the court of appeal rules the withdrawal of life support for 12—year—old archie battersbee should notponed beyond 12pm tomorrow. a man has appeared in court charged with murdering nine—year—old lilia valutyte, who was stabbed to death in boston, lincolnshire. the first ship carrying grain has left the ukrainian port of odesa under an agreement with russia, which is hoped to ease a global good crisis. and scientists supercharge one of earth's most powerful telescopes with new technology to reveal how our galaxy formed in unprecedented detail. england's lionesses have been celebrating with thousands of fans at a massive party in trafalgar square, after their historic 2—1victory against germany last night. the title is england's first for more than 50 years and the fa say the success will "turbo—charge" the women's game in this country. more than 17 million people were watching at the final whistle bbc one last night, making it the most watched programme of the year so far. our sports correspondent natalie pirks has been at trafalgar square for us. # sweet caroline... these lionesses may

so tell us what the outcome of that appeal was. >> of the court of appeals ruled 3-nothing in favor ofhe commission meaning i lost and partta of which would mean i wod need to re- change my staff, change policies and create cakes that went against my faith and reach retrain my staff. the retraining it's funny because it's a very small shop. my wife and i own it, my daughter worksny for me and my m who is in her 80s walked up to me one day and said by the way, i won't be reeducated. i said thank you mom, i love you and appreciate that. so that is what the court of appeals initially came back and said those rulings now stand so tthe next step is to appeal to the colorado state supreme court. >> that sounds very cultural revolution in china the education camp so you talk about this before but the government was essentially ordering you to violate your conscience. was there ever a moment through the first year was second-tier where you were sort of wavering and wondering if you should just give in and do what they said or just make the cake? >> i would close the shop down before i would st

the colorado civil rights commission, a panel of seven gubernatorial appointees, they ruled against you, right? then you chose to appeal to the colorado court of appeals. what was the crux of your appeal? >> the same thing, the state was forcing me to the civil rights commission to create cakes that went against my conscience so they were asking the court of appeals to reverse that decision and allow me to obey my conscience and make cakes in line with that. >> in the book you talk about a double standard because there's another denver bakery who didve something almost identical to what you did but they did not, were not persecuted in any way so can you tell us why that happened? >> there's a gentleman who went to at least three different bakeries and asked them to create cakes shaped like a bible with a message on their, a red circle with the extra silhouette of two men getting married in a message on a cake homosexuality or homosexuality marriage is wrong so he asked the bakeries to create those cakes and they declined because they disagreed with the message on it and that's what we were doing, we were going to serve these people, the two

colorado civil rights commission, which is a panel of seven gubernatorial appointees, they ruled against you and then you chose to appeal to the colorado court of appeals. what was the crux of your appeal lacks. >> the same thing. the state was forcing me through the civil rights commission to create cakes that went against my conscience. so asking the court of appeals to reverse that decision and allow me to obey my conscience and create cakes in line with that. >> and in the book you talk about there was a kind of double standard, becausee there was another denver bakery who did something almost identical to what you did, but they were not persecuted or in any way. so can you tell us why that happened? >> there was a gentle man here in denver who went to at least o create cakes shaped like a bible with a message like a red circle and annex through it for two men getting married and it was a message on a cake that said homosexual weddings is wrong. they declined because the message. and that is exactly what we were doing. we were going to serve these people [inaudible] the civil rights commission said they are not turning you away, only the

of your appeal? >> the same thing. that the state was forcing me through the arm of the civil rights commission to create cakes that went against my conscience so we were asking the court of appeals to reverse that decision and allow me to obey myconscience and create cakes that are in line with it . >> you talk about in the book there was this kind of a double standard because there was another denver bakery who did something almost identical to what you did. but they did not, they were not persecuted or in any way. can you tell us why that happened? what that was about? >> there was a gentleman in denver that went to these three different bakeries and asked them to create cakes that were shaped like a bible with a message on there like a red circle next to it with two men getting married and it was a message on the cake that said homosexuality or homosexual marriage is wrong so he asked these bakeries to create these cakes and they all declined to do that because they disagreed with the message on. that's what we were doing. we were willing to serve these people , and. [inaudible] that we can't create all cakes so the civil rights commission they're not turning you a

has decided that the court of appeal they have made, they have decided tha i . ., they have made, they have decided than _, . , ., they have made, they have decided than that uk court decision stands, any international— that uk court decision stands, any international law _ that uk court decision stands, any international law obligation - that uk court decision stands, any international law obligation to - that uk court decision stands, any| international law obligation to take into account the un treaty does not change the legal position more that courts in the uk must act in the best interest of the child, that is the decision that they ultimately come to and that means that doctors sadly will withdraw life—support for archie battersbee eventually. his parents had asked the un to consider it under particular human rights articles, including the right to life and also write to ford equality, arguing he had been left disabled after he had those injuries, the un committee on the rights of persons with disabilities said it

a circuit court of appeals has just temporarily blocked it today in ruled that a lower court to decidef some protections. based on the speech and debate clause of the constitution. msnbc legal analyst joyce vance tweeted this quote the 11th circuit significantly delays in any will as a billeting to take lindsey graham's testimony. romantic the case of the district court offered to decide if the subpoena can be squashed because of the speech and debate clause. this could be months, not weeks. joining me to discuss a former u.s. attorney and former deputy assistant attorney general during the clinton administration harry lippman. welcome, do you agree with choices assessment? do you think this could be pushed back past the midterms? >> yeah, i basically do. so what the court of appeals has said is not decided if it can be squashed under the speech debate clause but partially quashed. graham originally said, hey, i'm just doing my job as a senator. i have protection under the speech and debate clause. that's wrong. you have protection for talking on the floor for a few narrow things, not

. :: they ruled against you and then you chose to appeal to the colorado court of appeals. what was the crux of your appeal? >> the same thing. the state was forcing me were the civil rights commission that went against my conscience to we were asking to reverse that decision, allow me to obey my conscience and create cakes in line with them. >> you in the book you talk about double standard, another denver bakery who did something almost identical what you did but they were not persecuted. can you tell us why that happens? >> there's a general here in denver that went to at least three different bakeries and asked to create cakes shaped by a bible with a message on the, a red circle with an x through it, two men getting married in a message on the cake that said homosexuality or marriage is wrong so they asked the bakeries to create the cakes and they declined because they disagreed with the message of and that's exactly what we were doing. we were going to serve these people in the person can't create all cakes so the civil rights commission said there not turn you away, j

that is what the court of appeals said those rulings now stand. so the next step is to appeal to the state supreme court. >> that sounds like a reeducation camp so you talk about this before but the government was ordering you to violate your conscience. was there ever a moment where you were wavering and wondering if you should just give in and do what they said? >> i would close the cake shop down but the question why is how far could be go? i learned the colorado state supreme court have discretion in the cases that they take and then my case was declined and thought it was over there is only one option left and that is to appeal to the united states supreme court. we were willing to do that but what they hear our case? that was the question. host: they were willing to hear your case and tell us the odds of the us supreme court to hear your case. >> the odds are extremely small you will be heard they are petitioned with between eight and 10000 cases every year the only grant between 70 or 80 and it has to be to circuit if they ruled differently

court of appeals for the ninth circuit. by the end of the week, and possibly into the weekend, chamber plans to consider democrats tax policy health care and climate change package. a vote to start debate on that could happen as early as today. as always, live coverage of the senate on c-span2. will lead the. the chaplain: let us pray. eternal father, our souls long for you, for we find strength and wisdom in your presence. guide our lawmakers to put their trust in you, seeking in every undertaking to know and do your will. when they go through

of uk courts. the high court, the appeal court, the supreme court. thdrawal of life support but they would not do it if there were still court proceedings in place. we have had nothing thus far this morning from the supreme court although a christian organisation who have been supporting the family had told me this morning they thought papers were being lodged at the supreme court imminently but we don�*t understand that has happened. we are waiting to hear if there is been a statement from the hospital given that noon deadline for withdrawing support has just passed. brute that noon deadline for withdrawing support hasjust passed.— support has 'ust passed. we have been support hasjust passed. we have been hearing. _ support hasjust passed. we have been hearing, like _ support hasjust passed. we have been hearing, like you _ support hasjust passed. we have been hearing, like you said, i support hasjust passed. we have. been hearing, like you said, you've been hearing, like you said, you�*ve just outlined a number of organisations and comments and reac

life support is expected to be withdrawn from 12—year—old archie battersbee today, after court of appealid his treatment should not continue. british airways halts sales of tickets on short—haul flights from heathrow for a week as disruption for travellers continues. mps are calling for non—surgical cosmetic procedures like botox and fillers to be better regulated. welcome to bbc news. the leader of al-qaeda, ayman al—zawahiri, has been killed in an american drone strike in afghanistan. al—zawahiri was one of the masterminds behind the september 11th attacks against the united states in 2001. after years of tracking him, the cia targeted him with two missiles from a drone flying above the afghan capital kabul, killing him instantly. announcing the strike, president biden said the killing would bring closure to families of the nearly 3,000 victims of the 9/11 attacks. it comes nearly a year after the us�*s chaotic withdrawal from afghanistan, as our washington correspondent nomia iqbal reports. after decades, america has killed one of its most wanted terrorists. my fellow americans, on sa

but ensured a record number of judicial confirmations including to our critical federal courts of appeal. 30 years ago clarence thomas became a member of the supreme court our keynote speaker voted invade in favor of that confirmation. just as higher young law clerks and justice thomas is known to look for certain qualities in those clerks. a very long list of those law clerks are now federal judges on the circuits catches rouse strauss. ho rushing eyed miller. on the district court's pack hold my cell nichols on the tax court toro and the armed forces court of appeals mags and hardy. according to a 2019 article in the atlantic justice thomas has had more of his former clerk's nominated to federal judgeships under president trump. did any other justice passed or present? and not to be outdone judges the par bush now bandian and walker where shall we say recommended to the white house to be judges by our keynote speaker? all those nominees were confirmed. thanks to our keynote speaker. let me pause on that for a minute 30 years after the confirmation of clarence, thomas. these clarence th

of skills to the court. first they have just -- a senator versus a person who spent their time as a federal court of appeals dge. a federal court of appeals judge, and this is for obvious reasons, you don't want them to be biased, they never leave their office. the only people they see are their clerks, their secretaries, and once a month they hear argument and lawyers stand at a distance. they never see any trials. they never see regular people. a politician is out every day door-to-door working with people, getting to know people, understanding the needs or trying to understand the needs of regular people. second, a big chunk of the court's work is what into it be helpful for them to know how they operate? and i talk at length about third, warren because he was a master of this. but honestly chief justice john marshall was another master of this. sometimes politicians are good at getting people to agree or at least compromise. that may not be the case in the current version of politics we have. over the history in this country that has been one of the skill sets they have brought to the supreme court and t

the case was referred to the high court, the court of appeal, the supreme court and the european courterjudge agreed with doctors. after careful thought we refuse permission to appeal. the family eventually had to accept they had exhausted all legal roots. no family should ever have to go through what we have been through, it's barbaric. tributes to archie left outside the hospital today. his family had wanted him moved to a hospice away from what they saw as the noise and chaos of the hospital. that was refused, the trust arguing that archie was in such an unstable condition it was too great a risk. in a statement barts health nhs trust said its thoughts and condolences were with archie's family and said that treatment had been withdrawn in line with court rulings about his best interests, and it said staff had shown extraordinary compassion over months caring for archie and in often distressing circumstances. archie's family have said they are broken. the end of a life played out in the courts and in the public domain. simon, it is tragically impossible sometimes, isn't it, to reconc

streets there, a man was walking with a bicycle and it was a life sentence, and then the kyiv court of appealainian and the court replaced kyiv life imprisonment for 15 years of imprisonment and why so uh. look, this is a separate big question and a separate case. there are some comments about the qualifications under article 438, according to which convicts are held in a special first articles, actually, here we will not comment on the decisions of the judges, who are, so to speak, autonomous of ukraine, overturning the decision, the murder of a civilian . it really happened there, under the circumstances, and they require an additional investigation, because shimarin and this confirmed it an accomplice who was together with them in the car. only for some reason he was a witness, not an accomplice, and he received a command from one and then from another commander who were in the car to shoot one of whom they beat and the other for a few minutes, that is, here the extremes turned out to be only on the hook and not all the rest of the military group that is actually playing evil in us, well,

the court of appeal considers an urgent request from the united nations to delay the withdrawal of life—old archie battersbee. a ship carrying grain has left ukraine for the first time since a deal was agreed with russia to allieviate the global food crisis. and the jewels of the night sky — a new project is launched to reveal in unprecedented detail how our galaxy was formed. and coming up on the bbc news channel: it's day four of the commonwealth games. 28 medals up for grabs with laura kenny hoping to add scratch race gold to bronze from the women's team pursuit. good afternoon and welcome to the bbc news at one. england's lionesses have arrived in trafalgar square to celebrate with thousands of fans at a massive party, after their historic 2—1 victory against germany last night. the title is england's first for more than 50 years, and the fa say the success will "turbo charge" the women's game in this country. more than 17 million people watched the final of the euros on bbc one last night, making it the most watched programme of the year so far. our sports correspondent natalie pir

for example, a judge of the kyiv court of appeal yuriy tryasun repeatedly found himself in the field ew of public activists, in particular due to improper declaration of property, so in the declaration for 2020 tryasun indicated that in the 14th year and the owner of a plot of land in kyivska oblast with an area of ​​1,200 m², however, according to information from the state register of property rights to immovable property, the judge bought the plot back in 2007 and, probably until 2020, simply forgot to indicate it in the declarations, also a member of the ethics council, yurii träsun, has considerable wealth of unknown origin in the first in the electronic declaration for 2015, the judge declared $60,000 in cash at the nbu exchange rate at that time. almost one and a half million hryvnias, which is more than one and a half times the declared income of the entire family for 2015 tyrasun among the questionable decisions made by yuriy tryasun during his career as a judge, for example , changing the preventive measure for oleksandr belov from berkut, a suspect in the murder of three ma

do have to testify, but didn't squarely take on the speech and depp bait question so now the court of appeals has said, hold up, you do not have to testify this week. trial court, you have to decide this speech and debate question and we as the court of appeals will review that. this court of appeals is the 11th circuit, one of the most conservative circuits in the country. there's more to come but it is a temporary win for lindsey graham. >> elie, former president trump is pushing for the full unredacted release s. that something his legal team would want to see happen? >> donald trump and his legal team don't know. they don't have this document this is a document only prosecutors and the judge have seen. it doesn't go over to any suspect or defendant until there's an indictment. this is the document that prosecutors use to establish probable cause that federal crimes were committed. we've seen those three federal crimes, the violation of the espionage act, obstruction. there's not good news for donald trump but perhaps he wants it so he can pick it apart. the key thing to know he doesn't kn

i'm sure there are others in other courts of appeals that are working their way towards the courts of appeals right now. it's an issue that is involved in a considerable amount of litigation that is going on. >> i would say, judge alito, it's a painful issue for most of us. it is a difficult issue for most of us. the act of abortion itself is many times a hard decision, it's that decision, a tragic decision. i believe that for 30 years we've tried to strike a balance in this country to say that it is illegal procedure, it should be discouraged, it should be legal but rare. try to find ways to reduce the incidence of abortion. but as i listen to the way that you have answered this question this morning and yesterday, the fact that you have refused to refute that statement in the 1985 job application, i am concerned. i'm concerned that many people will leave this hearing with questions as to whether you could be the deciding vote that would eliminate the legality of abortion. >> that was associate supreme court justice samuel alito in 2006. appointed by president george w. bush, justice

we have seen several developments, for example in africa, in kenya, the high court rejected an appeal. botswana, the court ofdia is another example, as you mentioned. in singapore one of the things that is interesting is that the final ruling, orthe interesting is that the final ruling, or the latest ruling, was that the court of appeals said that they were not going to rule the law unconstitutional, previously in singapore there had been discussion this was not an issue for the courts but an issue for the courts but an issue for the legislative permit and that's actually really encouraging sign for singapore. it indicates i think there is a much broader support for legalisation in singapore than perhaps some other countries around the world. thank you so much forjoining us on the programme. the british heavyweight boxer, tyson fury, has called for tougher punishments for knife crime, after his cousin was stabbed to death in manchester. thirty—one—year old rico burton was attacked outside a bar in the early hours of saturday morning. a seventeen—year—old is also in hospital in a serious condition. police hav

parents had fought a long—running legal battle over the withdrawal of treatment, and in recent days made bids to the high court, court of appeal of human rights to have him transferred to a hospice to die. simonjones reports. saying their farewells, saying theirfarewells, in saying their farewells, in these pictures were released by archie's family in the hours before his life support was due to be withdrawn. following a series of legal fight pitting the family against doctors. as a parent i want to know that i have done everything within my power to make sure that i tried my hardest for my little boy. i wouldn't say i've accepted the decision i don't think i'll ever accept it. the 12-year-old _ think i'll ever accept it. the 12-year-old was _ think i'll ever accept it. the 12-year-old was found - think i'll ever accept it. the 12—year—old was found unconscious at his home in april he has suffered catastrophic brain injuries. the doctors treating him said there was no hope of recovery. but his family maintained he needed more time. fights health nhs trust which runs the royal london hospital disagree, it went to court and asth

parents had fought a long—running legal battle over the withdrawal of treatment and in recent days made bids to the high court, court of appealuropean court of human rights to have him transferred to a hospice to die. helena wilkinson reports. that success was not granted and life support was withdrawn. this is what his mother had to stay within the last few minutes. i am what his mother had to stay within the last few minutes.— the last few minutes. i am the roudest the last few minutes. i am the proudest mum _ the last few minutes. i am the proudest mum in _ the last few minutes. i am the proudest mum in the - the last few minutes. i am the proudest mum in the world, . the last few minutes. i am the i proudest mum in the world, such the last few minutes. i am the - proudest mum in the world, such a beautiful little boy, and he fought right until the very end. and i'm so proud to be his mum. he right until the very end. and i'm so proud to be his mum.— right until the very end. and i'm so proud to be his mum. he was taken off of all medication _ proud to be his mum. he was taken off of all medication at _ proud to be his mum

the court of appeal has ruled that the life support of 12—year—old archie battersbee can be switched treatment isn't in his best interests. our correspondent ellie price is here. still no resolution then to this tragic case. still no resolution then to this tragic case-— still no resolution then to this tragic case. no, another day of complicated — tragic case. no, another day of complicated legal _ tragic case. no, another day of complicated legal wrangling i tragic case. no, another day of| complicated legal wrangling and tragic case. no, another day of - complicated legal wrangling and at the centre of it the future of a boy that doctors say will never recover. we heard repeatedly from high court judges and the court of appeal that it is an archie's best interest for his life support machine to be switched off. having exhausted their route through the british legal system, his parents have appealed to the un commission on disability rights for them to investigate the case and that is what today's hearing was about, whether there should be a postponement of the withdrawal of care w

for example, the judge of the kyiv court of appeal, yuriy tryasun, repeatedly found himself in the fieldtivists, in particular, due to improper declaration of property, so in declaration for the year 2020, the shaker indicated that in the 14th year he became the owner of a plot of land in the kyiv region with an area of ​​1,200 m², however, according to information from the state register of property rights to immovable property, the judge bought the plot back in 2007 and probably just forgot about it until 2020 to indicate it in the declarations, also a member of the ethics council, yuriy tryasun, has considerable wealth of unknown origin. in the first electronic declaration for 2015, the judge declared $60,000 in cash, which at the nbu exchange rate at that time was almost one and a half million hryvnias, and this more than one and a half times higher than the declared income of the whole family of the ryasun for 2015. among the questionable decisions made by yuriy ryasun during his judicial career, for example , changing the preventive measure of oleksandr belov from berkut, a suspect

now they have to wait to see how the court of appeals will decide on this case. >> thanks for that updatehrew himself in front of his family to shield them as a terrorist being described as a palestinian with israelry censorship fired on a bus. he was shot in the neck. a family friend says it's a miracle the bullet narrowly missed his artery. in total eight people were injured, including five americans, two of whom are critically wounded right now. hadas gold reports from jerusalem where more victims, including a mother and her newborn are on a tough road to recovery. >> reporter: shia hirsh glick had come to jerusalem with his family to pray at the holy sites before his son's wedding. but it turned to horror sunday morning in what police are describing as a terror attack. a man coming up to a bus stop outside jerusalem's old city walls and began shooting. this is where the attack took place at the bus stop for king david's tomb. his family telling me they were waiting here for a taxi to take them to their hotel when the attack began. although shia was struck in the face and neck and he f

is there -- did they leave a question on the table that after you get a circuit court of appeals in one another region, what is it? >> right. so you're touching on an important legal point. when the federal courts of appeals are in disagreement with each other, that makes it more likely the supreme court will take something up. look, there's a raft of questions and dobbs left open this idea. so i mentioned privacy earlier. to what extent does the right to privacy still exist to the supreme court or constitution, how does it affect things like in vitro fertilization and interracial marriages, and how people conduct their daily lives? these are questions at least implicitly at issue post dobbs, and these will be tied to this abortion question. >> so we'll follow this for years, elliott is almost right. 82 days from now, america votes in the midterm election. democrats believe especially in these battleground senate states that are very close, where close elections are decided in the suburbs, they believe listening to these ads helps. >> ron johnson got his way and abortion access is endin

then the court of appeals, appellate judges, then the district court judges, your standard trial levelges. and a half step below that, you have magistrates. they handle things like search warrants. we're at the magistrate level now. if that magistrate rules against donald trump, i believe he will then say, he need toss go to the district court, to the court of appeals. so if donald trump -- >> so appeals all the way. >> if he appeals to the district court and the court of appeals, could take weeks or months. delay is part of donald trump's legal play book, we know that. >> certainly. and that's not at all what anybody wants to hear in terms of the possible timing here, depending how this plays out. stephanie, garland said this was a last resort and he said the department, in his words, looks for less intrue sive meaning fo the search. trump, of course, is out there with many absurd and obscene claims, saying that everybody was cooperating completely and handing everything over. said the government could have had whatever they wanted. but then with no warning, mar-a-lago was raided at 6

what happened with senator dianne feinstein and her religious beliefs while she was up for the court of appeals for the seventh circuit and the backlash that happens. if you would get that out and show the consequence it had when she then was nominated to the supreme court. >> she asked the nominee a series of questions ending with will you be able to separate your religious beliefs from your role as a judge and she said it seemed to be based on your writings and this is the exact quote i believe the dogma lives loudly within you so this created a huge backlash. of course the constitution provides there shall be no religious tests for public t office andt this stroke in numbr of people as a religious test. there were i gather in the gift shops and so-s on t-shirts and cubs. it became a slogan. anna there was so much pushback for three years later when the confirmation hearings l took ple she couldn't ask. what's interesting is the democrats obviously decided nobody was going to ask. the republican senators hadn't gotten the memo and they had all kinds of questions to pose to her along the lines

of 911. immediately evacuated. on the first time since a court building was built in the 1930s the court met elsewhere. they met in the federal court of appeals a building down the street. i think that was very disruptive because everybody had to leave their chambers over a period of i think a couple of weeks. no one knew how long this is going to last. the court started meeting again, not meeting publicly but meeting privately this past spring in april when everyone is vaccinated. most of the met and conference on all of them. i guess found in or something. they start being able to eyeball each other what's a blaster sound can you hear me now? >> yes.ey i think because some earlier feedback i'm now muted between sessions here. i want to make sure we spend some time on abortion. and i'll say for the oral arguments they cancel twoar sessions because there at the beginning of march. so they have special teleconference. they are creatures of habit. exceptions cannot rattle them. and i think you are right. i played out in the cases in ways that are probably mostly subtle. but we will never know whether there might have been a little more collegia

the court of appeal has ruled that the life support of 12—year—old archie battersbee will be switchedment isn't in his best interests. the government had asked judges to consider a request from a united nations committee, to keep treating him. let's get more on today's developments with our correspondent ellie price. ellie, do things right up to date with what has been said this evening. with what has been said this evenin.. . _, with what has been said this evenina. ~ _, .,, with what has been said this evenina. ~ , with what has been said this evenina. ~ _, .,, , ., with what has been said this evenina. ~ , ., evening. welcome it has been a day of complicated _ evening. welcome it has been a day of complicated and _ evening. welcome it has been a day of complicated and often _ evening. welcome it has been a day of complicated and often turbulent l of complicated and often turbulent legal argument today at the court of appeal but at the heart of it is the future of the 12—year—old boy who doctors say is brain stem dead. what we had today was about this, she mentioned, this applicatio

of the speech and debate clause. which basically protects sitting lawmakers from being subject to subpoenas for issues that fall within legislative duties. it's gone up and down between trial court and court of appeals. with the court of appeal says is go back to the trial court and try to figure out if some of this information is covered by the speech and debate clause and some is not? the bottom line is it's not great for the investigation because it can take months. >>> top republicans are demanding the release of the affidavit that authorized the recent search of his home. but it will be need need to be redacted before its release. the department justice is preparing for a hearing with the florida magistrate this week on what can and what cannot go public. what will they likely decide? if it is too heavily redacted to that run the risk of fueling more conspiracy theories? >> there will be conspiracy theories either way unfortunately. but if we see just enough information so that everything is open to interpretation it could lead to more disinformation. what is interesting, as you mentioned there are a lot of republicans are calling for the release of the affidavit. but the former president while

court of _ life. there was a hearing before the court of appeal last week. that appeal— court of appeal last week. ound to allow a case to be considered by the united nations committee which deals with people with disabilities. that was turned down _ with disabilities. that was turned down and — with disabilities. that was turned down and the judges said that barring — down and the judges said that barring further appeal, then the doctors — barring further appeal, then the doctors could switch off rg's life support — doctors could switch off rg's life support this afternoon. how common are cases like — support this afternoon. how common are cases like this _ support this afternoon. how common are cases like this in _ support this afternoon. how common are cases like this in the _ support this afternoon. how common are cases like this in the uk, - support this afternoon. how common are cases like this in the uk, where l are cases like this in the uk, where the legal world gets involved in the medical world? thea;r the legal world gets involved in the medical world?— the legal world gets involved in

little bit more definitive guidance because we have a district court ruling, the trial of organ may be to bring it up to the court of appeals we will have a little bit more sort of definitive nets about where that line isn't whether this falls on one side of the line or the other. could've been a motivation garland bennett think that's close to what she's asking but i think it's possible but i don't think he is case sort of more extreme version of that and some people but garland wants to take the case get a second ruling. he didn't appeal the case, it would be open they would be and we would have the judge kaplan's ruling, not as powerful as a court of the feels ruling but i think that is possible. it is good thought. >> one of the questions audio to nexus from rj to says that bill barr as we know, john carl over at abc news and part of this was where those claims about i didn't think these voter fraud claims were real all along came about previous question is what he believed is trying to rewrite history and do believe he is a future in a future in the administration. >> so i think he's trying to rewrite history because h

the supreme court has rejected another attempt by the parents of archie battersbee to appeal against his life—support treatment. a panel ofjudges decided yesterday's court of appeal judgement to allow doctors to end the 12—year—old's care was sound. archie was found unconscious at his home in essex in april. let's speak to our legal correspondent, dominic casciani. one wonders now where archie's parents go. it one wonders now where archie's parents 90-— parents go. it is looking very likely this — parents go. it is looking very likely this could _ parents go. it is looking very likely this could be _ parents go. it is looking very likely this could be the - parents go. it is looking very likely this could be the end | parents go. it is looking very| likely this could be the end of parents go. it is looking very - likely this could be the end of the legal route here in the uk even if there is hope for the family elsewhere. what this case was about as the court of appeal yesterday said this case should not be referred to a united nations committee for review because that un committee fo

yes, i have spoken to the judiciary press office, who have made their can stand that the court of appealbattersbee's family to seek permission to appeal earlier hearing, thatjudgment we heard earlier here at the high court, where a judge ruled that family could not transfer 12—year—old archie battersbee from the royal london hospital, where he is being treated for nearly four months, to a hospice. that was the parents, the family's wish, that archie battersbee, who doctors say is brain dead, who needs life support, has been on life support for nearly four months, his family wants him to have his last four hours in a hospice, but that was refused by a judge here today. the family tried to seek permission to appeal that decision, but thejudge refused permission to appeal that decision, but the judge refused to that and now the legal case continues here because the family have now, we know, put an application in to the court of appealfor know, put an application in to the court of appeal for permission to appeal that earlier hearing. in terms of what happens next, well, there are a number o

in the southern district of florida, get this resolved by judge cannon and the 11th circuit court of appeals instead of, you know, some turn deranged democrat judge in the dc district court and the dc court of appeals. i think president trump and his legal team need to go on offense. >> sean: mike well said. thanks for joining me tonight. >> thank you. >> sean: now to a shocking story out of washington, dc where commanders running back brian robinson was the victim of either a carjacking or attempted armed robbery in broad daylight. police say the suspects are likely between the ages of 15 and 17 years old. fox's own mike emanuel has the story for us. mike? >> sean, good evening. head coach ron rivera told reporters brian robinson is doing well and in a good place. the washington commanders sent out an update from robinson today. his message? surgery went well, thanks for the prayers. god is great. one of the team's young stars sounds grateful. >> my main concern was just, was he going to be okay, not football at all. and, you know, once we found that out, that it was non-life threatening in

this comes after the state court of appeals said earlier this month that county prosecutors could enforce chilean, founder and executive director of north land family planning center. thank you for being and with us to help us make sense of everything in michigan. there have been a flurry of lawsuits filed. what is your reaction to this ruling? what does this mean for the future of abortion rights? >> thank you, first of, all cory for having me on the show. i, and all the other providers in the state, are extremely grateful to governor whitmer and recognizing the distress and the lack of clarity that this court of appeal decision left for physicians for all pregnant people, for our support staff. this was a huge victory for now. we know that there is a number of lawsuits in michigan. this isn't going to be the last one. >> we literally just talked about how it has been back and forth, this rollercoaster ride. taking it to the polls, at least you will get voters a voice. before roe v. wade was overturned, you shared a personal story back in april describing the abortion that you got just 1

the court of appeals of washington for another case involving donald trump., he sailed away from the fucking president and allowed the house of representatives to receive access to the president's tax return, which should have been made public before, so this is even the latest news regarding the case of the american former of the american president, we will again watch the quality of the situation will develop further now in america and the people are chained to those two cases a lot . thank you very much for joining. thank you for your comments. the journalist and host of the voice of america actually from the united states of america was in touch with us regarding aid from the united states and the trump case. plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine to the united states of america in the years 15-19 and the chairman of the board of the ukrainian crisis center, valery. i congratulate you. i am glad to see and hear you. i congratulate you . that is why this topic is also close to you. i would like to hear your comments about these searches, or, as the republic

and a lot of the things that we have to do as judges, as you know, the court of appeals judges take 30 hours each. just found two of them to do first thing when we came back good one in the sixth circuit and one from i think the ninth, i do not remember. but we've got to get these judges done. they are lifetime appointees, very important. we're looking forward to do that, but as you know, there's lots of things we need to get done. trying to get as much done as we can. yes? >> the biggest issue facing candidates in the fall is the inflation reduction act. one will americans begin to feel this? sen. schumer: i think they are feeling it, it's down close to above. the chips bill will matter to people. we really focused on reducing cost. and i think the american people will begin to see it. when gas was five dollars a gallon it was very hard for people to see anything else but supply chain backlogs, as they're reduced, you're going to see prices. there will still be inflation but i think it will be somewhat lower. people were going to see in the election for first how far right the republi

happened when senator dianne feinstein asked about her religious beliefs when she was up for the us court of appeals for the seventh circuit and the backlash that happened. if you would sketch that out a little bit and show what consequence it had when she then was nominated to the supreme court? >> in 2017 donald trump named barrett to the court of appeals for the seventh circuit and diane feinstein was then head democrat on the judiciary committee and she asked the nominee a series of questions ending up with will you be able to separate your religious beliefs from your role as a judge, she said it seems to me based on your writings, this is exec what i believe, the dogma lives loudly within use of this created a huge backlash. the constitution provides there shall be no religious test for public office, and this struck a number of people as imposing a religious test, the dogma is loudly within you. there were, i gather t-shirts and caps, that became a slogan, the dogma live loudly within the and there was so much pushback, diane feinstein was still fair three years later when the supreme court co

but there's a number of judicial confirmations in terms of our critical courts of appeal. 30 years ago, clarence thomas became a member of the supreme court, our keynote speaker voted in favor of that confirmation. justices hire young long clearance, justice thomas's loan to look for certain qualities in those clerks. a very long list of those walk lurks are now federal judges, on the circuits -- miller, on the district courts patrick my cell, -- on forces and hearty. according to a 2019 article in the atlanta's justice thomas has more of his former clerks nominate to federal judgeship under president trump than any other justice past or present. and not to be outdone, -- or shall we say, recommended to the white house to be judges by our keynote speaker. all those nominees were confirmed thanks to our keynote speaker, let me pause on that for a minute, 30 years after the confirmation of clarence thomas. these clarence thomas loughlin its wouldn't be federal judges but for our keynote speaker. talk about the long game. [applause] in my lifetime there hasn't been a more consequential se