you have two courts of appeal that are against the president's travel ban, what would the impact of that be on the nine court justices who will make the final decision? >> normally the supreme court takes cases that have a conflict between two circuits, essentially they're saying we want to step in and resolve issues that are confusing to the circuits below or that there is an obvious disconnect between two parts of the country. if they rule in favor in the same direction, that conflict is kind of out of the picture. but i would suspect the supreme court would still want to resolve the issue because that balancing act of the national security interest against the establishment clause is a delicate balance and it's presidential per rorerogative. the fourth circuit talked about the campaign rhetoric should have guided the court's hand so the court -- supreme court may say even if there is the same result we may take issue with the underlying logic and that is a conflict to us in and of itself. they may still grapple with that very issue. >> it is possible, paul, as laura suggests that mayb

this was a judgment he gave in the court of appeal. it concerned a woman who westminster city council had... she was a homeless single woman with five children who was u nwell woman with five children who was unwell and because of the benefit cap, she was unable to meet her rent. so westminster city council wa nted rent. so westminster city council wanted to hauser 50 miles away in bletchley, near milton keynes in buckinghamshire. she disputed the legality of that decision. it eventually got to the court of appeal and sir martin moore—bick gave the leading judgment. he had to review the decision—making process by westminster city council had gone to and determine whether it was lawful. he did that and decided it was lawful. the case then went to the supreme court and he was unanimously overruled. it has to be borne in mind that he was looking at the process. in a judicial review, you are looking at the decision—making process. so it is perhaps a little unfair to point in his direction and say he may have a particular set of views about

won it in the court of appeals two weeks ago. and then yesterday we had a supreme court decision on this and the details, it's a complicated decision. so we'll argue it in the first or second week of october. but they did cut back on the injunction that the district court issued in our case. the district court said no travel ban, people from the six countries who are blocked from coming in. they said all of them could come in, plus the refugee ban, the block on refugees. that was also something that the president couldn't do because as sally was saying, this is motivated by religion and that's what the president campaigned on. i'm calling for complete and total shutdown of all muslim immigration. even when he signs the first executive order, he reads the title, looks up at the title and says, we all know what that means. and there were a whole bunch of other things the president has done to reinforce the idea that this is truly a muslim ban. what the supreme court said yesterday, that's fine, the challenge will stand for some peop

today be got the ninth circuit court of appeals, the appeals court today basically gsd the president exceeded the authority he has on the law rather than based on a claim it was unconstitutional and a form of discrimination. so now it's all waiting here before the supreme court. both challengers have filed their responses today which the court ordered last week after the government said, we want you to take our appeal from the two lower court rulings, and whoo you're thinking about whether to grant it, let us enforce the travel ban. what the government has said is make your decision quickly on this day so we can start enforcing it, and try to say whether you're going to take this case and say so before the end of june so we'll know you're going to hear it later on this year. >> yeah, the end of june is the last -- that's before they go from break, right? we'll hear one way or the other. we should hear one way or the other. >> we may or may not. the government has asked them to, but they get to do whatever they want. >> pete, thank you. we have attorney general chen on the phone. tell

last year, he left the court of appeal last yea r, after he left the courtast year, after serving 11 years or so. this morning, in the papers, one of his decisions has been picked up, and it is a case in 2014 where he oversaw a case and ruled that a london tenant, a woman who lived in westminster, a single mother with five children, and she was re—housed some 50 miles away by westminster council, in bletchley, near milton keynes. she disputed that decision, said it was unlawful, took a judicial review will stop when it got to the court of appeal, he had to scrutinise whether decision taken by the council... and councils are allowed to rehouse people out of area in certain circumstances. he decided it was not unlawful. some people are nodding at that as perhaps a perceived bias against vulnerable families. everyone i have spoken to has said, look at his entire career. this was one decision and he was applying the law. after the case, the solicitor said, the judgment could have dire consequences for vulnerable families across the country. he said, it gives the

he retired in december from the court of appeal. he isa december from the court of appeal.actising barrister who was involved in commercial and shipping cases. the reason that is important is that he would have been dealing with cases, big—money cases, but also cases where ship a collides with ship b or there is a fire on ship a. so he would have grappled with complex engineering issues that will be at the heart of the grand felling quarry. so he is qualified from that point of view. he is someone from that point of view. he is someone the barrister said is unfailingly courteous. he is a modest man and an efficient worker. he is held in high regard by lawyers who appear in front of him and also by thejudges who who appear in front of him and also by the judges who are his peers. and yet concerns have been raised about his appointment. they have. in one paper this morning, he was described as controversial. these concerns fasan on one decision he made in 2014. this was a judgment he gave in the court of appeal. it concerned a woman who westminster city council had... she was

and particularly with the court of appeal, you deal with an enormous range of work, involving local government judge. 137 high rise buildings have now failed safety tests on cladding in 41 local authority areas, according to the latest government figures. four of those tower blocks are in the london borough of camden, where residents from over 600 flats have been told to leave because of fire safety concerns. our correspondent tom burridge has been meeting some of the people who are still living in the chalcots estate, despite being told to leave nearly a week ago. michelle's family are facing a difficult dilemma. they've been told to leave theirflat in north london. because their tower block has suspect cladding and after the fire at grenfell, failed an inspection by the london fire brigade. but camden council has still not found michelle suitable alternative accommodation and so she has reluctantly been sleeping in her flat. i don't want to stay in that flat. i mean, last night, my husband refused to stay in it. i stayed in there with my daughter. and at two o'clock i woke up having a panic

you know, i actually had been quite impressed with the trump nominees to the courts of appeals. they, you know--look, i suspected they would put judge judy up. so i'm kind of happy, you know. but actually some of the most qualified people in my generation, certainly conservative, but i think reasonable, smart, very accomplished individuals. so that's one, i think, bright spot that we have seen. i don't know anything about the few u.s. attorneys that they have nominated. i can certainly tell you they have gotten rid of some extraordinary ones. >> back here. >> the states, it's not clear you have a lot of fans, and i wonder what your future holds and if elected office seems to be in the cards for you? >> i don't really see running for office. i'm not entirely sure what i'm going to do next. i'm taking some time with my family and starting to talk to some folks and i want to find an avenue where i can continue to have an impact on issues that i care about. but running for office has never been anything that i could picture myself doing. >> if i could just say something about being a

i actually have been quite impressed with trump nominees for the courts of appeals. they -- look, i mean, i suspected they would put judge judy up so i'm kind of happy. but actually some of the most qualified people in my generation certainly conservative but i think reasonable, smart, very accomplished individuals. so that's one, i think, bright spot that we've seen. and i don't know anything about the few u.s. attorneys that they've nominated. i can certainly tell you they've gotten rid of some ex-r extraordinary -- some extraordinary ones. >> back here. >> ms. yates it's clear you have a lot of fans not just in the tint but across the country. i was wondering what your future holds and if elected office might be in the cards for you? >> i appreciate that. and people have been incredibly nice and generous. i don't really see running for office. i'm not entirely sure what i'm going to do next. i'm taking some time with my family now and starting to talk with some folks. i want to be able to find an avenue where i can continue to have an impact on issues that i care a

circuit court of appeals in virginia also ruled against the travel ban last month. the trump administration has appealed that ruling to the supreme court. the white house maintains the ruling is fully lawful. >>> we could see record high temperatures tomorrow. sweating it chair. >> thank good news there is a bit of a breeze out here today. record high, 95 at national. 96 at dulles, 97 in martinsberg. we got to 95 at nashville. currently, it's still 91 downtown. still 90 as far north as frederick. let's focus on the 91 downtown. it's not that humid. the heat index only pops it up a degree or two. that's the good news tonight. going to the game tonight? very warm, but dry. 81 by the time you head home. what about records tomorrow? a you few are in jeopardy. i think this 94 at dulles is probably the only one that could fall. i think 97 up in baltimore is also safe. he'll come back. we will talk about a cold front, and tell you what that means to our chance for showers. break in our heat. >>> coming up, find out who bumped taylor swift out of the pro tip for fruit lovers

court, after an early defeat after a travel ban? an appeals court dealing another blow to the white house, affirming a hawaii judge's ruling that blocked the first version, the revised version of that ban. we'll discuss all of this. i want to begin this hour with the former u.s. attorney matthew whitaker, and john flannery, and former white house ethics lawyer painter, and april ryan. thank you all for joining me this evening. we have a lot to discuss. april, according to christopher ruddy, the president is considering firing robert mueller. the reaction tonight has been swift. why do you think this is coming out tonight, april? >> well, one, this president has never left us unexcited and anticipating his every move. he likes this, number one. number two, this president really is not a president of governance. he is a president who goes with a knee-jerk reaction in a lot of instances, but he's also a man who feels that his base is with him. he is not the establishment. he is pushing the envelope. and this might just push it too far, if he does indeed fire robert mueller as special counsel in this probe into the russia investigation, that's dealing with issues of obstruction of

court of appeals for the armed forces they throughout rape and assault conviction. this is someone who was convicted, in a court-martial and was thrown out because of the involvement of craig franklin who received for the case to court-martial. this all came about because in 2013, general franklin was admonished for tossing out the aggravated sexual assault conviction of a fellow f-16 pilot. because he was justly and correctly admonished for this abuse of power, the u.s. court of appeal found his subsequent decision to move forward with the entirely separate case constituted unlawful command influence. this has been made more ridiculous by two facts. first, the military judge during the actual trial found no evidence of unlawful command influence. second, the appeals court that throughout the case also didn't find evidence of unlawful command influence. just the appearance of it. the franklin case shows we have placed commanding officers in impossible positions. if they declined to press charges, they may be seen as favoring the defendant. they learned from the exper

i want to share a case that cam down a few months ago in the court of appeals for the armed forces day throughout the rape and assault conviction and visit someone convicted in a court martial and was thrown out because of the involvement of lieutenant general who referred the case to the court martial and it all came about because in 2013 general franklin was admonished for tossing out the sexual assault conviction of a fellow pilot but because he was admonished for this abuse ofadmh power the court of appeals found that the subsequent decision to move forward on the entirely separate case constituted unlawful command influence. this is made more ridiculous by two facts. first, a military judge during the actual trial found no evidence of the command influence in the second o and ss court threw out the case also didn't find evidence of unlawful command influence. just the appearance of it. it shows we have placed commanding officers in an impossible position if they declined to press charges they learn from the experience and press charges on a subsequent case that may be seen as unla

the fourth circuit court of appeals affirmed the judge's decision last month. a massive protest at the white house - after president trump announces the u-s will withdraw from the paris agreement. it strikes a major blow to worldwide efforts to combat global warming. 193 countries are part of the key climate pact. among just three nations not in the deal. but the president says walking away from the paris accord is good for the american economy - and american jobs. the president went on to say he would be willing to re-negotiate the deal. but - swift reaction from world leaders. france, germany, italy, all issuing a collective rejection.. saying the paris climate accord cannot be renegotiated. meanwhile here i the u-s - another type of protest overnight. take a look at this. boston's city hall lit up in green lights... and in new york city - the spire of one world trade center, also showing off a green hue. new york, washington state, and california are forming a colation called the us climate alliance to uphold the paris pledging to do the same. stay with abc-

and this morning, the ninth circuit court of appeals upheld the block on the ban.s chin, the attorney general of hawaii, joins me now. good evening to you, sir. you're all smiles today. what's your reaction to the decision? >> well, we were very encouraged by the decision that came out from the ninth circuit court of appeals. that was a decision that confirmed that our injunction against the travel ban should stand, and the reason for it was entirely new reason, that had not been really raised by the courts before. we've been raising it in our briefs from the very beginning. but essentially what they were finding is the problem with the travel ban is that it violates our federal immigration laws. and specifically, the immigration and nationality act. there's this provision that's in the immigration and nationality act where they say that the president does have the authority to ban entry of certain people, when he finds that it's detrimental to the interests of the united states. and so what the ninth circuit did is they actually said, you didn't satisfy that stand

sir martin moore—bick when he was sitting in the court of appeal, he had thejob of sitting in the courthether westminster city council had come to that decision lawfully. he decided they had done. it has to be said, as was mentioned, the case then went to the supreme court and it was pretty much a thumping reversal of that decision. it was a unanimous decision. it was a unanimous decision of the supreme court. there was a strong judgment which was the polar opposite of the judgment that sirmartin polar opposite of the judgment that sir martin moore—bick had made. just put that into context, sir martin moore—bick had in the supreme court for 11 years and we are talking about one of his judgments within that 11 year period. but some of the newspapers have written this up this morning and are nodding to the possibility, they would say, that there is some sort of view that he has about vulnerable families and that clearly has upset some people, but you have got to look at this in context but you have got to look at this in co ntext a nd but you have got to look at this in context and also s

following the post effect lot outside the supreme court. >> this amounts to a powerful slap down of these opinions by the circuit court of appeals the ninth circuit appeals out west part of the court has agreed to hear the oral arguments on the travel ban. that begins in october. in the meantime edits allowing the travel ban to take effect. this is a huge victory for the trump administration.

of the executive order. this comes in a paragraph about government allegations. the government alleges this, alleges that. and then the court drops a statement that the court of appeals clearly committed an error in considering what president trump said on the campaign trail. it's very interesting ambiguity. it could actually be an oversight, an unusual oversight in the u.s. supreme court opinion. but that could tell us how the court ultimately is likely to come out in this case. >> brian, matt, laura, thank you so much. >> thank you.

circuit court of appeals kept an a injunction in place blocking enforcement of at the present time's travel ban. in the ruling today the judges said the president veil late u.s. immigration law by discriminating against people based on their nash natural tea. they also say he failed to show how entry by people from six mostly muslim countries would hurt u.s. interests. the opinion also cited a tweet from president trump insisting on the need for a travel ban. today the white house said the president's tweets should not be considered by the courts, only the rule of law. >> when you look at what the law is and the u.s. code that allows the president to do whatever he has to, that's what it should be decided on. and i think anyone worth their salt fully agrees the president is within his rights to do what is necessary to protect the country. >> last month the fourth circuit court of appeals also upheld the case. >>> president trump is facing if you lawsuit claiming he is veil lating the constitution by remaining tied to his business interests and a taking payments from foreign governmen

department of justice is going to appeal that one up to the supreme court on the merits. couple weeks ago what happened was the u.s. department of justice had appealed the fourth circuit decision out of the east coast region and when they did that, they also asked the supreme court before they recessed at the end of june to issue a stay. >> it's 11:20 p.m. there. we appreciate you staying up with us. check back with us once we hear the next chapter in this. thank you. >>> the nba has crowned a new champion. the warriors knocking the king off his throne. coy wire has this morning's bleacher report. but it's my anniversary. aw. sorry. we've got other plans. your recurring, unpredictable abdominal pain and diarrhea... ...may be irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea, or ibs-d. you've tried over-the-counter treatments and lifestyle changes, but ibs-d can be really frustrating. talk to your doctor about viberzi,... ...a different way to treat ibs-d. viberzi is a prescription medication you take every day that helps proactively manage... ...both abdominal pain and diarrhea at th

he was appointed to the high court in 95 —— 1995, and to the court of appeal in 2005.ted a family's the d iletta ntes commonly rejected a family's the diletta ntes to prevent westminster council from moving them diletta ntes to prevent westminster councilfrom moving them out diletta ntes to prevent westminster council from moving them out of london. the supreme court overruled. he was labelled a controversial choice for the grenfell tower enquiry. and he knows that revealing the truth about britain's worst fire in modern history will be a difficult and sensitive task, carried out in the full glare of public attention. it could take in yea rs. tom is here with me. as you were suggesting in your report, there are already tensions about what this enquiry should do? are little, yes. he is well regarded in the legal profession as somebody who is very competent and a fast worker, importantly. he seems to be somebody who comes from a technical background. he has worked on shipping cases and disasters at sea. but many people in that area feel the roots of the fire lie in the w

and with the court of appeal, you do with an enormous range of work, involving local government, central applying the law as you see it. that's the work of a judge. as we've been hearing mps will vote on the queen's speech later today. labour has tabled an amendment calling on the government to end austerity and negotiate a brexit deal that delivers the same benefits as membership of the single market and customs union. simon mccoy is in westminster for us. thank you. the conservatives are going to be seeking parliamentary approval, for the vote later today. labour, looking to introduce elements of the manifesto, saying that the conservative programme is in tatters. dave penman is general secretary of the first division association union. hejoins me from cardiff. you have got 18,000 members, pretty influential. civil servants, diplomats, the pay cap that the conservatives want to keep going for two years, that is something you wa nt to two years, that is something you want to see continue, or have you had enough? the members are some of the most senior public servants. those are the peop

. >>> the man at the center of the first season of the serial podcast will be back in court. the maryland court of special appeals will hear arguments june 8 about whether he should get a new trial. the court won't make a decision right away. it will issue a written opinion later. that ruling could then be sent to the court of appeals. he was found guilty in the 2000 killing of his high school girlfriend. he was sentenced to life in prison. >>> beware of movie money in circulation or trying to be in our area. now police say someone used it to dupe a cashier at a wa authorities say a man walked into a store this weekend and asked for change for a hundred and gave the cash year fake bills. he was with a woman also caught by the surveillance cameras. the bills say they are for motion montgomery county police are investigating a similar scam. a woman giving a fredrick college student $500 in movie money to purchase her iphone last week. and she fell for it. it's not clear if these cases are related. >>> an airline is causing a big rift between amtrak and union station. the news 4 i team learned amtrak is suing to for

correct -- >> broad policy determinations by the executive, i do not think the supreme court or any of the court appeals have tried to limit the mandell test to just a discretionary denial of a visa by a console officer. muchally would not make sense to say a single consular officer overseeing a denial of a visa gets more president sunday president and making the order.n on a executive >> in this case, the executive order is extremely wrought. we are not dealing with an individual one-off decision by a consular office. >> that is what executive orders do. i do not know if it is extremely broad. those countries were designated as those that sponsor or sheltered terrorism. >> how many nationals doesn't apply to a lot of those countries? a large number. >> whenever the number of andonals who try to travel can't, we do not know because we have been unable to implement the order. the distinctions were made by congress and the rave is administration. administration said as a matter of policy, i do not know if it is enough. i don't know if i'm getting reliable information. we put a brief pause on entry to look

court i think there's a lot of evidence that he has always been a theological theocrat and one who loves to. pli religious tests to any public policy matter he certainly on the tenth circuit court of appeals had no sympathy for any claims that people were harmed by that they were forced to pay for someone else's religious ideas back that in the time he was on the federal circuit court of appeals there he was a leading proponent of the theory in hobby lobby that even a for profit company can exercise religion and in that case refuse to cover contraceptives for their women employees so he has a long history here he was always a nice fellow i remember you and i talking about of the democrats say well he's a nice guy and i'm sure he didn't kick his dogs and syria didn't eat chicken heads but the point is that those aren't the qualifications you have to have a passion for understanding what the constitution is it's not there to protect giving money to people who already have a lot of money it's not there to help religious majority it's here to help people who otherwise don't have political power so of course there's a christian majority in almost every state at least at this moment but you hav

gerri: the 9th circuit court of appeals is siding with a federal judge in hawaii and blocked president trump's executive order. reporter: all eyes on the u.s. supreme court trying to figure out the future of the president's travel ban. the administration wants the supreme court to reject several ruling which have halted the president's executive order. that order halted immigration and travel from people from iran, libya, sudan, syria, somalia and lebanon. it rules the president does have the power to control immigration but exceeded his authority given to him by congress. >> cases should be decide on the rule of law. when you look at the -- when you look at what the law is that allows the president to do this. that's what we were deciding on. any lawyer with their salt fully agrees the president is within his rights and responsibility to do what is necessary to protect the country. reporter: the u.s. supreme court is asked to throw out the injunctions and allow the travel ban to be implemented. and rule on the legality of the travel ban. if the court decides to hear arguments on the l

there's no disagreement between the courts of appeals. e ninth circuit in washington and the hawaii cases has already -- in the washington case, weight in as well as the maryland case. there is no disagreement among the courts of appeals either. but there are only a few days left on the original dental some nermeen: is that the case that they have put in place the application company application for visas has been approved, which calls for extreme vetting, which requires applicants to provide social media information and something like 15 years of employment and resident history? followed the actual procedures in place. the version 2.0 of thehe ban, executive order said these new procedures were essentially supposed to be done by the time the ban was set to expire -- which is a week from wednesday. amy: it was quite something that president trump attacked his own justice department saying the justice department should have stayed with the original travel ban, not the watered down politically correct version they submitted to sc or supreme

>> reporter: this is not the supreme court, chris, this is the ninth circuit court of appeals. this was the ruling in the case that was argued last month. there are two, remember two court orders that stopped the government from enforcing the travel restrictions. the first came from virginia, an appeals court there has upheld that stay on enforcing it. this was the argument on the hawaii case, and the ninth circuit court of appeals agrees that the president cannot enforce it. but it does so for different reasons. the previous rulings have all been based on a claim that the president was discriminating against muslims, the lower court ruling said just look at all his campaign statements. this is a ruling basically saying the president violated the law in these executive order. the ninth circuit court of appeals, it's an unsigned unanimous opinion. it says, yes, it's true that the law gives the president broad power to control the entry of people from other countries and take actions to protect the people, but the ruling says, immigration, even for the president, is not a one-pers

in this case as who areo witnesses, the seventh circuit court of appeals became the last law. to codify it into president obama's mandate has ne by the wayside, general sessions overruling betsy devos, they are engaging in that social and whittaker versus kenosha, a unanimous opinion from the three-judge panel ordered a school district to allow a girl toll use the boy's bathroom. the seventh circuit panel, which included g.o.p. appointee, ruled that the 1972, title 9 education law and the 14th amendment equal protection clause covered trans genderism as a protected class. rewrite laws and redistricting in favor of democrats and theyine mandate abortions, are using their self-proclaimed status as kings to redefine sexuality retroactive to laws codified long before the sexual identity movement was in vogue. in an emotional screen disguised as law it used a woman with female parts. in any other areas, these judges would have been deemed unstable. while refusing to rknies or even significant, the court contended there is absolutely no disruption or privacy concerns over opposite s

. >> last month the fourth circuit court of appeals also upheld an injunction but that court used different reasoning saying the order was a violation of constitutional rights to freedom of religion. this afternoon the administration said it would seek further review of the ruling from the u.s. supreme court. legal analysts expect the high court will hear appeals from the white house on both sides of this travel ban case, but at the same time they're not sure when that will happen. >> cristina rendon in the. >> they say it outlines a clear path that the supreme court should follow. >>> today president trump declared himself to be one of the most productive presidents in american history. >> i will say that never has there been a president with few exceptions, in the case of fdr, he had a major depression to handle, who has passed more legislation who has done more things than what we've done. >> the president made the comment during a meeting of his cabinet boasting that his administration has achieved a record setting pace of activity. while the president has issued a number of executive o

of an actor johns wilks booth. >>> 4:46 a.m., the federal appeals court at the state of mississippi said it can start enforcing the liberty objection law to deny services to same-sex couples based on religious relief. effect lastdge blocked the law year. the 5th circuit court of appeals lifted the block yesterday. organizations like aclu plan to appeal. >>> amazon and deal up next on "action news" at >>> many people love disney, but wait until you hear how many times this man went to the eart. "action news" continues, we'll be right back. use parental controls or the v-chip. learn how at thetvboss.org >> good morning everybody, we're looking live on the platt bridge looking good so far on a friday morning. we've got a very close-up view on the vine trees expressway at broad street where we had a disabled vehicle on the shoulder, cleared a second ago, we're doing okay westbound as you head toward the schuylkill expressway you'll not see a problem riebt on the vine. how about over here, upper chichester, 322, west of i-95 we had extra overnight construction you can see penndot with the arrow board blocking the left

but the fact that the court agreed at least partly to grant the stay and take the appeal means that they're certainly skeptical oft had two very different approaches. the fourth circuit court of appeals was perhaps the one that may be the most controversial. it looked at president trump's campaign statements and said, based on a long series of those, it's clear that the real animating force behind the executive order was religious discrimination, animus toward muslims. the ninth circuit court of appeal took a different approach and said the president just doesn't have the legal authority to do this. he didn't make a clear enough showing why national security requires this ban of this 90-day pause on travel. so the fact that the court agreed to this stay, i think, shows that there's at least some skepticism about that. some chance the government could pick up those two extra votes you talked about. >> is it -- we've used the word travel ban all the time. i heard the word pause. is this executive order, the most recent one, is it a ban or a pause? because that may have some impact on whether it's constitutional or

court of appeals ruled against the ban last month and the trump administration has appealed that ruling. >>> now to the nba finals where the warriors take on the cavaliers for game five tonight. >>> a look at the preparation under way and of course the growing excitement and nerves out there right. >> reporter: well six hours away from game time but that doesn't stop warrior fans from coming down and shopping here at the store and taking pictures in front of the strength in numbers sign outside of the arena. but inside the nba officials are fishing up the walk through before they close everything off to the media this morning. you can see them clearing the tarps off the floor and the warriors team store has been pretty buzz. we went in at 11 o'clock and there was a line at check out which is unusual for monday afternoon. fans were snatching up shirts and hats. the mood was festive with warrior fans feeling excited about the game five. >> we are going to take the win. we know they are going to victory so we are putting that energy out there. >> we are going to celebrate on the home court

circuit court of appeals blocking order last week. the president order bars entry from people from six-muslim majority nations and those include iran, libya, somalia, sudan and yemen for 90 days while the u.s. implements stricter visa screening. >> this is a president who is fighting for the american people, fighting for american jobs and i think the results whether it be in the job's numbers, whether it be in the confidence that you see in businesses and even in stock market all speak for itself. america is back because they have a president in donald trump. lauren: world leaders expressing their disappointment. >> president trump is drawing a chorus of criticism from world leaders following decision to pull the united states from the climate accord. vow leaders vowed to stick with 2015 accord without the u.s. amid concerns long-term political support and need to replace billions of dollars at pledge in climate change finance. emmanuel macron called donald donald decision irreversible. >> i call you to remain confident. we will succe

he was appointed to the high court as a judge of 1995, hearing commercial cases, and to the court of appealcond—highest court in england and wales, in 2005. people here are desperate for answers. the prime minister has said she would like an interim reports within months. today, the judge said that could include details of how the fire started, why it spread so fast, and the response. but, he said, even that could take up to a year. after all, the remit of the inquiry has still to be decided by the government. the cause of the fire will clearly be a core topic, but that involve delving deep into the regulations governing tower block safety, and the pressure to examine social and political causes is unlikely to go away. well, i've had a brief conversation with some of the residents... he spent several hours listening to the views of survivors and local people, but already he and they appear to have different views of the inquiry‘s aims. he may certainly get to the bottom of, you know, what caused the fire to spread so quickly. whether he will get to the bottom of who is responsible for causi

court of appeals in virginia ruled against the ban last month. supreme court. >> there is multiple ways in which the president's action is unlawful. statutory claims and constitutional claims. is we're optimistic as it goes before the u.s. supreme court. >> president trump tweeted as predicted the 9th circuit did it again, ruled against the travel ban at such a dangerous time in the history of our country. >>> yesterday in brentwood was a day to remember for harlem fletcher. the senior at liberty high missed his graduation when he was told that he couldn't wear his army uniform at the celebration. there was a special ceremony held to give him the honor that he earned. >> i was nervous but, you know, overall, it was looking out on that crowd and i knew we all came together. r. >> harlem has his diploma in hand and is preparing for what comes next. he has a summer job lined up and then the advanced military training will be in september. >>> an epic showdown at oracle ends with the warriors champions. how the team and the entire bay area are still

colorado is one of those states. the appeals court you cannot get around our antidiscrimination laws by saying you do not feel like baking for certain people because of your religion. i really do think when the court decided the hobby lobby case, for cracked open the door religious dissenters to be able to end run around basic civil rights laws, they really opened a pandora's box that is going to end up saying, you have such felicity in this country for religious dissenters that no one is going to have to serve anyone if they feel that their religious values are being undermined. i think this is the new frontier going forward. this is where we are going to see a lot of action, particularly with neil gorsuch on the court. amy: i wanted to ask about a case that specifically involves the center for constitutional rights. this is the recent supreme court ruling on june 19. the court reversed a federal appeals court that former high-level bush officials may be sued for their roles in the post-9/11 profiling of men. >> the second court of a

of the government has already filed its an appeal to the supreme court against the challenge coming from maryland. another defeat for the white house it would appear from the ninth circuit, the most liberal appeals court in the nation. they did not like the president's revised travel ban. we will keep you updated as we are continuing to read through this decision. >> heather: we will have a panel talking about it coming up as well. we are expecting to hear testimony from steven mnuchin. >> good afternoon to you, president trump talked about health care reform a short time ago surrounded by his cabinet team, saying he does not expect any democrats to help. >> we expect to get zero -- if we had the greatest bill in the history of the world on health care, we would not get one vote from the democrats because they are obstructionist, that's if they want to do. that's the game. >> big problem for senate republicans is the medicaid expansion. senate majority leader mitch mcconnell has offered three years, with 52 senate republicans, he can only afford to lose two of his members in order to pas

the court of appeals also ruled against the ban last month. the administration is now appealing to the supreme court. >> there are multiple ways that it is unlawful, statutory claims and constitutional claims. >> the president says as pre dinged the 9th circuit ruled against the travel ban at such a dangerous time in the history of our country. >>> east bay mud considering a dramatic increase in water rates. they are scheduled to meet this morning at the offices in oakland. east bay mud reportedly is proposing a 19% rate hike over two years. about a $4.34 increase every month for households averaging 200 gallons of water a day. today the board will set a public hearing and take a vote on this proposed rate hike on july 11th. >>> pg&e meantime is under fire for cutting down dozens of redwood trees in one neighborhood in sunnyvale. pg&e said they have to cut them down because the roots could damage natural gas lines. they sit within ten feet of a main buried three and a half feet down. the removal is part of the pipeline safety initiative. all of

spicer was asked about today's ruling by the ninth circuit court of appeals on the president's executive order on immigration refugees. at the top of the briefing the labor secretary updated reporters on a number of workforce initiatives. [inaudible] [inaudible] >> good afternoon. as you now have heard the presidents placing an emphasis on workforce development. secretary of labor and secretary of education along with president's daughter have been deeply involved in this effort. secretary had a chance to address the issue a few moments ago at the president's first meeting with his fully confirmed cabinet. like to kick it out by having secretary acosta come up and talk about the initiative and take questions. >> thank you and good afternoon. i want to think the work that has been done by ivanka trump and what will be talking about this week. i'll be traveling with her tomorrow for wisconsin where will be looking at excellent programs. her leadership has been invaluable. as you know by now, the president will be making an important announcement regarding apprenticeships. will be visiting

court of appeals for the armed forces threw out airman rodney's rape and assault conviction because of the involvement of lieutenant general craig franklin who referred the case to court martial. this all came about because in 2013 general franklin was admonished by his superiors for tossing out of aggravated sexual assault conviction of a fellow f-16 pilot. a unanimous decision by a jury of his peers and certainly a general should not have the power to overturn the findings of court of law simply because he thinks his buddy could not possibly have committed the sexual assault. but because franklin was appropriately admonished for this abuse of power, the u.s. court of appeals found that his subsequent decision to move forward with an entirely different case, separate, the case had unlawful command influence. this made more ridiculous by two facts. first, the military judge, during the actual trial, found no evidence of unlawful command influence. second, the appeals court that threw out the case also didn't find evidence of unlawful command influence. just the, quote, appearance, unqu

court of appeals from the ninth circuit court yesterday. they ruled against the travel ban such a dangerous time in the history of our country. supreme court, the president talking about taking the travel ban to the supreme court. the story in u.s.a. today reporting on the travel ban case. photoing that the court of appeals based its ruling on federal immigration law. highlighting several ways the travel band could be struck down by the supreme court. the ninth circuit court sidestepped where it violate constitution. rather than the judge said the travel ban discriminates on travel's nationality without improving national security. some of the reporting there from u.s.a. today. we'll keep following that story. but this morning in our first hour, we're talking about attorney general jeff sessions appearance this afternoon. 2:30 today. it's going to be live on c-span 3. tony from new jersey line for democrats. go ahead. caller: good morning. listen, that last caller, i couldn't disagree with him more. it's all about donald trump. i don't care