i think it was kicked off by the crosby garrett helmet. yet what exactly is going to happen. but the idea is to look at the definition of treasure to see whether there could be more categories of treasure added to the criteria. whether the process could be a bit more normalised than it is at the moment. things have changed since the act came into force, in terms of the landscape. and also give the police more powers in terms of law enforcement as well. there are different aspects to the act. but from an archaeological perspective, what people are most interested in is ensuring the most important archaeological objects end up in museum collections and that isn't always what happens. so for example you mentioned the crosby garrett helmet, very important object. because it didn't fit the definition of treasure, the legal sense, it was sold privately and therefore it's not on display in a museum collection. so what was it formed of, what was it made off? it was made of copper alloy and it was found in parts actually to start with, and then it