ukraine is calling the international court of justice. russia in violation of the convention on the prevention of genocide, in the fact that russia justified its full-scale invasion of alleged genocide in donbas. if we recall putin's address on february 24, he used this very word in it - genocide, and a lot was said about it during the hearings in gaza. so what kind of judgment is this? the international court of justice of the united nations is the highest judicial body in the world. only disputes are within its jurisdiction. between states and it is located in gas. ukraine filed a lawsuit against russia at the un international court of justice in the first days of the full-scale war, namely on february 26, 2022 . russia countered that the court had no jurisdiction to hear such a claim. so, the hearings, which lasted a week and a half, concerned this very issue. can the un court consider such a dispute? listening this is not essentially a matter of jurisdiction. the representatives of russia and ukraine presented their arguments. my colle

and the court of arbitration of iran and the united states. the international court of justice handles major cases between governments. property it was the islamic republic of iran that was signed by the united states in the treaty of mudat and some of our property was produced by them, which was shut down in this case. in the previous government, due to the government , the necessary measures were taken and a good legal operation was designed, and thank god. the american government was condemned for the first time in iran for the dam in the past few months and of course the international court of justice issued 15 game stands from the 5 continents of the world in favor of iran and gave a two-year deadline for the damage caused to iran by the united states. be paid and we have to understand with them of course let's come to an understanding about the amount of damages and taking a tourist . the international court of justice has decided that it determines the amount of damages. it is up to other banks and companies to decide how soon the vote will be issued, but at least a few

russia in the un court is a lawsuit regarding the violation of the genocide convention, if the court takes it into consideration, what will it change if the un international court of justice really recognizes that it has jurisdiction over this dispute of ukraine against russia then a lot will change, and there is no doubt that the decision of the international court of justice of the united nations will affect the further lawsuits of ukraine against russia as a state, as well as other legal proceedings in the international criminal court, for example , or in the international tribunal about the creation of which today ukraine negotiates with international partners. so, more specifically, it is essential for ukraine to achieve recognition in this very court, according to which 193 countries of the world , that is, countries of the un charter, that russia invaded ukraine on february 24, 2022 under on this pretext, in other words, she lied about the reasons for her invasion, they say that it was allegedly a genocide of the people of donbas or the russian-speaking population of donbas. territory of donbas , russia supposedly has relevant evidence, but very quickly , the infor

confident on our side that these arrangement is stable and meets the requirement of our european courts of justice. equivalent to the supreme court of the u.s. judgments are very important to us and latest adjustment -- judgment amounts privacy shield constituted our mandate in negotiations with his counterparts in u.s. the most important requirements from the court related to the introduction of sectors on one end and the other end to adjust avenues for european citizens. the new arrangement we have put in place has creates -- place creates important safe because -- cuts when it comes to the safety. it is important to say these safeguards are concrete when it comes of the reasons why this data can be collected because there are -- it is explained in the executive order -- there are a number of priorities for which these data can be collected. the conditions under which this can happen, the time under for which the data can be retained. it is important is leach try to spell out -- that we try to spell out during the new arrangement to be as concrete as possible when it comes to the nature of the d

and the situation came before the international court of justice and the international court of justice at that time decided that the convention has nothing to do with the use of force. those are 2 different issues. so we hope that the parts of those follow experience through the song will take up a decision of the stage and the, the claims of your brand will be dismissed. the of these was at this level of the level of jurisdiction. i'm just wondering, i mean, given the unprecedented reaction to the situation do quite around the world, do that we can count on the objectivity of the international court of justice, considering the cases involving russia have been politicized. uh uh yes, we already, uh we can of course all know that. so the environment are here and everywhere is uh, is very police of size box our calls. so uh, you know, uh in that direction. that's because it does look need to take uh and just using the in favor of rock show and paper a few k, i have to take her or we hold them, they will take the decision. we just full now own to is problems. they have already decided the

it consists of the supreme court of the united states that will composed of nine justices. there has been considerable debates about the upwards of the party to pack the united states. for left-wing justices to the court to grow the number from 9 to 13 because democrats are unhappy with the decisions that are being issued by the supreme court. when fdr tried to pack the court, it was widely recognized to be a grotesque abuse of power undermining the rule of law that was true, then it's true now. some democrats in this body claim, at least when they return home and talk to their constituents, that they do not support packing the supreme court. this amendment is an opportunity to go on record and be clear whether or not to support packing the court. i would urge adoption of the amendment. more >> thank, you senator. and a constitution, it does not stipulate the supreme court justices. that's a decision of congress. we have a long history of ordering the makeup of the court, the number of justices have changed six times before we landed on the number nine. in 1869. there's only

the psychological system is also with the verdict of the court of justice is not to connect foreigners to the national portal of licenses and i will put up a wall. before these two organizations, the associations of lawyers have also been connected with investment . 2. it is not in a state of economic equilibrium. different interpretations of this law can be taken from the parliament to this interpretation of the administrative court of justice, which caused the parliament to think of a solution to solve these problems . it was approved. the possibility of revoking specialized approvals is taken as a deregulation. guardian of all issuing authorities licensing, including lawyers' associations, document registration organization, and psychological system organization , must be connected to the portal and there will be no exceptions. heads of sda news agency, thank you for being with me, as we mentioned in the introduction, we want to know about the licensing system, its effects, as well as the latest news. the ones that exist in this area and this issue , mr. siah, the head of the nation

pardis, the government membership inspection organization, according to another resolution of the court of justice, it cannot annul the resolutions of the deregulation committee. according to the spokesperson of the judiciary , it is contrary to the constitution, and it does not include the competences of the administrative court of justice, which is the authority for people to appeal to the government. you excluded iran, but the representatives say that only the investigating authority has changed and the right to sue has been determined by mr. satayshi. he says that this resolution will be reviewed in the next few days in the guardian council. any decision taken by the council will be binding . he pointed out all the points and the answer and mr. siahi has a point, see the spokesman of the authority, show that there are many people talking about you, but unfortunately i did not read the text of the text of the resolution of the parliament , where should i say the test, where did he say that it should come under the economics test, and read the book reading competition. no, i'm begging you, dear

also, according to the ruling of the court of justice, the north of the country is not connected to the national portal of licenses. they will make this case foreign. before this, the two organizations , the associations of lawyers, have also been connected with the lawyer. it is not an investment. two , it is not in a state of economic equilibrium. the butterfly advocacy is clearly a way of expressing a different understanding of this law , it can be interpreted by the parliament to this interpretation of the administrative court of justice of the facilitation law. if this plan is approved by the guardian council, all licensing authorities, including lawyers associations, document registration organization and psychological system organization , must be connected to the portal and there will be no exceptions. the expert economist, a member of the faculty of amirkabir university , is present, what kind of person is the vice president of the union of lawyers' associations ? in this way, the independence of the number is questioned, and i would like to say hello and have a good time to yo

cost by so to get some kind of hint where they're going as a, as i said, until now the high court of justice has never on another side to basic. so an amendment to it. we're also going to get into a period of the 2 is high holidays and also the connected with only start by mid october. so it could take some time. now what that will decide, we have to see it all depends also a lot of experts saying, how's the government will then respond to it? whether this comfortable go into the constitution, chusen, or prices or not? thanks tanya. d, w 's tanya kramer at the as ready supreme court in tourism an american mind trapped deep inside one of turkey's deepest caves has been rescued after more than a week underground mark dickie became stranded hundreds of meters down after folding ill earlier this month. but thanks to one of the world's largest and most complex k rescue missions is now made it i've a life steep inside the mulch. a cave mocked dickie slowly. it's closer to the surface by stretcher. it's taking days and set for the international rescue teams to hoist the american k u back to safety.

so area of russia has owned the filed a written filing across no, to your for the hearings, but also the court. the i'm move international court of justice is the court of the united nations and russia is still a member of the united nations and even a member to the permanent security, a permanent member to the security council. so what really made to rush to change his mind to come today is not clear, but it is clear that they are expected to come to make their case, that this court has no jurisdiction. and the consequences if the court rules against russia. so then we had talking about years here, so if the court finds fetid, has jurisdiction in the case, we're just expected to take place in the next couple of months. then it will only look into the merits of the case. and as i, as i said, experts say that this might take years, but at the end of this, there could be reparations for ukraine. this would ukraine as ask for, they said that they want reparations for what came out of the false claim of genocide. and for that one flew reparations. and what about russian war crimes in ukraine which we documented day after day? you know? yeah,

violations of the convention between the signatories are being considered by the un international court of justice, the highest court in the world, the current case of ukraine against russia regarding the convention on genocide, how did the historical president react to the lawsuit? at first, the russian legal team ignored the process, but half a year later challenged the authority of the un court to consider the complaint of ukraine . the russian federation states that the genocide was not the reason for a full-scale invasion. legal basis, which countries are participating in the lawsuit ukraine, please, to the russian federation, but 32 more joined the lawsuit countries that signed the convention and believe that russia interprets it incorrectly, that is, in fact, this is a process of 33 countries against russia, and this is also a historic president in the practice of the international court of justice of the united nations. what are the stages of the legal process? the first stage took place last spring together with a lawsuit regarding the convention. ukraine filed a motion for preventive mea

it is the international court of justice of the un, the highest court in the world, that considers these of ukraine against russia regarding genocide convention historical precedent how russia reacted to the lawsuit at first the russian legal team ignored the process, but six months later challenged the authority of the un court to consider the complaint the russian federation of ukraine declares that genocide was not the reason for

court. the continent of europe traveled to europe on march 11, 2021 and talked about iran's nuclear program and, of course, about the decision of the international court of justice about the zionists. the prosecution of the court of justice has done the investigation about the situation in palestine, the severity of this regime's attacks on gaza forced the irish foreign minister simon to protest , and the german people responded to the gaza war to ray street. the leaders of the zionist regime in europe are getting away from the zionist regime, they are consulting and throwing money, and germany is reduced to an excuse, but in the end, polls show that the general view of the world's people towards the occupying regime, my friend, people believe what i said that whenever you take a fish out of the water, it is fresh we have the image of creating a new job , starting exercise and diet from saturday, and the same reforms of electricity consumption management in a small part of the people. horse sleeping mode, coffee maker, microwave, chargers, computer, tv , electrical devices also consume electricity when they are off, and we don't have time. take it out and look a

so the international court of justice is holding a hearing of a rush is invasion of ukraine. moscow attempted to justify its attack by claiming to you've had been committing genocide against russian speakers in the east. you claim rejected the allegation filing a case against moscow for abusing international. today, the code in the hague is hearing arguments from a russian representative for the 1st time. moscow argues the court has no jurisdiction to rule over the matter. the court has ordered russia to hope it's for when you try to see a shoulder and is the following. proceedings in the netherlands. explain to us more about what this case is about and see. let me try to make this as simple as possible. so in russia in rated ukraine, it said one of the reasons was an ellipse genocide and eastern ukraine. and no you cry and says that this is a violation of the genocide convention. the genocide convention is from 1948 and you cry and brought the co the case saying that russia, russ, violating this convention for that reason that i just mentioned here, to the court only 2 days after the invasio

with in august of this year, the parliament approved a plan to exclude the heat from the court of administrative justice from connecting to the portal, to clarify all the permits . this project has criticisms, the parliament is the support of the lawyers' associations, the judicial bills by the head of the judiciary, the representatives of the judiciary, in response , say that the legislative assembly has the power to legislate on this matter, the islamic council legislates for everyone and in all legal matters, and also has the right to supervise. do theory the young man moein tebal tayashi believes that with this resolution , some of the processes of obtaining a lawyer's license will be handed over to the ministry of economy, and the process of obtaining a lawyer's license will be handed over to the ministry of economic affairs and finance . handed over and approved by the designers, it is not a matter of the judicial branch, it has a representative in astanstan, kurdistan, the government membership inspection organization , according to this decree, the court of justice can no longer annul the deregu

the un international court of justice in gaza has completed preliminary public hearings in the ukraine. russia case, the court is deciding whether it has the right to consider it at all. the case concerns the unlawful application of the convention on the prevention of genocide, which russia used to justify its attack on ukraine. what did the representatives of ukraine talk about at the meeting and which final wait in the case? see further. the un international court of justice in gaza became the judicial institution to which ukraine turned after the full-scale invasion of the russians. the catch was that russia justified its aggression with genocide, which ukraine allegedly committed on the territory of luhansk and donetsk regions. moscow covered up the convention on the prevention of genocide and misinterpreted it. ukraine insists. this case does not promise. over a year has passed since ukraine filed a complaint, but the merits have not yet been considered. the thing is russia exercised its right to challenge the authority of the court. if there are objections, the court must conside

assembly on new york, ukraine against russia in the international court of justice, the ambassador withf the ministry of foreign affairs, anton korenevich, in his in his speech, he said that russia justifies the war against ukraine, referring to the terrible lie he quoted, that the goal of the invasion was to stop the kornev genocide, or called on the international court of justice to decide that it has jurisdiction to hear the case and to rule that russia must pay reparations for the invasion under false pretenses, russia is waging war against my country in the name of this terrible lie that ukraine is committing genocide against its own people, this lie is for russia an excuse for aggression and conquest, russia has not provided any it cannot provide reliable evidence, and that's why russia acted and continues to act on the basis of ukraine's false accusations of genocide. i am twisting the content of the laws that ukraine is contesting . ukraine had a say during the court session yesterday. hennadiy kuzmin's speech lasted three hours, he said that the international court of justice a

court. so to speak , there was such, uh, formed structure. which would be to not allow the use of the court. uh, as a means of justice as some kind of body for impartial consideration of all kinds of issues in order to use it against any state interests. well, there are two groups of countries. e members. some of them recognized in advance the jurisdiction of the international court with special statements. these diplomatic notes are kept in court. uh, others, uh, are recognized only under certain agreements. and third. eh, it doesn’t apply to any issues at all, a mandatory legal beige question is that, besides this, the court, as i already said , can give an opinion, a non-obligatory so-called advisory opinion, in which it explains certain provisions of international law upon requests. the general assembly of security councils or all of them, the consent of any other bodies and international organizations. this is the external one, so to speak. yes, this outer shell. having explained in detail, now two questions arise. the first is the decision , after all, they are, uh, recommendations. as i understand it, in the e

week from -- one week before one of the greatest civil liberties decisions in the courts history, west virginia for the -- board of education versus burnett, where justiceep. jackson: gave an opinion that struck down the compulsory flag statute that the jehovah's witnesses had objected to. i noticed that within seven days the supreme court had issued one of the worst civil liberties decisions in history and one of the greatest civil liberties decisions in its history. and, so that puzzled and interested me, and i think that we are very interested in reading about the supreme court during world war ii. i discovered that there is not much written on that as a subject. there is a tremendous amount written about fdr's battles with the supreme court, in the 1930's, his failure to pack the court, and by enlarging it, the famous switch in time that saved nine where one justice changed his vote to allow the upholding of new deal programs, and there is a lot written on the warren court beginning in the 1950's. but there is very very little written on the supreme court during one or two as a subject. -- world war ii as a subject. it turns out to be quite a story.

court how to run it. i don't think that there is merit to that argument at all. the constitution gives the congress a great deal of authority over the supreme court, including the number of justicesthe calendar of the supreme court, the kinds of cases it can hear, except for a very small group that the constitution says is in the original jurisdiction of the supreme court. now, there is a limit on it. congress cannot direct the court like in the case of smith versus jones, there is a limit on what congress can do in terms of governing the supreme court's affairs, but under the constitution, under our system of checks and balances, congress has a great deal of authority with regards to how the supreme court operates and how justices operate. the justices have to file tax returns. nobody says that they should be immune from that because congress cannot speak to the justices. the code of ethics falls in a similar category. you can say it is different because it is focusing directly on the supreme court as opposed to the same allegations as every citizen, but i think that congress has a lot of authority with respect to this type of issue. >> one more elephant in the room. you teach g

court of law . this, of course, is not a strange thing. do not take disputes to the courts of justice for this reason, in the age of 134 of the constitution, it was stated that disputes within the government should be resolved by the president, and the nature of the charter is that all disputes should be resolved by the president based on the law and on the basis of the regulations approved by the council of ministers . how many hours do we have to resolve disputes every week? disputes are complicated. i am present and 15 professors sit down to discuss their rights and reports . we settle disputes. we resolved to the government and various government agencies of roma 48 and we have to answer 450 inquiries so that the dispute can actually be resolved, and such cases kill a lot of applicants, and we have a dispute with this other agency in this regard . if one of these devices asks for a meter bit difference, we will invite the other side and you will dispute according to the local law. one of these disputes is that the program organization says that we do not have the business license

according to this interpretation of the administrative court of justice of the facilitation law, it made parliament to think of a solution to resolve this ambiguity. it was approved that the issue should be clearly mentioned . food licensing authorities are entangling themselves in the law. in the law, the possibility of revoking specialized approvals is taken as a deregulation. according to the spokesperson production jump commission, if this news is approved by the guardian council, all licensing authorities, including lawyers' associations, document registration organization and psychological system organization, must be connected to the portal and there will be no exceptions . mr. zamani, an economic expert and a member of the academic faculty of amirkabir university , is present. his name is kayani, the vice president of the association of lawyers . joining the national portal of licensing in this way calls into question the independence of the number, and greetings and good times to you and dear viewers, and thanks for the fact that something was allocated to the bar association to

the determination by the international court of justice would necessarily have finding value in the other courts. not least because there's plenty of evidence that they will have gather that are relying on and they might not require the detail decision of a civil courses effectively. it is, but of course the deals with breaches of treaty in support of its criminal procedures. but that i'm afraid is also something we must put on hold because you cry and was very inventive in turning to the quote in its application to have it's right, not to be falsely accused of you, of genocide, as you explained in your helpful opening, have to have it litigated, that is cooled, and so imagine that to lower ingle imaginative use of little by lawyers know something we often see, but really welcome when we do see it as just may lead to this decision being of wider implication than i suggest by a lot to keep our eyes on them, thank you so much for sharing your thoughts and analysis on the a little too. my pleasure to livia now, where rescue workers are struggling to identify decomposing bodies in the city of

asked the united nations to force the united states to implement the ruling of the international court of justiceat was this ruling? america and nicaragua, which the international court of justice ruled in 1986 that the united states should pay compensation for financing the armed attack against the nicaraguan revolutionaries, which the united states never accepted and said that this court does not have jurisdiction over this case. of course, america is a long way he has not accepted this kind of actions and so far, he has taken a measure to make america pay for the damage it has caused to this nation due to foreign interference in nicaragua, under the burden since 1986 until now, and the last speech is also related to the world of francis the diplomat . he is from trinidad and tobago, who is the head of the group that he has arranged for, from the conversations that happened during the period, let's go see him too. i stood before you, your heads of state and government, your ministers and representatives, and i spoke of the need to unite. the nations. i made a call to action for all states to fi

this, but it is about the question whether the court behind me with this, the international court of justice is in charge of the case or not russia abroad in a procedure claiming that the court has no jurisdiction. let me also remind you that this as the united nations court and russia is a member of the united nations, just as ukraine is. and russia is also a permanent member of the security council. that's a good night's nations, which is a very important organ. also, united nations. all right, we've got some support for you now and. and for being a one ferrari is carlos fine, says one, the single pull ground pri ending red bulls 15 race winning street, defending champion mux or stepan, who had won or reco 10 races in a row. only finished 5th off the struggling in qualifying on saturday. you know ras sides? no rental car is where it to be seen in the front row under the lights of singapore, ferries, posted a couple of signs with a perfect start and didn't even better and useful for robert you his teammate child . so the class over to the mercy, this is george russell. to make it an early f

well, european court of justice. ice in the european court of justice in what can only seem to be a prank, handed the united what can only seem to be a prank, a handed the united what can only seem to be a prank, a fine ed the united what can only seem to be a prank, a fine ed £32 united what can only seem to be a prank, a fine ed £32 million. kingdom a fine of £32 million. that's about £0.50 each. and look at £0.50 it's got look at a £0.50 it's got britannia on it. they're britannia on it. so they're taking from each of taking britannia from each of us. divergence us. owing to a divergence between uk and eu law about fuel or fools, the uk allows pleasure crafts to use died fuel red diesel effective that has been taxed at a lower rate. but under eu law that is apparently forbidden. a ruling from the eu's court in 2018 found the uk was in breach on the matter , but was in breach on the matter, but the uk didn't comply as a result, the commission, the body with all the unelected bureaucrats, we were so keen to get from

achieve the and putin and lavrov and other war criminals were on the bench of the international court of justiceench of the international tribunal , this international tribunal must be launched, vote at this general assembly, issue a mandate to the international court of justice and start a process against the russian aggressor and against russia as an aggressor country, this is the solution here question and this is a question of justice already international prosecution of the aggressor and putin his henchmen and this and at the same time the question must be resolved compensation payment of damages compensation and so on, a million injured ukrainians and those who are forced, forced refugees, migrants and families of the dead from the wounded and many, many other horrors of the war on our territory, who should be compensated by whom, well , it is obvious that the aggressor state, that is, russia , spoke about russia in the world at the general of the un assembly and the chancellor of the federal republic of germany, olaf scholz, let's listen to what the mayor said, without freedom is called o

i mean, what did you all for the us talk about the international court of justice or any of these uh, you know, pay per law mechanisms that they themselves don't subscribe to all or respect. but right now there's been as well as have the right to search for any type of uh, balance. so any type of defense of their sovereignty. because this as the cube you region, it is the s report that the us is trying to to use to really do open opportunistically use and manipulate the guy in each nation. we saw of the, the us or the western states, donnelly, before go after the leader of venice way live by a human rights concerns, etc. but it's hard enough to see a pattern here when we talk about dennis wheeler, oil rich, and perhaps to a certain degree on stable because of many reasons we could throw in libya, syria, as you mentioned, there is the layer of block goal there under there's copious amounts of invents will, is it just too hard for some to ignore? so yeah, been as well as one of these oil producers in the, in the world in terms of its reserves is right. it was so i hear radio and mexico

court of appeals for the fourth circuit, and for justice david souter of the united states supreme court. l professor larson. [applause] >> i will introduce the panelists in the order in which they served as solicitor general. paul, paul clement was the 43rd solicitor general of the united states. he is a partner at the climate and murphy law firm and distinguished lecture in law at the georgetown university law center. he served as solicitor general from june 2005 until june 2008. before his eight. before his confirmation as solicitor general, he served as acting solicitor general for nearly a year and as principal deputy solicitor general for over three years. he has argued over 100 cases before the united states supreme court. mr. clement practice areas focus on appellate matters, constitutional litigation a strategic counseling. he represents a broad array of clients in the supreme court and in federal and state appellate courts. last year he successfully argued supreme court cases involving significant issues of energy regulation, statutory interpretation, states immunity and articl

daria pugacheva, arranged a performance city ​​of war near the building of the un international court of justicehague, ukriinform reports. according to the artist, upon arriving in the netherlands , she had a strong feeling of losing her home. public hearings are now being held at the un international court of justice. regarding whether to recognize russia's actions in ukraine as genocide. that was the news for this time, i am iryna koval, i say goodbye to you and see you tomorrow, you can read more on our site espresso tv, also subscribe to us in telegram and watch on youtube, well, literally in a few minutes the big broadcast will begin in the winter, so wait and stay with the espresso channel. antwerp miner on mego. in the matches against the belgian champion, the miners must score maximum points. on october 4 at 19:45, cheer for the victory of shakhtar. turn on the champions league, exclusively. we, my dear, waited for you in the garden, but something hurts in the back, you have a hamstring, and you will help me like a young man. dr. tice's mai with comfrey. german ointment for joint and mus

the czech republic, hungary and slovakia, are asking ukraine to withdraw the lawsuit to the court of justiceng the group's ban on ukrainian exports. agricultural products, i want to discuss with you in principle this grain crisis that has developed between us, well, mostly , probably between us and poland, because the most good-neighborly relations are precisely with this, precisely with this state, so it happened that poland gladly welcomed us at the beginning of the war, welcomed all our people, gladly accepted hundreds of thousands of ukrainians, but now it cannot accept ukrainian grain, we understand that there elections will be held on october 15. however, from a diplomatic point of view, how can one assess this situation in principle, because it is too ambiguous and there was a lot of criticism towards the ukrainian authorities, they say, it was necessary to keep it all between themselves so that it did not all come out at all, yes so to speak, because in the beginning of the un assembly, they exchanged pins, and andrzej duda and volodymyr zelenskyi, the polish president compared ukrai

but i could be wrong, but i don't think at this stage that a determination by international court of justice would necessarily have finding value in the other quotes, not least because there's plenty of evidence that they will have gathered in our line on and they might not require the detail decision of the civil courses effectively. it is, but of course the deals with breaches of treaty in support of its criminal procedures. but that i'm afraid is also with them. something name is put it on hold because you crying was very inventive in turning to the quote in its application to have it's right, not to be falsely accused of you, of genocide, as you explained in your health for the opening up to have it litigated at the schools and so imagine that to lower ingle imaginative use of little by lawyers know something we often see, but really welcome. when we do see it just may lead to this decision being of wider application than i suggest the to libya now with rescue it because they're struggling to identify the composing bodies and the city of deadman. the city was devastated a week ago also t

pohacheva staged a performance of the city of war near the building of the un international court of justicethe hague, reports ukrainform. according to the artist, before coming to holland , she had a strong feeling of losing her home. public hearings are currently being held at the un international court of justice on whether to recognize russia's actions in ukraine as genocide. and i decided to make this parfon right here and at this very moment so that to strengthen our message about how we are going through this suffering, because of which the ukrainians come, and this cube, it is empty now, but it will be completely black at the end, i will write many times, the war in ukraine is still going on, to show that the war is going on and to show this... that we 're going through. 10 aerial bombs daily. russian terror in zaporozhye is gaining momentum. muscovites almost destroyed the city of nuts with powerful guided aerial bombs, you can't escape from them in the basement, let alone behind two walls indoors. the invaders are coming on civilian objects, places of population gathering and commu

international court of justice is hearing arguments from russia and ukraine. about most goes claims. that is most, it's invasion to prevent genocide. cubic cues as most go of abusing international more falsely alleging genocides a risky work is in libya, struggling to identify decomposing bodies in the city of done to the city was devastated a week ago off to, to dan's collapse following heavy ryans, there are growing concerns about the spread of disease, child strength, it has more over a week since thousands of people were killed when 2 dams burst and sent a wall of water and mud, crushing through the eastern libyan city of thermal. the search for bodies goes on . many people still missing and fed dead, many bodies a. so decompose that, identifying them is proving difficult and disturbing the search and rescue teams the to then so the, the muscles are the libyan. when i put on the bodies, i swear i cry, i can handle it, but it is god swell. so you have to hold up and put out the body. there was a body that was cut into 2 parts right before us. there is nothin

general assembly today, along with a high level officials from other countries the international court of justice is holding public hearings on the case ukraine, bulls against russia, days off, in the winter of russia's especial military operation. last year, most goes cold for the case to be thrown out saying the operation was starting to prevent a genocide didn't don't bus t of denies. the accusations aren't in loans, reparations. the hearings are set to run until september 27th. i will focus on legal arguments as to whether they are c, j has a jurisdiction to fully hear the case versus deputy permanent representative to the united nations. maria, as i followed sky has broken down the ongoing process for us. it all they saw saw these hearings were ready for the match, so the be expected that so he would include the police, decide that key real use those hearings in order to propagate, let's call narratives and they are holding doing so they're using the platform all day i subsea and to quote for certain stories regarding of course uh the quote will come down to the show. me tried to say it was

of the court . based on what i've read, as a result of that, the kind of exchanges with the justices were not kind ofhat you're used to in the modern court where things are on the one handmuch more compressed but on the other hand , are much more interactive than suggested. if you say it can be a conversation, and the an argument but either way it's very interactive with the justices and the time. things are changing by theday at the supreme court . the first decade or so i practiced there everything was the same and nothing changed and in a case it would be 16 minutes for an argument and like days back in the marshall area. 30 days if you were appearing back on the united states. you would have 10 minutes of argument time and that's it. on an issue of huge national importance and that is the most difficult thing you can do as an advocate is at your 10 minutes to make your whole case. john roberts when he was an advocate in the office he likened the difference between a 30 minute target argument and tenant argument and the difference between with a parachute from 30,000 feet and 10,000 feet. there's

will be spent on goods, which when the in, in, in uh, people the judges of the international court of justice, a hearing arguments from russia and ukraine. about most goes claims. it launched its invasion to prevent genocide. ukraine brought the case to the united nations highest cold days off to russia. invaded last year, he is accused as moscow of abusing international law by full sway, alleging genocide denise, to new crime, russia once the case to be thrown out and objects to the quotes jurisdiction. your creed is not accusing russia of committing genocide. ukraine is also not accusing or russia or failing to prevent or punish each other. so on the contrary, as your crane cease, no genocide has occurred that too long should been not to reject the keys. because according to the courts, you are is brothers. there was no genocide they cannot be at violation of the engine side much jeffrey nice is the former lead prosecutor of the some of them the loss of each trial for the united nations of the international criminal tribunal for you to solve you. he says, ukraine made a wise move by approac

of is the supreme court and other quotes to refute government decisions. if their team unreasonable, the court has to decide whether or not to limit its own or for a team. and so now the justices have never notified any amendment to basically all because of the constitutional weights the ruling would take some time says doug is changed in front of the hearing in the court. the court can completely accept the petitioners challenges and say that the law should be struck down. the court could continue to reject the petitions and say that it has either not either. it does not have the authority to strike down a basic law or even if it does as it has ruled in the past. but this basic law can stand and it will not break it down or it could try to reach a middle ground. just as supporters and opponents very much at part in how they envisioned the countries due to the future of is rose, highest quote is of so in question, and that is also now a documentary series tells the story of the stolen babies of franco spine that's coming up after a short break and anthony held in berlin, thanks for your company and from whatever in the world you're watching, have a good day, the interest, the

court itself. starting with you first, professor, describe what do you think of the criticism the court has faced recently and how do you think it is affecting the work of the justices? >> i think the court is in a position of real crisis. its legitimacy in the public among people across the particle spectrum has never been lower. part of it is of course the pylon of ethical scandals but yawned that, even beyond the unpopularity of a number of substantive decisions is the growing sense that it is a court in name only. justice kagan in her dissent in one of the cases in this term said the quiet part out loud. she said the problem is that the justices of whom she is one are no longer acting in a way that precedes the way a normal court does paying attention to the rule of law, precedent, the constitutional framework. the court is reaching out in cases that really don't involve genuine controversies. without anyone that has real standing to invoke the jurisdiction of the court to pursue an apparent agenda and it is in that circumstance that the court is in crisis. at the same time, around the world in countries ranging from poland to hungary and most recently in israel

situation is in this process that happened, some organizations are now going to the administrative court of justice from other places to get a series of rulings that we are not subject to this law. we have brought it and it has been emphasized in some way, well, anyway, there are currents in it some of these organizations who don't want to follow this law anyway and go to different titles , they try to exclude themselves from every possibility and capacity, and in order to close these ways, there is also a ruling in the program. seventhly, we named the so-called organizations and said that these organizations are included in the seven articles of the policy implementation law 44 and the education law, so the court of administrative justice can no longer exclude some institutions and some organizations from its regulation and these just like the rest of the devices, including self-regulation organizations, now men must know now it is possible that the engineering system, the psychology system, the medical system, now the law of lawyers, notaries public, these are the ones who, in any case, the licen

the people's mojahedin, also known as the hypocrites, in order to introduce a lawyer to the court of justice of tehran province, in correspondence with the head of the association of judicial lawyers, requested to introduce a list of lawyers to the criminal court of a province of tehran, based on the law of criminal procedure, to appoint a lawyer for the members of the hypocrites to the criminal court of a province. previously, tehran had issued a public notice asking the members of the people's mojahedin organization, known as the mojahedin , to introduce a lawyer to the court to defend themselves. the story of musa's failed operation in iran's missile industry has repeated the hashtag industrial sabotage and security is not an accident in cyberspace. news 14: a news bomb will explode . one of the news footage of the discovery details the largest industrial sabotage by the zionist regime in iran's missile industry. according to the journalist, the sound of the explosion reached the cyberspace and heated up the industrial sabotage hashtag . users published parts of this news on their pages a