seeing new that if there was any collusion with russia it was between the dnc and the clintons and certainly not our campaign. >> dagen: after months of investigations there's still no proof the trump campaign colluded with russia, but what did we learn this week? an explosive report out of the washington post showing hillary clinton's campaign and the dnc helped to fund that russian anti -trump dossier. collusion, no collusion, john layfield says enough stop this nonsense on both sides and get working for the american people. hi everybody i'm dagen mcdowell. this is bulls & bears. the bulls & bears including john layfield this week, are gary b. smith and joan as max ferris along with daniel mclachlan. welcome to everybody. john you just about had enough of this. >> john: i think america has had enough of this and enough of congress. this is classic bait and switch. they're trying to take the fact they're becoming the most inept do nothing congress in our country's history. look we've had 21 special investigations since the carter administration only two have produced prosecutions with the principal person being inves

the spot. >> marie: i would love for you two. >> harris: did you catch it? >> dagen: i was sitting at the dnc in philadelphia and i saw that flip happen when those emails were leaked about debbie wasserman schultz and the democrats, the dnc talking trash and basically trying to rid the nomination for hillary clinton. that day, the democrats took that meredith from russia entered it on his head and waited about trump and russia. when in fact this past week we have found out that the democrats paid russia. >> marie: that's not true. >> dagen: through an intermediary, they were paying the russia to compile a dossier. is that collusion, i don't know what is. >> marie: we also saw this week that the trump campaign arm can merge analytical reached out to julian is on jet asked for wikileaks help in dumping hillary's emails. julian sanchez is an enemy of the united states government. he is dangerous to our national security. there are a lot of things on this. could have been so poorly run that they did not know about this contract. i don't know. we don't have evidence yet. everyone on the other side

seeing new that if there was any collusion with russia it was between the dnc and the clintons and certainly not our campaign. >> dagenproof the trump campaign colluded with russia, but what did we learn this week? an explosive report out of the washington post showing hillary clinton's campaign and the dnc helped to fund that russian anti -trump dossier. collusion, no collusion, john layfield says enough stop this nonsense on both sides and get working for the american people. hi everybody i'm dagen

the wall street journal" has been outraged about bringing up. dagen: absolutely hillary clinton campaign democratic national qe under current leadership -- dnc pointingre were finished behind funding salacious days yea on candidate trump now president trump. but, again, the individual that is former british intelligence officer steele, responsible putting it together working with u.s. intelligence agents last year, has been in contact with robert mueller special counsel i just think raises a host of issues, about the witch hunt against president trump that now continues. and what is going to come of that what are lawmakers going to do to snuff out what is real what is phony, and the clintons still basically pulling strings in washington. maria: yeah, wouldn't it be interesting dagen, if you know, here we have all of the you know the levity he aggressively trying to push mueller to investigate the president. and potential collusion between president and his campaign the russians we knew from the beginning was nonexistent, a in the process, they trip over the fact that it is the democrats that have the collusion, right trip over. -- it is very well put

seeing new that if there was any collusion with russia it was between the dnc and the clintons and certainly not our campaign. >> dagenlluded with russia, but what did we learn this week? an explosive report out of the washington post showing hillary clinton's campaign and the dnc helped to fund that russian anti -trump dossier. collusion, no collusion, john layfield says enough stop this nonsense on both sides and get working for the american people. hi everybody i'm dagen mcdowell.

dagen: it is, cranky, cold. >> harris: we had "outnumbered" overtime yesterday and she worked for hillary clinton and ran for the dnc chair and they said they can't win the democrats without hillary clinton and her money. so -- and the voters that would bring in that cash. apparently, there were certain people in the democratic team that they can't live without. you were there. how's that possible? >> charles: because they built this party -- they built the city. unfortunately, not on rock 'n' roll but in silos and they divided everybody by gender, by race, by whatever rated. so appealing to one of those silos doesn't appeal to another so they have to have all of these little -- >> lisa: 's and she also went i ability because they have lost or special elections in a row. we sought in the special election where she was used against him and she was deeply unpopular in the district so that she also a liability? >> kennedy: the democratic party is a party of me because nancy pelosi is all about me. i am such an effective -- a master legislator. president obama talked about how great he is the democratic party, he is the

computers what they got dnc said don't touch so that it eric schmidt from goingl got them a private company what were you going to say. dagen: your gut has been right on a this story from the we were at dnc, and with this particular individual. who., by the way, was still in debbie wasserman schultz's employ until literally the day that. >> he got indicted. >> on pay role why within the she fire him. >> sometimes government will charge you with a very specious charge, just to keep you here. this is not a specious charge the charge is a very, very real charge but not the government's real interest, the government real interest preserving national security of the united states learning to whom all of this data, 5700 times to whom this data in the middle east went,and the government is curious as are the rest of us, in as to why congressman wasserman schultz is not curiosity about this. dagen: why protecting him when other democrats let him go. >> leads me to believe more than meets the eye every time we talk about this third or fourth time we discussed that more information comes out. maria: why coming out in bits and pieces? why are they -- >> russia so they keep the democr