so to start us off with this question and for your comments, i just want to quote craig aaron who is ceo of free press and tell you what he said after the d.c. circuit's ruling. quote, this ruling means the internet users will be pitted against the biggest phone and table companies and in the absence of any oversight these companies can now block and discriminate against their customers communications at will. we are disappointed that the court came to this conclusion, closed quote. now, to my mind, at least, it seems clear to me absent a further appeal that under the d.c. circuit's opinion, the fcc lacks authority to impose the very same regulations that it put in place before the court said, amounted to common carriage. again, i'm just assuming absent, further appeal or change in the law. yet, the court also said in its opinion that pursuant to the now famous section 706 in the communications act, and in conjunction with what verizon in its appeal and the descent as well by the way, referred to as the triple cushion shot theory of promoting broadband deployment, it seems clear that