interfere with er with their veto the organization of the united

the secretary of the national security council and other colleagues , members of the national securityouncil, did you know that you included a random person? well, it doesn't happen that way. then we included 20% by chance. and today, we included russian oligarchs whose property is here and who could help the ukrainian army to quickly liberate the russian federation . this is us we don't apply it. a lot. well, there is still a lot of russian business in ukraine. tell me the details of this law that you mentioned. about alpha bank. what was the decision of the parliament in the end? it was voted on. it was actually sent to the president's office. to be honest, i'm not ready to say whether it was signed or not . no, not signed, don't tell me, because we are not able to look into the parliament, unfortunately, you are not able to look into the parliament, although my colleagues and i have appealed to the leadership of the parliament many times with a request to allow journalists to return to the walls of the parliament to work because everyone knows when the verkhovna rada is sitting and

necessary level of tolerance, i quote . i.e. without details well, already after the meeting of the un security councillyanskyi said that his country was completely satisfied with the meeting itself because it was able to raise the level of awareness of the members of the un the meeting of the security council regarding the dirty bomb was also commented on by the deputy representative of ukraine in the organization serhiy kislytsia. only crazy people can trust russian criminals, he said, and added that during this week, the council of security may hold two more meetings at the request of russia, the first will concern iran's nuclear program, and the second will concern russia's repeated accusations against ukraine this time, regarding the alleged existence of military biological programs in ukraine, we already know the biolaboratories that russian propaganda often talks about. well, returning to the talks about the dirty bomb, the ukrainian authorities believe that russia, dispersing information about this dirty bomb, may be looking for an excuse for a false flag operation on the territory of ukraine,

of a special coordinating council. it will be headed by the head of the cabinet of the minister, the composition of the council will include deputy prime ministers, representatives of the securityments of the socio-economic bloc government administration of the president of the state council. in order to ensure close cooperation with all regions of the country, i would like to emphasize once again that we are proud of everyone. those who enter the military service today are doing their duty to defend the fatherland, and those are our soldiers. whatever tasks. they did not perform should be provided with everything necessary. this applies to equipment and places of disposition of living conditions of equipment and equipment, food and medical care. we have every opportunity to in order to solve all the issues that arise here, they are at a modern and worthy level for our country. who today are on the front lines or are being trained at the training grounds and training centers should feel. the president emphasized in support. so don't worry about seven. i am placed in the rear. the head of state instructed the governors to take control of assistance to relatives of all defenders.

of veto to take away the main role. in this mizan, according to tradition, a ukrainian was taken away, it is time to act, if the security councilnot able to act with russia as part of your duty to act without it. here are just such actions, just will be direct violation of the entire system of international security and the right, which has already been dealt more and more sensitive blows in recent times. one of them was the destruction of russian gas pipelines at the bottom of the baltic sea until now, in all international conflicts, cross-border projects, especially in the field of energy, were inviolable now change everything experts invited to the meeting dismissed the version of chance bottom using the most modern technologies to reduce the risk of damage caused by storms that are not exploding bombs, fishing nets or shipwrecks. this is an excellent pipeline. so as far as i know it's out of the question. however. i cannot tell you what exactly happened, the representative of gazprom, who was invited to the meeting of the security council, also did not put forward versions. but he spoke in detail about the circumstances of

october 2016, yerevan, at a session of the csto collective security council, the head of its member statespt another fateful document, the collective security strategy until 2025, and also decide to create a csto crisis response center. through it there is an interaction. during exercises and crisis situations, proposals are developed for the statutory bodies of the organization, monitoring is underway situation in the zone of responsibility of the csto and in the adjacent territories. collective security is not only military operations and negotiations between diplomats. this is a whole range of measures. when the decision was made to organize, literally immediately another very important institution, organizational councils, were created, which were purposefully engaged in , uh, the fight against drug trafficking. kov

her as well as other members of the security council . they're all in agreement of where things are and the need for tough action against north korea. but that is not the overall view of the security council and ambassador thomas greenfield. when she spoke in the counsel singled out 2 countries, she said that we're enabling north korea, that we're protecting north korea in her words. now she didn't name those 2 countries, but i can tell you it's obvious from speaking to diplomat. she was referring to, to permanent members of the security council, china and russia at that. do not want to pursue any more sanctions against at north courier at this time. in fact, both of those countries were critical of the u. s. they were critical of south korea. they were critical of japan, the recent military drills. they said that all of what was happening was not just the response, a response to all the fault of north korea. it was because of a confrontation and mistrust is going on between north korea and the united states . it's pretty clear, even th

the existence of the un security council is that there are legitimateof application, replace the use of nuclear weapons by the un security council for this is why a mechanism was created that would allow otherwise to ignore acting in the un security council, the use of nuclear weapons is very simple, if the russian federation uses nuclear weapons, it will destroy a couple of cities there, destroy several million people, lead to the third world war, then after this third world war ends with the another result of the country where the winners of the 30th war, on the ruins of the current world, create a new security council, in which these states will already walk, which will leave nuclear potential, of course, the main the topic of this un security council for the next ten years will be overcoming the consequences of this world war trinity talking about radiation sickness it will be a completely different civilization i am one and a half less from the point of view of the population of course but interesting but it is hoped that we will not see it that we

the united nations security council of the united nations security council of the united nations to form a commission to investigate to form a commission to investigate to form a commission to investigate these claims so we also this week russia these claims so we also this week russia these claims so we also this week russia staged a nuclear manure staged a nuclear manure staged a nuclear manure which it didn't do for three years which it didn't do for three years which it didn't do for three years for uh for for the last three years and for uh for for the last three years and for uh for for the last three years and uh so we have a strategic nuclear threat uh so we have a strategic nuclear threat uh so we have a strategic nuclear threat uh tactical nuclear threats which shall uh tactical nuclear threats which shall uh tactical nuclear threats which shall continue which the kremlin continue to continue which the kremlin continue to continue which the kremlin continue to repeat we have dirty bomb we have repeat we have dirty bomb we have repeat we have dirty bomb we have biologica

let's demonstrate to putin the determination of the security council, complete determination. ver, russia, as a permanent member of the security council, failed to demonstrate. there are right winds and no chance of passing the vote. such there was no resolution russian diplomats proposed to amend the document, but they were rejected we proposed to fix the call of the soviets to all parties involved to intensify the train of the diplomatic way of resolving the conflict. shouldn't that be the goal of our joint efforts. it turns out that ours would? western partners once again signed that they really do not want peace in ukraine, they dream of the defeat of russia, and this is in the light of rabid hostility. the west sets us different tasks. as a result, 10 countries for the resolution of russia against four of them , brazil, china abstained and judging by the statements , they did not quite abstain, supporting the american position, any action of the security council should be aimed at resolving the crisis, and not at intensifying conflicts and confrontation the crisis in ukrai

is due to the fact that such a step must be ratified first of all by the permanent members of the security council, among whom of the federation, and then as amendments, it was certified and the majority retained, including the parliaments of the states and permanent members of the security council, this is a very, very difficult period, that is, today it is realistic to talk about picking up legal rights from russia in russia. perhaps it is not entirely realistic. but i think that this issue is urgent and the issue needs to be saved and put on the agenda, and both of them are already being talked about a little bit, and i know that a lot and our association ukrainian foreign policy article and veteran diplomats had questions about it at various forms and i think it should be continued, this issue has a serious political undercurrent, which even has a moral undertone, it focuses attention on the illegality of russia's occupation of these places in the united nations. it seems to me that this is where we have all the legal grounds for at least to promote this issue is not just to select something l

her as well as other members of the security council. they're all in agreement of where things are and the need for tough action against north korea. but that is not the overall view of the security council and ambassador thomas greenfield. when she spoke in the counsel singled out 2 countries, she said that we're enabling north korea, that we're protecting north korea in her words. now she didn't name those 2 countries, but i can tell you it's obvious from speaking to diplomat. she was referring to 2 permanent members of the security council, china and russia at that. do not want to pursue any more sanctions against at north courier at this time. in fact, both of those countries were critical of the u. s. they were critical of south korea. they were critical of japan, the recent military drills. they said that all of what was happening was not just the response, a response to all the vault of north korea. it was because of a confrontation and mistrust is going on between north korea and the united states . it's pretty clear, even thoug

investigation start immediately and we welcome strong support for side steps by many members of the un security council. we have already invited un experts to visit ukraine to inspect, recall that the rain origin you're in order to facilitate the implementation of the security council resolution $20.00 to $31.00 distinguished colleagues. ukraine remains committed to the implementation of the black, the green initiative. since its launch 362 vessels, with 8000000 tons of food products and on board lap ukrainian ports for the countries of asia, europe and africa. the green continues working with the you and world food program to increase the amount of food sent to the most vulnerable countries. in particular, on the 18th of october, the 6th ball carrier under these program arrives in the port of your new morse to be further sent to yemen. the expert to ukrainian grain has already contributed to the established ation of the global market and decreasing prices. and the reduction in cow is coast by lack of food around the world. we therefore support its extension after the 22nd november, when the initial 12

well, what do emotions take over, sometimes our work is another topic of this security council was a s. how can they be assessed, uh, a meeting of the next security council on this topic and uh, for example, brazil, china, india and gabon, the resolution was not supported. will he continue to connect to this topic? uh, the meeting you mentioned preceded the nord stream meeting on sabotage and, uh, the main task here was for our western opponents. this is to introduce a draft anti-russian resolution and the results of the vote. in my opinion, just reflect exactly what these states that you mentioned. they are well aware that we are talking about the anti-russian draft resolution. in our speech, we said throughout that, uh, we don’t remember such a thing, so that it means that the members of the security council were brought to the court from evolution, which, uh, it would be proposed to condemn the actions of one of the members of the security council of a more permanent member of the security council, so this is completely unprecedented provocations that our western opponents. our for

such openly hostile actions from the west are a refusal to interact and cooperate in the un security council. some of our colleagues advise have hit rock bottom. violated even those few decencies that as it seemed to us still remained in this house. we do not know, for example, that the security council has ever adopted resolutions directly condemning one of the members of the soviets, tell me, do you seriously expect that russia can consider and support such a project. and if not, then it turns out that you deliberately bring us under the use of the right of veta, in order to then rant about the fact that russia is abusing it. the un security council was convened at the request of russia in connection with the sabotage on the branches of the nord stream pipelines. vasily nebenzya said that the accidents are certainly beneficial to the united states, according to the diplomat, in this way the last thread is broken, which ensured the independence of the european union in the energy sector. us in an energy crisis hastily european production is transferred. they get cutting edge. technology production r

as a result, he voted against the principles of the un charter in this vote, a member of the council of securityd this was the day before the decision on the further fate of sredzempiano, tomorrow will be the day after tomorrow with ride and i think that many things will be discussed, how china will act further, yes, for now, it has shown a weak position as a country that claims to have some new role in the world, that is , such a country cannot vote like that, or it is for either she is against and all these commands are a weak position. india, the largest democracy in terms of numbers in the world, has shown its absolute well, not the manifestation of the un that it wants to show its ball in the world. unfortunately, we knew india as a democracy that protects there against the empire against uh, having his illegal past, well, they wave the competition, gandhi would have addressed himself in the grave of his grave. if he knew what his country is doing now in this situation, that is, these two countries . unfortunately, uh, they follow their line, which is called pragmatic values, they absolutel

well, of course, he is the deputy secretary of the council of state security. e could be somewhere in the second or third row, but he was taken with them, although in fact he does not affect any of his processes. he doesn’t have his own team, he doesn’t have his supporters, that is, he’s just a normal person, a normal dude, who is putin so close to him? it’s interesting to me that the first deputy of the presidential administration number two serhiy kiriyenko, who took care of these reforms and referendums, by the way in the kherson region in zaporizhzhia, and you see him moved away, that is, i see that three four five six - these are people well, the sixth number is the russian prosecutor general - these are the people who now have the greatest influence in the russian establishment decision, and those who are on the left and right on the periphery. they have less influence on russian politics. and those who are on the other side. look at the third row there and sergey shoigu and sergey lavrov are there 11-12-13 and the head of russian intelligence, remember wh

of its full scale invasion, russian has shown contempt for this council. this continues with evidence that since august and in violation of the un security council resolution 20 to 31, iran has transferred more her year and shy a series. you avi's, to russia. these iranian origin, you a, these have been subsequently used in multiple attacks against ukraine, including the massive barrage on october 10, which had civilians and civilian infrastructure. in addition to the easily identifiable remnants of these you avi's recovered in ukraine, there is significant publicly available documentation, including photographs and video of these u. a. b 's being used against the graeme. the u. n. must investigate any violations of un security council resolutions. and we must not allow russia or others to impede or threaten the un from carrying out its mandated responsibilities. we take this opportunity to refute resolutely. russia's force assertion that geneva conventions do not apply to captured. foreign volunteers rushes obligations as a party to the geneva conventions, and their 1st additional protocol apply to its detention and treatment of any individuals in the arm

security council as to? attempts to deprive russia of the right to wind, well, there is already a wider discussion. uh, can russia stay in the security council here in the foreground, uh, released. uh, ukrainians, as always. they mean they say that in 1991 no decision was made that russia was the successor state of the soviet union. and just, uh, walked in. uh, the soviet representatives in front of him changed the plate with the inscription of the ussr to the plate of the russian federation and, as one of the arguments , he also cites the fact that in the un charter where the list of permanent members is still written union of soviet socialist republics but, while this is true, but simply reflects it, and the decision that was made in december. 1991, a unanimous decision with the participation and support of all permanent members of the security council, all non-permanent members of the security council and all members of the un, without exception, a decision that is absolutely impossible to somehow reverse the wishes of the kiev regime. yes , the turn of the american envoy did not come today. so w

of the relevant decree of the president of the russian federation announced at the meeting of the security councilhis the russian media reported that the dictator also added that the so-called heads of regions would be given additional powers to ensure of security, one of the biggest book events of the year, the frankfurt book fair, will start today in germany. it will last four days . thousands of publishers from all over the world are gathering here as a sign of solidarity with the ukrainian people. the fair paid special attention to ukrainian book publishers and authors at a separate stand of 100 square meters with its own partition more than 30 ukrainian publishers and authors present their books, including yuriy andruhovych, andriy kurkov , tanya malyarchuk, and oksana zabuzhko, this was all the news at this time, the updated final issue wait at 19:00 vietnamese balm zirka the first step in the treatment of colds a proven drug and not a cosmetic mixture we will be healthy ask at pharmacies vietnamese trust only proven drugs good evening we are from ukraine vasyl's big air winters my name is v

reject uh and very decisively all this russian brylyakina now russia wants to discuss it at the council of securitydays of the week in order to divert attention from what she is already doing and from what she wants to do in the future, well, apart from this, it is about the dirty bomb that was circulated in the last few days by serhiy shoigu, the minister of defense, or rather the minister of attack of the russian federation, we still have more several statements in the russian federation which, well, they are in line with this statement of the sheik. on october 20, anton krasovskyi said on the air of "our tudey" that ukrainian children should be drowned in rivers because they say they are the children of fascists or nazis, and with they need to be dealt with quite harshly, of course, and there it says that they are very deeply outraged by this statement, but this statement went and was tracked down by the russian mass media and further processed this information october 24 lavrov ukraine is preparing a dirty bomb, we will complain to the un again reinforcing the thesis about the dirty bomb octobe

let's move on to discussing the words to the deputy chairman of the security council, dmitry anatolyeviche remember, this was the statement of vladimir putin, which was voiced during the meeting of the russian security council irina rossius was with you, and my colleagues will see you. good afternoon. this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov just you could see, and we are here in the studio too, uh, the speech of the president of russia at the opening. at the meeting of the security council of the russian federation , an important decision was made, the relevant documents were signed, it is clear that we are discussing all this in the studio with our guests. meanwhile, israel refused to supply weapons to ukraine, the minister said. the defense of the country of the benigans. also, the ex-premier and leader of the opposition of benin, not italian, spoke out against israel's supply of weapons to ukraine. e throughout ukraine today again announced air e, alarm and. uh, now it is already known that explosions took place in vinnitsa, frankivsk, kie

important today to give opportunities to all between no organizations, she says the security of that of the security councilll the structures we insure first of all for control in our territories and in the territories that they say can be objects for diversion and much and accordingly kakhovska other e consultancies this is our initiative in the project such actions thank you mykola malamushek head services outside the crossroads of ukraine, a general of the army of ukraine since 2005-10, an adviser to the president of ukraine, was in touch with us for a few moments , a check for you

important today to give opportunities to all between no organizations, she says the security of the security council of the security council, the representative of this, according to the commission of the commission on the gt, all the structures we insure in first of all for control in our territories and in the territories that they say can be er objects for evasion and much more and accordingly kakhovska other e consultancies it is our initiative choose such actions thank you mykola malamushek head of the foreign intelligence service of ukraine general of the army of ukraine from on the 10th of 2005, the adviser to the president of ukraine was in touch with us for a few moments . i have a news check for you. be with us. good evening . vasyl's big broadcast of winter. beautiful winter. two hours of air time until 21:00. two hours of yours . of time, we will talk about the most important things for two hours to learn about the war , serhiy zhoretska joins our broadcast, military summaries of the day. of sports, yevhen pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for two hours in the company of his favori

as a result of the russian veto during the vote held during the 30th of set timber the security council was once again under -- unable to take the steps necessary to shoulder his primary this possibility for the maintenance of international peace and security. mr. president, i thank you for convening, resuming the special assembly. this allows all special states of the united states -- united nations to speak i subject of concern to us all. the respect of the nine nations charter and international law. faced with the security council paralysis it is up to the general assembly to rally for an international order based on the will of law, and not on the pencil of might is right. the illegal annexation orchestrated by russia and the sham a friend of the proceeded constitute a flagrant -- sham referenda that proceeded constitute a flagrant violation of the charter in the territory of ukraine. in these very difficult time we cannot recall enough often the text of 2.4 of the charter. they should reframe from the threat or use of force against a territory, state, or any other manner inconsiste

maintenance of international peace and security at this moment, millions of people around the world see on their screens the devastating consequences of russia's presence in the security council fact that the security council cannot effectively respond to security threats of a global nature and this inability undermines the image and authority of the un as a whole and hours and 40 minutes of the author's documentary film it is about valentin silvestrov, the most famous ukrainian composer on west, the main character is a 60-year-old laureate of the shevchenko prize and the author of nine symphonies, the film began to be shot in 2018, but due to the pandemic, for a long time they couldn't release the film, they worked painstakingly on the film, they worked only with the sound for two months on the day of the premiere, the main character valentin silvestrov turned 85 years old, but let it be a grand sylvester evgenia, she is absolutely heroic, because he never once betrayed music and culture in his whole life and the mechanism in itself, it absolutely turns out to be a legend and it is our property only that we can be proud to be proud not only here when in the world on this i h

now let's move on to the agenda of the meeting of the security council and discuss some issues of immigration policy. this area is extremely sensitive for national security for the stable development of russia and our society, the dynamic situation in the world is changing, new global and regional factors are emerging that affect the migration sphere. and to us we need to respond to these changes in a timely and effective manner and improve our work based on a thorough analysis of the new realities. it is so obvious that it is necessary to correct the current concept of state migration policy. it should fully take into account the whole range of existing and potential challenges, by the way, the basis for further improvement of legislation. i gave the corresponding instruction back in march 2020, and today i am waiting for detailed reports on what has already been done. on what priorities to focus attention in the near future. let's move on to discussing the word to deputy chairman of the security council dmitry anatolyevich medvedev please so the president signed two decrees on the introduct

by the way, tomorrow, if not tomorrow, and tomorrow, putin will convene a council with the members of the securityct against the key and civil infrastructure, yes, therefore, the houses of the civilian population, well, i'm sorry, it's such a remark, it's not, it's not a civilian, let's discuss what the tone says, yes, our attitude is understandable, but it's darker, less. a day passed , they arrived, what was it, it was formulated, yes, it was what they were thinking about what to do with it. they said so much that it was impossible to blow it up, they probably didn't hear it, but there is such a well- known russian analyst , yulia latina, who generally said that it would be possible to destroy it only with a nuclear strike. i remembered the information from e-e was published by komsomolskaya pravda russian, if i’m not mistaken . and there they described how they will defend this crimean bridge there, and some sort of underwater landing and ships and planes and even combat dolphins, that’s how guess who should answer for the fact that this actually happened. what well, and whose reputation will b

corresponding decree was signed by vladimir putin, the president said this, opening a meeting of the russian security council today. in addition, the leaders of the russian regions will receive additional powers and there will be special councils headed by the prime minister to coordinate security. here statement by the head of state. good afternoon dear colleagues. before we move on to our current trip. i would like to touch upon one extremely important issue during the referendum of a resident of the donetsk and luhansk people's republics, the zaporizhzhya and kherson regions firmly and unambiguously expressed their will. they want to be together with russia, the constitutional laws on the admission of four new regions to the russian federation came into force, the kiev regime. as you know, he refused to recognize the will and the choice of the people rejects any proposals for negotiations. against shelling continues, civilians are dying, neo-nazis are using frankly terrorist methods of sabotage at life support facilities, they are attempting to assassinate representatives of local authorities, like their