san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-13-528964; entitled cole anderson, a minor vs. city and county of san francisco. ~ san francisco superior court. >> roll call vote. >>> [speaker not understood]. >> excuse me, this is not the time for public comment. i will mention, i will mention that public comment has already happened on this. >>> [speaker not understood]. >> deputy sheriff? thank you, sir. >>> [speaker not understood]. >> madam clerk, could you please call the roll on item 57? >> on item 57, supervisor cohen? >> thank you, aye. >> cohen aye. supervisor farrell? farrell aye. supervisor kim? kim aye. supervisor mar? mar aye. supervisor tang? tang aye. supervisor wiener? wiener aye. supervisor yee? yee aye. supervisor avalos? avalos aye. supervisor breed? breed aye. supervisor campos? campos aye. supervisor chiu? chiu aye. there are 11 ayes. >> the ordinance is passed on the first read. [gavel] >> next item. >> item 58 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by mark morgan against the city and county of san francisco for $238,000; the lawsuit was filed on novemb

ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by mark morgan against the city and county of san francisco for $238,000; the lawsuit was filed on november 2, 2011, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-515615; entitled mark morgan vs. city and county of san francisco, et al. ~ in superior court. >> same house same call? this ordinance is passed on the first read. [gavel] >> item 59. >> item 59 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by joseph luebberke against the city and county of san francisco for 100,000; the lawsuit was filed on january 21, 2011, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-11-507528; entitled joseph luebberke vs. city and county of san francisco. ~ in superior court. >> same house, same call? this ordinance is passed on first read. [gavel] >> next item. >> item 60 is an ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by maria reyes jimenez de melendrez and amulfo jimenez against the city and county of san francisco for $90,000; the lawsuit what filed on september 11, 2012, in san francisco superior court, case no. cgc-12-524112;

city and county of san francisco is arrest participating member of california staidz authority this is the joint powers authority to issue notes and certificates and previously issued debt it requires that the jurisdiction in which the project is located approve this project for the duly notice that is for the exempt basis. pursuant to the responsibility act for the interests on the bonds the city is required to conduct a public hearing by the authority. in this case, the applicant it the presidio hills school the amount of bonds not to exceed $9 million plus a hearing notice is published in the san francisco chronicle it was held on may 12, 2014, no comments from the public were heard through the process arrest the purchase of the project to reindependence e finance the capital facilities including the 2011 for the one side to finance the construction and renovation and equipping of educational facilities on washington street in san francisco. that work was completed in 2003. this bond will also refinance an acquisition of real property on maple street purchased in may 2012. those bon

was written in appreciation to pay tribute to all city of san francisco who have dedicated themselves to public service employees of the city and county of san francisco contribute and play a vital role in our community and as a result of the duties the city and county of san francisco has benefited i'm intruding proud to have served the city for 311 years. as i reflect open my impending retirement i want to share thoughts and core principles. never forgot why we're here. working for the city and county of san francisco is more than a paycheck whether we're driving buses or paving streets or saugd our neighborhoods or progressing paperwork electronic or hardcopy effects people. our work is about others and it's about improving the quality of life for the residents and visitors of this city to this end we're accountable to the public. build bridges and pathways change is a part of our daily lives we provide leadership and directions for our workplace the city as a whole and at times for california and the nation that is a good thing to build pathways when formulating agreement and negotiating contracts and african-american our charters

intention to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $1,400,000,000 for the city and county of san francisco community facilities district no. 2014-1 (transbay transit center); and other matters related thereto. and item 43 is a resolution of intention to establish city and county of san francisco community facilities district no. 2014-1 (transbay transit center) and determining other matters in connection therewith. ~ the transbay transit center. >> supervisor kim. >> thank you. the two items before us today finally establishes the transbay transit center on community facility district in order to finance the cost of public infrastructure which includes the rate and method of the special tax with new developments that take care of -- that take advantage of the additional height and square footage allotted in the new transit center district plan which was passed unanimously by this board in the summer of 2012. with the additional density throughout this district, we will continue to raise the value of this neighborhood with two large public parks, one on the rooftop of the center and one und

san francisco for a major earthquake or natural disaster. item number 22, resolution authorizing and directing the sale of not to exceed $106,095,000 aggregate principal amount of city and county of san francisco general obligation bonds, series 2014d; prescribing the form and term of said bonds; authorizing the execution, authentication, and registration of said bonds; providing for the appointment of depositories and other agents for said bonds; providing for the appointment of depositories and other agents for said bonds; providing for the establishment of accounts related to said bonds; providing for the manner of sale of said bonds by competitive sale; approving the forms of official notice of sale and notice of intention to sell bonds; directing the publication of the notice of intention to sell bonds; approving the form of the preliminary official statement and the form and execution of the official statement relating to the sale of said bonds; approving the form of the continuing diskale you're certificate; authorizing and approving modifications to documents; declaring the city's intent to reimburse certain expenditures; ratifying certain actions previously taken; and

intention to incur bonded indebtedness in an amount not to exceed $1,400,000,000 for the city and county of san francisco community facilities district no. 2014-1; and other matters related thereto. and other matters related therein. item 51 is resolution of intention to establish city and county of san francisco community facilities district no. 2014-1 and determining other matters in connection therewith. >> supervisor kim? >> thank you. i'd just like to make a motion to continue item 50 and 51 for one week. >> supervisor kim has made a motion to continue these two item to the 15th of july. is there a second to that motion? seconded by supervisor campos. without objection, these two item will be continued to the 15th of july. [gavel] >> item 52. >> item 52 is a resolution declaring the intent of the city and county of san francisco to reimburse certain expenditures from proceeds of future bonded indebtedness; authorizing the director of the mayor's office of housing and community development to submit an application and related documents to the california debt limit allocation committee to permit issua

existing litigation: city and county of san francisco v. pacific gas & electric company 16. existing litigation: city and county of san francisco v. pacific gas & electric company 17.existing litigation: pacific gas & electric company, v. city and county of san francisco. 18 will not be heard. >> i will get a motion for the attorney client privilege. >> please si >> okay, we are back from the closed session. and announcement following closed session that the commission has reached an agreement to settle on item number 14, i will entertain a motion to disclose. >> move not to disclose. >> there is a second. >> all of those in favor. signify by saying aye. >> aye. >> and opposed? >> the ayes having it. any other commission business? >> seeing none, this meeting is adjourned.

existing litigation: city and county of san francisco v. pacific gas & electric company 16. existing litigation: city and county of san francisco v. pacific gas & electric company 17.existing litigation: pacific gas & electric company, v. city and county of san francisco. 18 will not be heard. >> i will get a motion for the attorney client privilege. >> please si >> okay, we are back from the closed session. and announcement following closed session that the commission has reached an agreement to settle on item number 14, i will entertain a motion to disclose. >> move not to disclose. >> there is a second. >> all of those in favor. signify by saying aye. >> aye. >> and opposed? >> the ayes having it. any other commission business? >> seeing none, this meeting is adjourned. (clapping) >> everybody welcome it's amazing everyone this is the reason for the first time i'm rart in an event it's great to see see it really work this actually works (clapping) and so we are thrilled to be opening our doors to our neighbors and a and friends after spen

of san francisco. they risked their lives to help save others and on behalf of the san francisco board of supervisors and our city and county, i wanted to thank and acknowledge them. i want -- before we ask if other supervisors wanted to say a few words, i wanted to ask if we could show a short clip on their heroism on july 6, 2013. i think we have the video set up and victor lim from my staff will hit play. [video presentation] >> [speaker not understood]. >> [speaker not understood] more than 30 feet from that fire. they were really standing on the wing. i had to get everybody away from the aircraft. >> safety officer mentioned a lot of people walking, walking wounded and people coming off the airplane. [speaker not understood]. hopefully there's a lot more coming off walking. >> right. and knowing i survived it is probably the best [speaker not understood] and i'm only no more than 100 feet away from it. and it was pretty much -- thats was the most i had to choose. do i run or do i stay? because she is in no condition to run. or even so much as move or carry her. but that's when i just [speaker not understood]. and just

retiree health care benefits to employees of the former san francisco redevelopment agency or the successor agency to the redevelopment agency of the city and county of san francisco. >> thank you, colleagues. can i have a motion to continue this item for one week? motion by supervisor kim, seconded by supervisor yee. without objection, item 55 will be continued for one week. [gavel] >> and item 56. >> item 56 was forwarded without recommendation. a charter amendment second draft to amend the charter of the city and county of san francisco to adjust the required annual appropriation from the general fund to the transportation fund annually to reflect increases in population of san francisco, subject to discontinuation by the mayor if the voters enact a new general tax on vehicles registered to a san francisco address, at an election to be held on november 4, 2014, and making environmental findings. >> this item also being required under board rules to sit for at least a week. can i have a motion to continue for one week? motion by supervisor wiener seconded by supervisor kim, without objection this item will be continued for a week. [gavel] >> ite

and to integrate, the tourism industry here in the city and county of san francisco. and so one of the things that i might want to again, encourage the members of the board to do, is to really lean on using and to lean on the institutions like that that have been around for over 50 years, and we have had over 24,000, college degrees earned by students who came through pac, and over the last 50 years and i can guarantee you, that the majority of the people that i am talking to right now, and i am talking about within the sound of my voice, and out of the airways, don't know who we are. and so, we want to encourage you, and we talked to over 2,300 students in the city and county of san francisco and about the college and career choices each and every year and, so please, please, reach out to us and we want to do what we need to do to roll up our sleeves and make this happen. thank you. >> thank you. >> next speaker, please. >> hi, good afternoon, my name is doug, and i am the president and ceo of a couple of... and a company that is located on webster street, and in the

the next item that i have is a resolution that calls upon the city and county of san francisco to renew our commitment to women's reproductive rights and women's reproductive freedom. as we know, there have been a number of rulings by the united states supreme court that essentially favor the rights of for-profit companies and religious organizations over the individual rights of women, not only in this city, but in this country. this recent war on women, in my view, is unacceptable. women without adequate access to contraception and basic reproductive health care face countless challenges. and here in san francisco, fortunately we have a long history of supporting women and their reproductive rights. in 2013 i sponsored legislation to create a buffer zone around women's health clinics to [speaker not understood] we saw against those women. currently i'm working with women health advocates, our city attorney's office, and other community members to determine the status of a buffer zone ordinance in light of the recent decision by the u.s. supreme court. they have been in the last ten ye

estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fys ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. fiscal impactt city clerk: item 1: 14069: [proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance for selected departments - fys 2014-2015 and 2015-2016] 1. 140619 sponsor: mayor proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fys ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. city clerk: item 1: 14069: [proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance for selected departments - fys 2014-2015 and 2015-2016] 1. 140619 sponsor: mayor proposed annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fys ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. fiscal impactt. 1234 item 2: item 2: [proposed annual salary ordinance - fys

served san francisco, i served on the san francisco democratic central committee, 2002, 2004, 2006 and i certain under mayor gavinson from 2005 and 2011 and i'm devoted to the county and city of san francisco. i was born here, i work here and i have and will continue to have every intention to continue to serve just like you folks serve your district and the city and the county. on june 12th, i suffered a seizure. on june 18th, i had brain surgery to remove a brain mass later to learn it was grade two -- i'm one of the lucky ones. i'm a cancer survivor and i have a new perspective on life. i look at things differently. i look at my health and my family and i look at politics differently. shall it return and i hope it doesn't, because of this ordinance my family will be taken care of. i'm one of lucky ones. this is for firefighters and police officers are here at the right time. today, and hopefully next tuesday the category will change. the importance of this legislation is really big, really significant, and it's going to help people that have lost hope, that have given up, that need assistance, so please move this important legislation forward to the full board. thank you v

[gavel] >> item 62. >> item 62 is a resolution urging the city and county of san francisco to commit resources towards addressing the need of the rising number of unaccompanied minorses fleeing from central america to migrate the mounting international humanitarian crisis. -- to mitigate the international humanitarian crisis. >> supervisor campos. >> thank you very much, mr. president. thank you, madam clerk. colleagues, i'll be very, very brief. this is a very important resolution for me on a personal level. but beyond that, i think that there is a long history, long tradition at this board of calling out and speaking out against injustices that we see in different parts of the world. and it is, i think, especially important when injustice is happening at home that we in san francisco speak out against this injustice. and this resolution deals with the very real and very grave injustice that involves tens of thousands of children that have fled central america escaping not only political turmoil, but violence and along the way risking their lives. and these are not adults fleeing, bu

couple of inflammatory comments in poland and being a representative here in the city and county of san franciscowhere we don't tolerant that level of discrimination or hateful ramdz it's appropriate to rename the street after tom and, of course, he's contributed to the lgbt community that's why we have the redesignation street street change. happy to take anothers comments and apple it up >> terrific thank you supervisor kim and taking little lead the street renamings are not straightforward. and take a while so i appreciate you and your staff per variance and happy to be is co-sponsor to rename this block for one of the greatest leaders in the city of san francisco. with that, open up open this up for public comment i have a few public comment cards which i'll read out (calling names) okay. okay go well, you, come up and don't have to testify in the exact order >> i want to thank supervisor kim on his own he merit woody allen dell stands up on highs own it makes sense to do that give the comments of that person and to choose small business lib woody allen dell so it makes sense on our part so t

we view this partnership with the city and county of san francisco as one that is going to be very important to us in the decades of the future i want to see that this is the only venue in san francisco that the pga of america had my interest in bringing a major champing to this is the only venue we'll have discussions with we couldn't be prouder mayor ed lee and ted the reasons are simple it wasn't hard to get fired up bugs i love history and diving into the history of harding park and seeing what this place is to golf i think it totally unisolated i was contacted by two champions i want to quote them first of all, tiger woods great memories of marreding park and it's great to see this played significant renovation were made to the course and it's exciting this is the first pga champing in san francisco also from phil harding park was an excellent host for the president cup and now can host the major champing i'm excited to have one of the golfs biggest events. i thought this announcement is really special because it means that the pga champing is going to be played in back to back years in

item 8 is an ordinance calling for providing a special election to be held in the city and county of san francisco on tuesday, november 4, 2014, for the purpose of submitting to san francisco voters a proposition to incur the following bonded debt of the city and county; $500,000,000 to finance the construction, acquisition, and improvement of certain transportation and transit related improvements. ~ chapter 37. >> colleagues, can we take this item same house same call? without objection this ordinance is finally passed. [gavel] >> and if you could call items 9 through 38 related to the budget. >> item 9 through 38 are the annual appropriations salary and associated fee ordinances and grant resolutions. item 9 is the annual budget and appropriation ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for selected departments of the city and county of san francisco as of june 2, 2014, for the fiscal years ending june 30, 2015, and june 30, 2016. ~ selected departments. item 10 is the annual salary ordinance enumerating positions in the annual budget and appropriation ordin