mr creswell, you have told us that you are _ mr creswell, you have told us that you are personally signing in an hour, or— some of those can be signed off in an hour, or less. you have told us that— an hour, or less. you have told us that you _ an hour, or less. you have told us that you still— an hour, or less. you have told us that you still think the process needs— that you still think the process needs to — that you still think the process needs to be sped up and it is not going _ needs to be sped up and it is not going fast— needs to be sped up and it is not going fast enough. you have not been able to— going fast enough. you have not been able to tell— going fast enough. you have not been able to tell us the budgets of the different— able to tell us the budgets of the different schemes, but you are going to write _ different schemes, but you are going to write to _ different schemes, but you are going to write to us with that information. i am sorry that you have _ information. i am sorry that you have not— information. i am sorry that you have not been able to table that in front _

creswell earlier and we have a positive — creswell earlier and we have a positive collegiate _ creswelland revise things _ positive collegiate dialogue to try and revise things as _ positive collegiate dialogue to try and revise things as we _ positive collegiate dialogue to try and revise things as we go - positive collegiate dialogue to try and revise things as we go along. positive collegiate dialogue to try. and revise things as we go along. i think— and revise things as we go along. i think the _ and revise things as we go along. i think the process _ and revise things as we go along. i think the process stymies - and revise things as we go along. i think the process stymies any- and revise things as we go along. i| think the process stymies any form of change. — think the process stymies any form of change, fundamental— think the process stymies any form of change, fundamental change. i think the process stymies any form i of change, fundamental change. on individual— of change, fundamental change. on individual cases— of change, fundamental change. on individual cases we _ of cha

and mr tips well related — trevor creswell and mr tips well related to your conduct that is currently? , , ., conduct? yes, there is an investigation. _ conduct? yes, there is an investigation. what - conduct? yes, there is an investigation. what there | conduct? yes, there is an i investigation. what there is, actually, is... mr read fell out with his hr director and she produced a speak up document which was 80 pages thick. and within that was 80 pages thick. and within that was one paragraph there about comments that i allegedly made. so this was an investigation, not into me, this was an investigation made into the chief executive, nick read. it's that one paragraph, actually, you could say was about politically incorrect comments that are attributed to me, which i strenuously deny. this was not an investigation into me, this was an investigation into me, this was an investigation based on the 80 page document prepared by the hr director. , ., �* director. so, ok, so you're obviously _ director. so, ok, so you're obviously accepting... - director. so, ok, so you're l obviously acc

also, the former criminal trials that away, tim here tonight colorado secretary of state janet creswell, also back with us, ashley, alston doug, elie honig. secretary, let me start with you, because we don't know how the supreme court is going to, rule or how soon, hopefully we will find out quickly on that. but what did you make of today's arguments and what we heard from people like trump's former attorney who believe it was actually a pretty effective day for him? >> i think it is a significant day for democracy, we are at the supreme court, just absolutely from the united states capitol where congress people ran for their lives, where we saw our nation assaulted and democracy under attack, and it was so striking to me to see trump continue to lie, to lie about his role in the insurrection, to continue to argue he is above the constitution and above the law, so i hope the justices see through his lies, and recognize that states have historically been able to keep disqualified candidates off of our ballots. >> but they seem to be making the argument, justice kavanaugh specifically, wh