'she court of criminal appeals in its decision revealing this component of article 64 inflicted that harm. >> so genal, you don't agree with the fifth circuit whenit said the injury was inflicted by the trial court ? >> yes and no your honor. this is part of the coequenceth narrowing over time. originally in his complaint mister reid brought both a facial and applieclm. the originalfacial claim is he was td no by the trial court . in authotave construction claim originally accrued as soon as a texas court in its opinion d dgment included the violation of due process which is the most prominently includes is the non-contamination requirement. the texas trial court on remand to the court of criminal appeals in paragraph and 18 of his opinion made it clear sent article 64 wasn't satisfied precisely because the evidence had been touched by a number of jury d court personnel consequence it's impossible get useful dna access. >> can you restate your argument about jurisdiction ino r as you suggested that goertz retains common-law authority despite any rungf the court? that sounds an awful l

went up to the court of criminal appeals, the court of criminal appeals wanted for the findings and oneof the tng they wanted finding-- one of them was a chain of custody requirement, which you have the non chemical requirement thalives inside the chain of custody requirement. sends it back down. my understanding is the good says, it's only in 2016 when the trial court -- is saying, oka there's a non contamination, we're making a finding of doncontamination. that now the prisoner has, the administration has notice that this may be a requirement that's being used against them. i'm not sure what that rule woulddo, in the -- because i think that anytime you have multiple opinions, whether it's multiple tria court opinions or opinion from a trial court, opinion from a court of criminalappeals, the litigants in the courcabe expected to compare the different ions and say, when was a suppos o the way that the court of colonel appeals and the w tt the state high court was going to ultimately resolve this? eith, you know, the first issuance of the opinion or undeniable every hearing. and aseems

or imdiely effective fromthe court of criminal appeals unless someone successfully ses tate or other sort of exceptional appellate . >> >> let me give you poetical . state court denies testing on one ground. party, you have taken a position in your brief that the accrual shou for that decision, >> asmi the background is a constitutional violation yes . >> now they go on appeal and the there was no appeal there. they go on appeal and the appellate court in texas says they werwrg on ground one . but they were right on an alternative ground. and now you say the plaintiff should appeal from when? he should have appeal fm the first decision or now he should appeal from the second or both? >> if i understand correctly you got a trialcourt th imposed one unconstitutional conviction>> they should have appealed and. >> i assume it's because the appellate cour iolvedin the appeal of that first judgment . >> are you saying that him appealing saves the ti he has to file? >> knoyo honor, he can go immediately to federal court on whatever. >> let'ssse

the court of appeals asked the department of justice to weigh in, and so we believe a decision from the court of appeals is probably imminent in the next couple of weeks. >> and that's a crucial decision. if you're able to survive general and civil suits, a motion to dismiss the case, that's kind of the key hurdle to get over, because that means you are very likely going to get your case to a jury. that motion can be reintroduced after the plaintiff has completed their case to a jury. sometimes civil suits are thrown out in the middle of a trial because of that. but what you are seeing in the justice department filing seems to be saying that in effect what they are seeing in this evidence, if taken the way it is presented by the plaintiffs, indicates that there is absolutely no immunity for donald trump, and in his case, the flip side of that, the flipside of no immunity is, you had to do something wrong to lose your immunity. >> that's right, lawrence. and again, it's their custom and practice to want to guard insulate the president no matter who that person is, no matter who she or he

but this court of appeal judgement . but this court of appeal judgement.reaction to it, please . well, i'm to it, please. well, i'm delighted . vindication despite delighted. vindication despite what carol may have said on twitter , after the after the twitter, after the after the judgement , the judge makes it judgement, the judge makes it perfectly clear that he found there was defamation. there was serious harm, and that she's going to have to pay damages . so going to have to pay damages. so i'm not quite sure how you spin into a victory for journalism. i mean, it was clear from the beginning that carol had no facts. she had a lot of conspiracy theories and i think the original. conspiracy theories and i think the original . yeah, i'm not the original. yeah, i'm not going to comment on that . but i going to comment on that. but i think the appeal court of right today, which is a fantastic and you were put through an extensive investigation by the electoral commission , a long electoral commission, a long investigation by national crime agency . how muc

the close of business on friday and the federal district court in washington, and the close of business today, wednesday, in the federal federal district court of washington. we saw an appeal of district court judges order processed in less than three days. each party had to file their briefs two days after the district judge ruled in the case. the appeals court ruled on those filings on the same day that they were filed. we have seen that kind of process take the better part of a year in other federal cases. sometimes longer than that. the last three days have been the worst days of donald trump's life as a delay producing litigant. delay, delay, delay has always been donald trump's legal strategy. but it is not working this week. in the face and special prosecutor jack smith's aggressive demand for donald trump's criminal defense attorney to testify to jack smith's grand jury. abc news is reporting that judge howls order allows jack smith to question donald trump 's defense lawyer on six topics. topics indicate that smith has zeroed in on trump's actions surrounding his response to him 11th department of justice supreme a sub subpoenaed it's not all remaining classified

about exactly when his sentence should be considered to have started and it seems the supreme court of appeal chief justice has decided it only began on the last time he began his prison sentence. they are taking the strictest interpretation of the law. anchor: andrew harding on a controversial social media influence andrew tate and his mother kristin have been released from jail and placed under house arrest. the brothers along with two romanian suspects have been in custody as prosecutors investigate them for suspected human trficking and rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women. the idea sounds simple enough, 15 minute cities. a way of living near where everything you need is nearby. the concept is growing in popularity but it has its critics. reporter: the 15 minutes said he. >> 15 minute cities have become a magnet for protests around the world from canada to the u.k. with conspiracy groups claiming without evidence they are designed to imprison us in our neighborhoods and limit our freedoms. the idea seems pragmatic. to have everything we need from doctors and supermar

chairman of the court at the time purchase 10 years ago, the cadastral value of this apartment was more than eight million rubles, then ifanov was the chairman of the eleventh court of appealn his declaration for 2013. this apartment, almost three of his annual income , is another piece of real estate that, according to media reports, belongs to the family. mr. efanov spacious apartment in this building closed. entrance to the underground parking area. and from the windows of the house a view of the volga opens in 2021, the son of the chairman of the court, official ivan fanov, turned out to be the most wealthy an employee of the administration of the samara region, his official income is more than 5 million rubles. and at the same time, uefanov jr. has three non-residential premises and 11 apartments. there are two properties at once in this house on akademika pavlova street , two more apartments in a new building. on the fifth clearing , the son of mr. ifanov, according to a number of media reports , lives in one of the best areas of samara in barboshina. during the soviet era, the area was known for the filming of the movie timur and his team. now this place is also fam

court of appeals agreed with her.Ñi the entire case is under seal,e we don'tt( know whatxd that is. ese materials soÑi the grand jury c seee1 themñ3[■ that reviewing a preparing for possibly l >> do you draw anyfáxd conclusi about the time frame on all of this? given thee1fá way they'reko■ mo through it. >> it's fair to jfsay, you don' go after the formerÑi president indictment.q nearly not as far along as they are theçó manhattan d.a. do this atÑi$x■ advanced stage 1 investigation. >> kyle,xd for a moment, priore trump announcing he6z■ wasxd ruu for president the reporting we had especially if the washington postok was that, you know, the j was close to charging decisions in the mar-a-lago caseÑi last t( fall. now,ok obviously that didn't co to pass. specialxd counsel smith is appointed to run this. it's now march. months later. but we are as laura points out we're talking about the president's lawyer being q subpoenaed, goingeo2ujux" providing this evidence,e1 what yourçó estimation about what el we might expecte1 in terms of witnesses to be called,xd in tes of the work that remain

passed, the eleventh court of appeal arbitration, which at that time was headed by alexander efanov a to the company's shareholders. the son of ifanov's court entered. ivan, after 8 years, already being the chairman of the sixth court of cassation , alexander efanov personally. bought from the company. the era of a plot of land on podzharnaya island after the appeal of state duma deputies alexander khinshtein. employees of the prosecutor general's office checked the result of the expected information about the affiliation of alexander alekseevich efanov with era llc was confirmed. could efanov to violate the anti-corruption legislation, the results of the audit were sent by the employees of the supervisory department to the highest qualification board of judges, the judge of 47 years of experience , retired chairman of the leninsky district court of samara, vladimir kucher, now runs the museum of justice and conducts excursions for schoolchildren and students. of the court to mr. efanov , the honored lawyer of russia vladimir kucher was one of the developers of the draft law on the st

he was passover when president reagan named an individual to fill a vacancy on the pc circuit court of appealswhich is one rung below the supreme court, the second most powerful court in america some say. he was passed over in favor of his friend again. when the vacancy appeared on the supreme court, sandra day o'connor was named instead. scalia had been passed over three times in about seven months. i call this chapter bitterly disappointed, because he told his first biker for that he was bitterly disappointed at not being chosen to be solicitor general. and i quote from tom petty, the waiting is the hardest part. a vacancy opened up again on the pc circuit court and scully was nominated for it. before that happened, he was offered a seat on the seventh circuit court of appeals which operates out of the midwest. and scalia really had cut his teeth on the ministry of law, to most lawyers it is the dreary us the most dismal subject, but he left the ministry of law. the powers of regulatory agencies versus congress, how much difference to the court should >> give to the decisions of regulatory a

the supreme court of appeal found that he hasn't diverged everything that happened that night, and thatondent andrew harding has more from pretoria. i'm afraid it's a pretty farcical situation, the south african justice system looking like it's made a big mess of this. in fact, today's parole board hearing, we're now learning, should never have gone ahead in the first place. that's because the prison authorities here actually received a letter three days ago on tuesday this week, explaining to them that 0scar pistorius has not actually served, according to their calculations, half his time in prison, half his sentence. in fact, that time will come next august in 202a. now, i spokejust a short while ago to 0scar pistorius's uncle arnold, who was mystified, who said it was clear to him that he had served half his sentence and he said he would be getting legal advice on how this confusion could have arisen. what seems to have happened, though, is that because pistorius was initially sentenced once, that was appealed, he was sentenced again. he spent some time in prison, some time under hou

of confusion factors that are applied ithe ninth circuit. i think that is primil apparent in the district court's consideration of the similarity of the marks factor, which is a factor that all the courts of appealonsider relevant to evaluating the likelihood of confusion. the district court, i our view the way thearody enters into the picture in most of these cases that ordinarily you would take the more similar marks, the likely consumers are to be confusedndhe factfinder could conclude that is in the in the parody case because the parody by natur is going to be drawn in some humorous contst with the original and that will if self served to distinguish the two in the minds of consumers. and i think theou could make that clear in its opinion and the pitner and the government of a disagreement about how besto read the district court's opinion whether they actually made of the legal error that we think the court made thais a question for the ninth circuit to resolve >> let me see if i have it. the similarity of the marks was a great emphasis in the disic court's opinion and perhaps too much to the point where there are some parodieshi the marks are going to be very similar, but everybody or most

and the moscow region , initially the court of first instance, the department of city property, refused e's searches completely here, and already the court of appealsible to work it out in favor of when people were receiving. and there was no road. its inhabitants equipped it at their own expense, but now, by a court decision, not only 230 m2 are taken away from them, but also all the public land of snt lesnoye, there is a general rule according to which a garden dacha cooperative may lose part of the public land, but payment is expected. a-a is being carried out appraisal of the market appraisal and, in fact, a garden dacha cooperative. uh, should be compensated for the loss of public land . while they say in the snt lesnoy there is no question of compensation, the residents are going to appeal the court's decision on the road along which a continuous stream will go through their holiday village. they definitely don't need cars artyom kuznetsov vladimir shabalina anastasia roev song and the memory of gennady rozhdestvensky on the house in a specific row where the famous conductor lived. a memorial plaque was erected today. this is a joint project

the court of appeals rather set up briefing schedule .that was a matter of hours, and they issued their decision a matter of hours later. i mean, it suggested that there is no there there on the president, former president side that is, it's extraordinary and itself and johnny if prosecutors have compelling evidence, the former president used his attorney in furtherance of a crime. what party investigation? do you think that would likely involved ? would you expect it to be the obstruction piece? it's hard to tell. ah as the judge suggested it could show his intent to willfully keep these documents contrary to the statute that makes him forces him to return them. they are classified, and they're all sets of rules that govern classified documents, and the government is very aggressive in going after this kind of information. i don't think the government is comfortable that trump indeed has turned over everything he might have. so that's probably giving them impetus to move quickly, rather than slowly is on this case judge it's not only the

of the supreme court. madame chief justice and members of the court of appeals cabinet secretaries and my fellow north carolinians i am so honored with the great state with me tonighis my remarkable wife our first lady and her three wonderful daughters and my son in law and my brother all of whom i am thankful for each and every day thank you. [applause] i am so grateful for allf you. [applause] each generation has soany chances to lead the indelible mark on history that benefits generations to come. buso often the greatest advancement to come more, protest, strife an disasters. as sta leaders at a time like this tremendous responsibility. and learning from the diversity and it reachesar into the future. legislative leaders following the directives in the first constitution cited the duty to nsult the happiness of a rising generation a charter the first public univeity in the nation. and with the north university system to reach around the globe. and then to see place of research and development and recognize the urgent need to diversify and 3 years ago was another shift in industry from the wrong class unirsity

circuit court of appeal, howell ordered temporarily on tuesday night, ordering an extraordinarily rapid series of filings in a matter of hours, including one from trump's team by midnight tuesday. news of the appeals court's decision on whether trump's attorney has to provide documents and testimony to the special counsel could come at any moment. joining us now, "washington post" investigators reporter jackie alemany, former republican congressman, david jolly, and andrew weissmann, justice department prosecutor, and senior member of robert mueller's special counsel investigation. they are all, lucky for us, msnbc contributors. jackie, let's start with you, where do things stand right now? do we have any indication when they're going to rule? >> evan corcoran must provide notes, transcripts and pieces of evidence, how classified documents remained at trump's mar-a-lago residence months after the subpoena. this was a panel, as you just laid out of three judges that issued this very brief court order that we at "the washington post" got our hands on. it is a sealed proceeding. we don't k

against a minor in the zakarpattia regional prosecutor's office filed an appeal with a demand to cancel the verdict of the volovets court of the zakarpattia district of the region and pass a new sentence by the court of appeals, in fact, contact us , vitaliy glagol, a transcarpathian journalist who closely follows this story , vitaliy is glad to see and hear. glory to ukraine, we wanted to ask you about your feelings about how big the chances are that the case will be properly brought to a logical conclusion of a legal decision well, in fact, i now have more faith that the case will be brought to the law of a logical decision because of the fact that professional lawyers are already ready and ready take the side of the girl in order to protect her interests in the appeals court colleagues, let's get in touch with mr. glagolev, well, the connection is bad , i would still like to understand what it is actually about. i would like to add one more reaction for now from the supreme council of justice, which commented on the work e-e of the volovetsky district court in this case in connection with the active discussion in the

she decided was so high stakes, so important had to be turned over expeditiously, and in the court of appeals said sided with her, obviously we haven't seen what they've done. it's sealed. we don't know what that is, but whatever it is, obviously they hear a lot of veteran as well, because they went through the trouble of trying to get the materials so that the grand jury can see them. the grand jury within review this and preparing to possibly indict. >> do you draw any conclusion about the timeframe on all of this, given the rapidity with which, the alacrity with which they are moving through this. what seems to be the and stages of this investigation? >> it's fair to say that we don't go after the former presidents attorney until you are really at a critical juncture. it's certainly not the move that you would make is your first entry into the gate. you would usually do it once you developed enough facts and evidence to feel like this is really the thing that we need, and you would have to take that showing to the judge that this is really critical evidence. it is not to say that they are

but late last year the second circuit court of appeal's shockingly reverse the decision of the trial urt and dismissed the nra claims against him. this decision, and i'm going to say it slow, if it's allowed to stand, would mean that government regulators can use their nearly infinite powers to silence and destroy any organization in pursuit of their own personal, political agenda. this is one of the most chilling decisions ever rendered by federal tele-core in our nations history. and make no mistake, if this dangerous precedent is allowed to stand, any politician or government agency would have the license to use the regulatory powers and authorities, including investigations, crippling fines, threats, blacklisting campaigns, abusive litigation and more to destroy any person, any company, or any organization they pollute -- they consider their political enemy. is that the kind of america you want to live in? me either. the stakes couldn't be higher. so today, i'm proud to announce, to all of you here at cpac, that the national rifle association of america has filed a petition with t

circuit court of appeal come is typically initially a three-judge panel. nd ultimately that can be appealed to the supreme court. so if that path occurs, we're not looking at anything that's going to be resolved any time soon. >> well, and the hoops that you were laying out there a moment ago i think illustrate one of the issues in all of this, and that is that trump enjoys using these delay tactics. he's been a master at it since he's been in legal trouble i guess for years now, decades i suppose. might that complicate matters for the special counsel in all this? >> well, i think it certainly slows down the special counsel. i am sure that from the moment jack smith took over that his team that had been running these cases were already well aware that at some point they were going to get to that sort of inner circle around trump. and you know, at least from everything we know the two critical people in that inner circle are mark meadows and certainly mike pence. and so i think the anticipation that these sorts of obstacles will be thrown in their way, i thi

of financial crimes. do they in your estimation have a good case for appeal? >> well, this is -- really their biggest appellate issue they have. a lot of things were objectionable but the court of appeals would not turn the case this. is one they could have an argument about and the court of appeals will hear, and you know, it was a judgment called by judge newman. if you buy that financial crimes can actually make you go and kill your wife and child, the pressure from all that, just to have, you know, a few weeks reprieve can make you kill your wife and child you should have let it in. but frankly, i don't buy that could be the motive. >> john: given the chance to make a statement as we saw at the top of this, mercedes, murdaugh claimed innocence to the end. >> i tell you again, i respect this court but i'm innocent. i would never under any circumstances all right my wife maggie and i would never under any circumstances hurt my son paw paw. >> john: the judge took that into consideration and fired back with this. >> it might not have been you. it might have been the monster you become when you take 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 opioid pills. maybe you become another person. i've s

completely satisfied all of his it's all his we also lost the second instance claims the first time, moreover, the appeal took place then already after the death of roma and in fact the court deprived his parents of the right to enter the case as successors and support his appeal. they allowed the parents , they didn't let them in, and so, accordingly, we in the supreme court canceled uh-uh canceled this uh-uh ruling , and it was repeated yesterday , that is, the supreme court sent it for a repeat appeal proceedings and yesterday the court of appeals was fully satisfied with all our appeals and the defense of the language of the protests of yar and directly of the novel, which he still submitted back in january 2022, well before the very beginning of the full-scale invasion. so, i think that this well, in fact, it is very important because it is the opportunity to name, to highlight events , to call things by their names, it is the opportunity to inform the community about what is happening in what is happening in affairs a-a in essence and not in e-e let's say it in formally educated phrases that nobody there apart from lawyers, he doesn’t understand it was roma’s direct

but the supreme court then failed to take their culture of appeal. so the court of appeals, we wrote that have a decision that was taken by the supreme court. and since then only one prison that had behaviors petition granted. so the little failed party biopharma came up with the administrative process. but as i was saying that missed your process or the legal way, the government can say that they are going to release someone from granted on. if they've been done, there is no legal avenue that right a or their lawyers can use to to force them to be released. what i think will happen by that, and i think the pressure will eventually be effective. is the men who have been approved for release will end up being released you know, because although it doesn't have a legal right, legal weight, it absolutely has a moral and ethical way. and i would say that the difference that we've had over the years between republican and democratic governments is that there are always people within the democratic government understand fundamentally some nation of right an

[laughter] if it were party specific relief that went up to the court of appeals and the court -- you had sought an emergency injunction on the court of appeals, the court of appeals ruled against the government on that, what do you then follow that in that circuit or n? msprogar: i think as a practical matter, we generally do follow that in the circuit. i nt to be careful here because i -- justice kavanaugh: you might not in the future? ms. prelogar: 'll, you know? justice kavanaugh: can admitted. ms. prelogar: our general practices, yes, fd -- it within the relevant circuit. but again, the concern here is atctually, it's imposing on us an obligation to followt throughout the nation. justice kavanaugh: and if you came up to this court in an emergency application, we said you did not have a likelihood of success. i think said earlier, you would follow tt. why would you follow that? ms. prelogar: we recognize at this court has authority to resolve these issues for the nation. justice kavanaugh: even though there are only two parties in the case, you would say, we are going to follow it

of perhaps greater significance. this one a unanimous ruling was from a federal appeals court. overruling a sicker kit court decision they held in favor of independent contractors that alleged that a.b.5 violation the united states constitution, specifically, it is an equal protection. and the court wrote, the legislature has not only refuted its own justification for the law, but has picked and chosen who is allowed to work and who isn't without any rational basis. the court referred to the quote peace meal fashion in which the exemptions were granted and lends credence that exemptions were the result of lobbying and back-room dealing as opposed to adherence to the stated purpose of the legislation. the court wrote who is subject to the law and who isn't could be quote attributed to and any must rather than to reason and enforcing in board hers on corruption, pure spite or naked favorrism. the court found the constitutional case against a.b.5 passes the test which is no tore rousely difficult to pass. a court will only strike down a law if there isn't a reasonable state of fact

mentioned the job shopping case, is is this an idea where you go to this judge and then the court of appeals, let's say the judge issued a decision that the fda didn't like. it goes to the circuit court of appeals and then would go to the supreme court. is that the path you see here? >> it is. the deck is stacked for the plaintiffs here. they haves chosen wise ly, it we're looking at this strategically. they know they are going to get this judge, who may welsh a nationwide injunction. the next step for the defendants and the government is to go up to the court of awe peels. this is the fifth circuit court. this is the most conservative court of awe peels in the country. then the next step is the u.s. supreme court that can't force them to take the case, but it's up to the supreme court. there's a 6 to 3 conservative majority in this courts as well. this is the same court that overturned roe v. wade. the deck is stacked in favor of the plaintiffs here. >> we'll watch as the case plays out is ask where it goes from there. appreciate your insights. let's continue the conversation with me in stu

prosecutors in this case, the special counsel office of jack smith, they have gotten the circuit court of appeals sign off that evan corker in this attorney needs to come back and answer additional questions about his conversations directly with donald trump the sort of thing that prosecutors believe will show that trump was trying to break the law. in those conversations, so this is really critical testimony that the grand jury is set to hear the other thing that is happening in this investigation because the appeals court just stepped in today is that there are documents of evan corcoran's that have been pursued here by the justice department that the grand jury is also likely to be able to get a hold of his handwritten notes and his transcribed verbal notes of his conversations with donald trump. so wolf this adds significant momentum to the grand jury. the investigation into the classified records being kept at mara lago after the presidency, and it also is the sort of situation in court where there is a history history being made here, a legal proceeding like we have not seen before. where t

decision of the tbilisi city court, according to which there are no grounds for the dismissal of the ex-president georgia in connection with the deterioration of well-being, however, the court of appealted that it did not find legal grounds for satisfying the complaints of the lawyers, at the same time, the defense of mikheil saakashvili noted that the judges made a decision without hearing the parties, but only on the basis of the case materials on the occasion of the 208th anniversary of the birth in lviv . public activists and schoolchildren to the musical accompaniment of the trembita choir, the city residents laid flowers at the monument and sang together ukraine is not dead yet, in general, the birthday is march 4 tomorrow and tomorrow a large delegation from the lviv region from the lviv regional council from the public organization of the social and cultural society of the population of kholm region lemkiv region lyubashiv region are leaving to honor the memory of mykhailo verbytskyi at the pantheon of wines what a person who was born on tsyanna , together with the author of the words pavel chubynsky, united all of ukraine, and we now understand that the promised and to the d

the sochi court of appeal confirmed the verdict of the crimean supreme court of simferopol residents high treason , the fsb reported, uh, the defendant received 12 years. deprivation of liberty. he was detained 2 years ago, according to the investigation, he was passing data to the ukrainian special services about russian aviation flights in the area of ​​the crimean peninsula. uh, the defendants sent the information using a secure messenger and managed to get 1,300 dollars for it. russian self-propelled guns, but if a fire defeat to the enemy in the red lebanese direction , this was reported by representatives of the cents group. in the krasnaya limansky direction , the crews of unmanned aerial vehicles orlan-10 of the group of troops of the center fled , accumulations of infantry and armored vehicles of ukrainian nationalists, this detection of the enemy was transmitted by the calculation of self-propelled artillery installations. stas , as a result of his defeat, the enemy suffered losses in personal condition and equipment. in addition , the chervonogibrovsky area is hidden the m

chief justice, and members of the supreme court, madam chief judge, members of the court of appeals, cabinet secretaries, and my fellow north carolinians, i am so honored to join you, to report on the state of our great state. my remarkable wife, first lady kristin, our three wonderful daughters, hillary, natalie, claire, and my brother, farrell, all of whom i am thankful for each and every day, thank you, guys, so grateful for all of you. [applause] each generation has so many chances to leave an indelible mark on history that benefits generations to come and so often, our greatest advancements come after the greatest of evils, war, protests, strife, disasters, pandemic. defined ourselves as state leaders at a time like this is to bear tremendous responsibility. responsibility to learn from adversity and make things better. a responsibility that reaches far into the future. 234 years ago, legislative leaders, following the directive in our first constitution cited the indispensable duty to consult the happiness of a rising generation and charter the first public university in the nat

there's a three judge panel in the d c circuit court of appeals. and they ruled yesterday that this defense attorney evan corcoran, doesn't just have to testify. he also has to turn over some notes regarding conversations with the former president. as part of this criminal investigation into the potential mishandling of the classified documents that were taken tomorrow, lago, a source tells me that the documents include handwritten notes transcribed verbal notes about his representation representation of trump in the case that is part of the bigger picture here. prosecutors didn't get their hands on those back in january, when he was testifying before the grand jury for about four hours or so. and also that was when corcoran declined to answer some of their questions, citing that attorney client privilege that has all changed. now the case is completely different given the justice department has successfully argued to a judge who agreed with him that there's enough evidence about trump's interactions with corcoran. that he might have used corcoran a

affected by the perpetrators appointed the deceased is carried out only against the accused by the court of appeal. the case was returned to the court for a new trial. again he appointed an examination at the moscow forensic center of the ministry of internal affairs of russia and she confirmed the conclusions of an independent expert. eugene, a chinese author of methods for auto technical examinations, investigates accidents for almost 40 years, the established speed, uh , by the employees of the ecc of the ministry of internal affairs of russia, is 122 km / h. this is the minimum speed, the minimum, which is only possible, the actual speed is 15-20% higher, that is, in fact it is somewhere around 140 km / h. and the state examination of the accident proved that both drivers violated the rules, but the document says the cause of the accident was precisely the overspeeding of the mine, but the court again did not change the decision, the only culprit of the accident, who died, i can’t understand the logic of the court. courts are very difficult to conduct analysis of such documents to the great re