d.r. requesters can tell me where you think it can be sited that would meet the requirements for coverage? >> if you look at the maps that they submitted, the coverage, the alleged coverage is needed down near marina boulevard. it is odd that they would place these small antennas where they are proposing to place them. they got very vague when they talked about the chestnut corridor. if you look at their maps, the proposal site does not make sense. >> i understand. i looked at the maps closely too. there are some vacant areas closer to the water. i agree with you. however that may be a hearing for another site at a different day because the site, believing their maps are accurate, does increase the coverage significantly around the area in question. it extends their good coverage a few blocks. it does not deal with the problem down by marina boulevard. i am not sure that a site here could be strong enough to cover that. thank you for your comments. what we see in our health effects and regulations from the department of health is that project sponsors, if their neighbors located it within

d.r. requester. >> some additional conditions for the commissionary consideration. exhibit l, o, p and q. good afternoon commissioners. i am a resident of the subject property at 2010 chestnut street. i filed a d.r. application in this case along with chris houston. this is an industrial commercial wireless facility proposed for a residential apartment building. it does not meet the code requirements. for your convenience we noted the pertinent sections of the planning code in exhibit a. in 2006 the zoning administrator made a determination that antennas like these are considered an accessry use but the permits can be denied or required to go to further hearings. the planning commission retains broad discretion to deny a permit and we will present arguments and evidence that it does not meet the language of section 204 and 703 of the city planning code. under section 204 and 703 of the planning code t-mobile must prove it is a required use or appropriate to the mixed use building for which it is proposed. t-mobile cannot do so. why are t-mobile's antennas not necess

d.r. request is existing roof deck shades the space and prevents southern light from entering the bedroom windows below. commissioner garcia: so the rails you are referring to -- let's see if they could perhaps put it back. >> overhead, please? commissioner garcia: face to the south. >> no, no.. commissioner garcia: but the sun is coming from behind, which would be the south. >> if we could have the overhead, please? commissioner garcia: thank you. >> the idea is we have a narrow space, narrow area. i think the most telling drawing to provide it our exhibit "i," which are the sunlight drawings. they show even under the best of circumstances, which would be june 21 when the sun is at the highest in the sky -- sorry. overhead, please? there is almost no direct light. this is just the nature of the some movement in the sky. the architect explained that, as mad as the sun changes its location in -- but as a myth as the sun changes its location in the sky. even june 21, when the sun is at the highest in the sky, there is no direct light. the benefit of a light well is more likely to capture th