the court of appeal, things have come i were referred to the court of. and the post office's entire approach to| investigators' behaviour and the . post office's entire approach to the ethics _ post office's entire approach to the ethics of— post office's entire approach to the ethics of prosecution, _ post office's entire approach to the ethics of prosecution, which - post office's entire approach to the ethics of prosecution, which i - ethics of prosecution, which i believe — ethics of prosecution, which i believe take _ ethics of prosecution, which i believe take is _ ethics of prosecution, which i believe take is way— ethics of prosecution, which i believe take is way beyond i ethics of prosecution, which i. believe take is way beyond the application _ believe take is way beyond the application of _ believe take is way beyond the application of horizon - believe take is way beyond the application of horizon data. i believe take is way beyond the. application of horizon data. and therefore — application of horizon data. and therefore i_ application of

the court of appeals accepted an am cows or friend of the court brief from a group called american oversight. lawyers from the firm of arnold andporter argue the court of appeals lacks jurisdiction and this time to hear the appeal, they cite a 1989 supreme court case in which justice scalia wrote for a unanimous court. it this argument swas the panel next week, it could immediately return the case to trial before the judge. and trump would face a jury of his peers before he faces the electorate. joining me now is elie honig, senior legal analyst, former prosecutor, author of "untouchable." nice to see you again. big picture, how many trials might trump realistically face before the election? >> that is the big question. i'm going to give you an ironclad precise answer right now. probably one, maybe two, could be zero, but that chance is low. but definitely not three or four. we can write off the fulton county d.a.'s case. that is not going to be tried before the election. the d.a. has asked for an august 2024 trial date conceding that would go into 2025, not going to happen. up until recentl

only 13 judges work in the kharkiv court of appeal out of 60 positions by state. largest kyiv court of appeal, out of 145 judges by staff, there are not enough 70. the higher qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges in appeal courts in autumn next year. competition. has already started for the occupation of 550 vacant positions of judges, more than 200 candidates are applying. most willing to take the position in the general court of appeal - 912, the least in the commercial court of appeal - 183. the meeting of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court elected judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny to the grand chamber for a term of three years. according to the estimates of the foundation's experts, there are appointed judges. unscrupulous, according to the conclusion of the public integrity council, the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income, and the judge allegedly deliberately understated the value of the purchased real estate in the declaration. olga s

crisis these and rules prevent the court of appeal from these and rules prevent the court of appealfromning these and rules prevent the court of appeal from overturning cases these and rules prevent the court of appealfrom overturning cases for all sorts of complexities. firstly, there are a number of different categories of fact situations involving different postmasters and mistresses. secondly, the procedure thatis mistresses. secondly, the procedure that is currently being put in place is actually pretty complex and has a number of barriers in it that is difficult to overcome. otherwise, far more than 93 would have been overturned already out of perhaps 700 or more. let's not forget, the added complexities that actually scotland and northern ireland, where fortunately that numbers are much smaller, i've got different procedural systems as well. so, it seems that when our committee looked at this, it seemed to us that we can't oversee awarding compensation to people unless they have had their convictions overturned as the law stands at the moment, although we did say, can't we just d

throughout— court of appeal proceedings. throughout this _ court of appeal proceedings. y - court of appeal proceedings. throughout this inquiry and i court of appeal proceedings. . throughout this inquiry and you didn'i_ throughout this inquiry and you didn't think— throughout this inquiry and you didn't think back— throughout this inquiry and you didn't think back and _ throughout this inquiry and you didn't think back and perhaps . throughout this inquiry and you - didn't think back and perhaps regret having _ didn't think back and perhaps regret having submitted _ didn't think back and perhaps regret having submitted a _ didn't think back and perhaps regret having submitted a witness - didn't think back and perhaps regret . having submitted a witness statement such as _ having submitted a witness statement such as this_ having submitted a witness statement such as this in— having submitted a witness statement such as this in criminal _ such as this in criminal proceedings? - such as this in criminal proceedings?— such as this in criminal ”roceedins? ~ , �* , proceedin

court of appeals out of 145 judges by state, 70 are missing. bove... the qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges in appeals courts in the autumn of next year . the competition has already started, more than 200 candidates are applying for 550 vacant positions of judges. most willing to take the position in the general court of appeal - 912. the least in the commercial court of appeal - 183. the assembly of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court elected up to. of the grand chamber of judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny for a term of three years. according to the experts of the dere foundation, the appointed judges are dishonest. according to the conclusion of the civic council of virtue, the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income. also, the judge probably deliberately understated the value of the purchased real estate in the declaration. olga stupak assured that she had purchased 10 acres of land in kyiv allegedly for uah 14,900. an

but we won in the court of appeals. d there was a conclusive victory, statute of limitations that case has been won. that's the story and it would come down to wall street which is a great building and he got a chance to see where the nicest buildi convenient place. we have it and it's been a very successful billing but it's shame to have to have gone through this for years and years and years and now we will see if we will get an honest verdict. we didn't have a jury a jury. it's a statute that's never been used before for purpose like this. i just watch a certain broadcast and they said they were looking at it as it's never been used before. it's a consumer fraud statute never been used for anything like this before. it shame. it's really a witch hunt in the true sense of the word in its election interference and it just came out right now letitia james visited joe biden at the white house numerous times on thtr witch hunt and it's been 10 minutes ago. it's all a conspiracy tomx t t get biden who can't put two sentence

i does that diminish your acquittal by the court of appeal?— the court of appeal? e, by _ the court of appeal? i don't think it diminishes mine, by debit - the court of appeal? i don't think. it diminishes mine, by debit better view thinks... that something has -ot view thinks... that something has got to— view thinks... that something has got to happen because there are 900 cases _ got to happen because there are 900 cases. not— got to happen because there are 900 cases. ., , . cases. not perfect, i get the sense--- _ cases. not perfect, i get the sense... not _ cases. not perfect, i get the sense... not perfect, - cases. not perfect, i get the sense... not perfect, but. cases. not perfect, i get the sense... not perfect, but i l cases. not perfect, i get the - sense... not perfect, but i guess it is the only — sense... not perfect, but i guess it is the only way- — sense... not perfect, but i guess it is the only way. good _ sense... not perfect, but i guess it is the only way. good morning - sense... not perfect, but i guess it is the only way. good morning mr i

sadly— have to say the court of appeal sadty for— have to say the court of appeal sadly for themem did not deal with the issue of parliamentary sovereignty which _ issue of parliamentary sovereignty which will — issue of parliamentary sovereignty which will be combined with the use of words _ which will be combined with the use of words clearly unambiguous and in any case _ of words clearly unambiguous and in any case did — of words clearly unambiguous and in any case did not concern an act of parliament — any case did not concern an act of parliament. failure to pass a bill to deal— parliament. failure to pass a bill to deal with illegal migration has led to— to deal with illegal migration has led to vast public expenditure, bittiohs — led to vast public expenditure, billions on services including health— billions on services including health care, education, social care, housing, _ health care, education, social care, housing, infrastructure, planning, 'ust housing, infrastructure, planning, just to _ housing, infrastructure, planning, just to name a few, not to mention m“lions

it scalia on the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia. aw clerk for justice scalia on the supreme court. john mcginnis arthwestern univr school of law or professor plus -- where professor lawson previously taught. professor mcginnis is a graduate of harvard college and learned -- earn his jd from harvard law school where he was an editor of the harvard ball review. he also has a masters of arts degree from bail college in philosophy and theoly. professor mcginnis served as a law clerk to judge can start on the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. from 1987 to 1991, he served as the deputy assistant attorney general in the deputy office of 8e■x)tcounsel at the departmentf justice. he is the author of accelerating democracy, transforming government through to knology and originalism and the good h mike rappaport. he is a past winner of the paul bap tour award given by the federalist society to announce outstanding academic under the age of 40. last but not least is professor tara chair of law at the university

such an unworthy judge has already been weeded out by the supreme court of appeals. t know if i'm present in this hall, generally sinless. someone from us. congratulations. i, tetyana shustrova, and the judicial control are on the air. reorganization and reformatting bodies of the judicial system. after receiving the status of a candidate for joining the european union, judicial reform is one of the main requirements for continuing our path to the eu. the higher qualification commission evaluates current judges for their suitability for positions. the servants of themis continue to amaze with wealth, which cannot be explained by income to professional incompetence. today we will tell you about those who have already been weeded out by vkks. but first before... news of a development in the criminal investigation of the attack on our colleague in ternopil. the court satisfied the complaint of the journalist maria ivanovska, who was attacked in may of this year by the tenant of the judge of the northern commercial court of appeal, lyudmila kropyvna. complaint of mariia s

court of appeals will do. then, the question is, what will the supreme court do when this is before them? will they take it up quickly, or will they drag this out? i think the supreme court will take this up quickly, especially because they have this other issue that they're dealing with, that is disqualification from the ballot. i think the supreme court is going to find -- comes out donald trump's way. going to want to be able to not say they are tipping the scales one way or another, so, i think they will also take this issue of immunity, which is clearly a loser for donald trump, up quickly. >> okay, christian greenberg, we'll see if your predictions are correct, as they usually are. thank you so much. well, he has one job, in the world is watching him this weekend. that story is next. is next (music) have heart failure with unresolved symptoms? it may be time to see the bigger picture. heart failure and seemingly unrelated symptoms, like carpal tunnel syndrome, shortness of breath, and irregular heartbeat

court of appeals, federal court of appeals for the d.c. circuit. at's the mid-level court of appeals below the supreme court. the way we got here, of course, is this started out in the district court. the trial level court where donald trump argued he was immune from prosecution because the conduct falls within his scope of the presidency. the district judge tanya chutkan ruled against that. there is no divine right of kings. when we go into court today, these will be the judges who are sitting. judge henderson was put on the bench by george h.w. bush in 1990. judges childs and pan were put on the bench by president biden. there's no tv broadcast of what's going to happen, but there will be a live audio feed, so we'll be able to hear the questioning and oftentimes having done a bunch of these arguments in a three-judge panel, you can tell pretty strongly where they're leaning by the number and the tone of the questions that they're asking. >> so talk to us about the argument here because trump's team is trying to essentially extend one of the nixon

the president, the former president, also made the case that his argument won in the court of appeals and the judge arthur engoron is ignoring that because it's not the result he wants. that's actually a misrepresentation of what took place. the court of appeals scaled back the initial case that was made by laetitia james, determining that the statute of limitation when -- removing his daughter ivanka trump from the tate case itself. very far from saying that the appeals court sided with him, in fact the appeals court would have shut the case down according to legal experts if they had felt there wasn't a case there. further, the president made the case that there was only one witness against him, and that was his former fixer michael cohen. someone who he said was a convicted felon, convicted of lying. michael cohen was convicted in part for lying on behalf of former president trump, so make of that what you will. he also made claims about -- joe biden, things that were largely false. the president though vowing that he's going to continue attending all of his court cases as the camp

courts of maine a basis to overturn what she did. but she was right in suspending the effect of her decision pending an appeal to the superior court ofing that she doesn't have unilateral authority to make this decision. >> donald trump's new main lawyer is leaning on the statutes in maine, saying that those statutes only give the secretary of state authority to do things like make sure he has enough signatures to be on the ballot, requires thousands of signatures, make sure his address is correct, kind of clerical things like that in his application to be on the ballot. and then the trump lawyer says, the secretary had no statutory authority to consider the challenges raised under section three of the 14th amendment. >> basically trying to treat the disqualification clause of section three, which is really central to the preservation of democracy from those who would overturn it as a kind of second class status, not nearly as basic as residency or birth. it isn't. it's equally important. it's perhaps the most important qualification. and there is nothing in a lot, either state or federal, that draws a distinction between disqualific

the court of appeals— the court ofls voted in favour of ours. but thisjudge has been very appeals voted in favour of ours. but this judge has been very slow to accept _ this judge has been very slow to accept that opinion. because that's not the _ accept that opinion. because that's not the opinion that he wants. we want _ not the opinion that he wants. we want and — not the opinion that he wants. we want and the court of appeals. that's— want and the court of appeals. that's the _ want and the court of appeals. that's the boss of this judge, he has to— that's the boss of this judge, he has to know that. there was a conclusive _ has to know that. there was a conclusive victory, statue it of limitations and other things without that case _ limitations and other things without that case is already been won. that's— that case is already been won. that's the _ that case is already been won. that's the story. i thought would come _ that's the story. i thought would come down to 40 wall st which is a great _ come down to 40

court of appeals. that's where we are now. important to note that there was at the high court refused to quickly rule on the issue, and the justices themselves might as well been taking up the case sooner than later anyways. that is because if the appeals court turns down trump's immunity claims this week, he is likely going to be appealing to the supreme court again. we've seen another version of this movie before. it's because we have. everything about where we are right now, it's the revisiting of trump's hallmark legal strategy. delay, delay, delay, delay and some more. he's nothing if he's not consistent. with the election looming, this is to put it mildly, deeply problematic. the stakes couldn't be higher. the 82-page filing for the d.c. court of appeals, the special counsel highlights the dangers of what can happen if trump's immunity claims were to succeed. taking bribes from government contracts, telling the fbi to plant evidence of political enemies, using the national guard as positional muscle against political enem

we've won this in the court of appeals they voted in favor of u us. dge has been very, very slow to accept that opinion that's not the opinion he wants. but we won in the■ court of appeals that's the boss of this judge. there is a conclusive victory a statute of limitations and other that case has been one. that's the story. you get a chance to see one ofat have to pay any rent because we have it and it's been a very t'successful building.'s a shame gone through this for years and years and years and now we will see if wed will get an honest verdict. we didn't h had no rights to a jersey jury it's a statute that's never been used for a purpose like this i watch a certain broadcast theyen used? beas a consumer fraud statute never been used in anythg lik s. it is a late witchhu iense of tn interfer.ame out right now letitia james visited joe biden in the white house numerous timesuring the■srumpitchhunt and this just came out about 10 minutes ago i got it. it's all a conspiracy to get biden who can put two sentences together into office. i just want angi

court of appeal, but you will— come back to the court of appeal, but you will do _ come back to the l, but you will do so _ come back to the court of appeal, but you will do so with _ come back to the court of appeal, l but you will do so with government assistance — but you will do so with government assistance and _ but you will do so with government assistance and legal— but you will do so with government assistance and legal aid _ but you will do so with government assistance and legal aid so - but you will do so with government assistance and legal aid so these . assistance and legal aid so these things— assistance and legal aid so these things can — assistance and legal aid so these things can he _ assistance and legal aid so these things can be attended _ assistance and legal aid so these things can be attended by- assistance and legal aid so these things can be attended by the . assistance and legal aid so these . things can be attended by the court of appeal, — things can be attended by the court oprpeat, but— things can be attended by the court of appeal, but i _ things can

court of appeals. and that's where we are now. mportant to note that in the the high court refused to quickly rule on the issue, the justices themselves might as well be taking up the case sooner than later anyway. and that's because if the appeals court turns down trump's immunity claims this, week he's likely going to appeal to the supreme court again. now, if it seems like we've seen some version of this movie before, while, it's because we kind of have. everything about where we are right now is a revisiting of trump's hallmark legal strategy, delay, delay, delay some more. the man is nothing if he isn't consistent. but with this year's presidential election looming, this is, to put it mildly, deeply problematic. and the stakes could not be higher. in the 82 page filing to the d.c. court of appeals, the special counsel highlighted the severity of the dangers of what could happen if trump's immunity claims were to succeed. taking bribes for government contracts, telling the fbi to plant evidence on political enemies, using the n

circuit court of appeals. over the holiday break if you were not paying attention and luckily i was not the last couple of weeks, the supreme court decided not to get involved in the immunity argument, to leave it to the d.c. court of appeals. so what's happening in the d.c. court of appeals in trying to decide whether donald trump as president is immune from prosecution? >> that's right. the goal of this immunity motion trump filed is to knock out the entire prosecution in the district of columbia. that's what this appeal will decide. the last brief is due today. that's donald trump's brief. they'll hold oral argument next week. but this is trump's argument. in essence, he says i'm a king. i'm immune. you can't prosecute me for anything that i did while i was president. and that argument goes to the heart of american democracy. i think donald trump loses this appeal and the one that follows to the supreme court. the only real question is how quickly the courts can remove and return this case to the district co

thank you, it was tetyana golunova, our correspondent, who is located in to the court of appeal of kyivthe appeal against the decision to continue the detention of colonel roman chervinskyi is being considered. well, roman chervinsky, he is not the only one. known for the fact that he is accused of allegedly being involved in the rocket attacks on the kanatov airfield, but also in the case of the so-called wagnerites, the case that took place in 2020, roman, well, we have been watching this case there for several months , as it unfolds in court, and somehow there is no answer as to whether it is right or wrong, or still, if we are legal the state... then we have to wait for the verdict of the court and then say that roman chervinskyi is not guilty of anything, even though before the war he accused the leadership of the ukrainian state that there were moles in the office of the president of ukraine and that they foiled this special operation , by the way, it is very important, but if you look at the further development of events, it was important enough for our special services to obtain

a case for the court of appeal quashed the conviction and i will start by looking at what the court ofnnan. the bottom of page 59. lisa brennan. the bottom of page 59. lisa brennan who had been a post office counter clerk when she was 16 years old was convicted on 27 counts of theft, representing a shortfall of £3a82 and a0 p. pausing at there. was it usual to have so many counts of theft representing for there is a relatively small shortfall? the difference _ relatively small shortfall? the difference with _ relatively small shortfall? the difference with this one it is a pension— difference with this one it is a pension and allowance docket or voucher. — pension and allowance docket or voucher. in— pension and allowance docket or voucher, in this case, the vouchers were _ voucher, in this case, the vouchers were overstated, there's a number of different— were overstated, there's a number of different types of fraud that took place _ different types of fraud that took place concerning vouchers and this is an— place concerning vouchers and this is an overstated voucher, the value had b

a miscarriage of justice to appeal a conviction by virtue of an application to the scottish criminal cases review commission who made themselves review and refer a case to the high court later endorsed in 2021 by the english court of appeal when quashing 39 convictions of those it had held had suffered a miscarriage ofjustice or —— are significant, because it confirmed beyond doubt the extent of

actually we won in the court of appeals. you probably saw that. that case has been largely won in the court of appeals. that was a political case. coordinated with the white house by the attorney general. i assume is what you're talking about. we won that case. largely in the court of appeals. reporter: the carroll case -- mr. trump: that is a ridiculous case. that case is a ridiculous case. we're appealing it. she didn't know anything about me. she didn't know when it happened. it was nothing. people are looking at that case, it's a disgrace. we're appealing that case. we had a very hostile judge. we're appealing that case. it's a ridiculous case. reporter: would you lock the u.s. acquisition by -- mr. trump: i would go after it. it's a horrible thing. when japan buys u.s. steel, i would block it ince tan tainusly. reporter: traditionally former presidents have access to intelligence briefings, biden canceled that for you. would you expect intelligence briefings in the -- as the republican nominee? mr. trump: i would cancel intelligence briefings

the court of a- eal than an act of parliament. the court of appealparliament. the court of appeal that can _ than an act of parliament. the court of appeal that can definitively - than an act of parliament. the court of appeal that can definitively say i of appeal that can definitively say in each individual case this conviction is unsafe, and therefore must be quashed. acts of parliament won't really do that. but must be quashed. acts of parliament won't really do that.— won't really do that. but what of the company _ won't really do that. but what of the company be _ won't really do that. but what of the company be hinds _ won't really do that. but what of the company be hinds the - won't really do that. but what of| the company be hinds the glitchy system? fudge sue has been awarded other government contracts worth billions but ministers say they won't act until after a public inquiry has concluded. there are some questions _ inquiry has concluded. there are some questions about _ inquiry has concluded. there are some questions about who - inquiry

surprised if they were able to beat the march 4th date, and jack smith wanted to leapfrog the court of appeals the supreme court denied that motion but it did jump-start the court of appeals. the court of appeals set an expedited briefing schedule, and they are hearing oral argument next week which is quick for a court of appeals. they can render a decision quickly, and i am sure it will go to the supreme court for further disposition. importantly, while that case is pending, there's a stay in the trial court which means that all of the things that would ordinarily be occurring right now like pretrial motions and exchange of discovery material and sending out questionnaires to prospective jurors is all delayed, and i don't think the case will start march 4th, i think a case starting in june is very reasonable. >> let's briefly talk about the 14th amendment, because maine and colorado dealt with it differently, and other states rejected this 14th amendment argument. the supreme court will have to deal with this. what is the likelihood that chief justice roberts will try and avoid a political de

courts move is mystifying, extremely slow. what we've seen in these last couple of weeks has been lightning speed, out of both of these courts. the court of appealsmmunity argument on a fast schedule of quick oral arguments that happen on tuesday. you, know it's very interesting that the supreme court declined to take that case out of order. i think we have to wonder, we can't resolve this, yap mother the supreme court might look at the decision that comes out of the court of appeals following tuesday's hearing, and perhaps they'll decide to stign off on that decision without re-hearing the case. the issues are novel in one sense, but not particularly difficult. the supreme court may be happy to let a lower court take it while they chew on these very difficult pressing issues involving the 14th amendment, and whether trump can be on the ballot in the state of colorado, and perhaps elsewhere. >> joyce, i don't want to throw water on what you just said but i think about places like fulton county, where donald trump has raise presidential immunity as a defense. i think about other jurisdictions or presidential immunity, including mar-a-lago. this ha

she could win for the moment in front of judge mcafee, but it donald trump succeeds in getting a temporary appeal to the court of appeals and then a stay, then it could be of the court of appeals for months, and then whoever loses in the court of appeals could go to the georgia supreme court and if this case does not complete before the general election, and trump is elected again he is going to argue that he cannot be prosecuted even at state court, while he is a sitting president. so the case might then go on hold for 4 years. so delay is fatal, potentially. >> professor clark cunningham, we have learned a lot about next week's hearing, a lot is on the line, thank you so much. >> a pleasure to be with you, laura. >>> up next, trouble in the ivy league. why a big dorner says cornell has a toxic environment, and why he says the university's presidential step down. >>> tonight, a bit of a nursery rhyme for ivy league schools. first came pen, next comes cornell and its president, out with the bathwater, donors have made a big ask of that school's trustee to fire martha they want her out over what is her shamefu

circuit court of appeals. the second highest court in the land. as put another south carolinian, an african-american woman on the fourth circuit court of appeals, d'andra benjamin. [applause] but he did not stop there. joe biden has appointed more women of color to our circuit courts than all the former presidents combined. [cheers and applause] when trump's handpicks supreme court struck down roe v. wade, republicans across the country followed by ushering in draconian abortion bans that risk women's health and their lives. and he has told us how much worse he can be. joe biden will appoint more justices like ketanji brown jackson. he will block any attempt of republicans who institute a nationwide ban on women's reproductive rights. joe biden will fight any attempt to turn the clock back. [applause] four years ago, candidate joe biden promised to improve and build upon barack obama's affordable care act and reduce the cost of medicine. and he has done so. [applause] during donald trump's four years in the white house, he and republicans in congre

they can try to re-establish a trial date, maybe in april or may, but if the court of appeals does not issue that mandate, the trial court remains frozen and donald trump will easily be able to run out the clock by asking for rehearing in the court of appeals then asking the u.s. supreme court to take the case, so that's going to be the make or break. >> speaking of the supreme court, let's remind everybody that february 8 comes the argument on colorado and by extension maine and other states as to whether he gets bounced from the ballot pursuant to section 3 of the 14'd amendment. how quickly will the supreme court rule in that case? >> i assure you they will rule by march 5th, before march 5th. the reason it is super tuesday and among the states voting, colorado and maine and about 14 others. i think the supreme court is going to rule by late february, so people know, people have to know if they're going into colorado are we voting for a guy ho is disqualified and i think what the supreme court will do is rule in a way that not only rejects the disqualification in colorado but is bro

of appeal heard this appeal of his and will then appeal to of the supreme courtst to bide time to delay the start of this trial so that... it definitely won't happen on march 4th, it will happen on march 25th, but on march 25th there will be another trial in new york, which is the jurisdiction of the state of new york, regarding, regarding his fraud, regarding the falsification of financial documents, and he will not be able to delay this process, but even if there will be guilty verdicts, a few days ago i heard the opinion of such a famous american lawyer, neil katiyal, former acting deputy... attorney general, and he, and he has a lot of experience representing in the courts, because he, he, when he was not in the government, he represented the interests of various plaintiffs in the supreme court, he says that definitely trump, if there is a conviction , he will appeal any conviction, and given the circumstances, what his personality is, and the fact that he is a presidential candidate, and that he is... a former president, and so on and so forth, that every ap

he did get a win at the court of appeals, but a narrow win. the court of appeals ruled some of the claims in this case were too old and had to be removed from the case. that happened. all the claims against ivanka trump were thrown out of the case. but everything that remained in the case is still the subject of the trial. he did win in a very limited fashion. >> michael cohen has recanted all of his testimony. >> that is not quite accurate. michael cohen was asked on the stand at one point, did donald trump ever tell you specifically to falsify these amounts, and michael cohen said, that is not how donald trump operated, he didn't give us explicit instructions, we understood the general marching order. so, he didn't take everything back in his testimony. michael cohen has certainly got some credibility issues, but it was an overstatement as to what happened with him. >> jamie, this is probably one of the clearest examples we have seen to date, and there have been a number of them, trump using his many legal problems as his campaign platform. a

court of appeals decision regarding trump's broad claims of, quote, absolute immunity. we've heard this before, we keep hearing it, and as a matter of fact, the claims have become even more outrageous as a plea on social media. joining me now in studio to discuss all of this is my friend, super lawyer, and colleague, msnbc legal analyst, former u.s. attorney and professor at the university of alabama law school, as well as co-host of the sister in law podcast. we have joyce white vance. as well as catherine christian. she is a foreman assistant district attorney and msnbc legal analyst. i did take off the glasses early and start, just with everybody here, thank you for being with me and breaking this down. i want to ask you, joyce. when it comes to the new hampshire primaries and his victory there, we have a victory in iowa. how does that factor into trump's arguments going forward on the legal front? does that make a difference in terms of him being closer to the nomination on your mind? >> it's fascinating. and i wonder if you of the same sense that i do. much of trum

appeal. the fact of the matter is it doesn't look good in the court of appeals if you look at what's going on with cases like these you see a difference of opinion. 21 states by the way have given an opinion saying we support california. 25 states said take a look. they are coastal states and urban states look at the red states inside their southern states. they are so typical for divisions like this. whether it's abortion or climate change. >> talk to us about the basis. >> it all starts with the fact that these states, particularly california, said we need this. the courts have said over recent years, you can't do that. this is fairly new up until 2008. go ahead. the government and the federal judges would say it's okay. do the changes you want. since hillary, no way. looking at this kind of wave, it's really important. now they are saying show us the historical backing. where you get those ideas from? don't try to do that when you're talking about machine guns. there were no such things. that's a problem. >> there were no things back then. recently there was a time when governments cracked

only 13 judges work in the court of appeals out of 60 positions in the state. ppellate court of 145 judges by state lacks 70. the higher qualification commission of judges plans to start interviews with candidates for vacant positions of judges in appellate courts in the fall of next year. the competition has already started for the occupation of 550 vacant positions of judges, more than 200 candidates are applying. the most willing to take the position in the appellate general. judges - 912, the smallest in the appellate commercial court - 183. the assembly of judges of the civil court of cassation of the supreme court was elected to the great chamber judges olga stupak and serhiy pogribny for a period of 3 years. according to the estimates of the foundation's experts, the appointed judges are dishonest. according to the conclusion of the public integrity council , the property of olga stupak's family does not correspond to income. also, the judge allegedly deliberately understated in the declaration. the cost of the purchased property. olha stupak assured that

the court should dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. ing immunity in a criminal case is not immediately appealable unless they claimed immunity rests upon an explicit statutory or constitutional guarantee that the trial will not occur. what do you think of the argument? >> it looks strong. there are very few such -- immunity guarantees. we know of two, i believe, a speech or debate clause, double jeopardy. those are the two that are enumerated. there are others that the courts have said do not exist, so other types of immunity, that have been shot down by the courts. presidential immunity, of course, has never been tested in the courts. >> right, he is saying because the category, there's establishment of the constitution, or explicitly granted, you don't get this thing called an interlocutory appeal. usually, the way this all works, and you will see this after people get convicted, they come outside of the steps, and the lawyer said we are gonna appeal the conviction. because in almost everything that he would appeal, you have to go thr

she could win for the moment but if donald trump succeeds in getting a temporary appeal to the court of appeals and then a stay, it could be in the court of appeals for months and whoever loses could go to the georgia supreme court, and if this case is not complete before the general election and trump is elected again, he will argue that he cannot be prosecuted even at state court while he's a sitting president. so the case might go on for four more years. >> we know now that next week's hearing, a lot is on the line. thank you so much. >> pleasure to be with you tonight, laura. >>> up next, trouble in the ivy league. why a big donor says cornell has a toxic environment and why he says the university's president should step p down.. >>> a bit of a nursery rhyme for ivy league schools in trouble, first came penn then came harvard next comes cornell and its president, out with the bathwater? donors have made a big ask of that schools trustees to fire cornell's president, martha pollack, they want her out over what they think is a shameful response to anti- peasant -- anti-semitism. the open lett

circuit court of appeals. this could go to the supreme court.before the three-judge panel

court of appeals in d.c., including shocking justifications for hypothetical assassinations of his politicalivals, just may have torpedoed any chance out of a successful appeal to the united states supreme court. there is much more to come on the katie phang show, and so do not go anywhere. anywhere. ma, ma, ma— ( clears throat ) for fast sore throat relief, try vicks vapocool drops. with two times more menthol per drop, and powerful vicks vapors to vaporize sore throat pain. vicks vapocool drops. vaporize sore throat pain. ♪♪ here's to... one year bolder. ♪♪ ♪boost♪ nutrition for now. an alternative to pills, voltaren is a clinically proven arthritis pain relief gel, which penetrates deep to target the source of pain with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicine directly at the source. voltaren, the joy of movement. sara federico: at st. jude, we don't care who cures cancer. we just need to advance the cure. it's a bold initiative to try and bump cure rates all around the world, but we should. it is our commitment. we need to do this. - i got the cabin for three days. it's gonna be sweet! wh

parliament could pass an act declaring all of the horizon convictions be quashed and the third would be a mass appeal with a crystal—clear submission to the courte is no longer a belief that there is no longer a belief that the convictions should stand, but that, there would be a precedent for it because 39 post office cases were overturned in one go in 2021 but as our legal and home affairs correspondent has said, running such a case would not be easy and it could still take years to resolve. we have been listening to what alex chalk has been saying in the commons and he has already been asked about the post office scandal. let's have a listen to that. in the post office scandal. let's have a listen to that.— a listen to that. in light of the ost a listen to that. in light of the post office — a listen to that. in light of the post office scandal, _ a listen to that. in light of the post office scandal, is - a listen to that. in light of the post office scandal, is my - a listen to that. in light of the i post office scandal, is my friend would _ post office scandal, is my friend would agree, it's notjust imperative we clear the backlog as qui