for d.b.i., the tracking system is very good. the rest of the city, the rest of the departments, that's where the difficulty is in getting that system working. you think today they could do it just like that. as we can all see, that is not happening. i just want to comment that as far as d.b.i. is concerned, they have a good tracking system. thank you. president murphy: thank you. next speaker, please. seeing none, next item. >> the next item is update on the status of capps. >> ok, yes, commissioners we talked about this briefly, the contact -- contract is scheduled to end on december 31. that contract will end. it's not going to be extended farther than december 31 as long as we get the final capps report. that is the status of the capps. the actual mayor's city administrators taking over the program on the actual earthquake management to find funds and things for this program to go forward. president murphy: thank you. commissioners. public comments. i see none. next item. >> item 6 everyone update on any other activities fact

in your package you will see agenda item number eight this is d.b.i.'s statement of incompatible activities as designed by the ethics commission of the city of san francisco. this is the current statement of incompatible activities. the staff and commissioners and board members are required every two years to take an update training on the statement of incompatible activities and submit it. we also in d.b.i., every staff member is required to file a form 700 whether they're a clerk in the finance department or an inspector. every single staff member is required to form, file a form 700 which would also list any gifts or anything that would be remotely connected with the statement, might be considered as incompatible activity. we also right now have in four requests from staff members just so that the commission knows, that have requested a waiver from some of the provisions so that they can work and train in their trades after work. that's normally been granted by the ethics commission. i have discussed it with the ethics commission and they do not see

for d.b.i., the tracking system is very good. the rest of the city, the rest of the departments, that's where the difficulty is in getting that system working. you think today they could do it just like that. as we can all see, that is not happening. i just want to comment that as far as d.b.i. is concerned,

departments' computerized systems may be using that may be different than the system or protocol that the d.b.i. may be using. it sounds like it has to engage the planning department anyway, but the other suggestion that i made at that time as well as keeping it small to begin with was to put a schedule together. i ask that we might be given some sort of a timetable of targets and when the targets would be met. so i'm going to take it today that the target is that we are going to be privy to an

departments' computerized systems may be using that may be different than the system or protocol that the d.b.i. may be using. it sounds like it has to engage the planning department anyway, but the other suggestion that i made at that time as well as keeping it small to begin with was to put a schedule together. i ask that we might be given some sort of a timetable of targets and when the targets would be met. so i'm going to take it today that the target is that we are going to be privy to an r.f.p. in the first week of january based on what i just heard. i don't think anything is going to happen between now and christmas. then i would ask please that at that time we would be provided with some sort of a schedule of how that's going to roll out over the year and what the target objective dates are. i would also like to suggest that somebody from the public and the people who are going to be affected by the efficiency of this system, that their input is part and parcel of the process because i think it's process because i think it's fair to say right now they are