so you've got this former waitress courtney scarmela filed the lawsuit against owners of a bar in whichhe used to work called o hara's in california. she claims if she had to wear the uniform she found inappropriate. she claims fans were placed on the floor to blow up the waitresses' skirts. they say she quit her job. when she complained about the uniform they changed the policy and took the uniform away but then she says they cut her hours back and it goes on and on. what is your take? does she have grounds for a case here? >> yeah, a vintage classic retaliation under employment law. look, i don't know what it is with men. how do they come up with these ideas about a short skirt? remember that was like britney spears when she used to be cute and then they attached velcro to it so some drunken slob can rip it off her. what a terrible, terrible idea. how demeaning. how humiliating for women. i think, again, there are allegations, poppy -- >> absolutely. >> if they can be proven courtney's case can be proven then i think she is very, very strong in the outcome. it's a very serious matter,

former waitress courtney scarmela says she was required to wear a skimpy played skirt to work and fansstaurant floor to blow up waitresses' skirts. she says that after she complained her hours were cut and eventually she was fired. that is a short skirt isn't it? now she is filing a lawsuit against the bar. a lawyer for the bar calls the claims baseless and says she wasn't fired. and that she quit. criminal defense attorney holly hughes is here. i wish i was in the same room with you for this. i know she is taking it very seriously but all the guys in the room said i love this story. how does she have a case here? >> i don't see that she does, don. let's break down why. this is a privately owned establishment and you have the right to make up your own rules. it's kind of like when somebody comes over to your house, you know, if they are doing something you don't like you can put them back out on the street. she doesn't have to work there. this is not a government agency. this isn't funded by the government. so eslings the owner can make up the rules as he likes. and i don't see anythin