same thing with cyber, these cyberspace. cyberspace is a fantastic opportunity to share and communicate information. at the same time we're going to be in a position where we need to understand between nations what are we allowing ourselves to do and not to do between let's say, civilized countries. and our country countries are going to spy on each other, our countries are going to do economic espionage up to one level? what should countries permit or not? and if you -- and to cooperate there and to establish limits, i think, is going to be incredibly important. and we're just starting this kind of global negotiation. but i think that it could -- it's going to make friends and enemies, and it could really create, i mean, exacerbate tensions if we don't deal with it. especially china and the u.s. >> we have a question back here. >> yeah, hi. i just had a question, i'm dawn -- [inaudible] in full disclosure, i work with nicholas berggruen. [laughter] i just had a question about the role of globalization. it seems like a lot o

forever you know, there is a shortage of the spaces in the physical museum, but if we put it in the cyberspace, there's no limitations whatsoever for temporal and spatial limitations, no. i began to propose, then, why don't we build this cyber shrines of the korean war veteran veterans, which will permanently be there and can be accessible anywhere, any time without much cost. bill: this database, this website, has an incredible amount of oral histories, too. what led you to begin starting to tape the histories of korean war veterans? professor han: because their memories have not been really respected and it's not been well preserved. so as a person and a scholar who knows about this strengths of the information technology, i wanted to preserve their memories forever, because even though the korean war was very important because it was the signaling of the cold war that actually shaped the every aspect of our lives, you know, that cold war divided whole world into communism and free democracy and capitalism. and that the korean war was the beginning of it. but not many people pay attention to

cyberspace has become incredibly relevant. i mean the same way as 50 years ago nuclear weapons -- or let's say nuclear power became incredibly important, for good or for bad. you can create energy but also weapons. the same thing with cyber. the cyberspace is a fantastic opportunity to share and communicate information. at the same time, if we are going to be in a position where we need to understand, between nations, what we are allowing ourselves to do or not to do between let's say civilized countries. our countries going to spy on each other? our countries going to do economic espionage -- are countries going to do economic espionage? up to what level? what should countries permit or not? to cooperate there and to establish limits i think is going to be incredibly important. and we are just starting this kind of global negotiation. but i think that it -- it is going to make friends and enemies, and could really exacerbate tensions, especially china and the u.s.. >> to you have a question back here? >> i just had a question

they unanimously support my decision and idea to preserve this memory in cyberspace. i'm getting tremendous support from the korean war veterans and korean war veterans association. i don't have any problem to arrange the interviews. they really want to tell about what they did for the country. >> how long do these interviews last? how many have you done so far? >> it all depends on the veterans. but the average length is 30 minutes to one hour. i have about 180 interviews. i have more than 6000 artifacts stored in my database. >> looking at the website the other day, it is not just the korean war veterans. it is also some of the service members who served their indifferent decades, including one in the 1970's and one in the 1980's. why are you interested in hearing from those folks as well? >> that is a very good question. the korean war started june 25 1950. but the u.s. government extended up to the january 1 1955, even though the war ended july 27 of 1953. that is the korean war veterans europera. there are more than 2 million u.s. forces that have served in korea

but we don't have any of this stuff, and it's really hard to enforce our rights claims in cyberspace.is where i think the philosopher comes to the rescue. when we think about cyberspace and enforcing our claims of justice and making sure that we can -- the state can protect us or different types of things he tells us a couple of things. you have jurisdictions, borders and laws but in cyberspace we don't have that and jurisdiction is a problem. then he says when that's a problem, what do you do? you actually fight with other states and that's how you prosecute your rights when you don't have the jurisdictional claims that you need. you go to your army and navy. but this is even a problem and it's completely insecure and it's not a good bet. then you need to create a free federation of states for a defense of community, much like nato, right? so we have nato. i call this social contract, nato style. if you know any of the people in the back kudos to you. if you can't point out who hobbs is and knows where he's sitting, more kudos to him. what i think is happening here is that we need ou

but we don't really face-off in cyberspace with our adversaries. we don't look them square in the face like this. for those of you who don't know we don't square off in the face area and we don't even really do good battles like fun battles in cyberspace. we hit below the belt. we do just enough to be irritating but not enough to trigger what we consider an act of war. and this is really telling. so how do we figure out when all of these below the belt issues are coming out? it would be really nice if we had something like a dark mark from harry potter told us when our networks are insecure and that in all of the data on the screen you are owned. but we don't have any of this stuff and it's hard to try to enforce our rights in cyberspace. so this is where we come to the rescue. when we think of cyberspace and the rights claims and enforcing our claims of justice and making sure that we can protect the data and different types of things, he tells us a couple of things. one, he says that the state needs to have the monopoly in order to protect our ri

we have to make cyberspace safe

we don't really face off in cyberspace with our adversaries. we don't look them square in the face like this. for those of you who don't know, this is gigi ping. we don't square off in the face. we don't even do good battles like fun battles in cyberspace. we hit below the belt, we do it just enough to be irritating but not enough to trigger what we consider an act of war, right? and this is really telling so how do we figure out when all of these below the belt issues are coming out. it would be really nice if we had something like a dark mark from harry potter that told us that when our networks were insecure that we were owned that all of our data would pop up on the screen, right "you're owned, the dark lord is coming" but we don't have any of this stuff and it's hard to enforce our rights claims in cyberspace. this is where i think emanuel kant comes to the rescue. i think when we think about cyberspace and think about rights claims and enforcing our claims of justice and making sure that we can -- the state can protect us or protect our d

that's not how cyberspace works. we unfortunately get caught up in these analogies where we think that because it's something like what we see in the national system, it ought to behave like that. so just extending the weather thing, when the sun comes out in seattle, people stop what they're doing, they run to outside -- [laughter] >> yep. >> when the sun comes out in miami, they're like, oh, i'm going back in, this is too hot. it's come almost to a different reaction when you're surrounded by things. you take different pieces. so in a private sector world, there is information that private companies can gather due to their observations of what they see inside cyber space much like what you're talking about with the she tech world. -- symantec world. they can market, they can sell. there are things that the government sees that may be more public in nature, kind of like the national weather service can see that snow is coming and make a prediction. >> uh-huh. >> i think this all works together. there's plenty of roo

it's really hard to enforce our rights claims in cyberspace. this is where i think immanuel kant, is to the rescue. and we think about cyberspace and think about rights claims in enforcing our claims of justice and making sure that the state can protect us or different types of things const tells us a couple of things. when he says that the state needs to have a the monopoly on coercive force in order protect our rights. and to do this you have jurisdictions, you have borders and laws but in cyberspace we don't have the monopoly and jurisdiction is a problem. then he says when that's a problem what a problem what do you do? you go when you actually fight with other states and that is how you prosecute your rights when you don't have jurisdiction on claims that you need. okay you go to your army, you go to your navy and they help you enforce your rights. but this is a problem in its complete and secure and it's not a good bet so he says and what you need to do is create a free federation of the states for defensive community much like nato. so w

with governance of cyberspace here on our planet. but internationally. i'm curious if you have given any thought to live frontier of governance which might be something like the interstellar governments were governance of cyberspace on a grand international scale and how that might take shape or form contrasted to your comments about the state of california that there is no easy recipe. >> i'm not sure they are easy recipes for cyberspace. in truth what has happened, i think it's a good thing that the consequences are enormous. cyberspace has become incredibly relevant, the same way as 50 years ago nuclear weapons, let's say nuclear power became incredibly important for good or for bad. it creates energy that you can also create weapons. the same thing with cyber. cyberspace is a fantastic opportunity to share and communicate information. at the same time we are going to be in a position where we need to understand between nations what we are allowing ourselves to do or not to do between civilized countries. our country is going to d

for cyberspace has become incredibly relevant. i mean the same way as 50 years ago a nuclear weapon, let's say nuclear power became incredibly important, for good or for bad create image but you can also create weapons. the same thing with cyber. the cyberspace is a fantastic opportunity to share and communicate information. at the same time we are going to be in a position where we need to understand between nations what are we allowed ourselves to be or not to do between, let's say, civilized countries, and our countries going to spy on each other? our countries going to do economic espionage? up to what level? what should be countries permit or not? and if you'd are going to cooperate and establish limits i think is going to be incredibly important and we just are starting this kind of global negotiation. but i think that it's going to make friends and enemies, and could really create, i mean exacerbate tensions if we don't deal with it especially china and the u.s. >> i just had a question. in full disclosure, i work with nico

we have to make cyberspace safer. we have to improve cooperation across the board. and by the way, this is not just here in america, but internationally. which also, by the way, makes things complicated because a lot of countries don't necessarily share our investments or our commitment to openness, and we have to try to navigate that. but this should not be an ideological issue. and that's one thing i want to emphasize. this is not a democratic issue or a republican issue, this is not a liberal or conservative issue. everybody's online and everybody's vulnerable. the business leaders here want their privacy and their children protected just like the consumer and privacy advocates want america to keep leading the world in technology and be safe from attacks. so i'm hopeful that through this forum and the work that we do subsequently that we're able to generate ideas and best practices. and the work of this summit can help guide our planning and execution for years to come. after all, we are just getting started. think about it. tim woerners lee from his lab in switz

liz: plus, just how large and involved has the cyberspace really become? to hear from fireeye ceo dave dewalt next. >> hi, everybody, i'm gerri willis. coming up on my show at the top of the hour, 3% down mortgages. the feds are pushing them but will they bury the housing market again? we'll find out. that is just one of the big stories coming up on "the willis report" in just a few minutes price, we can help guide your retirement savings. our experience is one reason 100% of our retirement funds beat their 10-year lipper averages. so wherever your long-term goals take you, we can help you feel confident. request a prospectus or summary prospectus with investment information, risks, fees and expenses to read and consider carefully before investing. call us or your advisor. t. rowe price. invest with confidence. liz: thousands of flights are canceled across the country as snow continues to blanket the world, or nation. david: rich edson live at international airport. we talk about how washingtonnians freak out within of snow on the ground. i can see the air

the second one, if there is a crime in the territory, a crime in cyberspace, -- convenience should not be the ideal way making checkpoints. guest: what you hear from tech companies is that you should use firewalls -- that firewalls are no longer sufficient, we need a multifaceted system where, the president was quite funny in his talk at the university, talking about his passwords. he actually has used different passwords, everyone says you need strong passwords, but it is no longer just passwords, they are not enough. you need tech security companies working on a multifaceted spectrum of not just authentication security. it is costly. you cannot do it on the cheap. what we do see is that in the last 10 or so years, companies are making progress. in the larger companies, it has been dedicated -- they have a large amounts of money. they put that toward security and you can see that the executives are listening more and more about how do we institute risk management programs. the concerned though, with smaller businesses which cannot always afford the cost, so i completely agree with tha

still on going and word snowden leak debacle the national security at agency is snooping around in cyberspace. still president of brock brock about came here with an initiative of the spirit of cooperation between government and private security sector. >>: president obama speaking everybody's on line and everybody is vulnerable. >>reporter: president obama said this time for a company's can companies and others to work together. >>: president obama speaking we have to make cyberspace safer and improved condition. >>reporter: the president used this stamford inside a new order. that could be a tough sell for him says and larry maggot. >>: we don't need the dominick government will not share information with different companies. the government need silicon valley and we're here to help as well. >>reporter: appleseed of tim cook group drew applause reminding people that information is in people's information is not for sale. as the president called for a spirit of cop cooperation. >>: president obama speaking with a gun if rates continue to thrive we have top this influx of security breach. >>r

crafting a secure internet in securing america's place in cyberspace is a huge technical and leadership challenge. it's our digital apollo program. here at the wilson center we have invested intellectually and cyber. we think ahead of the new cycle to focus on the digital security risks posed by nonstate actors. we are attracting key scholars to study the challenge from all angles. we are regular hosting off the record dialogues and we are very grateful to hear today from one of this administration's senior leaders on cybersecurity issues. i often say if you want to get the job done right put a woman in charge. while this case let's give a shout-out to three. number one caroline krinsky who came to us from the basement of the white house. she had to adjust to the fact that we had when does with real sunlight coming in. number two to ned king who is my right hand woman and ahead of our cyberinitiative at the wilson center and building our capacity and enormously and number three is lisa monaco security adviser to the president who is here to discuss the administration's cyber cyberstrate

we all know what we need to do, build stronger defenses and disrupt more tax and make cyberspace safer, improve cooperation across the board. this is not just in america but internationally. which also makes things complicated because a lot of countries don't necessarily share our commitment to openness and we have to navigate that. this should not be an ideological issue. that is one thing i want to emphasize. this is not a democratic or republican issue, not a liberal or conservative issue. everybody is on line and everybody is vulnerable. business leaders here want their privacy and their children protected like a consumer privacy advocates here want america to lead the world in technology and be safe from attacks so i am hopeful that through this forum and the work we do subsequently that we are able to generate ideas and best practices and the work of the summit can help guide our planning and execution for years to come. after all we are just getting started. think about it. tim from his lab in switzerland invented the world wide web in 1989 which was only 26 years ago. the great

i think if people fully understand what you understand about how vulnerable we are in cyberspace cyberspace, they would want us to do more, not in any way that compromised anybody's privacy but they would want us to do a lot more than i believe we are doing now. >> thank you. appreciate that. i think this will continue to be a vexing problem for us moving forward. it is a situation we are dealing with in many of our separate committees. i do appreciate your opinion very much. thank you, mr. chair. >> senator sullivan. >> dr. carter i wanted to go back to the issue of iran for a moment. under the chairman's we've had some tremendous witnesses over the last three weeks testifying on strategic challenges and how to think through them. dr. kissinger's testimony in particular was very powerful. he said as we kind of struggle with these we collectively, in the legislative branch executive branch these strategic issues and challenges, that we need to ask ourselves questions. and the first one -- and i think in his view the most important one -- was what do we seek to prevent, no matter how it happ

throughout his administration from the early issuance of the cyberspace policy review to the 2,011th international strategy for cyberspace to today's white house summit on cyber security and consumer protection pres. president obama has worked to make cyber security a national priority to protect consumers and their data and to strengthen our laws and policies. we are honored to have him with us today. please join me in giving a warm stanford welcome the president barack obama. [applause] >> thank you so much. thank you. thank you so much. thank you everybody. [applause] first of all, let all let me thank president hennessy alleges the introduction but for your outstanding as one of the great universities of the world. [applause] i have to admit i kind of want to go hear. [laughter] was trying to figure out why it is a really nice play collective a place a place like this is wasted on young people. they don't fully appreciate what you got. it's really nice. everybody here is so friendly and smart. it's beautiful. what is there not to like? i want to thank you and everyone at stanford

capacity to stop an attack like that but that requires us, then, being able to operate within that cyberspace, how do we make sure that we're able to do that carry out those functions, while still meeting our core principles respecting the privacy of all our people. and given germany's history, i recognize the sensitivities around this issue. what i would ask would be that the german people recognize that the united states has always been on the forefront of trying to promote civil liberties, that we have traditions of due process that we respect, that we have been a consistent partner of yours in the course of the last 70 years and certainly the last 25 years in reinforcing the values that we share. and so occasionally i would like the german people to give us the benefit of the doubt, given our history, as opposed to assuming the worst, assuming that we have been consistently your strong partners and that we share a common set of values, and if we have that fundamental underlying trust, there are going to be times where there are disagreements and both sides may make mistakes and there are

capacity to stop an attack like that, but that requires us then being able to operate within that cyberspace. how do we make sure we're able to do that, carry out those functions while still meeting our core principles of respecting the privacy of all of our people. and given germany's history, i recognize the sensitive the iti around this issue. i would ask that the germans recognize that the united states has been on the forefront trying to promote civil liberties, that we have been a consistent partner of yours in the course of the last 70 years and certainly the last 25 years in reinforcing the values that we share. and so occasionally i would like the german people to give us the benefit of the doubt, given our history, as opposed to assuming the worst, assuming that we have been consistently your strong partners and that we share a common set of values. and if we have that fundamental underlying trust, there are going to be times when there are disagreements and both sides may make mistakes and there are going to be irritants like there are between friends. but the underlying foundatio

craft a secure internet in cyberspace is a huge leadership challenge is is a digital apollo program. here we have invested intellectually in cyber. they are contacting scholars posting to hear from the administration on cybersecurity issues per grafton's if you want to get the job done right but a woman in charge. let's give a shout out to three. caroline came to us from the basement of the white house to adjust to the fact we had windows with real sunlight. to the head of our cyberinitiative building our capacity enormously and number three is the son of. common security advisor to the president. she has a worse job in washington. and people pay lip service to the cyberchallenge. before this job the first person who is a woman if she got a start as an interim with the wilson quarterly. is a homecoming as the white house and congress are seeing a significant impact on the enormous cyberchallenge. to correcting to schaede standards to use the bully pulpit between the key cyberconstituencies for the white house has tried to move forward in the absence of congressional action by issuing

it's the official theme of the cyberspace administration and was posted on its website just days beforea announced a tightening of its internet restrictions. economists is not one of those who sing long. he blogs on corruption and censorship. >> there is so much information out there and of course, there is criticism. but this is normal. and people should be able to speak the sky won't fall if you let people criticize and vent their unhappiness. >> from march 1st, there could be more unhappiness. from sunday the government will ban social media and internet accounts that are not registered in the names of the real users. the measure is aimed at halting the spread of rumors and lessoning the impact of something else that he fears most, social instability. >> yes the arab spring movement definitely has an impact. the government strictly cracks down on any voices of any such campaign. >> but its surprising, perhaps what is permitted. these are comments from people reacting to a news report about how eight inmates died in one prison during the past six years. what's wrong with this country?

there is a name throughoutfloating out there in cyberspace. the danish media thinks it has put its hands on the actual identity of the man bindehind the killings. we have called police repeatedly. they are not confirming the real points are his age, his violent past weapons possession. these are things that the police have confirmed. the head of the danish intelligence saying that he has not gone abroad for any kind of foreign training but that he was on their radar screen in the security services. >> one can imagine a sense of relief across denmark at the moment that the police appear to have got their man. is it fair to say, though that danes have been expecting some sort of an attack like this for years? >> they have been expecting an attack of this kind for almost a decade. it was in september 2005 that the danish newspaper set off an international firestorm with people attacking danish embassies and boycotting danish goods because the newspaper published caricatures of the muslim prophet mohammed and that offense did not go away. there we

build stronger defenses disrupt more attacks, make cyberspace safer.mprove cooperation across the board, not just here in america, but internationally, which also by the way makes things complicated, because a lot of countries don't necessarily share our commitment to openness, and we have to try to navigate that. this should not be an idealogical issue. everybody is online and everybody is vulnerable. the business leaders here want their privacy and their children protected, just like the consumer and privacy advocates want america to lead technology and be safe from attacks. so i'm hopeful through this forum and the work we do subsequently that we're able to generate ideas and best practices. and the work of this summit can help guide our planning and execution for years to come. after all, we are just getting started. think about it. tim burners-lee from his lab switzerland invented the worldwide web only 26 years ago. the great epics, the bronze age, iron age, they span centuries. we're only 26 years into this internet age. we have only scratched t

these people were picked up because of the efficacy of this kind of -- >> surveillance and cyberspace in particular. >> absolutely. >> what it also tells you, paul, is that islamic state has become a magnet, an inspirer of jihadis around the world. >> right. >> of course here in the united states and so as long as -- >> a recruiting beacon. >> right. as long as they're perceived as successful and powerful they are going to inspire more -- more such people not all of whom the fbi and other intelligence agencies are going to be able to stop. so when susan rice says that a group like islamic state is not an existential threat, i think that's a premature judgment on her part. there are thousands of westerns who are traveling or attempting to travel to syria, to iraq, to be trained and then to return to the west. >> well, i don't think we can overemphasize enough how the web is contributing to this phenomenon. the web has become a vehicle for recruitment, propagandizing and self-brainwashing by people who spend hours on it, listening to these people who then direct them to go and commit th

. >> we all know what we need to do build stronger defenses and disrupt attack, we have to make cyberspace safer. we have to improve cooperation across the board. >> reporter: before leaving the state, the president signed a sweeping executive order that increased communication about cyber threats between companies as well as with the government. the plan technology analysts say would function as an early alert system for cyber attacks. >> my analogy for this is like a neighborhood watch. if i'm watching just my house i'm watching just my house. if i can get my neighbors' assistance we all live in the same neighborhood to all watch each other's houses as well, that's great. think of that in the industry. >> reporter: an industry learning the hard way how damaging and costly cyber attacks can be. >> several silicon valley's big names declined invitations to the summit. among them, facebook's mark zuckerberg, yahoo's marissa mayer, google's larry page and eric schmidt. it's reportedly because of a fight with the feds over data encryption. the tech companies want to protect consumers they say

those responses can be in cyberspace or other ways, but certainly, they should include the option to respond in cyberspace. >> and the option to respond would you say that would include demonstrating the capability to do so? is that part of our deterrence when it comes to protecting our country, our agencies, and private businesses when it comes to cyberattacks? >> i agree with you, i think deterrence requires that a potential aggressor know you have the capability to respond. they obviously can't know all the details or they may be able to counter your response, but they certainly need to know you can respond. host: defense secretary nominee ashton carter at his hearing on capitol hill, laying out the arm -- the argument for effective cyber operations. what you think about this? jimmy in bryan, texas, republican, you are first. go ahead. caller: this is a bad idea, because this will actually be used against the american people. if they do not keep these secrets that they keep from two categories of people, terrorists and the american people, then you wouldn't have to worry about the

in particular the core mission is building a sustainable cyberspace. today's event is quite timely as i'm sure that most of you know. just last friday president obama visited silicon valley to sign a new executive order that will encourage and promote the sharing of cyber security threat information between the private sector and federal government rapid information sharing is clearly in a central element of effective cybersecurity because it ensures that u.s. companies worked together to respond to threats rather than operating a load without any collaboration. so the executive order lays out the framework for the expanded information sharing designed to help companies collaborate with the government to protect against cyber threats. removing barriers to improve the delivery of the timely and relevant intelligence to the private sector to the renewed interest and passing the much-needed legislation come of this year 2015 is really shaping up to be an incredible year for the improved cyber collaboration across the public and private sectors. we at the

. >>> happening today a new frontier in cyberspace. the fcc may impose more control over the internet. it's called net neutrality. the today the fcc will vote on a new set of rules. if passed internet providers won't be able to block or slow down apps, websites or online services. fcc is keeping the vote confidential and the outcome won't be known now for months. >>> just getting started on this thursday at 4:40. we have seen how cold it is back east. now meet one new yorker who is so fed up she is convinced her boss can move her to the bay area. that's coming your way. >> and what's cool about your school? email your nominations to us at coolschools@kpix.com. we may come and feature your school on the show. >>> a los angeles area lawmaker wants the fda investigated regarding a bacterial infection outbreak. nine patients were infected with the drug-resistant bacteria cre after procedures at ronald reagan ucla medical center. two of them died. the bacteria were linked to intestinal scopes considered difficult to clean and disinfect. con

we think our ability to dominate in the air space airtime cyberspace domains is going to be in question. so we will operate on land that facilitates freedom of action of movement in those more contested the main street so wedomains. one of the things i'm concerned about him access to commercial satellite imagery unmanned aerial systems, and capabilities with autonomous systems, long-range missile capabilities, tied to weapons of mass destruction. it is a narcissistic way to define it. there's a tremendous offense of capability by potential enemies that is analogous to the v1 and v2 threat from europe and world war ii. i think what we're seeing increasingly our enemies using long-range missile capabilities in urban areas and restrictive terrain which is will demand a joint force answer. our army has got to be prepared to contribute to that through expeditionary maneuver capabilities. then our enemies will expand on to other battlegrounds. this is a battleground of political subversion, the connection of crying networks and what is -- of crime networks, and what is different? we need bett

the president proclaimed cyberspace as the new wild west with daily attempted hacks and people looking to the government to the act as sheriff. today he called on the private sector to do more. >> there's only one way to defend america from these cyberthreats, and that is through government and industry working together, sharing appropriate information -- as true partners. >> the president signed an executive order to encourage the private sector to share information about threats with each other and with the federal government. tonight at 6:00 -- reporter david louie has silicon valley's response to the president's ideas. >> president obama picked a good time to visit the bay area. beautiful weather. stunning outside. what an afternoon it has been on lake merritt in oakland. people enjoyed a peaceful day in the warm and in some cases record-breaking temperatures. abc7 news meteorologist sandy patel is live outside. it is the place to be. >> it is indeed. that's why i had to cop out here to soak up the sun and enjoy the warmth. it really feels good out here. lots of sunshine. barely a

. >>> pope francis will deliver some inspiration to young people today in cyberspace. >> he is totally with the times. the pope is hosting his second ever google hangout this morning. did you ever think you'd put pope and google hangout together? >> how cool. >> the pope will meet with young people who have disabilities or special needs. kids from the u.s., brazil, india, and spain, are all going to take part. >> fantastic. >>> want to hang out with mike right now. we get to do that right here right now. >> i'm willing to bet mike is on a google hang out. >> it's a lot of fun, technology always changes things. over here we're looking toward the commute and this is always changing as well. westbound 580 moving nicely. you notice unlike yesterday there's not a lot of cloud cover so you can see the city lights and distance just over the freeway westbound as we look at your map, west 580 dublin and livermore move smoothly on your right. the altamont pass shows slowing coming off of 205 and zooming with 580. bottom of the bay south bay at the forefront of your screen, easy drive for san jos

reporter: the obamaed administration says it needs to fight isil on the battle field but also in cyberspace slickly produced videos and social media campaign could lure more fighter to take up arms. former cia agent says it's going to be a big challenge for u.s. >> some sort of a communications hub which is helping to reinforce and to amplify indigenous messages in the region that's a good thing. but when it has a u.s. stam op it, it carries a taint. and there is no avoiding that. >> reporter: if until this new plan takes place, they are trying to counter the message online hoping the message gets through despite the fact that the u.s. is the messenger. patty culhane, al jazerra washington? still to come on al jazerra. why workers at one of america's biggest supermarket chains are happy. plus. >> reporter: reporting from. [ inaudible ] in the southern philippines, this is the scene of a recent encounter that left more than 60 people dead. >> the new al jazeera america primetime. get the real news you've been looking for. at 7:00, a thorough wrapup of the day's events. then at 8:00, john sei

>> all i'll say is meab we're patroling the borders of cyberspace? i cannot overstate how important this is. we literally lose people every day who are willing to come to deform h.s. and work long hours in the luxurious government office environments we provide them flickering fluorescent light and somewhat dingy carpet but they're willing because they believe in the mission and know how important it is but ultimately, after a few years, they look around and say, oh, my goodness i could make literalry six times the salary in the private sector. you know it's one year of work in a private sector worth six years of work in the government for me? and we lose them. some of that we just have to recognize. we're never going to have the normal government lifetime career employee in the cyberfield. we're not building ourselves to work that. we recognize we'll always have people going back and forth to the private sector and that's healthy. at the same time we have to have the best talent. when the pay differential is so incredibly vast as it is reeth now, it

and fourth, we need to make cyberspace intrinsically more secure, replacing pass words with more secure technologies, building more resilient networks, and enhancing consumer protections online. president obama will continue to do everything within his authority to harden our cyberdefenses, but executive actions alone won't be enough. we need durable, long-term solutions codified in law that bolster the nation's cyberdefenses. this is not and should not be a partisan issue. the future security of the united states depends on a strong, bipartisan consensus that responds to a growing national security concern. everyone shares responsibility here, including the congress. in december, congress passed important bills to modernize how the government protects its systems and to clarify the government's authorities to carry out its cybermissions. today, we need the congress to build on that progress by passing the package of cybersecurity measures that president obama announced just last month that encouraged greater information sharing, set a national standard for companies to report data brea

they're not violating people's privacy and in some ways fareed this is similar to what's happened in cyberspace. these technologies that we're developing have the capacity to empower individuals in ways that we couldn't even imagine 10 15 years ago. but we don't yet have the legal structures and the architecture both globally and within individual countries, to manage them the way that we need to. part of my job over the past several years and over the next couple of years that i'm still in office is seeing if we can start providing some sort of framework that ensures that we get the good and minimize the bad. >>> next on "gps," the president on bebe and boehner after the speaker invited the prime minister to address the u.s. congress. president obama has said he won't meet with net nanyahu when he comes in march. >> i think that's inappropriate. >> he'll explain when we come back. >>> and then we'll talk about more thorn in president obama's side. russian president putin. are we on the road to war between the russia and the west. i have moderate to severe crohn's disease. it's tough, but i've

>> what we're seeing is a recognition that cyberspace is a domain where the same security risks and more security risks than we are seeing in the physical domain are being recognized. we are seeing it from corporate entities that get hacked. we just talked about two nationstates. we are seeing a variety in the playing field of different actors and different targets expanding on a daily basis. >> the serious story about them using hot babes -- i'm trying to imagine what anthem does. when and some calls fireeye what does fireeye do as soon as you hear about the threat of the new hack? >> the key to an investigation is taking the time to understand what the attackers do once they got in the network. were they stealing data, what type of data were they stealing, how were they doing it, and what were the tools behind it? we are always reluctant to jump to a conclusion about who is behind something. we want to get details and not just say since this tool was used at a bank, and must be the same group. we wait to make those assessments until we really know the lay of the land. >> how do you do

but that is not how cyberspace works. we unfortunately get caught up in analogies where we think that because it is something like what we see it ought to behave like that when the sun comes out in seattle people stop what they are doing and run outside. when the sun comes out in miami they are like this is too hot. almost a different reaction. in the private sector world there is information that private companies can gather to to there observations of what they see in cyberspace. that is that is information they have developed, sense, can market and sell. they're are things that the government sees that might be more public in nature. i think it all works together. there is plenty of room for the public side to infer and see things, plenty of space for the private sector to infer analyze, sell the information but this is the think -- the thinking question, what is the model? it is not atmospherics. that is what we like to look at. we need to develop a new model that comes together with this magical thing we call informa

and war in cyberspace. how do we prevent it or fight it? >> it preponderates a challenge to the nation's critical infrastructure and government system. >> now a new center to connect the dots and save the americans from a 21st century threat. >> two people don't just vanish. >> a night on the town turns in a decade- long mystery. >> their family and friends have not seen them. >> someone has. >> this happy couple vanished without a trace. >> i want my daughter to come home. >> a search for a break in a very cold case. it is all "happening now". >> and we begin our second hour with the president asking congress to authorize military force against isis and opening the door to a limited ground combat operation, the commander in chief could face push back at home especially from the members of his own party. welcome to "happening now". i am jon scott. >> i am jenna lee. this is the first time a president sought congressional approval for military force since congress gave president bush the go ahead to invade iraq. our president will make a sta

in this case to help them define a safe space in the real world or cyberspace. >> the girls have 24 hours, the challenge is, to create safe spaces or increase access for girls to have access to safe spaces. >> reporter: it is part of a competition working towards the same goal. in oakland three teams of girls started saturday working two 12 hour days developing their idea, and then writing the thousands of lines of code to bring it to life. she says her team developed an app called talk it out. aimed at helping girls help other girls with complex issues. >> have your own profile. you choose if you want to help somebody or be helped. >> reporter: other teams worked on confidence coalition, aimed at building self-esteem. black girls code is organizing the oakland teens. >> empower young women of color to get excited about coding and technology. >> reporter: the girls are keeping one eye on the screen and the other on the future. >> i want to go to stanford. go to high school. i want to be a entrepreneur and if that doesn't work out i want to be in coding. this is really cool. >> reporter: i

. >> the obama administration says it needs to fight isil on the battlefield, but also in cyberspace. former c.i.a. agent said it's going to be a big challenge for the u.s. >> some sort of a communications hub, which is help to go reinforce and to amplify indigenous messages in the region, that's a good thing but when it has a u.s. stamp on it, it carries a taint. there's just no avoiding that. >> until this new plan is flushed out and put in place the u.s. state department is spending even more money trying to counter the isil narrative on line hoping the message gets through despite the fact the u.s. is the messenger. al jazeera washington. >> iranian and u.s. negotiators resumed talks in geneva on tehran's nuclear program saying the marsh deadline to reach a deal. u.s. secretary of state john kerry will join the discussion on sunday and monday. negotiators are trying to reach a lasting agreement. they have made an interim deal in late 2013 for iran to suspend its nuclear program for a year for exchange for the easing of sanctions. >> the president's of foreign troops and organizati

the actions that we take today and those we fail to take will determine whether cyberspace remains a great national asset or increasingly becomes a strategic liability. lou: a striking change of tone by the obama white house. it was only two months ago in december that president obama dismissed the sony cyberattack as an act of cybervandalism. this will be called the cyberthreat intelligence integration center. and it will cost taxpayers $35 million per year. it is unclear what the agency will do that isn't already being done other then doing something about cyberattacks no matter how little. and with that, we are coming right back. stay with us because there is much more ahead. republicans are accepting, it seems. the obama amnesty fiat as new reports outline the cost and economic impact of getting millions of illegal immigrants a free pass. ♪ ♪ i'm almost done. [ male announcer ] now you can pay your bill... ♪ ♪ ...manage your appointments... [ dog barks ] ...and check your connection status... ♪ ♪ ...anytime, anywhere. ♪ ♪ [ dog growls ] ♪ ♪ oh. so you're protesting? ♪ ♪ okay. [ m

who fills the physical space and idea logical space and cyberspace? >> my view in order to assist the organizations or coalition forces that we bring on the ground we have to put u.s. forces with them. that ise perfect mission that we have united states army special forces. >> reporter: still many questions and opinions here on capitol hill about the timing and scope and geogravy of this situation, jenna. >> thank you very much. >> yemen in recent years was a major alley in the war of terror is in the process of unravelling. al-qaeda fighters taking over the army brigade as they assert their authority. and the washington post reports that the cia has been forced to scale back operations in yemen because of the rebel take over for the capitol. and a setback for the white house as it scrambles to deal with all of the unrest. the administration still contending leland that yemen is a success story? >> reporter: exactly jon. it was a couple of months ago that president obama held yemen out as a success story and a model in the foreign policy portfolio. an

social media, terrorist twitter accounts are designed to target today's young people online in cyberspace. by the way, the older people here, as wise and respected as you may be, your stuff is often boring. [laughter] compared to what they are doing. you are not connecting. as a consequence you are not connecting. these terrorists are a threat first and foremost to the communities they target. communities have to take the lead in protecting themselves. that is true here in america as it is true anywhere else. when someone starts getting radicalized, family and friends are the first is the something has changed in their personality.