the original d.r. filer, who is the complainant has used every device in the book from d.r. to filing building complaints, to delaying hearings, to filing letters of determination, to appealing their own letters of determination, to delay the process. and this has come at extreme expense both to the property owners emotionally and financially. and we want this to be treated as a single project, such that we're not dealing with a notice of violation and then dealing with additional series of d.r.'s and appeals. because though it could lead to a speedy resolution of the complaint, it gives more devices and more process at the finger tips of the complainant to make the project sponsor's life difficult. i think keeping it as one item makes it clean, allows the different departments to look at holistically and not break it up into pieces. >> and duly noted. and i do understand your thought process with regard to that. based on the history here. if there was some memorandum of understanding that would not be appealed, would that change anything? >> if there were a memorandum of un