i have a note here from craig morton, from 1626 schrader, submitting his opposition. >> thank you, you can leave it up here. >> thank you. >> good evening. 155 belgrave avenue. i am strongly against this variance. as you have heard from the neighbors already, there are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances having to do with this lot. 7500 square feet and a land of very large lots, all of the homes on belgrave avenue are conforming lots. they were all grandfathered in, the exceptions. the largest what is more than 11,000 square feet, at and at least 70% are effectively 5000 square feet. 27 are conforming out of 38. the previous owner deliberately enlarged his own lot. sorry, i don't think i got a reset. thank you. the previous owner deliberately enlarged his own lot, 75 _ feet. this developer should not be able to take advantage of the predecessor's action for that variants. the slope of a lot also does not justify a variance. all of the properties have the same slope. it creates no hardship for use ofa the use. it variance would not help them. rejecting the variance would not r