hackers but from a dnc insider because you don't believe julian assange, but he was supported by craig murphy, who said he met the dnc insider and that is where the information came from, and not russian hackers. would you address that? people who allege that jim comey weighed in for political reasons, i think were wrong. that was an unfair assessment. you can cover about whether or not it was the right decision or the wrong decision or a wise decision or unwise one, but to the extent people accused that activity of being political, that is plainly true -- plainly false -- and some of the leaks that occurred in the final weeks of the election i found deeply troubling and i do have concerns there were potential political motivations there, that is just as trump deserves criticism, people who took shots at the fbi fairly deserved criticism as well. as to this question of whether or not we should take the words of julian assange and craig wright over the unanimous judgment of the u.s. intelligence community, that is a nonstarter of a question. we are talking about signals , documents, the weight

he was also supported by craig murphy, who said he met the dnc insider, and that is where the information came from, not russian hackers. could you address that? briefly, people who allege that jim comey weighed in for political reasons are wrong. that is an unfair assessment. to the extent people confused that -- accused that activity of being political are an. i found it deeply troubling and have concerns that there were potential political motivations there. , just as trump deserves criticism, i think it is fairly deserved criticism as well. as to the question that we should take the words of julian assange over the unanimous judgment of the u.s. intelligence community, that is a nonstarter of a question. signalsalking about intercepted, forensics documents, even the weight of public evidence, the notions that there is not a direct connection tween the hacking of the dnc and the hacking of those documents on wikileaks. addedrom the outside, with a very detailed intelligence that we were provided in october, i do not think there is any credibility to that statement. raised mean -- show

hackers but from a dnc insider because you don't believe in julian assange, but he was supported by craig murphysaid he met with the dnc insider and that's where the information came from, not from russian hackers. when you address that? >> who would like to address either of those points briefly? >> briefly, people who allege that jim comey weighed in for political reasons i think were wrong. i think that was an unfair assessment. you can talk about whether that was the right or wrong decision and whether it was a wise decision or an unwise one. but it extent people accused that activity of being political, that's plainly true. that's plainly false. some of the leaks that occurred after and in the final the election i did find deeply troubling and you have concerns that there were potential political motivations. but that just sort of trump deserves criticism, people it took shots at the fbi on those grams as a family deserve criticism as well. as to this question whether that we should take the words of julian assange and craig over the unanimous judgment of u.s. intelligencof theintelligence