we've got just about every media outlet in the state here. >> woodruff: all right, craig carper, wcve public radio, we thank you, in richmond. >> thank you, judy. >> woodruff: following this week's cease fire collapse, there was heavy fighting again today between israel and hamas. members of the palestinian group's military leadership were among the casualties. hari is back with that. >> sreenivasan: thousands marched through the streets of gaza today in the funeral procession of three senior hamas military commanders. the men-- identified as mohammed abu shammala and raed al-attar, mohammed barhoum-- were killed by a pre-dawn israeli air strike. the militant group quickly decried the killing. >> ( translated ): the assassination of the al-qassam leaders in rafah is a big israeli crime that will not succeed in breaking the will of our people and won't weaken the resistance. and the occupation will pay the price, god willing. >> sreenivasan: but israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu hailed the intelligence behind the attack and vowed there's more to come. >> ( translated ): i want

joining us, craig carper, reporter for wcve in west virginia. mr.arper, thank you for being here. >> thank you, rachel. >> as far as i understand it, we're expecting four closing arguments tomorrow, the prosecution, then bob mcdonnell's attorneys, then maureen mcdonnell's attorneys, then the prosecution's rebuttal. i know that there's been a lot of consternation or at least argument concerning the instructions to the jury at that point when they get the case. what's the worry or the consternation about the instructions to the jury? >> well, the instructions are key. we spent the better part of today discussing those. prosecution and defense lawyers for both teams, the bob and maureen mcdonnell teams, presented suggestions, their own versions, to judge james spencer today. the prosecution trying to cast a much wider net in terms of how the jury should be able to read this evidence. the defense, of course, trying to draw this criteria much more narrowly. >> who has been better, broadly speaking, at making a cogent case that the jury could easily wrap