court of appeals for the second circuit. judge calabrese, as he was my torts professor in law school, and i know that both professor magli oka and i learned a great of law and history and wisdom from judge calabrese, professor mack leocha teaches and writes in the field constitutional law and the author of the book washing tins air the life of justice bushrod washington. professor magliozzi has authored four other books and, more than 30 articles on constitutional law and intellectual property. his sixth book will be released in 2025. it will be about the youngstown case and justice robert jackson. or, as we now like to refer to him, the first justice jackson. i look forward to that book as well. i could say more, but that would take away from our time to hear about justice. bushrod washington. please join me in welcoming professor gerard magliocca gerard magliocca. thank you. chilton. thank you, chilton. thank you, justice kavanaugh. thank you all for coming. are you all hearing me all right? yes. okay, great. so i want to e

the vacant position in the supreme court of appeals appeared after on march 27, the judge of the courtal of kyiv, roman ignatov, resigned as a member of the supreme court of appeals on his own volition. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the sccc is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full force. out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17, has a quorum, and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, independence and professionalism. judges and prosecutors consists of persons, ten are elected by the congress of judges of ukraine, two are appointed by the pre

court judges? so, the other 970 of us out there. and we are really focusing on the court of appealsjudgesn for now anyway because we are the ones having the disagreements. so the 200 of us, you know, we still have disagreements. we stillw,e have courts there ss to be some block voting and something about that doesn't seem right. >> that never happens at the supreme court. [laughter] it's a challenging time to be a judge. i don't know if you have any of former clerks, so young the a few years away if you have any becoming court of appeals judges. what would you say to him or her about how to be yourself don't be afraid to advocate for what you think is right you can't be a oneho person show. what would the advice be? >> i guess i don't think of them as intention with each other. i just think you can be a good and strong to judge and that's part of being a good and strong judge. i d think people make different decisions and have different perspectives in my court anyway about how frequently. i am a little bit of an institutionalist so i don't write separately and then i write dissent

the court of appeals judge and great chief judge. thank you for being of the person in the chair. >> host: thank you for your leadership on the court. [applause] [applause] [inaudible conversations] >> since 1979, in partnership with the cable industry, c-span has provided coverage of the halls of congress from the house and senate floors to congressional hearings, party briefings, and committee meetings. c-span gives you a seat on how issues are debated and decided. with no commentary, no interruptions and completely unfiltered. c-span, your unfiltered view of government. c-span's campaign 24 takes you to milwaukee for coverage of the republican national convention. tune in as delegates from across the country gather to select the republican nominee for president which watch as they lay out their priorities for the next four years and the party's vision for the future. the republican national convention live today on c-span, c-span now or online,

working group, she did not find any violations in the actions of volodymyr baben, the head of the court of appeal of the cherkasy region, who systematically put pressure on judge serhiy bondarenko. did not make the decision demanded of him by the head of the court in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. the history of serhiy bondarenko's conflict with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court where bondarenko worked, is well known ukraine. and so serhii bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that could actually protect his rights, but, ah, people. volkova, as the person who could make the appropriate decision and really stand up for the judge, signed as part of the group, concluded that there was no pressure on the judge, mr. babenko, such a classy head of the court, therefore he has no right to actually defend . the explanation of this story by volkova herself was specific. i directly spent three, well, probably three hours with judges bondarenko, it's mine. in general, it was extremely long, tha

the head of the poltava court of appeal, serhii galyu, also lost his judgeship. the fact that he lived in a church that he built himself. here is this house with an area of ​​661 m2, located in the suburbs of poltava, but he was dismissed from the post of judge not for this, but because of extrajudicial proceedings. other communication with the lawyer and judges regarding two cases about driving cars while intoxicated. one of them features the judge's son. in audio recordings of conversations recorded by the national anti-corruption bureau, galonkin promises his help. the third disciplinary chamber of the vrp publishes an excerpt of this conversation. by and large, you know, we are normal people, we will always do anything. if you need help, we will always help. however, the members of the disciplinary chamber probably did not see it. significant misconduct and decided that galonkin's three-month deprivation of allowances would suffice as a punishment. this is the judge's decision appealed, but the supreme council of justice dismissed the judge altogether. a signi

court of appeals and it -- it's the 11th circuit court of appeals. d.c. court of appeals. a split in the circuit and go to the supreme court and have it resolved. >> bill: but didn't the judges say you didn't go through the facts enough and why they sent it back? he has to prosecute it. >> this is a question of law. not a -- there is no dispute that jack smith hasn't been senate confirmed. that is not in dispute. rob hur actually -- was rob hur in federal service at the time they picked him to be special counsel? so like john durham is different. john durham was a u.s. attorney and senate confirmed. jack smith is like going to wal-mart and finding a prosecutor. no offense to his -- but -- >> dana: you could have picked anybody off the street. >> anybody in the world. how can that happen? >> dana: we want to bring in james comer from kentucky and chairman of the house oversight committee here to talk about, of course, the investigation into what happened at the failed assassination attempt of president trump but this news just coming on board that the documents case for pre

court judges? so, you know, the other 970 of us out there that -- and we are really focusing on the court of appealsges for now anyway because we will be the ones having disagreements in groups of three. so the 200ha of us, you know, we still have disagreements. we still have courts that when we have banks there's some block voting and something about that doesn'tab seem right. >> that never happens at the supreme court. >> anyway -- [laughter] it's a challenging time to be a judge. is there anything -- i don't know if you have any former clerks because you are so young, but if you have any former clerks becoming court of appeals judges -- >> my first. >> what would you say to him or her about how to t be yourself, don't be afraid to advocate for what you think is right but be a good colleague? because you can to be a one person o show on a three person court. what would the advice be? >> i guess i don't think of them as intention with each other. you can be a good and strong a judge and also be a good colleague and that is in fact part of being a good and strong judge. i think people make different

to talk about the homeless encampments in the city, because just yesterday, the ninth circuit court of appeals a court order that limits when and how the city can clear those encampments. want to go now to ktvu, ali. rasmus, who's here to explain what all of this means? ali? well, bottom line, claudine, it means the city of san francisco now has fewer restrictions when it comes to clearing away homeless encampments or simply removing people who are sleeping or camping on public streets and in public parks. the ninth circuit court of appeals just yesterday lifted a temporary ban. what had been a temporary ban on the city coming through and clearing homeless encampments, and that ninth circuit court of appeals action comes just days after the us supreme court issued a ruling on a similar topic. you'll recall it was june 28th when the us supreme court ruled that it is constitutional for cities to cite and remove people who are sleeping or camping on public streets. now, even with that high court ruling, san francisco was still limited on what it could do because of a previous lawsuit filed agains

how it worked its way from a trial court in the district of columbia to the court of appeals in the district of columbia and ultimately to the supreme court of the united states, conceivably an appeal of judge cannon's order to dismiss the indictment based on the appointments clause deficiency that she found would work its way through the court of appeals and perhaps to the security, and what does the timing look like? months if not a year or more. and so this is a very difficult path for the department of justice. may have a battle on multiple fronts. not only does the immunity decision give the trump team a foothold to argue that what he allegedly did consisted of official acts which would be immune from prosecution, there's no case anymore. it's been dismissed. it's gone. in order for it to be revived, an appellate court would have to find as a matter of law judge cannon's interpretation of foiments clause, of the mechanics, of the appropriations, of the procedure, that judge cannon was completely wrong as a matter of law. by the way, the appellate court has found in an earlier instance i

just yesterday, the ninth circuit court of appeals threw out part of a court order limiting when andencampments. ktvu is ali rasmus is here now to explain what all of that means. good morning to you, ali. >> good morning claudine. well, it means the city of san francisco now has fewer restrictions when it comes to when and how it clears. homeless encampments throughout the city. it comes after the ninth circuit court of appeals, just yesterday lifted what had been a temporary two year ban in this city on widespread sweeps of homeless encampments. now that comes after the supreme court, just a few weeks ago released its own ruling on the issue of homelessness and how cities can regulate it. the high court ruled that cities across the country do have the constitutional authority to cite and remove people who are sleeping or camping in public streets, and the court says they don't have to offer people a shelter, bed or other housing when they remove them gives the city's localities a freer hand in deciding what to do when the police and the, you know, the executive, whether it's the may

among the candidates are judges of the supreme court, the high anti-corruption court, a judge of the court of appeal, judges of local judges and retired judges. vacant position. appeared in the vkk after a member of the vkk with a judicial quota, judge kyivskyi, voluntarily resigned on march 27 roman ignatov of the court of appeal. he held the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the vkks is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. in 2022, as part of the judicial reform, the supreme council of justice still does not work in its full complement of 21 members of the vrp, currently there are 17, it has a quorum , and the selection of its members is ongoing. a collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, independence and professionalism of judg

went to the court of and the court of appealslooked at it. that's the law. yeah. these tribes have two thirds of the state of maine, so of course, we're all headed to the supreme court. and see who gets two thirds of the state of maine and we get a call from. the white house, jimmy carter. hello. this is a person. carter, you guys ought to come to the white house. let's talk this over. the state of maine wants to talk it over. okay. so we all come to the white house. tribal leaders talk of the of maine and agree to settle the case. instead of having one big winner and one big loser. and so the tribes came away with a lot of land and a lot money, not two thirds, but pretty pretty good chunk of it. and a lots of money for the land that they had to give up. so. next thing we know, here comes some other eastern tribes. hey, that happened to us, too. we have the same same situation as. the personal parties in penobscot and. so one after another, we started all these eastern tribes whose eastern states come in and took their land with

circuit court of appeals, their rulings are generally in line with the rulings of the supreme court, am i right to remember that? >> i think they get a lot of respect from this court including because several of them have come from this court. you can think about the d.c. circuit as being jv supreme court. >> that's how i think of it. >> because of that, because they know these folks, they're colleagues of theirs, former colleagues of theirs, they tend to get a lot more deference than other courts of appeals, and they tend to be more in line with the mainstream of this court, if not necessarily the mainstream america. >> mike, can i ask you about doj. core immunity in this opinion is that the president's interactions with doj are immune. what does that mean? >> that a president who runs for office and gets elected saying that he is going to turn the organs, the departments of the federal government including the department of justice, against his enemies, now has a very clear path legally to claim that he's immune and back to lisa's point and others about the way this opinion sets up

of judges. among the candidates for judges'. court, the supreme anti-corruption court, a judge of the court of appealdges of local judges and judges in resignation the vacant position in the ccc appeared after a member of the ccc with a judicial quota, roman ignatov, a judge of the kyiv court of appeal, voluntarily resigned on march 27. he held the position of the head of the vkk. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the vkks is carried out by a competition commission consisting of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. control. it is foreign experts who have a voice during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform , the supreme council of justice still does not work in full composition out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17. it has a quorum and the selection of its members is ongoing. the collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which is responsible for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial corps, the independence and professionalism of judges and... consists of people, ten are elected by th

but now that it has, the ninth circuit court of appeals ruled just yesterday that san francisco can goring away encampments. so that part of the lawsuit has been thrown out following the supreme court decision. but other parts of it remain in place, including the part that san francisco city officials and public works crews have to continue tagging and saving people's belongings when they remove people from public streets. now, we've asked, we've looking into city. we're going to be asking city officials about what this means, whether they will be enacting some more aggressive policies and clearing away homeless encampments now that they have this additional legal authority that was just given to them yesterday. by the ninth circuit court of appeals live in san francisco. ali rasmus, ktvu, fox two news. >> thank you. ali. well, today, the santa clara valley water district board will consider banning homeless encampments along county waterways. the proposed ordinance would establish protection zones along the nearly 300 miles of waterways under its control. valley water says many of the

member of the working group, she did not find any violations in the actions of the head of the court of appeal volodymyr babenko, who systematically pressured judge serhiy bondarenko. the latter did not make the decision that the head of the court demanded from him in the case regarding the office premises of the azot plant, which belongs to the ukrainian oligarch dmytro firtash. serhiy bondarenko's history of conflict. with volodymyr bobenko, who was the head of the court in which bondarenko worked, is known throughout ukraine, and serhiy bondarenko turned to the council of judges, to the body that actually could protect his rights, however, lyudmila volkova, as the person who could accept the relevant decision and really stand up for the judge, ah, as a member of the group, she signed the conclusion that there was no pressure on the judge. mr. babenko is such a classy head of the court, that's why he has no right to defend himself. the explanation of this story by volkova herself was specific. i directly spent three, well, probably three hours with judge bondarenko, it seems to me that it wa

of the u.s. court and the agency and the judicial branch running the fellows program regressive court of appeals for the 11th circuit and previously worked for the u.s. district court for the and earned his ba in government georgetown and the university of malic gospel so we are very smart fellows we are happy to say your experience is only half over so we look forward to seeing what you've accomplished and the remainder of your journey. today for your lecture a little will and the chair of the supreme court rules of practices and procedures and advisory committee. it is the academic world for his work on federalism and state constitutional law and the second circuit. just as hagan has served 2010 prior to her appointment to the court she was general of the united states the federal government public health. i do that, just as was the successful hartford gospel previously a law professor at the university of chicago and served as associate counsel and assistant domestic policy. on the d.c. circuit in marshall. welcome to my favorite people on the planet for a phone conversation. [applause] [appla

so if it is tautogical and those are the only opinions that the court of appeals below gave, and that is no longer your potion, you're not defending that position, why shldn't we either send it back to the court of appeals or issue an opinion making clear that that's not the law? mr. dreeben: well, i -- i am defending the court of appeals' judgment. and i do think thathere are layered safeguards that the court can take into account that wi and relate -- and concerns about undoing children for residential conduct. that concerns us. we are not endorsing a regime that we think would expose former presidents to criminal prosecution in bad faith, r political animus, without adequate evidence. a politically driven prosecution would violate the constitution under wayt versus united states. i's not something within the arsenal of prosecutors to do. prosecutors taken, the attorney general takes an oath. i don't want to overstate your honor's concern with potentially relying solely on good faith, but that's an ingredient. and then the courts stand ready to adjudicate motions based on selective

of the buildings, they have privatized apartments, and they are now through the courts insist that the territory of stairwells, basements and attics is a common area of ​​use, and the lviv court of appeals that, in fact, this common area is not common, but is... the property of only individual owners of apartments, and when journalists on this topic became interested, showed this story, then the judges addressed the fact that they, they say, declare that journalists are putting pressure on them, that is , by covering the activities of journalists and judges, we are putting pressure on them in this way. let's watch a short episode about this topic, and then we'll come back to it, the city center, mickiewicz eight, the so-called house of the book, everyone who... has been to lviv, lives in lviv, knows where it is, look, in which the condition of the stairs, and we, according to this court decision , cannot use them, well, it can be soon in every house in lviv. the attic is black and gray, but it will not be possible to repair it from now on, because it is a private area. look at the condition of the attic, and we, er, cannot repair it, and below are our apartments, there is a leak, and we

okay, well, look, good luck at the court of appeal. >> when's the hearing, >> when's the hearing, >> nths. the court systems backlogged with a whole number of cases. yeah you know, it's the way that things work in the uk at the moment. >> okay, well, i really appreciate you coming in and keep us up to date with your progress in the courts. thank you ben. and yeah, thank you . you ben. and yeah, thank you. thanks for coming in. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> that was teacher joshua sutcliffe. thanks very much. right. coming up, sutcliffe. thanks very much. right. coming up , tonight's top right. coming up, tonight's top panel of pundits return to help me run you through the very first of tomorrow's front pages. hot off the press, we'll also be covering the decline of the church in modern britain. the obama support for kamala harris, and, of course, the chaos at the paris olympics. this is patrick christys tonight with me, ben elliott. only gb news welcome back. grab a cup of tea. grab some bickies. because it's time to bring you the first of tomorrow's newspaper front pages. let's kick

okay, well, look, good luck at the court of appeal. >> when's the hearing, >> when's the hearing, >> hs. the court systems backlogged with a whole number of cases. yeah you know, it's the way that things work in the uk at the moment. >> okay, well, i really appreciate you coming in and keep us up to date with your progress in the courts. thank you ben. and yeah, thank you . you ben. and yeah, thank you. thanks for coming in. >> thank you. >> thank you. >> that was teacher joshua sutcliffe. thanks very much. right. coming up, sutcliffe. thanks very much. right. coming up , tonight's top right. coming up, tonight's top panel of pundits return to help me run you through the very first of tomorrow's front pages. hot off the press, we'll also be covering the decline of the church in modern britain. the obama support for kamala harris, and, of course, the chaos at the paris olympics. this is patrick christys tonight with me, ben elliott. only gb news welcome back. grab a cup of tea. grab some bickies. because it's time to bring you the first of tomorrow's newspaper front pages. let's kick o

roman ignatov, judge of the kyiv court of appeal. the position of the chairman of the central committee of the central committee of the russian federation. the competition is ongoing, the selection of members of the vkks conducts a competition for the commission. in the composition of three ukrainian judges and three foreign experts in the field of law. foreign experts have the controlling vote during the voting procedure. updated in 2022 as part of the judicial reform, the supreme council of justice still does not work in full force. out of 21 members, the vrp currently has 17, has a quorum, and the selection of its members is ongoing. collegial body of state power and judicial governance, which corresponds for the honesty and transparency of the entire judicial body, the independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors, consists of ten persons elected by the congress of judges of ukraine, two appointed by the president, two elected by the verkhovna rada, two more by the congress of lawyers, two delegated by the all-ukraini

like how does jack smith get to the court of appeals to stop judge cannon or try to stop judge cannonfrom taking what many of us view as inappropriate or even illegal actions, and this is the vehicle for him to do that. >> and vaughn, you are in milwaukee, obviously some celebration there by donald trump, by his team. tell us his reaction and also while we have you, what the likely schedule is today in terms of the big unknown that we're all waiting for, which is the vice presidential choice. >> right, we could get the vice presidential decision here any hour now. the expectation is that that could very well come here today, but the gaveling in for this convention is going to be beginning literally in just about three hours from now, andrea, and you're going to see this convention arena full of more than 2,000 delegates and other vips, other elected officials for that formal roll call vote here. as for donald trump, i want to be very clear. we are just about 36 hours out from the attempted assassination in which he was shot in pennsylvania. he is here now in milwaukee, and over the la

thus, without further clarification, the members of the supreme court of appeals decided that the candidate was suitable for the position of judge and recommended her to the lyubashiv district court of odesa region. the composition of the higher qualification commission, updated within the framework of the judicial reform , was entrusted with titanic tasks and responsibilities. however, all members of the central committee of the communist party of ukraine went to high positions consciously and of their own free will. so we hope the commission will be able to restore. high level of efficiency. and for today, that's all i have, it was judicial control and i, tatiana shustrova. if you know the facts of corruption in the judicial system, or you want to report an unscrupulous judge who makes illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to the e-mail address you see on the screen. it's all good, we'll meet in exactly one week. we are looking for 13-year-old olena and her 15-year-old brother artem yankovsky. these children lived in the kakhovsky district of the kherson region in the village of c

meeting was held at the state residence ala-archa with the prosecutor general of the supreme court of appeal turkey republic by muksin shentyurk. he also noted the close ties between the two countries and thanked russia for the fact that our country warned turkey about the preparation. coup d'etat in 2016. igor krasnov congratulated his colleague on his recent appointment and announced a number of initiatives. in particular, he proposed to speed up the signing of a memorandum of cooperation between the university and the prosecutor's office. each entrepreneur interacts with control authorities so that the process brings more benefits and at the same time takes less time; it is transferred to a digital format. about we will tell you about the main electronic services in 5 minutes in this issue of instructions. so, massive digitalization has taken place in the field of control activities. all events are now recorded in a single register, and information is also transferred to the personal register. office on the state services portal. this project was implemented jointly by the ministry of dev