., ,., , ,, , court of appeal? nobody disputes the scale of the problem _ court of appeal? facing the government but we don't feel it's an emergency— government but we don't feel it's an emergency and everyone's definition of that— emergency and everyone's definition of that word. we were pleased that the judge _ of that word. we were pleased that the judge decided quickly at the end of the _ the judge decided quickly at the end of the hearing to award us the opportunity to appeal and we will be considering that as well as any other— considering that as well as any other legal action. the considering that as well as any other legal action.— other legal action. the home secretary _ other legal action. the home secretary says _ other legal action. the home secretary says she _ other legal action. the home secretary says she has - other legal action. the home secretary says she has to - other legal action. the home l secretary says she has to solve other legal action. the home - secretary says she has to solve what she calls an emergency to get people blood of hotels in the sam

court of — supreme court? the circuit court of appeals _ supreme court? the circuit court of appeals cope - supreme court? pe it... we are fairly certain this will be challenged, we already heard the pro—abortion extremist biden administration will challenge it. this is the best for women in our country, there complications were chemical abortion drugs that can cost woman her fertility, abortion drugs that can cost woman herfertility, can cost her health, cause significant damage to her body or even take her life depending on some of the factors behind your pregnancy if she takes those drugs not knowing that she has an ectopic pregnancy or is our hedge negative or further along so this is a pro women decision and pro life but pro—women and we are a pro protecting women. thank you so much. and later tonight — we'll be speaking to drjamila perritt, the president and ceo of physicians for reproductive health. stay with us here on bbc news. hello there. i hope you've been making the most of the easter sunshine because on sunday the weather starts to change with some wetter weather in time for easter monday. at

decision was passed the day before by the large chamber of the supreme court, the judges overturned the ruling of the northern commercial court of appeal, according to which more than 40% of the shares of gzk were transferred to four offshore companies, details in our story, ukrainian justice in action, swiss the ferrex company helped maintain control over the poltava mining and processing plant, which is the largest ukrainian exporter of iron ore pellets to europe and repulse the attacks of raiders that lasted for about 20 years, which regulates the main taking into account fulfilled, i ask the cassation appeals of the coastal ag and the true partners to fully satisfy the ruling of the northern appellate economic court in this case to cancel completely in 2002 the ferrex company purchased for 27 million dollars more than 40% of the shares of poltava gzk since 2005 , the former owners tried to cancel this agreement and take back the company, then the proceedings dragged on for up to 10 years until in 2015, the above commercial court sided with ferrexpo, but the raiders did not stop trying to capture the profitable business and from 202

talking about what happened in august when an appeals court ruling reversed lower court decisions that initially forced the chapel to pay up. the district court ofeals cited the u.s. supreme court ruling that decided banning indoor worship services in counties where covid-19 was surging violated the freedom of religion. that same month the supreme court decided not to hear a petition from the county hoping to challenge the court of appeals ruling. >> i believe that this case is going to be a great vehicle on appeal. it's a very clean appeal. >> reporter: she says the next step is to file a motion for reconsideration and/or repeal the case at the court of appeals. >> in addition we have appealed the claim we brought specifically against county counsel james william for first amendment retaliation. >> reporter: also at hand, a possible new lawsuit against the county for allegedly conducting unlawful surveillance of church goers. a long fight ahead with both sides agreeing a settlement might be possible, as long as it's reasonable. in san jose, stephanie magallon, nbc bay area news. >>> tonight we go one on one with alameda county's district attorn

the court of appeal overturned that decision, saying dia should stand trial. after all, in south africa, 10 members of the same family including a 13 year old child, i mean killed in a mash shooting. it happened outside peter merits province. if it wasn't a towel, one suspect was killed by police. another 2 were arrested. authorities are searching for 4th suspect. recent crime statistic show south africa is an average of 84 murders a day. it's a crime scene. terrible to many people were last year when i'm apologize what, what, what did we need to police patrols day and night? protecting our community because these criminals are roaming our streets all day. we have women living with children and orphans on their own, which is not safe for them. but more african countries look set to approve a new vaccine for malaria. developed in the u. k. donna and nigeria have already endorsed the use of the u. r. 21 job. the move was seen is unusual because the world health organization hasn't approved the vaccine research has that university of oxford say it's 75 percent eff

she says the next step is to file a motion for reconsideration and or appeal the case at the court of appeals >> in addition we have an an appeal for retaliation. >> a long fight ahead with both sides agreeing a settlement might be possible as long as it's reasonable. >>> 4:38 right now. making your next trip easier. a new tool google maps is adding to its app in the aim to help to its app in the aim to help you navigate through a state ♪ i have type 2 diabetes, ♪ ♪ but i manage it well. ♪ ♪ it's a little pilill with a big storory to tell.l. ♪ ♪ i take e once-dailyly jardiaiance, ♪ ♪ at each d day's staaaaart.♪ ♪ a as time wenent on itit was easy y to seee ♪ ♪ i'm lowering my a1c. ♪ jardiance e works 24/7/7 in y your body toto flush outut some sugag! anand for adulults wiwith type 2 2 diabetes and knowown heart didisease, jardiance e can lower r the rk of cardidiovascular r death, t. jardiancnce may caususe serios sidede effects including g ketoacidososis ththat may be e fatal, dehydrdration, thahat can leado sudden wororsening of kidney y function,, and geninital yeast t or uriny tracact inf

the new uk supreme court started operating, they did have cameras in the courts, right from the very beginning. of course, appealo criminal trials because there are not really witnesses and there is not really an opportunity for lawyers to showboat because it is justjudges there opportunity for lawyers to showboat because it isjustjudges there in court. that was viewed as a safer option for televising courts. it was used as a success in four years after the supreme court started doing televised asian, the court of appeal themselves started broadcasting televised hearings and so, isjust broadcasting televised hearings and so, is just 2013, broadcasting televised hearings and so, isjust 2013, about broadcasting televised hearings and so, is just 2013, about ten years we have been having a live broadcasting in the appeal courts, and before that, the supreme court as well. qm. that, the supreme court as well. 0k, thank ou that, the supreme court as well. 0k, thank you so — that, the supreme court as well. 0k, thank you so much for that. we will p0p thank you so much for that. we will pop back to you a little later o

wade, which ha been the law for 50 years, o what the court of appeals is doing here with this abortiostic what th supreme court is going to do the right thing here, becaus the court of appeals decisio was just so out there, but i think it's going to be ver hard for the court to do anything else. even in dobbs, when justic alito wrote the opinion, h said, okay, we are going t overrule roe v. wade, and no this decision should go back t the people and the people have authorized through the fda, this drug, fo decades. and it can't be that two judge can sit in a judgment of tha and flip it. it's particularly true her because as a legal doctrin called standing, which is th idea of who actually gets to file a lawsuit and the theory of standing tha -- these attackers on the dru have used is that, well, a doctor one day might have to treat someone who has take this abortion drug that has side effect. that is, to put it mildly, a preposterous theory of standing it would mean every doctor could challenge every single drug that the fda had ever approved because it might lead to a side effect that

these plaintiffs just don' have standing at all the court of appeals said thes plaintiffs, the organizationious doctors have standin because the court declared a statistical certainty that som person somewhere wit experience complications fro medication abortion an therefore one of these doctors would be called upon to trea them and that argument just rests o three problems that ar inconsistent with the law, the facts, and common sense. on the law, the supreme cour in 2009, in an opinion b justice scalia, said organizations don't have standing nearly because they can show it's a statistica property probability that on of their members is going to b injured, whether they have t show which members actuall going to be injured. second is the court of appeals said the fda's patient agreement form established tha two out of seven women would experience complications tha would send them to emergency rooms. but all of the patient agreement says is that 2 to out of 100 women won't successfully and their pregnancies via medication abortion but those people are not necessarily going to end up in emerg

of our 13 federal circuit courts of appeals. now the way it will work is a panel of three judges will be randomly assigned. they will rule on the case. and then the losing party there can try to get the case in front of the u. s supreme court, which of course overturned overturned roe v. wade just last year, so i think the future of this ruling is very much in doubt. now there are some important indications if you look back at the dobbs decision, which over overturned roe v. wade that some of the justices who voted to overturn roe v. wade may not be willing to sign on to this, but it's very much in doubt how this comes out. how quickly karen, could we expect this to go all the way to the supreme court? i think this can be fairly quickly . i think this might be done on emergency basis. so it depends. you know what? what what people choose to do, but i think because this has extreme implicate health implications. i think we could anticipate this going to the supreme court quickly whether the supreme court agrees to hear this quickl

the court of appeal will today. the court of appeal will begin— today. egin its— today. the court of appeal will begin its first— today. the court of appeal will begin its first day— today. the court of appeal will begin its first day of— : the court of appeal will begin its first day of legal arguments— begin its first day of legal arguments against the policy tater— arguments against the policy later this— arguments against the policy later this morning . arguments against the policy later this morning, g later this morning. british citizens— later this morning. british citizens trapped in sudan have accused the government of abandoning them. it follows what the prime minister described as rapid and complex evacuation of uk diplomats and their families from khartoum amid an escalation of violence in the country . is of violence in the country. is pubuc of violence in the country. is public support for the royal family wavering? well, as rumours circulate - family wavering? well, as rumours circulate of- car "g? well, as rumours circulate of a cw, "g? we

the next step in the litigation will be at the fifth circuit court of appeals on may 17th. but this tonight it's a big win for the biden administration after its emergency request to keep the fda approval of the drug with a federal judge blocked it. the president has issued a statement tonight saying, quote i continue to stand by fda as evidence based approval of mifepristone. the stakes could not be higher for women across america. i will continue to fight politically driven attacks on women's health. more now from cnn's paula raid, paula good evening, pamela will hear the supreme court has ensured that this commonly used abortion medication will remain widely available, while larger lawsuits about its fda approval work their way through the system. at the heart of this case, is this drug that you just mentioned per stone. it is one of two drugs that is used in medication abortions, which account for more than half of all abortions in the united states. and last summer after the supreme court overturned the constitutional right to an abortion. medication abortion became a r

members joined by counterparts in oakland and emoriville say that the decision by the 9th circuit court of appealsa done deal. earlier this month the court ruled that natural gas piping should be permitted in new construction in perpetuity going against the city of berkeley's ban of gas piping which was to stave off fossil fuels and here's berkeley's kate harrison. >> we know what that is really about, and it trumps local and state government's rights to protect the community's health and safety. >> harrison says she's asking berkeley city attorneys to ask for a re-hearing at the 9th circuit court of appeals. reporting in berkeley, emma goss, nbc bay area news. >>> jerry springer, former talk show host has die at the age of 79. springer died peacefully in his home. springer was cincinnati's 56th mayor and after that he became a news anchor and commentator in cincinnati before taking on a new role as a talk show host in the early '90s. as news broke fans of his daytime tv show chimed in online many of them calling the host a legend. >> it is hard to make it in the bay. the housing shortage in calif

about exactly when his sentence should be considered to have started and it seems the supreme court of appeal chief justice has decided it only began on the last time he began his prison sentence. they are taking the strictest interpretation of the law. anchor: andrew harding on a controversial social media influence andrew tate and his mother kristin have been released from jail and placed under house arrest. the brothers along with two romanian suspects have been in custody as prosetors investigate them for suspected human ficking and rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women. the idea sounds simple enough, 15 minute cities. a way of living near where everything you need is nearby. the concept is growing in popularity but it has its critics. reporter: the 15 minutes said he. >> 15 minute cities have become a magnet for protests around the world from canada to the u.k. with conspiracy groups claiming without evidence they are designed to imprison us in our neighborhoods and limit our freedoms. the idea seems pragmatic. to have everything we need from doctors and supermarkets

of ban the urts to n abortion nationwide. amy: the u.s. justice department has asked the supreme court to block in appeals court ruling limiting access to mifespristone . then to president biden's trip to ireland, marking the 25th anniversary of the good friday agreement that ended three decades of fighting in northern ireland. finally, in new jersey, day five of the first faculty strike in rutgers universities 257-year history. and we will speak to a cuban journalist as washington and havana hold talks focused on migration. all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. florida's republican governor ron desantis signed a six-week abortion ban into law thursday. the ban will take effect if the florida's current 15-week ban is upheld at the conservative-controlled state supreme court, where it is being challenged. the six-week ban would make exceptions for rape, incest, and human trafficking. in such cases, survivors could get an abortion up to 15 weeks into pregnancy but only if they are able to provide official documentation such as a police report or medical records. since the u

but the situation is far fro resolved the case will now go back to the fifth circuit court of appealsh is considered t be the most conservative appellate court and the country, where it will be argued in front of a three judge panel beginning on may 17th. meanwhile, there are at leas two other cases regarding th legality of mifepristone in a separate case out o washington state, a judg recently ruled that the fd must preserve access to th pill, although the ruling in that case only pertains to the 17 states and the district o columbia that signed on this point of three days ago, genbiopro, the manufacturer of the generi version of mifepristone filed new lawsuit against the fda, i a bid to ensure their produc doesn't get pulled off the mar it at eight yet another strand of complication to the entir issue. because of how contentious confusing and conflicting this situation has become in just a matter of days, it's almos guaranteed we are going to regardless of how the fift circuit rules on that may 17th hearing, it will be appealed again and it will wind up back at the supreme court at

then there's a question of appeal to the supreme court. and then liz, the question of the 5 legs, the supreme court doesn't agree to the european human rights. and even if he goes to america, who really years before they decide whether the post amendment from his prosecution would bring many people's really trump lawyers to say the 1st amendment doesn't apply to foreign as i was or completely good unless it's a controversial matter. ready whether indeed the evidence that he's really is being spied on, which was the case. so we'll be in the daniel elves, prosecution leaking, the pentagon papers. we will stock his case where he's looking at 5 years incarceration in march with suspected terrorists. and that is the way, recent in america, we're treating someone who is in prison because essentially he published a crew in the nation as somebody who has advised julian songs in the past. his father, as i mentioned before, his father has repeatedly said, this is a political case and needs a political solution, not a legal one, given what you've said

now, i've never known a case to take so long to get to a decision from the court of appeal. but he does quote, dooley and his son, and you're not kind of limber, which you should never be. because is there a strong argument for those 2 homes and say they should go ahead and then there's a question of appeal to the supreme court. and then liz, the question of the 5 legs, the supreme court doesn't agree to the human rights and even if he goes to america . ready will be years before they decide whether the post amendment from his prosecution, which in many people is really this is a trunk really is to say the 1st amendment doesn't apply to foreign i to get unless it's a controversial matter. ready whether indeed the evidence that he really is being spied on, which was the case, so will be in daniel those prosecution leaking. the pentagon papers will stock his case where he is looking at 5 years incarceration in march with suspected terrorists and lackey was the way recent in america, preaching someone who is in prison because essentially he published crew in the nation as somebo

accessed him if a prestone will continue oral arguments are scheduled to begin and the 5th circuit court of appeals on may the 17th. but while that legal process plays out, a majority of the justices here at the supreme court decided that access to the drug should remain widely available. and 2nd guessing the food and drug administration, the regulatory process before those legal arguments have played out. in fact, there is some expectation that in the, in this case will return to the supreme court once the 5th court of appeals has made its decision. but what a precedent it would be if the supreme court had agreed with restrictions on a drug that had been widely available for 23 years with proven efficacy and a lack of health problems. joe biden, very quick to welcome the decision saying that this is another, another sign that the american people india need to vote democrat and create a congress where abortion can be codified once and for all. the democrats know, especially a time when joe biden has very low approval ratings of democratic party in general, has very low approval ratings. as we saw t

court of appeals for the d.c. circuit has denied an emergency motion filed by president trump's legal team yesterday seeking to stop several of his top aides including mark meadows from testifying before the federal grand jury this is a sealed proceeding, the documents are not public, but nbc news previously confirmed that that is the docket associated with the appeal this is a very big deal. not clear if trump intends to appeal the appeal denied to the full circuit court or the supreme court. >> it is a good reminder of just all that donald trump is currently facing it is not just this indictment here in new york city. this is the first indictment that he's faced. it is all of the other cases there is the two special counsel cases, one looking into the classified documents, the other looking into the leadup to january 6th, where a number of his top aides will be forced to testify. donald trump trying to stop that let's see if he goes to the full panel, court of appeals panel and potentially the supreme court to tr

protocol, so it's a very forceful filing that they have put their they've asked the fifth circuit court of appeals to act by thursday so that everyone knows whether they have some breathing room to make their appeals. more concrete as a challenge this very unprecedented decision by judge cause merrick out of amarillo, texas, last friday night. what he did was he rolled back approval for the that the fda had first put in place back in the year 2000 he questioned the fda is review. and approval of this drug, saying that it had shortcomings that both psychologically and physically physiologically it didn't not take account of harm to women and just really upended. the process essentially stepped into the shoes of the fda experts saying that the drug drug should not have been approved and should not stand now, fred and then joan. how does the washington state ruling play into all this? just one? override the other in terms of the decisions. no the more important one is definitely texas. but i think you had a map of exactly the states that had sued and going to us district court in washington state, wa

stopping the equal rights- centers will also consider a judicial nomination for the nintciuit court of appeals c-span3 at 10:00 a.m., an oversight hearing cdit reporting agencies. then it 1:30, fbi decr christopher wray testifying on the president's 2020 f bget request for his agency before a house appropriations subcommittee. these events and more are available to wat o her free mobile app, or online at c-span.org. >> c-span's "washington journal," every day we take your calls live on the air, on the news of the day, and we discuss policy issues that impact you. coming up monday morning, -- coming up thursday morning, the california republican carson talks about debt limit plans and other news of the day. then we will continue the conversation on the debt ceiling debate with wisconsin congresswoman gwen moore. and the south korean president's visit to the u.s. and the biden administration's policy toward asia. watch watch washington journal live at seven caught eastern thursday morning morning on c-span, or c-span now, our free mobile app. join the discussion with your phone calls, facebook c

the supreme court has removed all restrictions on the widely used abortion pill myth of kristen, while an appeal of a lower court ruling moves forward, in addition to the legal implications are obvious political considerations as well. our senior data reporter harry antin joins us now. so what does the data show about where americans are on abortion are more pro choice and they have been in over 25 years, you know, one of the interesting ramifications of the supreme court overturning roe v. wade was that on the question of whether you're a pro choice or pro life before 2022. it was a fairly you know hard for question, right? pro choice was slightly ahead of pro life. but look what happened in 2022 approach choices. now up 20 points on the pro life question. and this to me is important because this was one of the anti abortion activists. best questions right? it was one of the questions that tended to suggest we were 50 50 nation. but on this question now we are no longer a 50 50 nation. we are firmly approach choice nation of pro abortion rights nation. what about mean other supreme court ruling

then the only issue that goe before the court of appeals is is a likelihood of success will the courtrict court's ruling? the special counsel will tak advantage of that rapid proces to adjudicate and ofte overcome those privilege assertions all that will give them access to information from some of th people that we interviewed, bu did not get some of thos direct communications becaus of that privilege assertion. >> going even further details, the -- court had constructing a official proceeding. that's against three of th alleged rioters, finding tha the question of corrupt intent applies only because the three defendants whose cases wer before the court were also charged with attacking police. they also those, charges right does this suggest that particular charge could no potentially be filed against donald trump >> it's actually a victory for the government, because so man of the january six cases relie upon 15 12 c, to the obstruction of an official proceeding statute and the court of appeals has now invalidated that charge. they will rule specificall that the person who is charge

i look at the court of appeals opinion and the district court opinions, they both refer to the regulationshat are being interpreted. >> i think this court's decision in hardison clearly resolve the meeting of the 1972 version of this action because there was an open question in the case of which version of the statute applied, whether 1972 or the predecessor version and wealth -- both hardison and the u.s. government said there was a retroactive difficulty and it should be applied in the case. the court resolved that issue by saying the 1972 statute and its undue hardship standard carries the same meaning as the predecessor version as laid out in the eeoc guidance. it is essential to the court's decision that he not resolve retroactivity, that it discernment -- data -- it determined that it was applied to heart is in itself. another way to put this is that if there was any possibility of daylight with the 1972 statute having a higher burden on employers and a undue hardship standards than the courts would have to resolve that issue. it could not have been said that was unnecessary to deter

court of appeals in the district of columbia circuit, and it's clear that he had testimony to give.rkable thing historically as well because i don't think we've ever seen a circumstance where a vice president, a former vice president, is being called to testify before a federal grand jury in a criminal investigation against a former president under which he served. it's simply a remarkable thing. and obviously the court of appeals rejected, given what we can see from the docket, although all the papers are sealed and the opinion is sealed, it's pretty clear that the court of appeals rejected any effort by trump to block the testimony. and i think -- i hope that mike pence was cooperative and testified as to all his conversations with the president, which aren't subject to executive privilege because they weren't in furtherance of trump's executive duties. they were actually in dare ohgation of his duty to defend and support the constitution. >> i want to ask you about some of the other legal issues facing the former president. trump was photographed this past week hugging a woman wh

and as soon as tomorrow the fifth circuit court of appeals could weigh in joining us now is melissa murrayprofessor at new york university of school of law, co-host of the legal podcast "strict scrutiny" and of course an msnbc legal analyst thanks for joining us tonight. >> thanks for having me, alex. >> so what is your -- the fifth circuit is a very conservative court of appeals >> that's a very generous way to put it >> i think six circjudges were appointed by trump, many others appointed by reagan and george w. bush. is it a forgone conclusion they keep miff misstone off the market how do you see this maybe playing snut. >> it could be the case this ruling from judge matthew kazmierczak is so lawless, so unprincipled and frankly so not smart even the fifth circuit can't hold its nose and affirm it they could say this ruling is unprimped and invalidate it. they could also uphold the ruling they could also do nothing, right? they could pause the ruling while the appeal is pending, but either way whatever the outcome i think we know where this goes next and that's to the united states supr

there is some expectation in the, in this case will return to the supreme court once the 5th court of appeals has made its decision. but what a precedent it would be if the supreme court had agreed with restrictions on a drug that had been widely available for 23 years with proven efficacy and a lack of health problems. joe biden, very quick to welcome the decision saying that this is another, another sign that the american people india need to vote democrat and create a congress where abortion can be codified once and for all. the democrats know, especially a time when joe biden has very low approval ratings. a democratic party in general, has very low approval ratings. as we saw in the mid terms. this is an issue that swing voters independent basis and the democratic bass can get behind. she every time see al jazeera washington still ahead on l. g. 's era of more african countries look to legalize a new malaria vaccine after ghana and nigeria give it the green light. ah frank assessments for this treaty provides us with this hopeful moment what countries could come together and stop putting

at the same time, we managed to switch to new forms of work of higher courts, including full appeal in all types of justice without increasing the number of judicial workers and creation of new specialized courts of appeal. the main responsibility for the development and implementation of the strategic directions of judicial reforms has always assumed the supreme court. the strengthening of its role and potential contributed to the creation in 2014 of a unified system of courts of general jurisdiction, headed by one supreme judicial body, the supreme court, as a coordinating and guiding center for judicial policy and judicial practice. at the same time , the functions of judicial support of judicial administration. this allowed the unification of the judiciary to remove all the problems of logistical support. the courts were also freed from their unusual function of executing judicial decisions, the number of judicial bodies was optimized through the liquidation of military courts, which ended with a structural functional change in our employment as a kind of symbol of sovereignty and

if that is - conservative, circuit court of appeals, if they affirm it i imagine this case will go tocant one. the legality of this medical abortion drug loan is a very significant issue, but if it judge can overrule the decisio of the fda, the agency that is given a for approving drugs in this, country then that ca give - drugmakers drug makers rely on an fda approval when they invest in their research and development and distribution and sales and all kinds of things with drugs the idea that a judge can come in and second guess that, think, is just untenable even if judges who are looking at this on appeal don't like the medication abortio decision, i think it will be very difficult for them to say any judge can just overturn th decision of the fda becaus they just don't like the drug. so i think, i am cautiousl optimistic that on appeal, w will see a change in thi ruling >> and use each, some extent christina, the republicans broadly speaking, they are not embracing this decision. not a lot of people have com out in support of it republican officials, i' talking about, in congress

relict forest on the black sea coast the arbitration court of the north caucasian district overturned the decision of the 15th petrozhny court of appeal-don and sent the case for a new trial with the participation of the prosecutor's office. let me remind you of the same ruling. our the program talked about how, in the vicinity of gelendzhik , on leased plots in a protected forest where the unique pitsunskaya pine grows, instead of health areas, huge cottages with swimming pools for personal recreation are being built , initially the arbitration court of the krasnodar territory recognized them as capital buildings. however, the tenants were able to prove with the help of pocket experts that the houses in the forest are supposedly the so-called temporary houses. by the way, a criminal case was initiated against one of the experts, the former head investigation department of the investigative committee of russia for the krasnodar territory. andrey maslov instructed to conduct an inspection, rostov region. this week again shocked, a high-profile corruption scandal, this time two dozen policemen from different departments became defendant

appeal on the merits on the substance of this claim. i think whoever loses will almost certainly appeal back up to the supreme court, at which point they also have to consider the substance of this, not just whether or not to push pause, but whether or not the district court judge was correct when he said the fda didn't follow proper procedures when improvement kristen and then when it made changes to make it easier to obtain mifepristone in 2016 and 2021. one i mean, this case obviously has everything to do with abortion. but on the other hand not that much to do with abortion in the sense that we're talking about whether or not a single federal judge has the power to undermine. what an executive agency here the fda did again almost a quarter century ago. now i think in reality, we're not going to see people challenge cholesterol, drugs or heart medication, but it could be other controversial forms of treatment. like for instance, vaccines those could be next to be challenged. dr alison adelman joins me now from portland, oregon. she's a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at oregon health and science university. thank you so much f

e-mail systems specialists do everything possible to normalize work and protect servers supreme court of appeals of the anti-corruption court acquitted the judge of the kyiv district administrative court oleksandra bragina, who was previously found guilty of intentionally not submitting an electronic declaration for the year 2020 in january 2023, vaks imposed a penalty in the form of a fine of uah 51,000 with the deprivation of the right to hold certain positions according to the indictment, despite the opportunity to submit a declaration for the year 2020, the judge did not do this because she did not receive an electronic signature, allegedly due to religious beliefs . the panel of judges of the appeals chamber annulled the verdict of the higher anti-corruption court and closed the criminal proceedings due to the lack of a criminal offense in early march in the commercial court of the kyiv region held a meeting of judges at which the head of the court was elected by secret ballot. pavlo gorbasenko was again not the best candidate for such a responsible position, and now we will tell you why pa

and signed by the governor so that we can make that change and send it right back to the court of criminal appealsnd see if they can make another decision and don the oklahoma court of appeals denied the request for a new trial or a stay of execution in a unanimous vote, why do you think that was unsuccessful? given the amount of support glass it has received not only by the state attorney general, but by so many republican and democratic legislators. these justices have been trying to kill rich glossip for 26 years, and i have no real idea as to why he's just a normal, simple, poor man. and there is no reason for them to continue this sort of i don't know what word to use almost like a vendetta. they want to kill him. they made it clear that they ruled and they almost seem offended that anybody can bring new evidence and we have a lot of new evidence to bear before he is executed and for people who are who are watching and don't know the story. what you need to understand is mr snead. is the murderer, but the prosecutors gave sneed a deal. he would not go to let death row if he said that glossip

it's genuine concern because if the fifth circuit court of appeals ruling goes into effect, if those restrictions or some of those restrictions stand there, not insignificant. i mean, you mentioned the generic manufacturer this this would no longer be approved under this ruling, and that accounts for two thirds of the market right and i imagine there's a financial aspect of that because the generic versions are typically less expensive, perhaps much less expensive, but other things as well window to obtain cristo narrows to seven weeks from 10, the dosages would change. these are significant rules changes if this stands in some form or some of them stand right and one of the things too, that the fda told the supreme court is look, we can't just snap our fingers and institute these changes. this is a days, weeks or months long process, so the fda is expressing uncertainty has as to how they'll even proceed here. if the supreme court doesn't continue to put these restrictions on hold, so there's a lot in play here and again. we kind of thought that we'd get some sort of definitive decis

so what is your, i mean, the fifth circuit is a fairl conservative court of appeal >> that's a very generous, it alex. >> arch conservative i think 26 of the fifth circui judges were appointed by trump others appointed by reagan and george w. bush is it a foregone conclusio that they keep mifepristone of the market how do you see this playing out? >> it could be the case that this ruling from judge matthew because merrick is so an principled and lawless and frankly so not smart that even the fifth circuit can't hold its nose and deferment so that's one option they could simply say this ruling is completely and principled and they coul invalidated. they could also uphold the ruling they could also do nothing right? they could pause the rulin while the appeal is pending. but either way, whatever the outcome, i think we know where this goes next that's to the united state supreme court. so this circuit is just an intermediary way station on th way, and the real questionhere is the landscape of chaos an confusion be heard from around the country, doctors who don't know what is possible, whether

. - [narrator] in a rare move, the appeals court judges allowed the hearing to be filmed. - [female speaker] united states court of appeals for the nth circt isow in seion. - ease be ated. the dirictourt ccluded th there w no that tofficer ghaus. it's undputed th, ll call hiandy, was not committing any crime or attempting to evade arrest. so under theircumsnces, it's undputed th, ll call hiandy, wee on left wi one ctor to nsider, whicis wheth andy posed, a in quot, mediate reat to e safety of t r the no linse fopolice tkill teagers wi three sonds whven thatfficer ss fopolice tkill that t gun wasnot poinng ati teagers wi three sonds wi this rung four years ter g the blic cou at lastee at the pice rsion ofhe shootin had en misleing all ong. unterred, lhaus and the unty the courrefused to heathe ce allowinghe lopezamily's lawsuit. fang a pubc tria that wld real tails ofhe shootg lhaus anthe coun settled e case f thremillion llars. alough theopez se was or, alletions ofolice brality ntinued sonoma unty alough theopez where people ha died dung or aernteractis wi law enfcement sincandy lop was sh and kild. victimsf exce