court of appeals. this is the first time that senior presidential aide, who has served as president for four years, is ever been held in contempt of congress. there are legal issues here that need to be decided by the court of appeals. the judge decided based upon an evidentiary hearing last week, that there was in adequate evidence to show that president trump formally instructed dr. navarro to invoke executive privilege. respectfully, we disagreed with that decision, we think that the evidence established that president trump instructed dr. navarro to invoke executive privilege. in any event, we think that based upon the separation of powers between congress and the executive, that executive privilege is part and parcel of the office of the president of the united states, and that no expressed implication of privilege was expressed. otherwise, president reagan would have no executive privilege and any confidential conversation he had with his senior aides at the time would be waived, and you all coul

they need to be decided by the court of appeals. judge _ decided by the court of appeals.g last week that there was inadequate evidence to show that president — inadequate evidence to show that president trump had formally instructed dr navarro to invoke executive — instructed dr navarro to invoke executive privilege. professionally we disagree with that decision, we think— we disagree with that decision, we think that — we disagree with that decision, we think that the evidence establish that irr— think that the evidence establish that in fact president trump instructed dr navarro to invoke executive — instructed dr navarro to invoke executive privilege —— respectfully, we disagree. but in any event we think— we disagree. but in any event we think that — we disagree. but in any event we think that based upon the separation of powers— think that based upon the separation of powers between congress and the executive, _ of powers between congress and the executive, executive privilege is part and — executive, executive privilege is part and parcel of the office of the presid

most liberal districts, and i lose everywhere, because the judges there are liberals , and the court of appeal way to get to the supreme court or the fifth circuit court of appeals before it's too late, bye. they did not grow rehabilitated shadows. otherwise you won't win texas i guarantee if harris county can send out 2.7 million ballots and you lead texas by 600,000 votes you'll lose if a few counties do it they'll just honor it. how many votes do they need? we won every single trial, all 12, and i told him we would lose. at least one end for you. he didn't believe me. i said look at other states, because if this is happening in texas and it's similar. right program i'm focused on texas you better make sure that this will not happen in other states and, of course, in georgia, where there was the same advantage in favor of trump, they did not stop it 4 years ago. this is the governor attorney general. they simply signed a consent decree, and there they did not check the mail ballots by signature; bring them and put them in the box. and guess what, in georgia, where there was the same margin i

is the first jurisdiction of the provincial court of appeals, whose book of jurisdiction has been commented on, in terms of dispute resolution, the first branch of the provincial court of appeals, which the judicial authority of the province issued the last order of disqualification, convert to islam, 208 people, the beginning of voting, the most important end voting was approved in order to implement the notice of the second row of the honorable guardian council in the title of the third chapter of the third chapter, the wording of the order of proceedings in the council, the wording of the order of consideration of islamic compromise measures, 208 people are present. respected guardian council regarding the 23 expressions of the treasury proceedings of the dispute resolution council can be the cost of the proceedings of the dispute resolution councils. in financial claims, the cost of handling islam and a note is added to article 23 as follows. note, if the case is referred to the dispute resolution council by the judicial authorities for peace and reconciliation, if the cos

is a judicial function, so i could no longer be present in court if they are right, the court of criminal appealsour state. in this they are similar to the supreme court. the supreme court is the final authority in civil cases. so they could remove us from one area of ​​law, if they are right, the supreme court should tell me what to argue in civil court. i’m not allowed either, because i’m part of the executive branch. if this were correct, then every attorney general is not allowed to go to court, that is, the attorney general of the state of texas is not allowed initiate cases of election violations. that's right, despite the fact that this is written in the law. one of these things that is not prescribed to be done is four things under the texas constitution and one of these points is everything that is required by law, who makes the laws, the legislative assembly of the texas, they passed the law in the fifty-first , which directed the attorney general to prosecute a judge for voter fraud , basically because i think they didn't trust the local prosecutors because it was a political issue and

we suggest they wait for the court of appeals to rule and receive direction from the trial court. if the court of appeals remands the case for hearing, we would ask those in the media and public respect the privacy for those included in the filing. jim and i want to thank those on the team who stand behind us and worked tirelessly to ferret out the truth. alex murdaugh maintains and still maintains his innocence in the murder of maggie and paul and believes the truth will only prevail. >> the right to a jury trial is a fundamental principle of our justice system. jurors must be free from outside influences and must decide the case solely on the evidence presented in the courtroom, subject to the rules of evidence, subject to the rules of the court, and most importantly, subject to the crucible of the sixth amendment by the constitution, the right to confront witnesses. when jurors receive private communications outside the confines of a public courtroom, the sixth amendment is violated and numerous other constitutional rights are violated. and that's not jim griffin on the law that

thank you very much dmytro didora correspondents from the press joined our ethereum from the court of appeal of kyiv, where the change of preventive measure for ihor kolomoiskyi should be considered today however, as they heard the meeting endured a culture shock in odesa region, art teachers were detained, he tried to raise a pro-russian generation, the state border service reported the man used to serve in russian intelligence instead of introducing children to the world of beauty , the so-called teacher imposed on them propaganda narratives that ukraine and odessa and donbas started the war - this is the territory of russia, meanwhile , russia cannot live without fire today , the border shebekino is on fire, according to russian telegram channels, the fire has spread a workshop for the production of rosin, the preliminary cause is a short circuit, and another 610 invaders are already going to the russian federation in black packages , in general, since the beginning of the full-scale invasion , the ukrainian defenders have destroyed 266,290 russian invaders, also in the past day , eight t

now, they will go to the court of appeals, ask the court of appeals for the right to say we needs now. this is too important. and the court of appeals could say you're right, you do get specific enforcement, send is back and then you know what, maybe we should have another judge oversee this at the trial court level. >> and then a follow-up to your other two points if i could consolidate them and precedent setting, nowhere does it say if you're a drug user or an alcoholic, or does that preclude you from being able to own a gun, whatever the outcome here is, it's a potentially, it could potentially impact millions of people, right? not just hunter biden. but millions of people who may be alcoholics, or you know, once drug addicted or still drug addicted in terms of whether they had the right to own a gun. >> yes, and we have precedent right now. we saw what happened where there have been laws in the books, on the books in new york, basically saying, if you want to have a carry permit, in new york city, you've got to show proper cause. you've got to show special circumstances. the

stuff. despite its ongoing legal challenges, the big one still hanging over our heads is the court of appeals that the se, decision that of good essentially shots traveler down at any time. so we continue to do our jobs, but it's saying that we're fighting for our lives. and later in the program, the rebuilding of the deputies floods in boxes. the local and g. o is reconstructing people's homes using climate friendly materials. the hope is these houses in which time the new flux calamity, the liability expanded. you welcome to the new news, a sure glad you can join us. for the beans. gold has acquitted nobel peace prize when nobody ever saw in a funny tax fraud. case filed against huh. and the new sites you founded roughly the rest of it was cleared on similar charges 9 months ago. she has long maintained that she and rep level targeted for the critical reporting on former president, on the vehicle to test or replicate close the follow detectors both to put down on the lead, the drugs that left thousands dead. the test is divisive. 6 year time ended last year, he was succeeded by fed man bone

of the court with mr. haibatullah najand , the legal advisor of the family of mr. nouri nazari, hello yesterday in the 13th session of the court of appeals, mr. nouri was interrogated about the cultural hope of this swedish police officer . please tell me that the prosecutor and his lawyers had questions for this person. from the beginning of the story i would like to tell you more about mr. omid farhani, who is khomeini and an iranian police officer who works in the swedish police . the story of the bear under which conditions he was conducting the investigation in the case, how did he confuse bagali ? he met personally and did mr. farhang himself have anything to do with the accusations raised against him or not. in fact, he was the main one . also, what is the special characteristic of mr. farhang who was chosen as the research, who said, "well, i am a sleeper who is farsi." i knew what he was doing in the designs and in the selection of the texts that he said after i was reading these books or someone's documents. i estimated mr. nouri's phone and it recovers . in fact , i didn't translate the content of the books, the written materi

court of appeals for the fourth circuit, and for justice david souter of the united states supreme court. l professor larson. [applause] >> i will introduce the panelists in the order in which they served as solicitor general. paul, paul clement was the 43rd solicitor general of the united states. he is a partner at the climate and murphy law firm and distinguished lecture in law at the georgetown university law center. he served as solicitor general from june 2005 until june 2008. before his eight. before his confirmation as solicitor general, he served as acting solicitor general for nearly a year and as principal deputy solicitor general for over three years. he has argued over 100 cases before the united states supreme court. mr. clement practice areas focus on appellate matters, constitutional litigation a strategic counseling. he represents a broad array of clients in the supreme court and in federal and state appellate courts. last year he successfully argued supreme court cases involving significant issues of energy regulation, statutory interpretation, states immunity and articl

stuff. despite its ongoing legal challenges, the big one still hanging over our heads is the court of appeals that the se decision that have good essentially shot traveler down at any time. so we continue to do our jobs, but it seems that we're fighting for our lives. and later in the program, the rebuilding of the deputies floods in foxes, the local in g o is reconstructing people's homes using climate friendly materials . the hope is these houses in which time for new floods, calamity, the liability expanded. you're welcome to the the news a shot. glad you can join us. for the opinions gold has acquitted nobel peace prize winner maria ever saw in a funny tax fraud case file against her and the new site you founded roughly the rest of it was cleared on similar charges. 9 months ago, she has loan maintained that she and rep that were targeted for the critical reporting on former presidents on pico detector. rep. look closely followed. the tape is broken down on the legal drugs. that left house instead starts as divisive 60, at the end of last year, he was succeeded by said, man bone bone mock

. >> reporter: the ninth circuit court of appeals in san francisco, known for liberal rulings is under fire. angry citizens, along with san francisco's mayor claim the court has exacerbated homelessness. >> and the fact that the courts have crippled our ability to do our job to help get people into shelter is ciriminal! >> reporter: at issue the ruling that blocked city officials from removing a single homeless person unless there were enough shelter beds for a city's entire homeless population. that decision known at martin decision for a man living in boise, idaho affected nine western states in the ninth circuit's jurisdiction where 42.5% of the nation's homeless population lives. in oregon, they are challenging the ninth circuit with a closely-watched case, aimed at getting the supreme court to overturn the martin decision. >> the cities in the ninth circuit are having troubles with navigating when that's cleaning up encampments, finding safe places for people to go, when it's handling drugs. >> reporter: grants pass cannot provide enough shelter for the 256 homeless people live in

appeals court for the delay to allow the appeals court to act. now, the appeals court has a feeling right now for how quickly they're going to act and how much of a delay, if any, how much of a pause, if any, you might want. so, it is entirely possible that if they do issue some kind of stay, some kind of pause, it could be ten days or two weeks, or even less. >> that's exactly right. and the breathless newsreel that you dictated at the top, lawrence, we didn't have their briefing schedule. that's what really matters there. they are totally focus. they're not just going at warp speed, they're going on warp speed to get there before the 23rd when that trial could start. so, there is no irreparable harm to. meadows i also think the district court was probably concluding, you know, what he doesn't have a great chance of prevailing. that's another reason you don't get a stay. i wanted to add one more point on the speedy trials, i don't know if it's so much that they don't want them, i agree with barb, delays, fine but what they do want is severance. and fani willis made the argument in her briefs you have to make them wave speedy trial. otherwise, if

appeals court for a delay to allow the appeals court to act. now, the appeals court has a feeling right now for how quickly the they are going to act, and how much of a delay, if any, how much of a pause, if any, you might want. so it's entirely possible if they do issue some kind of stay, some kind of pause, it could be ten days or two weeks, or even less. >> that's exactly right. in the breathless newsreel that you dictated at the, top mark, we did not have their briefing scheduled. that is what really mattered. they are totally focused, not focused i'm going on warp speed, focused on going on warp speed to get there on the 21st when the trial starts. there is no irreparable harm to meadows. i think they also are concluding that they don't have a great chance of prevailing, another reason that they will stay. i wanted to add one more point on the speedy trials, i don't know if it's that they don't want them, i agree with barb, the delay is fine. but what they do want is severance, and fani willis made the argument in her briefs, you have to make them wait speedy trials, otherwise, if you give severance, they could play that automatic speedy trial

of court decisions that in 2016 the tokmak district court of the zaporizhzhia region returned to the national police a report on an administrative offense several times and eventually closed the case. the court of appeal2, vitaly lomeyko continued to receive legal fees from the funds of taxpayers, currently paid stopped information regarding the investigation of possible high treason of lomeik in the register of court decisions at the moment. and finally , the judge of the starobil district court of the luhansk region, ihor kudryavtsev, according to the version of the law enforcement officers, he committed treason in occupied starobilsk and went over to the side of the enemy and got a job at the district court of the terrorist lpr. i almost half of his life he has been working in the courts. this is my dearest favorite business, together with kudryavtsev, he joined the occupiers and the head of the court staff, they agitated others judges and staff members to swear allegiance to the russian federation, the judge organized a meeting of judges and employees of the institution, where he called on them to cooperate with representatives of the occupation administration and write applications for employment

he is a judge of the northern commercial court of appeal. olodymyr kuksov, he is from crimea, before the occupation he was a judge of the alushta city court, in 2014 he was transferred to kyiv. after the full-scale invasion of the russian federation, kuksov began to agitate his acquaintances, support the occupiers, justified russian aggression, and called ukrainians fascists. according to sbu records, the judge denies mass atrocities by russians. tanners and assures the interlocutor that only the so -called people from bandera are capable of this. fuckers of benderov can rape, well, we have the same situation , we have half of our salary, like there, the supreme court decided to give creeper salaries for the war, we don't need this war, when the russian troops were forced to flee from the kyiv region. the judge complained that ethicists are driving they feel good everywhere here , that's how the judge of the northern court of appeal volodymyr kuksov campaigned for an acquaintance who was in the occupied territory of the zaporizhia region to j

so now flip over to the ninth circuit court of appeals. so these two city officials were both school board members. and they maintain facebook profiles and twitter profiles or whatever twitter is calling itself today. and what they set on the profiles was we are school board members, and potentially importantly, part of what they did on their facebook pages was to ask for and receive feedback and input about their jobs. so they would post school board meeting coming up, happy to get your comments, comments would come in, including comets from a disgruntled family. they made heavy use of the comments page, including commenting over and over and over and over again on everything that these two school board officials posted. and eventually the officials got vexed at that and block them. they sued under section 1983 claiming three claiming that the free speech rights were violated, and here the ninth circuit parted with that sixth circuit and concluded that because the way that these school districts trustees were operating on those pages, tha

it is the judge of the northern commercial court of appeal, volodymyr kutsov. court in 2014, he was transferredr the full-scale invasion of the russian federation, kuksov began to agitate his acquaintances to support the occupiers, justified russian aggression and called ukrainians fascists according to with sbu records, the judge denies the mass atrocities of the russian invaders and assures the interlocutor that they are capable of such things. to escape from the kyiv region so the judge of the northern commercial court of appeal, volodymyr kuksov, campaigned for an acquaintance who was in the occupied territory of the zaporizhia region to join the occupation to the police and also complained to his acquaintance about how he wants to go home to the crimea. well, nothing. i still want you in both of them. it's a good movie. in september, the state bureau of investigation informed the judge about the suspicion of inciting collaboration and justifying russian aggression . the pre-trial investigation is currently ongoing . the words of the judge should be investigated by a linguistic expert, volo

thus, the judge of the northern economic court of appeal, volodymyr kuksov, campaigned for an acquaintancewas in the occupied territory of the zaporizhia region to join the of the occupation police and also complained to his acquaintance about how he wants to go home to the crimea. well, nothing. i still want you in both of them for sure, here we are coming home. a good investigation bureau informed the judge about the suspicion of inciting collaborative activities and justifying russian aggression . the pre-trial investigation of the judge's words is currently ongoing . linguistic examination volodymyr rukhtsov faces up to 15 years of imprisonment with confiscation of property, and this is the judge of the chernihiv district court of the zaporizhzhya region, vitaly lomayko, last year he tried managed to escape to an honorable retirement before he was likely to be convicted for cooperation with the enemy, lomiko submitted a corresponding application to the high council of justice, however, it turned out that the judge is in berdyansk, which is just as occupied as chernihivka, where the cou

but that has been over 10 by the court of appeals. so it's a struggle any different when you are up against this kind of grand institution this. yes, this is, are you the previous government? we had a division that was quite independence and the wives i'm quite up to just you can show you some kind of and the out to me really that's what bought for to the into the chair properties one big juice and then the uh, courts in uh, pushing 70 percent like for you to do the steps, which is a lot of money because it goes around different conditions out. one thing being a technician is which is are all that can meet you and he's joining us. and therefore, this is based on what was to come from governments. they sort of appeal to the notes over time busting the course on 50 percent of the district. but they asked us to go to the environment course to discuss the issue. again, how much the community should have been consistent if it should be more than welcome to believe it or less the 3 because we have, since i feel just to disapprove, what is th

court of appeals for the armed forces, and colleen sheehan, director of graduate studies at arizona state university will be our guests to discuss why those essays are considered one of the most important references for interpreting and understanding the original intent of the constitution. watch books that shaped america, featuring the tpertist. monday, live at 9:00 eastern on c-span, c-span now, our free mobile video app, or online. also scan the q.r. code to listen to our kpapbdon podcast, where you can learn more about the authors of the book featured. >> c-span is your untpultered -- unfiltered view of government. we are funded by these television companies and more including cox. >> this syndrome is extremely rare. but friends don't have to be. >> this is joe. >> when we are connected you are not alone. >> cox, supports c-span as a public service, alo with these other television providers. cnn. joining us this morning is mychael schnell. how gop reports progress in spending talks as some holdouts relent. who are these holdouts that have relented and who has not? guest: there is the

court editor of the harvard law review. following law school mister clement clerked for lawrence silverman of the us court of appeals for thec circuit and for justice and tone in scholarly of the united states supreme court. he went on to serve as chief counsel of the us senate subcommittee on the constitution , federalism and property rights. we welcome mister clement. [applause] >> donald b verrilli junior was the 46th solicitor general of the united states. mister verrilli is a partner in the law firm tolls and olson and founder of the washington dc office. mister verrilli is a lecturer at columbia law school where he teaches classes on the first amendment and supreme court. previously he taught first amendment law for many years at the georgetown university law center. mister verrilli is one of the nation's premier supreme court and appellate advocates . he served as solicitor general from june 2011 to june 2016. for serving as solicitor general mister verrilli served as deputy white house counsel and previously as associate deputy attorney general in the united states department of justice . in those positions he couns

as i said , it won in the court of appeal will remain to see what happens in the supreme court. even if it if the decision was in favour of the government, those representing the claimants in this case would have to persuade the european court of human rights to take the case if it was to have any chance of flourishing there. so that's that.in flourishing there. so that's that. in terms of the point about public opinion, i'm not sure that's quite right. i checked the government website this morning and it's right that there is a petition they're advocating that the uk should withdraw from the european convention on human rights. it's only signed by about 20,000 people. and because it passed the 10,000 threshold, there is a government response. and that response confirms despite going on today, that it remains policy of the government to remain part of the government to remain part of the government to remain part of the european convention on human rights. >> yeah, but i reiterate the point and indeed a supreme court judge of ours, lord sumption , judge of ours, lord sumption, wh

eighth circuit court of appeals decision persuasive authority. the eighth circuit said it will be the rare case if ever were a trial court should sever the trial of alleged co-conspirators. the other side pointed to this, but i want to mention the any potential jury confusion can be addressed by other means other than severance such as instruction to the jury to separately consider the evidence of each defendant. because this is a conspiracy case, all of the evidence is admissible against all of the defendants. even if there were some issue or to be extra cautious, the court could give a limiting instruction. states position is that it would not be a limiting instruction after another after another because all of the evidence is admissible against all of the defendant. also the defendants even more completely ignore the long line of cases in georgia that affirmed the denial of severance for georgia go act violations all decided under the same principles i just talked about. the first 1986 decision. -- we have the sightings here. >> those are provi

as i said , it won in the court of appeal will remain to see what happens in the supreme court. even if it if the decision was in favour of the government, those representing the claimants in this case would have to persuade the european court of human rights to take the case if it was to have any chance of flourishing there. so that's that.in flourishing there. so that's that. in terms of the point about public opinion, i'm not sure that's quite right. i checked the government website this morning and it's right that there is a petition they're advocating that the uk should withdraw from the european convention on human rights. it's only signed by about 20,000 people. and because it passed the 10,000 threshold, there is a government response. and that response confirms despite going on today, that it remains policy of the government to remain part of the government to remain part of the government to remain part of the european convention on human rights. >> yeah, but i reiterate the point and indeed a supreme court judge of ours, lord sumption , judge of ours, lord sumption, wh

but that has been over 10 by the court of appeal. so it's a struggle any different when you are up against this kind of grand institution. uh yes it is. uh, in the previous government we had a technician that was quite independent and wise um, quite up to just you can show you some kind of and the out to me really that's what i bought for to the, into the junior properties. one big juice and then the, uh, courts in uh, pushing 70 percent do the steps which is a lot of money because it goes around different beneficial, 013 big i think the shooting switches or else i can meet you and use join us. and they are for, this is based on what was to come from governments. they sort of appeal to the notes over time. i see the question 50 percent, let me do this debt. but they ask us to go to the environment for us to discuss the issue. again, how much the community should be more consistent if it should be more than welcome to believe it or less the 3 because we have since i feel just to disapprove, what is bullshit like this was a little adjus

but that has been over 10 by the court of appeal. so it's a struggle any different when you are up against this kind of grand institution. so yes, this is the previous government. we had a technician that was quite independent and the wives i'm quite up to just to, to show you some kind of the out to me really that's what bought for to the, into the junior properties. one victories and then the uh, courts in uh, pushing 70 percent left for you to do the steps which is a lot of money because it goes around different conditions. uh, one thing being i think assuming switches are all 13000000 years join us and they are 4 biggest this one has to come from governments. they sort of appeal to the notes on terms of seeing the course on 50 percent of the districts. but they asked us to go to the environment for us to discuss the issue. again, how much the community should be more consistent if it should be more than welcome to do that or less than 3? because we have students feelings to disapprove. what is going to ship like this was a little

will: meanwhile, this is a big decision, the fifth circuit court of appeals, the affirmation of lower amendment of the united states when they pressured big tech companies into censoring americans. jeff landry said the fifth circuit unanimously affirmed the injunction, freedom of speech a major win against censorship, totalitarianism and biden. pete: remember that moment, who knows? on what topics and the way in which the federal government use powerful agencies to strongly suggest pressure/tell tech companies to censor certain speech, certain individuals. the court in retrospect. will: this is important because this is the fifth circuit court of appeals. three levels of appeal and the court system. theoretically you could find a federal judge at the district level, and to one side or another. now you've gone up and there's nine districts. that is the supreme court of the united states. he rachel: you think it would go there? >> an injunction to coordinate or influence big tech censorship. you have to think the administration would appeal. a white house spokesperson says the administr

the honorable chief of justice , expert work on this legal case , as well as the extraordinary court hearings of the gorgan legal court, as well as the hearings of the court of appealwas held in the first branch of my presidency two people from this happened, we were able to complete it in two weeks with the attention he had to the judiciary of the province, of course, with special measures and delegation of authority from the head of the judiciary. and the possibility that the president honorable justice ruled that this village is excluded from the national resources issued here because the old building structures are still in the field and after that some people are in possession and are present . our hearts were burning, and we had to do what we had to do with the ownership documents and documents that we have. the plaintiff's documents were stronger than our defenses , and according to that, the judicial system ruled in favor of the environment foundation and issued a permit for overnight stays in the area . he took the capacity and by using the existing cloud capacity of music, he gave permission they are abstract meanings , now the visit of the head of the ju

the big point here, i don't think the court of appeals will reverse. d all six of them will need to go through that process because it would be too perilous to put them on trial and then potentially have a court of appeals reverse. so i think it has implications for the breakdown of groups and when trilals occur, especially for trump. >> and that's what you see with this many people and this many different kinds of motions. it is the small places where the timing begins to drag down. not for illegitimate reasons. there's substance going on. the judge's point, to wait until the issue gets resolved so they don't have more complications. so spaces like that that you see it begin to build up incrementally. >> we got to see this grand jury special report. a notable takeaway was that the jury did not have a unanimous vote in recommending charges for senator lindsey graham or the other two senators no longer in the senate. what does that say about d.a. fani willis's strategy? >> yeah, 13 votes not to recommend indictment of lindsey graham. the big thing, back

and i just love this quote because i think it summed it up, again, 8th circuit court of appeals decision, persuasive authority, there in the united states versus keyho, the 8th circuit said it will be the rare case if ever where a trial court should sever the trial of alleged coconspirators. the other side pointed a little bit to this. but i did want to mention that any potential jury confusion can be addressed by other means, means other than severance, such as an instruction to the jury to separately consider the evidence as each defendant. the state's position, because this is a conspiracy case, because it's a rico conspiracy case, that all of the evidence is admissible against all of the defendants. but even if that, you know, even if there were some issue to be extra caution, the court could give a limiting instruction and the state's position is it would not be limiting instruction after limiting instruction, because, again, all the evidence is admissible against all the defendants. also, the defendants ignore, completely ignore a long line of cases in georgia, to affirm the denial

the kyiv court of appeal left the preliminary injunction the oligarch ihor kolomoisky's appointment remainsustody bail of 509 million hryvnias, well, they tried to take mr. kolomoiskyi as bail, members of the tv channel 1.1 team, the case of kolomoiskyi and his suspicion of fraud for more than half a billion hryvnias raises many doubts and has signs of a staged nature, the anti-corruption center believes, they this is our own vision of history, in fact, let's analyze, as they say, from the legal side, whether there are enough grounds, whether there is enough soil, and whether we have enough grounds at all now to say that for kolomoiskyi, they took up really hard and , as they say, gennadiy dubov, a political expert, lawyer, candidate of legal sciences, is in touch with us. gennady , i congratulate you, glory to ukraine, i congratulate you, kolomoiskyi, this is not one thing, first of all, let me remind you, but we are talking now. about the specific topic of conversation, how do you, as a lawyer, and then, perhaps, as a political expert, evaluate all that is happening, please, the fact is t

court of appeals, the 11th circuit, known as a conservative court of appeals.dismissal. you can argue that in state court, too, but you have a better chance getting the case thrown out all together if you get into federal court. >> thank you for the run down, elie honig. >>> breaking news we're following this morning. north korea and russia now both confirming north korean leader kim jong-un will soon visit russia at the invitation of russian president vladimir putin. north korean media says that kim will, quote, meet and have a talk with putin during this visit. it has not been said when exactly this is going to take place. but as we have been reporting, south korea says kim is already on his way. >>> new york mayor eric adams saying this city is struggling to handle the financial strain of caring for the influx of migrants. we're going to be joined ahead by the homeland security secretary alejandro mayorkas is with us next. >>> you're looking at life pictures of ground zero in new york city. marking 22 years since the september 11th attacks. we'll be right ba