programming request to the california transportation commission for $27 million, and we were approved by the ctcmillion of the $61 million. a $31 million represents the balance of that funding source. prop1b, there is $78 million left in the program listed as uncommitted. 72.3 of that $70 million of and committed funding will be allocated to the central subway program. we have been receiving $9 million in savings from this been climate for project phase one, so we will be looking at reprogramming that prop k effort back to central subway. phase two, we recently received federal allocations that allows us to unallocate some of the funds for islais creek. geneva can be project, that project is in close out, $1.2 million in savings for that effort that would be allocated to the central subway project. finally, the its radius system replacement program. there will be some lower-cost program that will be allocated back. some of the lower priority options are like a digital, visual announce the system for cards, along with using their radio system as a means of mapping out the yards. these are lower p

: i think that it was another bureaucracy plopped down on top of the bureaucracy we already had and ctc, the cia counterterrorism center, had the same charter as the new bureaucracy that was put in place. and the cia had the same charter as the dni. the cia was brought in to, brought into being to pull all intelligence together, centralize intelligence so we didn't, things didn't fall through the cracks. and then essentially that's the dni's charter too. we're going to centralize intelligence. and it's, in my view, an unnecessary bureaucratic >> host: one more time, the storyline for "intelligence." >> guest: it is the next big terrorist attack, and it is a bunch of counterterrorism analysts warning, and the warnings the administration doesn't really want to hear the warnings because it's an election coming, and they've just been saying how much safer we are. and a terrorist cell has been rolled up, and they want to think that was it, that solved the problem. and it didn't. >> host: now, we were talking before we got started here in miami, and you said that you're working on another boo

the ctc meets thursday to continue a proposed rule on what is assume his position limit, essentially restrictions on the number of transactions that traders can make on a commodity. this is a little less than two and a half hours. >> hearing for the subcommittee on general farm commodities and risk management to review implementation of provisions that the dodd-frank consumer act on consumer issues will come to order. i'd like to thank everybody for joining us today as we review the state we were out on the implementation provisions of the dodd-frank relating to position limit. this hearing is very timely as just recently the ceo of sanderson farms says he was delaying forward purchase of feed until the cftc had issued position limit roles and that he doesn't like to buy grain with quote index funds under 25, 30% of the crop, and a quote. so i would say that is why we are here today, to have some daily, to know where her out on this. i see that chairman peterson has joined us. i'd like to take a moment if i could and divert from the hearing and recognize the outstanding work and dedi

: i think that it was another bureaucracy plopped down on top of the bureaucracy we already had and ctc, the cia counterterrorism center, had the same charter as the new bureaucracy that was put in place. and the cia had the same charter as the dni. the cia was brought in to, brought into being to pull all intelligence together, centralize intelligence so we didn't, things didn't fall