d.e. ea.. declaration that she was entitled to attend school, second -- [inaudible] >> [inaudible] >> page 21 of the orange brief -- >> no, i know. the respondent be's appellates -- >> yeah, the orange -- >> what allegation says they want reimbursement for her schooling, etc. >> so, first, they want a declaration, okay? and that's number b. and then -- >> the declaration was that the ada had been violated. >> correct. and our point is that the statute requires you to look at is this relief available under the i.d.e.a -- >> well, if it's not available, you don't get a declaration that the ada has been violated or the rehabilitationing act has been violated -- >> that's -- absolutely, justice kagan. we couldn't read the statute to, the second half of section 1415, the exhaustion requirement to say you've "to show, you know, that the i.d.e.a. gives that form of relief. really i think what 1415 does, it has two parts. the first, as the argument was started with, it's about the what. it's about what