the court of appeal was right to overturn the high court decision, and to consider the evidence againncluded, by majority, that asylum seekers who were sent to rwanda are at real risk of refoulement. and that the policy is, therefore, unlawful. the question for this court is whether they were entitled to reach that conclusion on the evidence. the court of appeal based their conclusion on the following evidence. first, rwanda has a poor human rights record. in recent times, bruce british police have had to warn rwandan rational nationals living in the uk are credible plans by the rwandan government to kill them. in 2021, the uk government criticised the rwandan government for extrajudicial killings, deaths in custody, enforced disappearances and torture. there were also concerns about media and political freedom in rwanda. since rwanda has ratified many international human rights conventions, this evidence raises questions as to its compliance with its international obligations. it is also relevant to the question over if rwandan courts can be expected to act independently of the rwand

and the supreme court of appeal and the supreme court has accepted.— court of appeal and the sylum seekers now in this country? _ the features of asylum seekers now in this country? hot— the features of asylum seekers now in this country?— in this country? not for me to comment _ in this country? not for me to comment on. _ in this country? not for me to comment on. we _ in this country? not for me to comment on. we only - in this country? not for me to i comment on. we only represent our clients to the best of our ability and it gives at least those asylum seekers some hope that this country, the highest court in this country, has confirmed that there is respect of human rights and dignity for all who come here for international protection. who come here for international protection-— who come here for international rotection. , , ., ., protection. giving his reaction on the, the claimants _ protection. giving his reaction on the, the claimants lawyers i protection. giving his reaction on | the, the claimants lawyers there, giving reaction. i assume that you are happy with th

district court judgeo the ninth circuit court of appeals. one step below the supreme court. watch live coverage of the house on c-span, the senate on c-span two, and a reminder you can watch all of our congressional coverage our free video app, c-span now, or online at c-span.org. >> c-span now is a free mobile app featuring your unfiltered view of what's happening in washington, live and on demand. keep up with the events with live streams of floor proceedings and hearings from the u.s. congress, white house events, the court, campaign and more from the world of politics all at your fingertips. also stay current with the latest episodes of washington journal and find scheduling information for c-span's tv networks and c-span radio, plus a variety of compelling podcasts. c-span now is available on the apple store and google play. download it for free today. c-span now, your front row seat to washington, anytime, anywhere. >> now, a number of legal scholars discuss constitutional law, originalism, and the impact precedent has on the supreme court and lower level decisions. the

i will explain what a circuit split is printed circuit splits or when the courts of appeals across the country take the same legal issue and resolve it differently. that's one of the classic cases in which the supreme court will step in. because we are at the top of the judicial hierarchy but if there are disagreements we can resolve them to make the law uniform throughout the country. if state supreme courts are disagreeing with one another or a state supreme courts are disagreeing with the federal courts of appeals, you don't want to have different law applicable and say, california than oklahoma. or in minnesota than in louisiana. the court will step in and resolve those splits. that's probably the most common situation in which we step in and get involved but i think there are fewer splits than there used to be. one thing that we always say come and that some people are surprised to hear, is that we don't take cases just to correct errors. just error correction. we have not historically done that. the supreme court rules identify the factors that we apply in deciding whether to tak

, the supreme court of appeals makes a recommendation for dismissal, the supreme court already makes a final decision, but in fact it will correspond to what the supreme court of appeals recommended. the powers of this member of the public integrity council, unlike the previous members of the body, have been expanded and improved. the public is now also involved in the inspections of the high council of justice and supreme court judges. we will participate in competitions for the court of appeals, as a public integrity council, that is, to analyze each candidate who wants to occupy a position in the appeals, this competition has already been announced by the higher qualification commission, and perhaps, if the recruitment to the supreme court is announced, the public integrity council also analyzes all candidates in this process. now the public council of integrity has to participate in the qualification assessment of more than 2,000 judges, which was not completed. due to the expiration of the powers of the previous members of the higher qualifications commission, as well as to appo

court precedent. what about the horizontal precedent of inferior courts? courts of appeal as a precedent-setting court. three-judge panels can only overrule precedent. does that square with your perspective, professor lawson? if so, why? if not, why? >> i have the same problems with that that i have with horizontal precedent at the supreme court level and think about district courts in a circuit -- >> well, they don't make law. district courts don't like when i say that, but district judges don't make law. >> i think if the supreme court is going to do things normally found upon, it's because the constitution authorizes it to do it, you are panels are not inferior to each other, and therefore, i don't think you can get a textual escape from the obligation to decide cases in accordance with governing. >> what do you think about the notion that by statute, congress, which created those inferior courts, also created a process that would seem to contemplate that that is how it has to operate? >> congress can create whatever structures it wants. what i don't think congress can

the panel of judges of the kropyvnytskyi court of appeal nevertheless left the verdict of the court ofst instance unchanged and approved the punishment of in the form of deprivation of liberty. since the judge failed to fulfill the promise, most of the funds had to be returned. only part of the bribe was found at the intermediary's place of residence: $450. a resident of the ivano-frankivsk region who tried to kill a judge. in order to avoid punishment, he was sentenced to 10 years in prison. in august 2020, the man was dissatisfied with the course of the trial against him and wanted to delay the process and postpone the sentencing and prison sentence. the desire was so much strong that he decided to simply kill the judge of the bogorodchansky district court of ivano-frankivsk oleg shyshko, who was considering his case. the attacker attached a grenade. to the garage door so that it would detonate when the garage was opened, but the judge noticed the device, the grenade did not explode. the investigation of the case was completed only recently. it was possible to prove the criminal's gu

against the decision of the northern court of appealm in the form of suspension of the decisions of the shareholders' meetings. subsequently, with another ruling, the supreme court , as part of the same collegium headed by volodymyr studentets, satisfied the petition of the raiders of the bilotserkiv thermal power plant. so the company had to drop the lawsuit. the suspension of the decisions of the prad shareholders' meeting was called legitimate. and during the review other complaints in this case. in particular, regarding the decision of the judge of the commercial court of the kyiv region, pavlo gorbasenko, who declared the decisions made by the shareholders to be invalid. let us remind you that gorbasenko also forbade state registrars, notaries, the ministry of justice and other bodies that can carry out registration, to take actions in relation to betzets. despite the illegality of such a decision and the fact that information about the new head of the company, ihor vegularny, has already been entered into the unified state registe

the court took up the case against volodymyr kuksov, a judge of the northern commercial court of appeal, who is accused of collaborationism. after the liberation of kyiv region from occupation, kuksov complained acquaintance on these events and justified the atrocities of the rashists, instead he called ukrainians fascists. fuckers can force, well, we have the same situation, we have half of the salary, like there, and the supreme court decided to give creeper pay for the war, damn, i need this war. the judge of the northern commercial court of appeal, volodymyr kuksov, originally from crimea, was a judge of the alushta city court before the occupation. in 2014, he was transferred to kyiv. almost a year ago, the state bureau of investigation informed the judge about the suspicion of inciting collaborative activities and justification of russian aggression. the court chose a precautionary measure for him in the form of a bail of 3 million hryvnias. since at that time the supreme council of justice was not yet authorized. prosecutors could not apply for an arrest warrant. if the court fin

court. if it doesn�*t go the government�*s way, could we see a further appeal to the european court of humanights? it's possible. as i say. this is uk's _ of human rights? it's possible. as i say, this is uk's highest _ of human rights? it's possible. as i say, this is uk's highest court, - of human rights? it's possible. as i say, this is uk's highest court, so i say, this is uk�*s highest court, so in terms of in the uk, an appeal stands as faras it in terms of in the uk, an appeal stands as far as it can go. it�*s difficult to set the moment what the would do if it loses here at the supreme court. in terms of their plans, which has been front and centre of rishi sunak�*s immigration policy, but all they have to go back to the drawing board? and perhaps see if there is another country which they might be able to work with that is not rwanda. so we will expect out of the judgment here for the government to make a statement and we expect thatjudgment, as i say, very shortly. and we expect that 'udgment, as i say. very shortly._ say, very shortly. thank you very much. helena _ say, very short

situation, we have half of the salary , like there, the supreme court decided to give клазирплаты на войну, бляд, мне нужна ета война, the judge of the northern economic court of appealccupation he was a judge of the alushta city court, in 2014 he was transferred to kyiv, almost a year ago, the state bureau of investigation informed the judge of suspicion of incitement to collaborative activities and the justification of russian aggression. the court chose a precautionary measure for him in the form of a bail of 3 million hryvnias. because at that time the supreme council of justice. was still under-authorized, prosecutors could not apply for an arrest warrant. if the court finds volodymyr kuksov guilty, he faces up to 15 years in prison with confiscation of property. in october, the highest anti-corruption court classified half of its verdicts related to top corruption. in particular , three out of six decisions were classified, i.e. verdicts in the cases of lawyer oleg horetsy, who was an accomplice of the ex-head of the supreme court vsevolod knyazev, when receiving the record. a bribe of almost 3 million dollars, as well as the cases of former deputy and ex-head

situation with us is half of the salary, like there, the supreme court decided to give creeper pay for the war, damn, i need this war. judge of the northern commercial court of appeal volodymyr kuksov is originally from crimea, before the occupation he was a judge of the alushta city court. in 2014, he was transferred to kyiv. almost a year ago, the state bureau of investigation informed the judge of suspicion of incitement to collaborative activity and excuses. russian aggression. the court chose a precautionary measure for him in the form of a bail of 3 million hryvnias. since at that time the supreme council of justice was not yet authorized, prosecutors could not apply for permission to arrest. if the court finds volodymyr kuksov guilty, he faces up to 15 years in prison with confiscation property in october, the highest anti-corruption court classified half of its verdicts related to top corruption. in particular, three of the decisions were classified, these are the verdicts in the cases of the lawyer oleg horetsy, who was an accomplice of the ex-chairman of the supreme court vsevolod knyazev in receiving a record bribe of almost 3 million dollars, as well as

>> this was a prosecutor jack smith filed a 67-page brief with the circuit court of appeals in washington d.c. today, opposing donald trump's appeal of a limited gag order on defendant trump issued by a federal judge tanya chutkan in the case where donald trump stands accused of crimes leading up to and on january 6th. jack smith's brief says, there has never been a criminal case in which a court has granted a defendant and unfettered right to try his case in the media, malign the prosecutor and his family, and target specific witnesses with attacks on their character and credibility. jack smith mentions the federal criminal case against arthur ray hansen ii of alabama, who is charged with the federal crime of issuing interstate death threats to the fulton county sheriff and fulton county district attorney fani willis in georgia. the death threats specifically said that they were being threatened because of the prosecution of donald trump. judge chutkan's limited gag order preventing donald trump from attacking the prosecutor and witnesses in the case in washington, d.c., but because the

certain persons, well , there was a report that nabu and sab exposed four judges of the kyiv court of appealreceived a bribe in the amount of 35,000 dollars for making the right decision, well, actually, this is probably not the last such exposure, we see that the anti-corruption infrastructure still catches corrupt people, we also know that both the european union and nato are demanding , in order to ukraine has overcome corruption, we are overcoming, we are overcoming this corruption, we are overcoming, we are overcoming this corruption, well, we simply will not reach the point of overcoming it, mr. serhiy, what do you think, what is the problem, is ukraine the most corrupt country in the world, what do we they constantly reproach us that we are a corrupt state, the system is corrupt, that this system is built incorrectly, and this system must be rebuilt, and we are constantly poked in the face of this corruption, well, now any corruption scandal resonates extremely loudly in the west, because in the west opponents of the supply of weapons to ukraine, of course, use the argument that ukrai

this ruling tonight from the 8th circuit court of appeals would effectively end the voting rights act in a significant swath of the country. we're going to be talking about that. that was a surprise ruling today from the eighth circuit. we're also going to be talking about tonight under the radar, but potentially hugely important story about another right wing media takeover in our country. we've got details on that with somebody who absolutely has a totally unique and well informed perspective on that. we've also got some bright spot news tonight about people fighting hard for their rights and for good treatment, and not only winning, but their victory for themselves has had the knock-on effect of helping all sorts of other people of not helping in their fight but were in a predicament they were in. it's good news about people who were fighting hard and having ripple effect good news for people who didn't even join in that fight, but who can really benefit from it. that is a rare type of good news story in our culture and in our economy, but we've got that tonight. and that story als

to the court of appeal , appealed to the court of appeal, then right up to supreme court. again many months. i can't see this happening before the next election. >> so with that in mind, on the face of it, we're going to go to christopher hope soon for the political fallout. this seems like a quick get out of jail card for rishi, but if a single person doesn't leave, it's just yet more window dressing . yet more window dressing. >> yeah, i mean, it seems like a get out of jail card. it seems like, you know, a perfect solution. but i would ask solution. but then i would ask the question, if this was so easy, then you, the court of appeal , these were the arguments appeal, these were the arguments that were being put forward, that were being put forward, that was a real concern that there was a real concern that there was a real concern that could returned to that people could be returned to their country of origin, to an unsafe country. why on earth was that not put forward? you know, enshrined in some kind of treaty back then, before then, putting it before

prosecutor's office informed volodymyr honchar of the suspicion of the judge of the kropyvnytskyi court of appealaccording to the investigation, for $10,500, the judge promised to review the verdict of the court of first instance and change the punishment for committing a traffic accident with fatal consequences, from three years of imprisonment to a suspended term, to receive and keep the bribe, the judge instructed his intermediary. however, it did not go according to plan. board judges kropyvny. the appellate court still left the verdict of the court of first instance unchanged and approved the culprit's punishment in the form of deprivation of liberty. since the judge failed to fulfill the promise, most of the funds had to be returned. only part of the bribe - $450 - was found at the intermediary's place of residence. a resident of the ivano-frankivsk region, who tried to kill a judge to avoid punishment, was sentenced to 10 years in prison . in august 2000, the man was dissatisfied with the course of the trial cases against him and wanted to delay the process and delay the sentencing and imp

court of appeals, with a copy of a document that was filed in the new york a.g.'vil fraud case that laid out in detail the extent of the harassment that former president trump is unleashing on judge arthur engoron and his court staff. the letter includes new revelations that trump is targeting of one of judge engoron's top clerks has resulted in approximately 20 to 30 calls per day to her personal cell phone, and approximately 30 to 50 messages per day on social media. even more stunni a disgusting, the letter reveals quote, since the interns state was issued, lifting thga orders on november 24th, 2023, approximately half of the harassing and disparaging methods have been antisemitic. trump's team pushing back yesterday, saying that the harassment and threats documented in the new york case never happened in the d.c. case, and any gag order would be election interference. been there, heard that. joining me now, msnbc legal analyst, former federal prosecutor, and the host of the justice matters podcast, glenn kirschner. glenn, my friend, like i said, doj not taking

court. more than 98 percent of lower court decisions are upheld on appeal. the original court in which you filed the case, as you said, threw it out. and so you went to the 7th circuit court of appeals where you confident a victory on appeal. you won there of course. but the entire process was like 5050 chance because there was one circuit. the 3rd circuit that had recognized these types of, uh, you know, causes of action. it was really the only one at that time in the country. so that that case originated from pittsburgh, pennsylvania as the grammar case. and so i figured we had a 5050 shot, you know, so i wasn't necessarily confident, but i certainly thought, you know, we could prevail. so i was very happy that this law firm stepped in and the appellate attorney, his name is andrew todd. he is really a brilliant legal lines, and with him i felt much more, you know, confident that we could succeed. and we certainly did. we won 3 to 0 and we did change the law. wow. after you won at uh, at that level, the federal appeals court level, the biden ministration ap

first of all, the appeals court is taking donald trump's first amendment argument seriously. they're going the hear him out. second of all, they have signalled to donald trump you're on a very short leash here. we intend to move very, very quickly. so we'll have to wait and see what the appeals court does in the next couple of days. >> important point. jennifer rogers, as you know trump has argued that this gag order violated his first amendment rights, and it looks like the appeals court is taking that argument seriously, right? >> there's some thorny issues here, wolf. we never before have had a presidential candidate under indictment making comments about his rival and his rival's justice department, who is prosecuting him. so we are in unchartered territory here, which is why the appellate court does want to take time and it makes sense to freeze the gag order so that trump can ultimately say he was somehow harmed by this. i think, though, it would be really fool hearty of trump to violate the gag order that isn't in place, but to violate the terms of it now, it would give

was adopted today by the verkhovna rada of ukraine, and also in yesterday's ruling of the sixth court of appealwhere it was actually determined, and what is actually the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate and to whom it is subordinate. mykola knyazhytskyi, people's deputy of ukraine. mr. mykola, i congratulate you , today the budget for 2024 was approved by the verkhovna rada, i would like to briefly a general assessment of this budget, how realistic it is, first of all, and then maybe about the humanitarian component, whether this year at least something was achieved and in what areas should it be allocated for the development of culture? well, whether it is realistic or not, it is difficult to say, because we are in our budget... completely dependent on our donors, in this case, on the united states of america and on the european union, whether funds will be allocated to us or not, we do not know all the time , obviously there is a big deficit in the budget, this deficit is planned to be covered at the expense of other revenues, but we live with our budget, well, we actually

rada passed a decision on november 28, and then, at the beginning of january, 2010, the kyiv court of appealsed its decision, a court decision, which was, the revision, so to speak , was not subject to final revision. made his decision that the holodomor of 32-33 is considered, otherwise you cannot call it, as the genocide of the ukrainian people, they ask why there was a decision of the verkhovna rada and you still need there was a trial we knew the habits of the communists, as we, for example, on august 20 , 8, 28, 1991 passed after the adoption of the act of independence, we passed on the 26th of the presidium of the verkhovna rada, having documents about the involvement of the communists in supporting the hekchapists, these were also arrested here in lviv, when they were sealing up the district committees, city committees, committees and - they found these documents signed by the first secretary of the central committee of the communist party of ukraine, about the obligation of every party organization to unconditionally support the central committee of the communist party of ukraine, al

so you have a lone district judge, a district judge bound by the decisions of the court of appeals, the 8th circuit in this instance, and the supreme court. taking the words of one justice in a concurrence and deciding to center his inquiry and decision making on the opinion of that concurrence. understand what happened in burnovich. i have no doubt that justice gorsuch circulated his draft to colleagues. he was not joined by them. that was not part of majority opinion or a plurality opinion. it was his opinion, and one district judge understood that to be communicating something and decided to issue this decision. then it goes to the eighth circuit court of appeals and we get this decision 2-1 by david straus, another appointee and former clarence thomas clerk, who enshrines this decision from the district court judge. and i raise all of this, joy, because this is an upending, an attack on the judicial process. it's one thing when it happens as it did in the affirmative action cases when justice thomas's and alito's gave ed blunt the litigant, as he put it, he needed an asian-american

of judges, however, did not pass. and this is another contender for a position in the constitutional court , oleksandr korovayko, head of the kherson court of appealhe has been embracing this... garden since 2012. i am oleksandr korovayko, a candidate for judges, also the chairman since the 12th year, the permanent head of the kherson court of appeal , although this is prohibited by law from serving more than two terms in a row, that is, here you can already understand the attitude of this person to the law and to changes in judicial system. korovaiko has bad memory and sometimes forgets to declare the car, then the real value of the apartment almost 150 km away. this apartment was purchased and presented to the judge's wife, allegedly by his 68-year-old mother for $22,000. obviously , the indicated amount is understated. how many times before that , in 2000, the mother also bought 65 m in simferopol. they were registered to the judge's daughter. the judge's son is also provided with real estate, although he allegedly saved up and bought 95 square meters in odesa at the age of 26. he had problems with declarations, which was pointed out by the pub

court of appeals for the fourth circuit. also with us is laurence tribe, professor emeritus of harvard law school, cofounder of the american constitution society, author of the important book american constitutional law. what do i need to talk to you gentlemen this morning, because this one is way above my pay grade. judge luttig, let me start with you. talk to me about this. you've tried our best, to lay out what we believe the court was intending to say about this amendment. i would now love your interpretation of all of that. >> thank you, ali, thank you for having professor tribe and i on this morning. this is a historic decision. it will reverberate throughout the country, from today through the 2024 presidential election, and while beyond. the colorado court decided that as you said, those pressing constitutional questions facing the nation, holding that the former president did engage in an insurrection to overturn the 2020 presidential election. you simply could not overstate the constitutional significance of this fu

the appeals, court federal appeals court hearing in that case last monday indicated that the appeals court judges were in favor of preserving most if not all of the gag order issued by judge chutkan. today, donald trump's lawyers urged the new york appeals court which is considering donald trump's appeal of the gag order issued by judge arthur engoron who is receiving, he's the judge who's receiving those hundreds of harassing phone calls a day, to completely overrule the gag order issued by the judge. the -- insist that death threats issued by donald trump supporters because of things donald trump says about the people threatened are not donald trump's fault. the trump lawyers right, at base, the disturbing behavior engaged in by anonymous, third-party actors towards the judge and principal law clerk publicly presiding over an extremely polarizing and high profile trial merits appropriate security measures. however, it does not justify the wholesale, aggregation of petitioners first amendment rights in a proceeding of immense stakes to petitioners which has been compromised by the introduction of partisan bias o

continue to analyze the most important thing, because naboo, so to speak , four judges of the kyiv court of appeale searched today, the security service of ukraine searched representatives of the moscow church in ukraine, pause, after that we will continue to analyze this, wait. attention, an incredible new product, super warm and very comfortable alaska boots style. perfect fit, water-repellent material and a feeling of warmth, even in 30-degree frost. alaska style houses have a universal design and practical black color. therefore, they will fit both men and women, sizes from 36 to 46, so get two pairs at once, for you and your husband. furnace zippers will ensure a perfect fit even on the widest leg. the heater perfectly retains heat and removes moisture. and the top is made of waterproof and wear-resistant raincoat fabric and reinforced with eco-suede. boots alaska stayle can be worn both in wet weather and in very cold weather. high-quality, light and warm alaska style boots. by. unsealed comfort and in the changeable wet autumn, and in the frosty winter, and in the unpredictable spring, you

now, in the court of appeal, when it came to its own conclusion, back in time, it sets itself that were one that had a full human rights record. or in the even slice of the evidence of british police have to wonder why the nationals living in the u. k. that they were at risk of possible extrajudicial kennings. and even in full disappearances and torture was so side so. so why does the same? yes, to fulfill its obligations under international laws as well and about how the fact that it does in gauging this process of refinements and sending a asylum seekers back to the countries of origin where they are at risk of torture and even death. nevertheless, this has been an enormous blow back for the government itself. it was the one the scheme, front, incense out of the government's immigration policy specifically to deal with the issue of small boats closed costing the channel that now is that in the was itself, policy. and the prime minister will have to find all the means and ways tackle the issue which has become very much a toxic debates in british politics. sonya guy jago, which is era

when the court of appeal split, it was a 2 to 1 split. th it was the lord chief justice. a more senior figure than a lord, than a trainee. however, they've made a complete mess it and they've got no mess of it and they've got no plan b. let's talk to fellow gb news tory mp jacob news presenter and tory mp jacob rees—mogg, at westminster. rees—mogg, who's at westminster. jacob, catastrophic, jacob, this is catastrophic, like it's certainly not good news and the government will need to legislate now to make the rwanda scheme work . the rwanda scheme work. >> the key here is that parliament can legislate to say anything . it can legislate to anything. it can legislate to amend the human rights act. it can legislate to override the european convention on human rights and essentially this judgement boils to down who do you trust to decide whether rwanda is safe ? do you trust the rwanda is safe? do you trust the judgement of the home secretary or do you trust the judgement of a united nations agency which has had all sorts of problems? the huma

court of odesa, viktor poprevych. he is known for the high-profile case of activist serhiy sternenko. later reversed by the court of appealych was also released on a small charge. i am the ex-director of the victoria children's camp, where three children died in a fire in 2017 , and he helped drunk drivers avoid punishment, in particular, he saved the head of the odesa district administrative court, oleg hlukhanchuk, who was jumped behind the wheel for a drink. viktor poprevych also respects the soviet union so much that in 2019 he lives in partenit, on the southern coast of crimea. now viktor poprevych, in honorable retirement, retains all judicial privileges, including immunity, and will also receive lifelong payments of uah 100,000 per month. relaunching after more than three years of non-functioning of the higher qualification commission of judges of ukraine is, without exaggeration , an important step for further changes to the conditions set before us by the european commission for continuing the path to s. the new higher qualification commission for judges has two priority tasks: to complete the qualification evalu

the supreme court is the final court of appeal in the uk and is set to deliver a decision on whether rwanda. this ruling comes afterjudges at the court of appeal injune ruled that the plan was unlawful and could breach article 3 of the european convention of human rights, which prohibits torture and inhumane treatment. the prime minister has made stopping the boats a central part of his immigration policy. rwanda, he and his ministers argue, will deter people from making the dangerous journey across the channel. in recent years, many people have died from making that trip. the government says the travelling must stop to cut levels of illegal migration and to reduce the number of people dying. 116,000 people crossed the channel last year. so far this year, more than 27,000 have done the same. that's 19,000 fewer people so far. ever since the rwanda policy was created, its been bogged down in the courts and nobody has been sent to the country, with planes halted at the last minute. the supreme court judges will have looked at the following when making theirjudgement: were the right test

the court of appeal of the case of hamid nouri, an iranian citizen imprisoned in sweden. court had sentenced mr. nouri to life imprisonment on the charge of participating in the punishment of hypocrites in 1967. terrorist for the 16th of november, stockholm, the capital of sweden. terrorist for this is hamid nouri's 17th trial. the hypocrites are present as in the previous court sessions. in the nearby halls and streets , they are asking the court to try this man. he has been spending the last four years in saed's solitary prisons since november 18, 2018. he is hamid light sweid sentenced him to life imprisonment on the charge of participating in the punishment of hypocrites in 1967. mr. judge, let justice be done in your court . now, after this verdict, his family resumed pursuing the case. father still to. they have been arrested and still cannot properly defend their rights. since the beginning of his arrest, mr. noori has been asking for a doctor because of his eye pain, but he does not get an answer. my eyes are going blind. i will not send me to the ophthalmologist.