d. bimple deparg at to say that it's going to be built this way. i think that would solve a lot of problems. >> i think that is hopefully that we will have a good discussion in april on this. sometimes a front facade is not historically significant but it triggers off emotions that it shouldn't have been removed though on the plans the contractor shows that it can be removed. obviously, you have to communicate if you have concerns and that's not the issue but i think it's important that we balance it. there are a few bad actors out there and there's a lot of good contractors out there who are trying to do exactly as approved. and who have no interest in exceeding their permits. they get caught in this web sometimes and i have to feel that we have to talk about them and recognize that they are doing a good job out there as well but there are definitely people out there who need to be dealt with and who are abusing the system. that's hopefulliy in the planning commission joint hearing we can talk about that and we'll be straight about that. as i said