characteristic, i would called it fundamental, why because in a press release the international criminal courttated that it was, well, limited to a certain extent to secrecy , which it imposed on this investigation, but it nevertheless announced certain facts, as the court itself explained, precisely to prevent international crimes in the future, such as the named persons and the so-called commander of the black sea fleet, now i will explain why the so-called commander of the long-range aviation of russia, they are accused of a strike. so on the energy infrastructure of ukraine, indiscriminate strikes, as the court says, this is a quote, or on strikes on civilian objects, or strikes even on those objects that could be recognized as having a military character, but as the court says, the military advantage here was not comparable, it was much smaller than the losses to the civilian population, and here, in my opinion the most important thing is the conclusion of the international criminal court that not only... there will be these suspicions of war crimes, as well as crimes against humanity, be

i'm asking why you're supporting someone who has been found liable for rape. >> it was not a criminal court. >> george: it was a civil court that found him liable for rape. >> by the way she joked about the judgment and what she was going to do with all that money and i find that offensive. as a rape victim who's been shamed for years now because of her rape, you're trying to shame me, again, by asking this political question. >> george: you've repeated that again and again and again. >> i find it offensive. as a woman, i find it offensive. i endorsed the man that i believe is best for our country. it's not joe biden, and you looked at the dueling rallies yesterday in georgia. laken riley's family was with donald trump. they weren't with joe biden, the same guy who apologized for calling her killer an illegal who was an illegal. and here you are trying to shame a rape victim. i find it disgusting. >> george: you keep saying i'm shaming you. >> it is. >> george: how is the question asking you about a presidential candidate -- >> you're asking a rape victim. >> george: and there's no question

if you commit a war crime, you will be prosecuted by the international criminal court. that's the message. that is why it is very important, but the problem is that the international criminal court does not have jurisdiction to prosecute putin for the crime of aggression. precisely for the resolution of this war. i will say more, in the entire history of mankind , we have only one such precedent. this is the nuremberg trials, where nazi war criminals were tried only after the nazi regime fell. but we live in a new century, there is no need to impose justice depending on when and how this war ends. we cannot wait, we must create a special tribunal now and bring putin and his entourage to justice. and i repeat once again that all war crimes, all crimes against humanity and this war itself, genocide became possible only because the crime of aggression took place. the crime of aggression is a so-called mother crime. that is why we must send a clear signal to the world that leaders who unleash an aggressive war...will be held accountable. the international criminal court has

have actually checkmated the international criminal court, because if uh karim kham, the current british prosecutor general at the international criminal court does not indict the israeli. ministers does not indight netanyaho or even the president of israel, sak herzok, it loses its credibility, and so i see movement in latin america and africa and asia that unless the international criminal court does its job, they will withdraw from. from the statute of rome, so here it's a moment which it's important to give it the proper visibility in australia, very prominent law firm just submitted to the international criminal court a case against australia, against their own prime minister anthony albonesi for complicity, and i think that this is the moment to submit cases to the international criminal court. against sunak, against macron, against olaf schulz in germany for complicity, and the complicity is well established, i'm not talking in in in the air, the statute of rome is clear on this, the same as the genocide convention in article three paragraph little e condemns right, i can

the arrest warrant for putin is already yes, why not support the decision of the international criminal court and not focus efforts on bringing putin to justice. there is no competition here, the work of international criminal judges is extremely important, and when they issued this first arrest warrant, i warmly welcomed it. because this is a huge signal that we need in our world, that is, that we do not care that you are a sitting head of state that is a member of the un security council. we do not care that your state has a powerful military potential with nuclear weapons. if you commit a war crime, you will be prosecuted internationally criminal court that's the message, that's why it's so important. but the problem is that the international criminal court does not have the jurisdiction to prosecute putin for complex aggression, precisely for the resolution of this war. i will say more, in the entire history of mankind, we have only one such precedent. this is the nuremberg trials, where nazi war criminals were tried only after the nazi regime fell. but we live in a new century. justice m

i want to remind you that in the international criminal court, and it is assumed that this should be every court, but unfortunately, for example, for the international court of the united nations, it is... it is not quite justified, but in the international criminal court, and this is exactly the case of the japanese judge, they act in of personal quality, these are people who are as principled as possible, as professional as possible, and therefore one can expect from such a new head of the court only principled, decisive decisions in accordance with the rome statute, and also in accordance with those priorities that were voiced last year by the prosecutor of the international criminal court, karimkhan , then he... said that among the priorities are the deportations of the civilian population, both adults and children, that is, we will also have a new round in this case, these are selective attacks by the russian federation on civilians infrastructure, including energy, and we had new warrants for the arrest of russian generals on march 5, and i think that this is not the end of thi

children, so putin's warrant is finally there, why not support the decision of the international criminal court and focus efforts on bringing vladimir putin to justice? there is no competition here, the work of international criminal judges is extremely important, and when they issued this first arrest warrant, i warmly welcomed it, because it is a huge signal that we... we do not care that your country has a powerful military capability with a nuclear weapons, if you commit a war crime, you will be prosecuted internationally criminal court that's the message, that's why it 's very important, but the problem is that the international criminal... has no jurisdiction to prosecute putin for the crime of aggression, precisely for the resolution of this war. i will say more, in the entire history of mankind we have only one such. this is the nuremberg trials, where nazi war criminals were tried only after the nazi regime fell. but we live in a new century, justice should not depend on when and how this war will end. we cannot wait, we must create a special tribunal now and bring putin and his entour

ukraine, in turn, submits evidence of crimes against humanity to the international criminal court. our correspondent kateryna galko knows more. she is with us live. kaitya congratulations, so how many religious crimes by russians in crimea are documented and is there a response from the international community? congratulations. greetings to the viewers of the espress tv channel. so today it became known that the office of the prosecutor of the international criminal court received the 14th submission regarding crimes that take place on the territory of occupied crimea, and we can hear more details from the prosecutor of the autonomous republic of crimea. mr. igor. mr. igor, i congratulate you. please tell me more about this 14th submission, what preceded it and what exactly is in this submission. good day. yes, indeed, this is the 14th submission. that is, this report, which contains the evidentiary basis of the commission of crimes by the russian occupation administration in crimea against religious communities in crimea, in particular against the orthodox church of ukraine, again

it happened literally a day ago it is known that the international criminal court has issued arrest warrantshe commanders of the russian long -range aviation killers and the black sea fleet of the terrorist state, well, we are talking about high-ranking officials, that is, the commander of the black sea fleet of the russian federation and... the one who commands the long-range aviation in the russian federation, zelensky welcomed the decision of the international criminal court to issue arrest warrants for high-ranking russian military personnel involved in crimes in ukraine. let's listen to what zelensky said. in particular, they carried out and are carrying out a terrorist campaign against our state and people, strikes. in particular, they carried out and are carrying out a terrorist campaign against... our state and people, strikes against our energy, our civil infrastructure, these are obvious crimes, war crimes of russia and crimes against humanity, and it is in this regard that there is a principled movement in the international criminal court, when international justice is starting to

they work "igeer with the prosecution office and the international criminal court.rviewing ukrainians who are refugees. so they claim to have more than 100,000 and they feel that the case is sufficient to submit to the prosecution office or the international criminal court, they do it. you have work for maybe 50 years for sure because you know that the criminal cases from the in many cases, the prosecutors and special international criminal court secfq cases and start to work on it. but if you look for numbers, for 50 or 60 years for sure. >> maybe i will ask a question while you're still thinking about your questions. i think a really important point that you make is this idea of peace is justice and that there's a kind of transfer in the we are imagining protests and human rights advocacy. i wonder if you can talk about that a little more. the different methods of advocating human rights during wartime. >> the first for many human rights groups is jttary. there are specific protocols and tools recognized on the united nations level and the council of europe and eu

according to the announcement of the criminal court of a tehran province, 14 members of this group willtried in the court of investigation of the crimes of the hypocrites. the indictment of this case contains more than 700 pages. the investigation of the accusations of the main members of the people's mojahedin khalq organization began today in criminal court no. 1 in tehran. this terrorist has been notified by the appointed vishei branch. the people's mojahedin organization faced the regime after the victory of the revolution and there was a general cut off of the people and the assassination of popular statesmen. he martyred the first-rate figures of the system, including rajai ba hanar and beheshti. assassination of ayatollah qudousi, the country's first prosecutor general in september 1360. this judicial official was also martyred by a bomb explosion in the prosecutor's office. according to the intention of ayatollah khamenei, imam juma of tehran , he hurt the emotions of the revolutionary people , execute all these hypocrites, kill all of them , they allied with the enemy by invadi

palestine, 2007, the government is required to use the capacity of the international criminal court, that is, article 3 of the law specified in the name of the court, in fact under prosecution of the international crimes committed by the leaders of the zionist regime in our internal laws has already been foreseen, the government was obliged to doubt the capacity of this court and was required to report weekly to the parliament for the implementation of this law, so this has not been achieved. now, what was the root of this neglect or lack of activism? look , we are a part of this neglect and lack of activism, not only at the international level, but at the domestic level as well, we were required to take these actions. we have another law, the law against the hostile actions of the zionist regime. according to 1399 , the attorney general is the legal deputy the presidency and the ministry of foreign affairs are required to use national and international capacities to prosecute the crimes of the zionist regime. well , at the international level , we did not use the international court

from the international criminal court we didn't use the international court of justice , we didn't use the international court of justice, do the same thing that we were told to do, the iranian government could have taken this initiative on its own. he is a member of the nazkashi convention , and there was no question or doubt about israel's recognition . in fact, germany, which has the lead in its legal war against iran, could use this opportunity to take a legal action against germany in favor of the palestinian nation was the german government that came with its own internal courts for some of our political figures like the late hashemi. in this case , it was not the german government, it was the belgian government, but the german government in many human rights cases against us is actually flagging and preempting, even if it was not domestic and extra-legal justice considerations, maybe those authorities will make a decision based on this. political views can also use this opportunity and this capacity , but unfortunately, i said, despite the legal obligations that are in the subje

now the criminal court is investigating war crimes in occupied territories and in the future the criminal court should focus on the role of private companies and investigate them. question the company and even the people who were there after investigating their role in terms of violations of international law and human rights in this region, so we can say with seriousness and determination that private companies can be fully prosecuted. there are , if their role in being involved in the conflict situation is clear, thank you. it is a remarkable research. there is a debate about our practical actions today , fortunately, one of the heads of the judiciary is the head of the judiciary we were also in the meeting, he made good comments that islamic countries should take action against the zionist regime in these courts . we had done it and the south african lawyer appeared as a good example of a country that has taken practical action because we believe that effective action should be taken in the legal war and not be passive . what can our effective action be? first of all, our effective act

one of the duties and one of the jurisdictions of the international criminal court , which is also called icc, is based in the hague, netherlands, and its job is to punish international criminals. dealing with war crimes and crimes against humanity , and of course also genocide, these actions are actually depriving the civilian population. access to food is something that is called in international law as forcing civilians and actually creating an obstacle to the provision of food and medicine is considered one of the war crimes and if it is to be handled in the form of if the international criminal court is done, this issue will not go away from the judges of the court . thank you very much, mr. hossam. din lasani, an expert on international law issues, whom i heard from i will conclude by saying that the round table organized by these four doctors from the united states, england and france can be somewhat promising in order to increase the pressure on the zionist regime , but one of my colleagues had a look at this round table of four doctors. we will continue to discuss this issue. the

the criminal court should play a role in the future. company focus on private companies, investigate them and hold them accountable, the company and even the people who were there, after investigating their role in terms of violations of international law and human rights in this region, so we can seriously and let's be clear that private companies can be fully prosecuted if the responsible institutions in our country, from the government, the foreign ministry, the judiciary, a significant part of which is today's speaker, take action. all those who were in the conference emphasized that after holding today's meeting and today's conference, definitely practical measures should be taken. in line with these practical measures, we had invited the representative of south africa and the lawyer of south africa to be a good example of the country. because we believe that effective action should be taken in the legal war and should not be passive. what can be our effective action? first of all, our effective action can be legal and political su

the criminal court released the first results. of course, this also became possible thanks to cooperation with ukrainian law enforcement agencies, which helped identify the ship, missiles and their commanders. so it was a good example of cooperation between national state authorities and the international criminal court. the iss did not simply qualify these actions. it was said that these were crimes against humanity. yes, you briefly mentioned the issue of genocide. obviously, it is legally difficult to prove the fact of genocide, but you have been working in this field for more than 10 years. when you read what the russians are saying, when you see what they are doing, are they really committing genocide in ukraine? this war is genocidal in nature, putin recently gave a public interview in which he reiterated his genocidal intentions. he said that ukrainians do not exist and that we and russians are one people, and we, as human rights defenders, have been recording for years how these words turn into a terrible practice on the g

can uh to block it, so personally i do not hold great hope in specifically the international criminal court, the international court of justice could be slightly different. but i think the extent to which any decisions made there can have an impact on the material reality is yet to be seen, and i much agree with you that it's the balance of the international pressure, the inability to withstand some of the domestic pressure that comes upon some of the global powers, but most importantly the mechanisms of resistance within the region who are working. and night without sleep to try and force a different equation in gaza. thank you, dr. mar, where do you stand on that? do you think, as i do, that there will be no justice forth coming in the so-called international legal system, that being more or less lipstick on the pig of injustice that the world order has been. that there may be accountability and a holding to account in political change in western countries. where do you stand? well, i'll tell you george, from experience that how lebanon dealt with the non-existence international community

lawyers who volunteer to file a genocide complaint against israel. at the international court of uh criminal courters of different nationalities on board and still counting, as he travels from country to country to promote his grassroots campaign. we are witnessing new movement in the world. the atrocities committed in gaza are no longer only matter that concerns muslim countries, far from it. here we have a french lawyer that has started an initiative that brought together 300 lawyers from across the world. in less than 10 days and that number grew rapidly to 100 thous, and now with the mou that we have signed at the iran judiciary bar, that number will be rising to 50,000 lawyers. with iran on board, you can also expect lawyers from iraq, syria and lebanon to joining as well, and an optimistic gil de ver, who has already filed a complaint of genocide against israel with the international criminal court, demanding an arrest warrant. top israeli politicians, including prime minister benjamin netanyahu. this is going to be tough battle without a doubt, but in just few months, all these lawyers have

well, in the case of the international criminal court, the lawyer who was just appointed to head the investigation into palestine and the crimes committed there is in fact a donor to the conservative party, and he's somebody that when uh put in the position to make the decision made sure that no british soldiers were prosecuted. for war crimes in the iraqi context. of course, the question points clearly to a kind of infallibility of these particular global powers during this section of human history, but the pendulum is moving in a different direction, and the global economy is returning to a more natural.

international criminal court. palestine is a nation that does not have an army, but lawyers serve as a weapon. matt is them in different countries from guinea to iran, from bahrain to maghreb and algeria, we lawyers are all working for palestine. now he is in tehran and has provided 3,000 pages of documents and documents of the genocide in gaza to the judiciary lawyers center so that iranian lawyers can cooperate with other lawyers without borders in supporting the rights of palestinians. they are actually an army of lawyers. international without borders formed against the zionist regime, in fact today we joined the campaign of 200,000 international lawyers of the oppressed palestinian people. this is not the first attempt of iranian lawyers to defend the rights of palestinians. two months ago, 500 iranian lawyers filed a lawsuit against the zionists' crimes in the international criminal court or icc. international criminal court. according to the rome statute , it has jurisdiction over war crimes and crimes. it

. already two , shall we say, batches of arrest warrants by the international criminal court, what our american colleagues and partners from lithuania have done and there will be more, i have, i know for sure that there will be more during the year, so it is very important that we not we were waiting for the end of the war, the end of the war, we were already doing our work now, you mentioned the warrant of the international criminal... court, it was such a powerful lever, at least in the political plane, because it was directed specifically against putin, now issued a new warrant for the arrest of commanders of the russian army for shelling and energy infrastructure in ukraine. how important is it? the first arrest warrant in march of last year is historic not only because it was issued during of war , which was issued against the president of a country that is a permanent member of the un security council, but it is also unprecedented, because the speed of our work, we literally worked together for five months, provides, we provided evidence , the opportunity to communicate

the first warrants for the arrest of russian generals from the international criminal court, will war criminals be punished? they are afraid and hiding for the fifth day russia does not withdraw its ships to the black sea and the aid to ukraine from the usa remains blocked, will europe find another financing strategy? good evening, anna javamelnyk and the espresso team are here to summarize the past week. aid to ukraine is being blocked by those who want the us to withdraw from world leadership. america cannot do this, because it would expose all of europe to russia's attack. the president emphasized this. joseph biden in his address to congress, however, they still haven't approved the package of support for ukraine, which becomes an additional reason for speculation in the pre-election presidential race. against this background, the eu is looking for a joint strategy to help the armed forces, and there are those who want to put ukraine at the table of transition with the russian federation. further in the plot is about what we can expect from the world and who is trying to act as a

uh, so those decisions get made in a different part of the criminal court. uh, i make decisions that involve the release of people who are in custody in the treatment courts, but those those questions arise because, um, the parties have agreed that someone should, uh, engage in treatment rather than proceed with their criminal case or because the person is subject to a law which qualifies them to participate in a diversion program. and when those referrals are made to me, there is an understanding by everyone that the person is going to be released. uh in ideal cases, they'll be released to the custody of someone in the, uh, public health realm who will take them to a program where they can engage in the treatment that they need and that they deserve. uh, so when i release somebody, it's because they are being treated imported into the treatment that my courts oversee. and after their transport to that treatment, we are in constant contact with them. and we have repeated hearings to make sure that they are are complying with the program, um, that they are mak

happen: well, in the case of the international criminal court, the uh, lawyer who was just appointed to head the investigation into palestine, and the crimes committed there, is in fact a donor to the conservative party, and he's somebody that when put in the position to make the decision made sure that no british soldiers were prosecuted for war crimes in the iraki. text, of course, the question points clearly to a kind of infallibility of these particular global powers during this section of human history, but the pendulum is moving in a different direction and the global economy is returning to a more natural equilibrium, which i think along with it will render these types. of exertions of force, what you're talking about in gaza is the power to some extent of the global north being visited upon the heads and the shoulders of what is deemed to be the most vulnerable part of the global south. gaza is separated by land from its allies in the rest of the resistance axis, and you have really in the region on one side the resistance axis, but then on the other side the assistance axis.

this is reported on the website of the international of the criminal court in gaaz. arrest warrants were issued in the context of the situation in ukraine. mutual crimes were committed at least from october 10, 22 to march 9, 23. let me remind you that it was during this period that the russians actively bombarded our energy infrastructure. unfortunately, we had some problems. with the power supply, and accordingly the criminal court believes that there are sufficient grounds to believe that the two of them are responsible for these missile strikes, not only missile strikes, but also drone strikes, because we remember, drone strikes also our energy industry was shelled, inflicted by them, if the forces, in fact caused a large number of such not very good consequences for the ukrainian infrastructure. and that is why they will actually be responsible for it both personally and collectively, and it is about the violation of human rights, of course, and about all their atrocities and crimes, the military too, let's hope that the case will develop as quickly as possible,

yes. include the, the international criminal court because the international court of justice is already sitting in the hey, gets, how does provisional measures existing discussing this already in that case, continues among the other recommendations from that i c j. case in the hey, that south africa's case now should be taken to the un security council. she's saying that they should be an urgent arms embargo on israel, so that the us particularly, but lots of other european states that are providing the buttons and the money for the palms. they should not be able to do that anymore. she sang the damage in gaza . she said basically cause of the infrastructure in agriculture and everything and goals are being raised. the israel must pay full reparations for that damage. israel must put the bill for everything, but it is destroyed. she's also cooling in a temporary measure for an international protection, forced to go in on the ground in gaza. and she's saying that the us agency that is been doing the humanitarian relief in gaza, that israel has been pumping down on it. makes is claimed th

the main controversy between the state of international criminal court because the state decided andhed. the last point is about information and basic because now in fact we have limitedcy. we can speak about the quality of political life or maybe we just don't know because the informations limited and the more we take from it soon 0lwe have the whole generation who hasn't experienced political life challenge because it could be also violent so [inaudible] and if you have some questions or want to emphasize something more. at this point we will take■ questions and come down and ask your question right over here so that wet get it. maybe we can go back to your title slide and then be able to see what the questions are. the floor is open. thank you for the■- interesting presentation. the main question what are current organizations and what are the perspectives? >> working as specific protocols and they are submitted in the international criminal and they work together with the rnl court and there are many interesting to also work on interviewing ukrainians and■% claim to have more tha

of lawyers were volunteered to file a genocide complaint against israel at the international criminal court. refer to as the army of lawyers for palestine, the initiative has so far mobilized more than two. an unprecedented global movement gaining momentum, initiated by veteran french lawyer and academic gil de ver, the army of lawyers for palestine now has over 200 thousand lawyers of different nationalities on board and still counting as he travels from country to country to promote his grassroots. here we have a french lawyer that has started an initiative that brought together 300 lawyers from across the world in less than 10 days and that number grew rapidly to 100,000 and now with the mou that we have signed at the iran judiciary bar that number will be rising to 50,000 lawyers. with iran on board you can also expect lawyers from iraq, syria and lebanon to joining as well, and an optimistic gil de ver already filed a complaint of genocide against israel with the international criminal court, demanding an arrest warrant for top israeli politicians, including prime minister benjamin net

the peer that the persecutor of the criminal court, mister kreme hand is dragging his feet. and we speak of confidence because we, besides the requested information and documentation of such crimes, that he has enough evidence to start issuing ever as far as far as where any war criminals, including the dipper personnel, but also leaders of the highest level, including the scenario and so it is long overdue, and it is quite as strange as shocking, but until now we still don't have and these are as far as. but if you allow me just to, to clarify something here. and i think guys is he understands very well that it can play all the diplomatic maneuvers it wants. it cannot jump over the post the institution. so there will be a re, as far as i am sure of that. and there will be a risk for assume, but the ways in which the court will move forward with this investigation is also the particular importance there need to be, i think particular focus on which the cases would be selected, which crimes will be advance. and okay, the only time will tell i'm on the, i'd like to bring an ac

court not to extradite annan mainly on two grounds. firstly due to the systematic nature of torture other ill treatment of palestinians. secondly, while israeli citizens are subject to israeli civil and criminal law, palestinians are subject to a military court system. lawyer, flavio albertini also argued that the charges against this client and the other two palestinians were politically motivated, referencing italy's prime minister georgia. and that does with this editional world news, thanks for being with us, it's bye-bye for now, عليهم ولا هم يحزنون صدق الله العظيم. iran and turkmenistan do not consider themselves just neighbors, but relatives. throughout ages, they have bolstered their ties from culture economy and science and technology and a myriad. other fields, yet they have set the stage for bolder steps in order to faster vibrant trade ecosystem between the two nations and make the region an energy hub. iranian entrepreneurs, officials and business people have held an exhibition in the land of their relatives to pave the path for greater sinner. watch this documentary to catch a glimpse of the neighborly ties. hoy nos reunimos en solidaridad ante la desaparición. the united states

can uh to block it, so personally i do not hold great hope in specifically the international criminal court, the international court of justice could be slightly different story, but i think the... extent to which any decisions made there can have an impact on the material reality is yet to be seen and i much agree with you that it's the balance of the international pressure, the inability to withstand some of the domestic pressure that comes upon some of the global powers, but most importantly the mechanisms of resistance within the region who are working day and night without sleep. to try and force a different equation in gaza. thank you. dr. marwa, where do you stand on that? do you think as i do that there will be no justice forth coming in the so-called international legal system, that being more or less lipstick on the pig of injustice that the world order has been, but that there may be a... accountability and a holding to account in political change in western countries, where do you stand? well, i'll tell you from experience that how? on dealt with the non-existence international

gil dever who has already filed a complaint of genocide against israel with the international criminal court demanding an arrest warrant for top israeli politicians, including prime minister benjamin netanyahu. this is going to be tough battle without a doubt, but in just few months, all these lawyers... have joined us. this kind of solidarity is unprecedented. we have never seen so many lawyers join hands for one purpose in history, so this is a great sign, because it won't be enough to tell a judge, look, there's no many of us. instead, we have to be able to defend palestine with strong legal arguments, and by the looks of things, we have solid base for that. his south african fellow companion, shedding light on the legal aspects. the matter while explaining how the case brought to the international court of justice by south africa is also paving the way. the icj order specifically spoke about creating a humanitarian corridor and humanitarian assistance to the people of gaza. the united states and israel were saying that the word cease fire did not exist in the icj order, but this is not t

together with accomplices, at the direction of organizers from abroad, he systematically attended criminal courtsor extremism. hard to tell. what this man was counting on, his every presence in the courtroom was recorded on a surveillance camera. the activities of several persons assisting the extremist formation have been prosecuted. vesna protective center in the cities of brest, baranovichi and pinsk. a forty-year-old resident of brest recorded the progress and results of the meetings, passing on information about them, including data on witnesses and law enforcement officials for publication on destructive internet resources. at the moment, the man is in a pre-trial detention center, and the actions of his accomplices are being given a legal assessment. birch grove in honor of the eightieth anniversary of the liberation of belarus.