what the court of life for our city. what the court of appeale are legally fatal. so what i hope the government does is rather than tinker and tweak with their policies is finally abandon any plans for a new runway at heathrow. do you think it is simply impossible for the government to come up with a new plan which would be compatible with the undertakings in the paris accords? what the committee for climate change said is not to ban flight altogether but it's important, when you talk about growth, is to bear in mind the obligations we have to address climate change because we face a climate emergency. the upper‘s track record is not great, they ought to have 500,000 people affected by noise pollution, that would have increased. that air of london is a pollution hotspot was an air quality limit exceeding the lawful requirements. i'm afraid, what the government's got to recognise is, rather than having its head in the sand and ignore the obligations we have, they have to address them. but as mayor of one of the major capital cities of the world,

that isn't what the court of appeals relied on. >> i think if the court of appeals got the substance right and you don't agree with the reasoning, there's no reason to reverse, particularly when the question wasn't presented to the court. this point was raised in the reply brief of baroni that didn't petition. let me address the authority and instruction that was addressed by the court directly. that instruction was proposed in the context primarily of an instruction on 18 usc 666 which is the more general misappropriation of federal funds statute. and the instruction on that which appears on page 870 of the joint appendix already itself contains reference to authority. both the government and the district court were quite clear in the district court and you'll see this finding by both the court of appeals and the district court that baroni and kelly were free to argue the authority issue. the only question was whether the jury was going to get a specific instruction on that point. and the government believed the instruction was unnecessary. it would have been a novel addition to the

first of all there's the instruction that the court of appeals deemed adequate, that's at page 835 of the joint appendix which is the instruction on obtaining property, which the court of appeals deemed sufficient to notify the jury that when someone is acting on behalf of an organization, acting as the agent of that organization, he's not obtaining property when he exercises the authority that the agency is duly conferred on it. but even better than that is the materiality instruction from pages 875-876 which says if you find six which says if you find that the representation that the lane and tollbooth reductions was for the purpose of a traffic study was false, you must determine whether that representation was one that a reasonable person might have considered important in making his or her decision to commit port authority resources for that endeavor, including service as a port authority personnel. >> what does that say about authority to reallocate the lanes? >> if baroni had the authority to reallocate the lanes for any reason or no reason, assess council just dated to this th

the headlines on bbc news: a major blow for plans for a third runway at heathrow — the court of appeale uk's climate commitments. two more people in england test positive for coronavirus, after contracting the virus in italy and tenerife. the uk threatens to walk away from post—brexit trade talks with the eu if there's no progress byjune. people in flood—hit parts of the midlands are being warned they could face a further ten days of what the police are calling difficult conditions. homes across shropshire and worcestershire were evacuated yesterday after barriers holding back the river severn began to give way, with the river said to be pushing through 500 tonnes of water per second. in ironbridge, emergency services are working at capacity and a severe flood warning, meaning danger to life, is still in place. our reporterjohn maguire was there this morning. he sent us this update. absolutely, the emergency services at full stretch and they have been for the past ten days, they are now planning for ten days in the future. the river severn, pushing through about 500 tonnes of water per

the court of appeal is delivering its ruling now on whether plans to expand heathrow airport are illegale they don't take climate change policies into account. the challenge has been brought by a number of campaign groups as well as by councils in london affected by the expansion and the mayor of london sadiq khan. people in flood—hit parts of the midlands are being warned they could face a further ten days of what police are calling "difficult conditions". homes across shropshire and worcestershire were evacuated yesterday after barriers holding back the river severn began to give way. in the shropshire town of ironbridge, a severe flood warning remains in place today. the government will publish its strategy for post—brexit trade talks later, as it prepares for formal negotiations with the eu to begin. brussels has already set out its strategy. it wants britain to follow eu rules and standards, and grant access to its fishing grounds. the two sides begin talks next week, with the aim of reaching an agreement by the end of the transition period on the 31st of december. borisjohnson says

but now, the courts have intervened because of climate change. in a landmark decision, the appealthat because the uk is signed up to the paris agreement, a plan to tackle global warming, ministers should have considered that when deciding on heathrow. the secretary of state acted unlawfully in failing to take into account the paris agreement on climate change, when deciding to designate the airport's national policy statement in support of the expansion of heathrow airport. cheering. this led to jubilant scenes outside the court, campaigners delighted that thejudges had recognised the legal obligations of climate change. this is game—changing, notjust for aviation, not just for the uk, but for everybody. the paris agreement has teeth. not everybody believed it, but today, that they know that's true. what next for heathrow? the judges didn't say that the airport could never expand, but the government has signalled that it will not appeal. that may suit the prime minister, borisjohnson. he has long opposed the third runway. i willjoin you. i will lie down with you in front of those

the court of appeal rules it's unlawful because of the uk's climate commitments.the court of appeal because they didn't take into account the uk's committments on climate change. heathrow says the expansion would give a big boost to the economy. the online gaming firm mr green, which is owned by william hill, has been fined £3 million. that's for failing to protect people addicted to gambling. the watchdog said the firm was lax in checking customers were using legitimate sources of money. it's time to think big and spend more when it comes to tackling inequality betweeen regions, according to an independent inquiry. the uk 2070 commission says disadvantaged areas should get an extra £200 billion. it says inequality is a blight on britain. many companies are exposed in particular to china and the biggest brewery in the world says profits are down by $170 million in the last two weeks alone. because of the outbreak of the virus. goldman sachs is warning that it could actually cause a recession. joining now is emma—lou montgomery from fidelity international. this is

we're sitting down with the first african-american woman appointed to the california court of appeals. it's been a long journey for justice terry jackson. she said she and her sister were the first to integrate their schools and neighborhood. as of january justice jackson assumed her new role in the 1st district court of appeal. >> this is what i'm doing because i love it so much but i cannot dismiss or minimize that it is history. the first means responsibility. it means fear. it means sadness. why did we get into this? but it also means it's a door or opportunity to be opened for others. >> justice jackson says she knew she wanted to work in the justice system when she was just five because she watched the movie "to kill a mockingbird." go to abc7news.com and search black history month to find out more information about black leaders making history. she's inspiring. >> that's cool. >> just to sit down with her and know what it's like to be the first to have people count you out and look at you like you don't deserve to be somewhere and to keep going. it was awesome. >> nice to see t

yes, from the court of appeal, and borisjohnson said he would lie down in front of the bulldozers toommons in 2018 when as foreign secretary he went to afghanistan on a foreign mission rather than face the commons on this one. there's a lot riding on it. the government has a lwa ys lot riding on it. the government has always indicated that the expansion of heathrow is necessary from an economic point of view, but opponents say it cannot be justified if britain is to meet its paris agreement commitments of keeping temperature increases down to 1.5 degrees and it's also not compatible, they say with the objective of being carbon neutral by 2050, so if the ruling goes against the government in this case, it will energise opponents of heathrow expansion and it might provide an opportunity for the government, should it wanted, to back down on the plan but alternatively could continue fighting. is today's ruling the end of it or could there be further appeals? there could be further appeals? there could be further appeals. the government could decide to look back at its appraisal process a

of the runway say expansion is vital for britain to compete on the international stage. roger harrabin reports. cheering in the sleet and cold they massed outside the appeal courtng for a ruling that the government acted unlawfully by failing to take climate change into account when it approved the heathrow expansion. thejudge‘s ruling, when it came, was clear. the secretary of state acted unlawfully in failing to take into account the paris agreement on climate change when deciding to designate the airports national policy statement in support of the expansion of heathrow airport. the government acted unlawfully. it triggered the scenes ofjubilation outside. the government has been told it's got to go away and think again. if they want to resurrect the project they will have to do a full and proper appraisal against all the climate change impacts over the full lifetime of the project, and that's a pretty demanding assessment to do. i think it's pretty unlikely that heathrow would through that evaluation, but that's a matterfor government. but that hope may be premature. since its opening in the 19505, heathrow has faced many setbacks to expansion. and normally

of the earth and plan b and for the climate. this is a great day for anybody who's concerned about climate change. we will be appealing to the supreme courtrong, however at the same time, we will work with the government on their review. two more cases of coronavirus are confirmed in england. both are being treated at specialist centres. the uk threatens to walk away from post—brexit trade talks with the eu if there's no progress byjune. ten more days of difficult conditions are predicted for parts of yorkshire and the west midlands hit by flooding. now on to sports with sarah. thank you very much. let's start with david beckham because finally after seven yea rs with david beckham because finally after seven years of planning, he will be able to see his own football tea m will be able to see his own football team make their official debut in america's major over this weekend. the former england captain is the co—owner of inter—miami and says he has no idea just what a challenge it would be to get the team to this point after years of arguing about this site for the stadium. beckham admits it has been a tough journey, but he is glad that

but now, the courts have intervened because of climate change. in a landmark decision, the appealrt has ruled that ministers should have considered that they'd signed the paris agreement — a treaty meant to tackle global warming. the secretary of state acted unlawfully in failing to take into account the paris agreement on climate change when deciding to designate the airport's national policy statement in support of the expansion of heathrow airport. cheering. this led to jubilant scenes outside the court — campaigners delighted that the judge recognised the legal obligations on climate change. this is game changing not just for aviation, not just for the uk, but for everybody. the paris agreement has teeth. not everybody believed it, but today they know that's true. what next for heathrow? the judges didn't say that the airport could never expand, but the government has signalled that it will not appeal. that may suit the prime minister, borisjohnson — he's long opposed the third runway. i will lie down with you in front of those bulldozers and stop the building — stop the const

the court of appeal has ruled doctors can stop providing medical the parents of a baby who is said toges analysed evidence on four—month—old midrar ali after a high courtjudge concluded that treatment could be withdrawn. midrar‘s father said the ruling was "terrible", after arguing their son had been showing "signs of life". but doctors at st mary's hospital in manchester said midrar earlierjoe donegan was outside the hospital and expend the background to the case. for that entire time the baby has been on a ventilator and feeding tube at st mary's hospital in this compass behind me. there were complications during his birth which led to profound brain damage and although his body is so flushing with the help of all of the medical care, his clinicians about two weeks after his birth started conducting tests which they say prove that he is brainstem dead. they want to stop treatment and say that would be kinder and more dignified. his parents disagree with that. they have always felt that he has showed signs of five and they wa nt has showed signs of five and they want that treatment t

a similar outcome approach i think we have to hold the line p d r's are legal in fact in our court of appeals case the court of appeals said they are legal that's not how you beat the case is it we haven't beaten the case yet in 2018 i had 11000. and investigations against me and rappler in 2019 i had to post bail 8 times to be free so least these cases are still ongoing we did not get around it by having pierre omidyar dhoni this is something that that they did because they wanted to remove in their mind remove they did this independently of rappler but i continue to challenge is this is a point of law so do territories starts with the media but you told me that you are seeing signs that this government is now going further looking at other institutions and trying to perhaps capture some of them is is it any coincidence that he started with the media not at all you go back to 1970 s. and then you go back again to 986 any time someone wants to take control of government the 1st step is to control the media that's the 1st step of ferdinand marcos in 1972 he shut down a.b.s. c.b.s. and controll

court. so, what do you know now having been a justice and been on the other side of the bench that you would like to convey to advocates for the court or court of appealsor otherwise? >> i think i knew then what has been reaffirmed over and over again. the supreme court is what lawyers call hot bench. that is, every justice has done his or her homework, is armed to the teeth for oral argument, uses their power effectively. that is not true of all appellate benches, and i remember one argument in a federal circuit court i will not say which number. >> i don't think it was hours. >> my students came with me to this argument and i thought our reply brief was devastating. i start arguing it and i sense early on that the panel far from reading my reply brief had not even read the opening brief. so i had to go back to being a kindergarten teacher and lead them in the direction i wanted them to go, but that can be very disillusioning to do an advocate if you are dealing with a cold bench. >> the opposite of that of course is when advocates are making an argument and then they are interrupted, and some of the more recent studies have suggested that both female

of fair use. that decision was first appealed to the federal circuit court of appeals in washington because of the fact there were patents in the case. this is where the decision went. the cafc said the declaring code and this is out of the case, the declaring code and structure in sequence and organization of the api packages are entitled copyright protection and therefore they reversed the district court and sent it back for a new trial on fair use. so then they went back to the district court and decided fair use. that went to the jury in the jury this time found it was excused by fair use so now we get a second appeal to the court of appeals in the federal circuit this time oracle was arguing that the fair use was not an appropriate decision for the jury and they again reversed and said google's use of java api packages was not fair as a matter of law and so they decided as a matter of law that the use was not fair. it was a commercial use, a competing use, it was not a fair use. >> so now google has appealed to the supreme court. this is a significant case. the two questions the supreme court

today, at the court of appeal, kirsty‘s family is challenging leicestershire county council's decisionlawyers are basically saying is that by removing kirsty‘s access to her specialist bus, and therefore her education, the council is in breach of her human rights. the local authority which operates these buses today said it wouldn't comment on the ongoing case, but remains committed to supporting families. it also said it needs to focus on providing statutory services in the face of increasing budget pressures. it's bedtime. all right? for stefan, he feels he shouldn't have to constantly justify his daughter's disability in order to access the vital services they as a family need. leg up. it's an emotional drain because we have to go through this all again and it all comes out again about kirsty‘s disability, the impact that it has on us as a family... sorry, i'm going to get emotional. it's quite difficult. take your time. it's quite difficult, because, you know, she's my daughter. 0k? stefan drexler, kirsty‘s father, ending that report by our disability news correspondent, nikki fox.

of fair use. and so that decision was first appealed to the federal circuit court of appeals here in washington because of the fact that there were patents in the case. this is where that decision went. the cafc said that the declaring code and this is kind of out of the case -- the declaring code and the structure of sequence and organization of the a.p.i. packages are entitled to copyright protection and therefore, they reverse the district court and send it back for a new trial on fair use. so then they went back -- back to the district court and decided fair use. now, of course, went to the jury and the jury this time found that it was excused by fair use. right? appeal e get a second to the court of appeals to the federal circuit. this time oracle was arguing that, you know, that fair use was not an appropriate decision for the jury. and they reversed and said that google's stands was not fair as a matter of law. and so they decided as a matter of thraw the use was not fair. it was a commercial use. it was a competing use. it was not a fair use. adam: and so google has appealed to the supreme cour

. >>> she's the first african-american woman appointed to california's court of appeals. ice terry jackson is inspiring others. >>> i'm excited to see her story. good morning, everyone. i do want to let you know about a sigalert i'm following in los gatos. there's an issue with this big rig on westbound bear creek road before alma college road. big rigs are not allowed on this street, so a lot of upset commuters in this area. it's a specific spot, i don't want to spend too much time on it. heading up to the north bay, we have dense fog in the area, so if you're traveling along highway 101, highway 1, highway 12 as well, if you're in between santa rosa and petaluma, you will experience that dense fog visibility from zero to a quarter mile. richmond-san rafael bridge, quite a few cars making their way towards the toll mras splaz. a beautiful shot this morning at the golden gate bridge. i'll send it over to drew touma with the forecast. >> you've been tracking the fog, i've been tracking the fog on live doppler 7. here's the visibility. tracking zero miles in santa rosa and p

to continue work on the nomination of a judge on the 11th circuit court of appeals. on c-span3 at 10 a.m., federal reserve chair jerome powell testifies for the house financial services committee on monetary policy and the economy. later at 2:30 p.m. house armed services subcommittee examines white supremacy in the u.s. military. >> c-span, your unfiltered view of government. created by cable in 1979 and brought to you today by your television provider. >> a house financial services subcommittee recently held a hearing on mobile payment technology.

the court of appeal decided that the government's heathrow‘s expansion decision was unlawful becausemate commitments into account. heathrow said it would challenge the decision, but the government said it would not appeal. if we are not to have an oral statement on the heathrowjudgement, and given the government has decided not to appeal it, will the leader of the house take this opportunity to confirm the government does not intend to keep the disastrous third runway scheme alive? it would be wrong of me to pre—empt the written ministerial statement, which will be laid before this house today. early today, the court of appeal handed down a historic and fantastic ruling, judging that the government's heathrow expansion decision was unlawful because it did not take into account the government's legally—binding commitments on climate change. madame deputy speaker, the secretary of state for transport has tweeted, "the government will not appeal this ruling". but the government's transport policy is now in confusion and chaos along with its climate change policy. could you, madam deputy

they split on the issue of fair decision washat first appealed to the federal circuit court of appeals here in washington. because of the fact that they were patents. where the decision went. the declaring code and the structure seeks an organization of the packages entitled to copyright protection and therefore, they reversed this court and sent it back for a new trial on fair use. back to they went district court and decided fair use. that of course went to the jury and the jury this time found that it was excused by fair use. now, we get a second appeal to the court of appeals for the federal circuit. arguinge, oracle was that the fair use was not inappropriate decision and they again reversed and said that google's use of java api packages was not there as a matter of law. law decided as a matter of that the use was not fair. it was a commercial use. it was a competing use. it was not a fair use. >> so now google has appealed to the court and this is a significant case, because of the two questions the supreme court has granted on copyright ability and whether the copying is counts

this is the ninth circuit court of appeals. president trump has so often criticized. in this case at an earlier phase, president trump attacked one of the judges, and it was this case that triggered chief justice john roberts to come back with that statement. remember months ago where he defended the judiciary against attacks? so this is the court that really bothers president trump, and today he suffered two really big losses. >> ninth circuit, ariane de vogue, thank you so much for the updates on that. >>> the 2020 race heads into super tuesday and cnn is taking you behind the scenes of some of the most influential presidential elections of the past. in race for the white house, we dive into the 1960 race between lyndon johnson and barry goldwater, a race that redefined both of america's political parties. >> on july 2nd, 1964, lbj walks into the east room of the white house and transforms the lives of millions of americans. >> i'm about to sign into law a civil rights act of 1964. >> this is a time when everybody's watching

. >>> she is the first african-american woman appointed to california's court of appeals. how the journey of justice terry jackson is inspiring others. >>> i need to have a repeat of yesterday. i was living my life out there on a lounger. just the sun. >> you know what? >> shorts. >> it's like we have surpassed all of our winter and gone to the summer months. that's how it will be today as well. we will get what we got and deal with it. >> and lounge. >> did you wear sunscreen? >> um -- >> excuse me, wear sunscreen. you can still get burned. live doppler 7. we have an issue with fog, especially in the north bay. this is in miles, when you see zero, that is zero miles visibility. around highway 16, 101, thick fog this morning. as you head south on 101, approaching sausalito and the golden gate bridge, that's when the fog lifts quickly. the fog is isolated in nature, where we have it it is thick. temperatures in the 30s and 40s. 48 in the city right now. san jose at 41. cooler in san ramon. grab the heavier jacket first thing out the door. later today, it's a warm day. compar

court with instructions to dismiss it. judge griffith wrote article 3 of the constitution forbids federal courts from resolving this interbranch dispute. we agree and dismiss this case. this means a federal appealsourt ruled that the constitution bars the court from getting involved in the certain issues of impeachment. this allows the white house to claim victory. house democrats have until march to request a hearing. it's possible this could end up at the supreme court. gregg: president trump is nominating john ratcliffe to be the director of national intelligence. the president tweeting he would have completed the process earlier but ratcliffe wanted to wait until after the inspector general report was finished and published. his whole a opposite would be congressman jerry nadler hop has moved on to his next witch hunt, attacking the department of justice. he wants more than a dozen people to testify, including the 40s cry baby attorneys who gave roger stone an unfair sentencing recommendation that was resides by bill barr. and u.s. attorney john durham is investigating the corruption behind the russia hoax. the president tweeting, the democrats request is another attempt to distract from the

court with instructions to dismiss it. judge griffith wrote article 3 of the constitution forbids federal courts from resolving this interbranch dispute. we agree and dismiss this case. this means a federal appealsourt ruled that the constitution bars the court from getting involved in the certain issues of impeachment. this allows the white house to claim victory. house democrats have until march to request a hearing. it's possible this could end up at the supreme court. gregg: president trump is nominating john ratcliffe to be the director of national intelligence. the president tweeting he would have completed the process earlier but ratcliffe wanted to wait until after the inspector general report was finished and published. his whole a opposite would be congressman jerry nadler hop has moved on to his next witch hunt, attacking the department of justice. he wants more than a dozen people to testify, including the 40s cry baby attorneys who gave roger stone an unfair sentencing recommendation that was resides by bill barr. and u.s. attorney john durham is investigating the corruption behind the russia hoax. the president tweeting, the democrats request is another attempt to distract from the

today at the court of appeal kirsty‘s family is challenging leicestershire county council's decision basically saying is that by removing kirsty‘s acce55 to her specialist bus, and therefore her education, the council is in breach of her human rights. the local authority which operates these bu5e5 today said it wouldn't comment on the ongoing case, but remains committed to supporting families. it also said it needs to focus on providing statutory services in the face of increasing budget pressures. bedtime. all right? for stephan he feels he shouldn't have to constantly justify his daughter's disability in order to access the vital services they as a family need. it's an emotional drain because if we have to go through all this again and it all comes out again about kirsty‘s disability, the impact that it has on us as a family... sorry, i'm getting emotional. it's quite difficult. it's quite difficult because this is my daughter. ok? hmm. stefan drexler, kirsty‘s father, ending that report by our disability correspondent, nikki fox. a man has appeared in court charged with the murder

judicial nominations with a procedural vote this afternoon on a nominee for the 11th circuit court of appeals. later in the week, senators may take up war powers resolutions that would require congressional approval for further military action against iran. and the house will consider legislation to remove the deadline for the ratification of the equal rights amendment, originally passed in 1972. it is now ratified by 38 states but not yet part of the constitution.

of the earth and for the climate. this is a great day for the climate. this is a great day for anybody who's concerned about climate change. we will be appealing to the supreme court. we think the appeals court got it wrong. we will work with government on the review. two more cases of coronavirus are confirmed in england. both have been treated at specialist sinners. the uk threatens to walk away from post brexit trade talks with the eu if there is no progress byjune. there are ten more days of difficult conditions predicted for parts of yorkshire and the west midlands. they have already been hit by flooding. in a moment it will be time for sportsday but first a look at what else is coming up this evening on bbc news...(f12)saudi evening on bbc news...(f12 saudi arabia has temporarily halted the entry of pilgrims entering the country to visit holy sites, in an attempt to slow the spread of coronavirus. after eight o'clock we'll speak to rashid mogradia, the founder & ceo of the council of british. at eight thirty we'll dig in to the issues surrounding the heathrow third runway being ruled unlawful, with a pro—expansion campaign group and a clmate change research

later the more liberal third, seventh and ninth courts of appeal upheld the lower courts saying the administration had to give up the grant money. now the second circuit court of appeals in new york has sided with the administration and because there's now a major conflict between the various circuit courts, it's likely the supreme court will step in to make the final call. decide from the court leaning 5-4 conservative, scotus has said the federal government maintains broad power over states when it comes to immigration policies. tucker? >> tucker: interesting. trace gallagher, thanks for that. the white house is hoping for yet another court win. today the trump re-election campaign filed suit against "the new york times" for libel over the russia collusion hoax. specifically the lawsuit concerns an op-ed the payer published in march of 2019 accusing the trump campaign of reaching a "quid pro quo" with the rush government in 2016. jen ellis joins us tonight. thanks for coming on. >> thanks for having me. >> tucker: summarize for the nonlawyers what this suit alleges. >> fits it's important to cla

government's decision to build a third runway at heathrow airport is overruled unlawful by the court of appealppealing against the judgement at heathrow who have said that they will. alex veitch is the head of policy at the freight transport association. what's your reaction to what we heard today? it's bad news for all of the uk. it's also true that the sanction of heathrow has to...|j of the uk. it's also true that the sanction of heathrow has to... i do apologise. we seem to have a slight broken up connection to you. we'll try and get to you later. we apologise for that. we will be discussing this from eight o'clock here on the bbc news channel. foster ca re rs here on the bbc news channel. foster carers are operating with huge depths. the local government association says it's worried that such financial instability could put at risk the care of vulnerable children. the government is currently carrying out a review of the care system. here's our social affairs correspondent alison holt. this care home can take just three children but each place is in high demand. they get about 30 requests

ok, let's turn to the front page of the ft, and the appeal court, no to the third runway hands johnsony. so again, this is something of a surprise, that the appeal court found the government had failed to take into account its own obligations that flowed from the paris climate change agreement to take into account the impact on climate change of the heathrow decision. and the significant point about that is that, having lost in the appeal court, the government is not now going to take it to the supreme court, which would have been the logical next step if it wanted to defend the decision taken by mrs may's government to allow this third ru nway to may's government to allow this third runway to go ahead. now, we know that boris johnson runway to go ahead. now, we know that borisjohnson personally, his constituencies in the west of london, it is directly affected. when he was a backbencher he said he would lay down in front of the bulldozers rather than allow this to go ahead. and it looks as if politically this is a very convenient decision for him. superficially it looks as if it is a

the ruler of dubai has lost his appeal against that high court decision to publish, and presumably thaton the coronavirus and other stories going on today. the syria and turkey border etc, on a newsroom life but right now we say goodbye to viewers on bbc two. greece has boosted border controls after reports that turkish officials would no longer prevent refugees from crossing into europe. the eu says it has had no official confirmation that turkey has stopped border patrols. it follows a bloody escalation in the conflict between turkey and forces loyal to president assad in the syrian province of idlib. more than 30 turkish soldiers have been killed in air strikes — prompting a swift retaliation. russia — which is supporting the syrian forces — says it wasn't involved. in the last hour, nato's secretary—general has called on russia and syria to stop attacks in idlib — saying the alliance stands with its member turkey. a little earlier i spoke to our correspondent lina sinjab who's in beirut. she said turkey wanted europe to share more of the burden of helping people who are fleeing the

the court of appeal says it finds that the 1998 nikah ceremony didn't create a marriage. performed in eight registered building, no certificates have been issued, no registrar was present and further they knew that the ceremony had no legal effect and they would need to undertake another ceremony in order to be validly married. i think the fallout from this is that if you want the protection of the law when a relationship breaks down, you need to make sure you do the right thing in law at the time you get married. you cannot rely on a religious ceremony that doesn't have the legal protection to give you those rights if the marriage breaks down later. how many other people could find themselves in a similar position, thinking they are married but legally they are not? it isn't clear but there certainly are other couples in that situation who think they may have some degree of protection because of the ceremony they have gone through and there has been a lot of interest in this case, lots of people suggesting this might set a precedent that could affect a lot of other coupl

we've rebuilt our military we've appointed a record number of judges to our federal courts of appeals we're respected in the world again. the senate acquitted the president of the united states and now a job report that reflects not only 225,000 jobs but people coming into the work force, the labor participation rate tells the story the american people see that thanks to the president's leadership, cutting taxes, rolling back regulation, unleashing american energy, but also securing historic trade deals, the usmca phase one with china, this economy is working for working americans and we've seen more than 3.5 million people come into the work force and that is reflected in that report today so it's a great week for america. and it's a great tribute to the leadership and the vision of president donald trump >> and jobs and unemployment, is that top of the list for you, mr. vice president most importantly >> i think for this president it's always about the safety and security of the american people first. that's why in the last month you saw the president take decisive action to respond

of lower courts ruled in their favor. later, the more liberal third, seventh, and ninth circuit court of appeals upheld the lower court's decisionministration had to give up the grant money. but now the second circuit court of appeals in new york has sided with the administration and because there is now a major conflict tween the various circuit courts, it's likely the supreme court will step in to make the final call. and aside from the court leaning-4 conservative scotus has repeatedly along said the federal government maintains broad power over states when it comes to immigration policy. record. >> tucker: interesting, trace gallagher, thanks foruc that. >> sure. >> tucker: the white house is open for yet another court win. today the trumper election campaign filed suit against "the new york times" for libel over the russia collusion hoax. specifically the lawsuit concerns and op-ed the paper published in march of 2019 that explicitly accuse the trump campaign of reaching a "quid pro quo with the russian government in 2016. senior legal advisor to the term election campaign, joins us tonight. thanks so much for coming on. >>

i want to tell you about the 9th circuit court of appeals blocking president trump's remain in mexico asylum policy. the judge ruled asylum seekers must be aloud into the united states instead of tbhaight the united states while their claims are reviewed. the united states and the talibanr may be set to sign an historic agreement tomorrow. u.s. officials say the deal includes taliban commitment on counter-terrorism. president trump says if the taliban and the government afghanistan live up to their commitments, we'll have a powerful path forward to end the war in afghanistan and bring our troops home. coming up next. american voters think the radical dimms have a serious god problem. we'll take it up after the break with pass for robert jeffress. i am totally blind. and non-24 can make me show up too early... or too late. or make me feel like i'm not really "there." talk to your doctor, and call 844-234-2424. i need all the breaks, that i can get. at liberty butchumal- cut. liberty biberty- cut. we'll dub it. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you ne

today's history maker is a first african-american woman appointed to the california court of appeals. kumasi sat down and talked about it. >> reporter: she's no stranger to being first. >> my sister and i, we were the first to integrate into our elementary school and junior high school. we were the first to integrate. my parents and my family, we integrated into our neighborhood. the first means responsibility. it means fear and sadness. why did we get into this? it means it's a door or opportunity to be open for others. >> i terry l. jackson -- >> do solemnly swear -- >> terry jackson became the first mampbl justice on the san francisco based first district court of appeal. >> what was it like for you? >> first it was overwhelming. and a little em. are you sure you know me that well? but also, privileged. very honored. >> do you feel like you are black history or a part of history some or do you just feel like this is my purpose and i'm doing what i love? >> well, a little bit of this is what i'm doing because i love it so much. but i cannot dismiss or minimize pits h that it is hist

the board of immigration appeals theoretically could side with her but not likely. if the board of immigration denies that we get to the fourth circuit court of appeals. in the federal court, where we prevail if we do prevail, and get it reverse a lot of the legal reasoning in the matter of a.b. i just spoke to you about tracy whitaker, but that only applies to credible fear. so that does not restrain judges who want to deny on the merits because of the a.b. case. so in the face of this decision, in the matter of a.b. what is happening in reality to the decision-making. we track, the assistant attorneys and then we can talk about the outcomes of the cases. his nonrepresentative example. it is not comprehensive. it's that simple of attorneys who asked for help from us. so often times, generally people are underrepresented, they don't know about this process. so this is what were saying from this. we seeing 50 unpublished cia unpublished, where fear of gain and, 370 miles and 13 back to the invasion judge and generally, they cite to the matter very superficial. and it's a matter of what a.b. decided and whatever. not positive. but in immigra

of immigration appeals to decide. the board of immigration appeals theoretically could find for her. not likely. but if the board of immigration appeals denies, then we get up to the 4th circuit court of appeals. so we are in a federal court where if we prevail prevail, we would hope to get reversed a lot of the legal reasoning in matter of a.b. and i should say i spoke about grace v. whitaker, but that only applies to credible fear. so that doesn't restrain judges who want to deny because of the merits a.b. case. in the face of this decision in matter of a.b. that tries to fore close the claims, what is happening in reality to decision making? the center for gender and refugee studies we assist attorneys and attorneys tell us about the outcomes in their cases. it's not a representative sample. it's not comprehensive. it's that sample of attorneys who ask for help from us, and so also we wouldn't have any prose -- pro se cases. people can't or don't know about us or don't seek our system. this is what we have seen. we've seen 50 unpublished cases for fear ofd.v. gangs where there were 37 denials and 13 remands back to the immigration judge, and generally the bai cites the matter of

will keep pushing forward this is a significant decision because the effect of it is that the court of appeal is stating they had social media companies such as google and facebook have arrived to make a decision. what people are going to be exposed to the reach of those companies is unprecedented but we ducked reach there's not been an equivalent in position of responsibility there rescore course is that those companies will be able to control the political agenda so in order for this to change the rules be a need for additional laws to be to be brought in in order to ensure that social media companies are not placed in a position where there are effectively controlling the entire political system. when it comes to dealing with the threat of coronavirus something the scientific literacy would be not just a plus but maybe a must it hasn't stopped us vice president mike pence who has little time it seems from an evidence based approach to health this is from being put in charge of america's response to the crisis. i think this is great because mike pence has a lot of experience in this area he

of boris nemtsov. still to come an appeals court in the u.s. rules in favor of you chub in a case centered around free speech details after the break. the world is driven by shaped by. military thinks. we dare to ask. the republicans have a reputation as knowing all about more about money than the democrats but the democrats are always very confusing and so bernie sanders is just out of a tradition he's talking about socialism which again is a it's a it's a model based on a in comprehensible. non existent theory about money. welcome back it seems like a long fun died in the death this week. on internet killjoys and then later spouts of rage. diary what a wreak of distressing stories there's new evidence suggesting that back in the seventy's buddy was a loony rate from to assist a disappointment on his visit to india donald trump managed to vote but he must pick up every single engine that came his way and alexandra because there cortez were $500.00 sequined dress during the day but the thing that really got my anxiety levels peaking was this twe

this is the ruling by the court of appeal suggesting that the government's policy had not fully takenvernment's policy had not fully ta ken into account government's policy had not fully taken into account what is effectively its own legal restrictions of the back of the paris accords. what i mean if it was two things. one that it is extremely politically expedient and convenient one might say for the prime minister, it gets him out of a potentially difficult hole because of course his own constituency is own outspoken two way down in front of bulldozers should a third runway go ahead. this makes it easierfor him not to be put in the political conundrum. but i also feel that this is another example of what the government have been i think quite rightly anxious about, so—called judicial overreach. in this case it isjudicial judicial overreach. in this case it is judicial overreach that seems to be quite convenient for them. what about the comments made by cra n ks hafts about the comments made by crankshafts though saying that any expansion at heathrow will be industry led? expansion a